Re: Newbie
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free ScubaMonster.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Newbie
| Greg Mossman | 30 Jan 2010 16:08 |
> Just kidding - Greg when do you leave on your next trip? > Have a good trip! Not until May. Mid May. Over three more months to go.
|
| Joe | 30 Jan 2010 14:52 |
> On Jan 29, 7:52 pm, Ecnerwal > <MyNameForw...@ReplaceWithMyVices.Com.invalid> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Duh. this discussion and ptII has been very enlightening - nice discussion and points.
Now shut down the thread and lets get back to guns, politics, and global warming!@
Just kidding - Greg when do you leave on your next trip? I'm going to Vegas and betting on a volcano eruption or an asteroid strike. Do you have any preferences?
Have a good trip!
|
| Greg Mossman | 30 Jan 2010 05:41 |
On Jan 29, 7:52 pm, Ecnerwal <MyNameForw...@ReplaceWithMyVices.Com.invalid> wrote:
> In article <cgn6m5138gm11tirlvors86afv25shl...@4ax.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > unrestricted breathing. It raises the partial pressure of nitrogen in > your lungs. But exhaled air is 78% nitrogen versus the 79% in inhaled air. With every breath of recycled air from a snorkel's dead space, you're actually reducing the percentage of nitrogen inhaled versus inhaling fresh air.
Duh.
|
| Ecnerwal | 30 Jan 2010 03:52 |
> With a snorkel you are getting just a little bit > more CO2 from the spent air in the tube vs. without and this tends to > increase your respiration rate, it's a reflex you have very little > control of. I find it amusing that you accept this as fact, but agree with Greg that it's "ludicrous" that there is an effect, small but non-zero, of rebreathing more of the excess nitrogen which is coming out with the exhaled CO2 that you are breathing back in. It's exactly the same thing - a snorkel adds dead space to your airway, increasing the amount of whatever your breathe out that you breathe right back in - so if you are offgassing nitrogen, you are breathing in a snorkels-worth of what you breathed out every time, meaning that what you breathe in is richer in nitrogen and carbon dioxide than it would be if you did not have a snorkel in your mouth. That does make offgassing less effective than unrestricted breathing. It raises the partial pressure of nitrogen in your lungs.
If you think there is no effect, try adding a 10 foot extension to a snorkel (stay on dry land) and breathe through it until you pass out. You'll be passing out from lack of oxygen, but it illustrates the effect of the tube - the effect of a shorter tube is less, but it's not nothing. All I said was that it is not quite as effective to snorkel at the surface as to breathe freely at the surface - not "OMG you can't possibly do that!" I do it myself sometimes, when the site permits.
 Signature Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by
|
| Geoff | 29 Jan 2010 23:21 |
>> Just a few more comments - what the heck, it's actual scuba, which seems >> to have gone missing from rec.scuba since the last time I was reading [quoted text clipped - 72 lines] >I have no problem with the physics and needing continuous exhalation. >It's "doing it" that intrigues me I suppose. Did you not do an ESA from 15 feet on your instruction dives? I missed doing it on my lake dives due to some confusion about which instructor was taking which student and I had to do it on my first ocean dive after a rather long kelp crawl from the boat with the instructor. My course was combined NAUI/PADI. Fifteen feet only gives you a taste of what it would be like from 30 or 60 but it's enough to make sure you understand the principles. We were also taught to keep the regulator in your mouth just in case you couldn't resist the desire to inhale or in an actual OOA situation there might be enough left on the way up to cover the ascent.
>> Our sub >> guys train for it in a 100 foot deep tank, if I recall correctly. Some [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >from my snorkel - at least until I choke on water going down. So a >clear head and intention is needed. Visualization. etc.). This is a bad idea. As a newb I tended to delay putting the regulator in my mouth to the very last minute too. This can only make you suck more air on the dive and I have demonstrated it to myself several times. I pretend the snorkel isn't there. On the surface, swimming out to a descent line, OK, the snorkel is in. But in that case it's a good idea to stop at the line and take the snorkel out and rest and recheck with your buddy. Then put the regulator in your mouth and begin your descent together. With a snorkel you are getting just a little bit more CO2 from the spent air in the tube vs. without and this tends to increase your respiration rate, it's a reflex you have very little control of. You are also increasing your overall anxiety about the dive by initially worrying about your air consumption even before the dive begins and adding to the busy-ness at the surface playing with regulators and snorkels and which one is appropriate. Sucking water through a tube because you played games with the descent and then suppressing coughs while you swap to the regulator is just silly. You also want to make sure your regulator is in your mouth and properly seated and breathing correctly before you are suddenly at 3 feet with no air in your lungs and a tangled rig.
The goal is to be prepared, calm and ready to begin your descent BEFORE you begin your descent.
Diving is in stages, preparation, donning, entry, descent, trim, swim, ascent, safety stop, surface, exit. Each has things you need to be concerned about and focused on in addition to your situational awareness on your pressure, depth and your buddy. Focus on each stage and you will be calmer and more competent.
The Zen of diving is confidence in your training and your skills and to not fight the element you are in but to ride it like the fishes. When you are calm and not fighting current and not needlessly pushing your own weight of water your air consumption will decrease dramatically. I went from 40 minutes of air on a 30 foot dive to 70 minutes according to the computer once I finally became comfortable and experienced. A one hour+ dive to 35 feet in warm water kissing sea cucumbers was nothing. Proper trim and buoyancy control help immensely. Others have commented about how wasteful mask clearing and equipment problems can be. This goes to preparation. As a snorkeler I tended to fight the water more, as a scuba diver I have learned to be 'one' with the water. It has given me a deep appreciation of the beauty and skill of real free divers who can free dive for minutes at a time.
>> Actually practicing free ascents is a considerable DCS risk - limited if >> you just go down to 60 feet and immediately ascend - also limited if you [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >do it once and for all at 30' and I'll be content with that. Sounds >more and more like a plan, actually. As a confidence builder with an experienced buddy, preferably a decent instructor, a 30 foot exercise would be a good idea for a first dive of the day. Be aware that the reason they do it from 15 feet is to minimize the risk to you and your instructor because it's essentially a bounce dive and the ascent is more rapid than recommended.
>> You might want to leave the camera to your air-sipping wife - even with >> 100+ camera dives, merely taking the thing causes a noticeable increase [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] >bricks. That's a cynical remark regarding manufacturer influenced test >data. I have experienced cheap stuff, Apollo Prestige fins, Force fins, and Apollo Bio fins, I like the Bio fins best. The Prestige fins wobbled and yawed more and generally worked my ankles more, leading to a tendency to cramp. Force fins felt lighter but I couldn't get the hang of them and they seriously sucked on the surface or walking to the boat gate. The Bio fins seem more stable and I cramp less, I can also kick slower than my buddy for the same swim speed. I bought the Prestiges as a beginner, inherited the Force fins, bought the Bios.
>People (not targeting you) tend to have a lot of ownership loyalty and >hence after plunking down cash on something, they defend it to >absurdity. (This applies to cameras, cars, cheese and very soon to your >nearest iPad owner). Very true.
|
| Alan Browne | 29 Jan 2010 21:55 |
> Just a few more comments - what the heck, it's actual scuba, which seems > to have gone missing from rec.scuba since the last time I was reading [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > the hour with 750-1500 lbs. Coincidentally, those were dives 11& 12 for > him. He'll get better, and so will you. Well, for a newsgroup there is surprising consensus ;-) on the above points, so it's sticking...
> Back when there was more discussion of scuba here, there was someone > from your (very) general vicinity with a tagline about the St. Lawrence > being comparatively warm, clear freshwater diving. Not sure where it's so clear. A lot of people dive in the Gaspe, which is definitely saltwater, clear and cold. Though not as cold as les Escoumins (2'C) which is definitely dry suit country. You might get away with a thick wetsuit at Gaspe. I think.
> Certainly people from > this general area do drive 4-5 hours to go diving up there. While you [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > thermoclines and the north atlantic. No coral, but there are wrecks and > some wildlife. Probably wait for summer... I will definitely look to dive here to increase my experience. My SO is less willing. I (chubby) did not need a wet suit at Cancun or San Andres, but she needed one badly (thin). (After a 15 minute pool exercise she was shivering w/o a WS). There are a few dive shops along my usual routes and when I have time I'll drop in to ask about organized outings.
I'm looking to buy some used gear as well. I'd rather learn about what I like or not from used gear before committing to new. Feedback from others helps too - esp. if I can find some divers about my size.
> If you and your spouse both like to dive, a liveaboard dive boat is a > great way to get a lot of diving in when you do go to a tropical [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > that behavior until you don't, and then you get shipped home in a bag. > There certainly wasn't any 3 minute safety stop at 15 feet... Like I said - well aware and deliberate on my swim back to the boat on a shallow climb. That particular dive was to 70 ft. The instructor did not practice safety stops except on deep dives (100'+). I know that is against all prudence, but that's the way they seem to do things there. The sole time we did a 3 minute stop was on the dive to 110'.
> If you ascend from 60 feet, you will have plenty of (too much actually) > air in your lungs, even if you just exhaled - remember that the air in > your lungs will expand as you go up - just keep blowing bubbles. I have no problem with the physics and needing continuous exhalation. It's "doing it" that intrigues me I suppose.
> Our sub > guys train for it in a 100 foot deep tank, if I recall correctly. Some > TV show about the training showed their "don't hold your breath, stupid" > training tool - a nearly empty sealed plastic bag released at the bottom > of the tank, which burst somewhere around 20 feet. I visualize my lungs as quite fragile throughout the dive - so that's a good reminder to exhale all of the time. Though going over coral/plants when skimming the bottom I would tend to hang on to the air for a few seconds until momentum would keep me going up.
> You will have to get over a desire to breathe in, however. Some of the > more technical organizations apparently train for using the BC as a > crude rebreather in that instance, but if you are going that route, > you'll want to be sure you disinfect the inside of the BC - our > instructor commented that you could get some great lung infections from > that practice. No doubt. But I'm fairly clear on the need to exhale. (OTOH I'm also the guy who starts the dive bleeding the BCD while confidently breathing from my snorkel - at least until I choke on water going down. So a clear head and intention is needed. Visualization. etc.).
> Actually practicing free ascents is a considerable DCS risk - limited if > you just go down to 60 feet and immediately ascend - also limited if you > opt to stop at 15 feet rather than take your practice all the way to the > surface. As I said, I intend (too strong a word, perhaps) to do the first one from 30' and then work my way down on later dives. It could be that I do it once and for all at 30' and I'll be content with that. Sounds more and more like a plan, actually.
> You might want to leave the camera to your air-sipping wife - even with > 100+ camera dives, merely taking the thing causes a noticeable increase [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > between trips and the first dive is always a bit of a shakedown and > refreshing habits/skills. Excellent advice. While I'm a proficient photographer who usually works fully manual, I suspect that for diving I'll be as automatic as possible in the camera. And I have no stunning ambitions for that photography (initially) - I'll probably get a P&S with a pressure enclosure. I know that's not particularly "photo worthy" but at least for close ups the colours render well with the flash. Shots of other people look pretty lame (like the ones I posted... not my camera).
> While someone else commented that they "*GASP* even hold their breath" > or words to that effect for camera positioning, I will stop breathing, > but not hold my breath - there is a difference, and the difference is > that holding your breath involves stopping up your airway, and not > breathing does not. As such, not breathing does not involve any risk of > lung overpressure injury. I'd be more likely to exhale and then pull in a quarter/half breath. Kinda like shooting. IAC, photography is not the highest item on the list by far. I'm a slow, deliberate, tripod kind of photographer, so I'd need a different plan under water.
> There are better fins than the old things you have, but what fins are > better can be a bit of a religious issue, and probably also depends upon > intended use to an extent. I like the Apollo bio-fins (with the slit), > and they seem to have some decent actual test data supporting better > efficiency. I could probably generate better test data for a pair of strap on bricks. That's a cynical remark regarding manufacturer influenced test data.
People (not targeting you) tend to have a lot of ownership loyalty and hence after plunking down cash on something, they defend it to absurdity. (This applies to cameras, cars, cheese and very soon to your nearest iPad owner).
> If you read magazines, Dive Training is the one we've kept up the > subscription to, though you have to ignore the gear press releases, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > subscription. No idea what it's like now, or if it's even still in > business. Most magazines have turned into gear promos. And again, I'm not talking about diving alone.
Are there specifically good scuba gear review websites?
For example, for photography, dpreview.com is spec. exhaustive and does pretty good testing. They have their biases, of course, but you sure learn a lot more about manufacturers offerings than you ever could perusing magazines or co. literature.
 Signature gmail originated posts are filtered due to spam.
|
| Ecnerwal | 29 Jan 2010 15:55 |
Just a few more comments - what the heck, it's actual scuba, which seems to have gone missing from rec.scuba since the last time I was reading it, mostly.
As others have mentioned, and as the instruction material should have (but they like to dumb it down more and more) snorkeling is not a great practice for surface intervals. Snorkeling by which you actually mean free diving is a very bad idea - even surface snorkeling is not quite as effective at degassing as being on the surface breathing - the length of the tube makes respiration somewhat inefficient. Also, it does not help thermal management - even warm water is cold, barring a thermal spring (and what a sucky dive that was - amusing, but sucky)
Do larger people use slightly more air - yes. Is that your primary air consumption problem at 12 dives - almost certainly not. The difference between large and small folk at the same level of experience is much less than the difference between experienced and inexperienced folk. Was diving at the beginning of the month, there was a guy on the boat of similar size and age, shallow water (25-30 feet) 1 hour limit requested by boat. He seemed to be in pretty good order, but was coming up with 250-300 lbs several minutes before my wife and I were getting out after the hour with 750-1500 lbs. Coincidentally, those were dives 11 & 12 for him. He'll get better, and so will you.
Back when there was more discussion of scuba here, there was someone from your (very) general vicinity with a tagline about the St. Lawrence being comparatively warm, clear freshwater diving. Certainly people from this general area do drive 4-5 hours to go diving up there. While you might be that far yourself, depending which part of Quebec you are from, it's a good place to go get more time underwater without as much "opportunity cost" as tropical locations, or the cold murk of lake thermoclines and the north atlantic. No coral, but there are wrecks and some wildlife. Probably wait for summer...
If you and your spouse both like to dive, a liveaboard dive boat is a great way to get a lot of diving in when you do go to a tropical destination. 5 dives a day is very nice.
If you were aware of your pressure and ran out of air at 20 feet, you were failing to act appropriately on your awareness. You get away with that behavior until you don't, and then you get shipped home in a bag. There certainly wasn't any 3 minute safety stop at 15 feet...
If you ascend from 60 feet, you will have plenty of (too much actually) air in your lungs, even if you just exhaled - remember that the air in your lungs will expand as you go up - just keep blowing bubbles. Our sub guys train for it in a 100 foot deep tank, if I recall correctly. Some TV show about the training showed their "don't hold your breath, stupid" training tool - a nearly empty sealed plastic bag released at the bottom of the tank, which burst somewhere around 20 feet.
You will have to get over a desire to breathe in, however. Some of the more technical organizations apparently train for using the BC as a crude rebreather in that instance, but if you are going that route, you'll want to be sure you disinfect the inside of the BC - our instructor commented that you could get some great lung infections from that practice.
Actually practicing free ascents is a considerable DCS risk - limited if you just go down to 60 feet and immediately ascend - also limited if you opt to stop at 15 feet rather than take your practice all the way to the surface.
You might want to leave the camera to your air-sipping wife - even with 100+ camera dives, merely taking the thing causes a noticeable increase in air consumption for whichever one of us is using it. We've arrived a policy of just not taking the camera on the first dive of a trip - it's more task loading when it's not a good idea, since it's usually months between trips and the first dive is always a bit of a shakedown and refreshing habits/skills.
While someone else commented that they "*GASP* even hold their breath" or words to that effect for camera positioning, I will stop breathing, but not hold my breath - there is a difference, and the difference is that holding your breath involves stopping up your airway, and not breathing does not. As such, not breathing does not involve any risk of lung overpressure injury.
There are better fins than the old things you have, but what fins are better can be a bit of a religious issue, and probably also depends upon intended use to an extent. I like the Apollo bio-fins (with the slit), and they seem to have some decent actual test data supporting better efficiency.
If you read magazines, Dive Training is the one we've kept up the subscription to, though you have to ignore the gear press releases, since they are press releases, not reviews. 11 years ago Rodale's Scuba Diving had the only actual gear reviews that would EVER say anything negative about anyone's gear, or do any actual testing, but the rest of the magazine was crap - once we got our gear bought we dumped the subscription. No idea what it's like now, or if it's even still in business.
 Signature Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by
|
| Geoff | 29 Jan 2010 04:37 |
>oh. I would have though it's zero sum since I'm taking "surface air" >with me, not 'pressed. In 1996 when I was certified, PADI, NAUI and DAN all advised against snorkeling after or between dives. I don't think that has changed.
The physics makes it NOT a zero sum. While you are not absorbing new nitrogen on your snorkel dives, you still have more nitrogen in your tissues than you should have for normal surface pressure. Diving to 20 feet with a nitrogen load from a scuba dive and then a rapid ascent can get you bent.
You are also not off-gassing as rapidly as the tables are designed or your computer calculates so your SIT is not what you think it is and your computer is lying to you on your next dive and not in a good way. Your nitrogen load is not what the clock time is telling you and you have no way to calculate what it really is. Granted, the tables and computers are "conservative" but do you really want to bet your life or nervous system on the margins?
Unless you have a bottle of water on your snorkel you are also not re-hydrating during your SIT and dehydration has a strong influence on your blood chemistry and your off-gassing rate.
Take the swim, stay on the surface, get back in the boat and take your hydration. Pee on the ascent and avoid the extra swim altogether.
|
| Alan Browne | 29 Jan 2010 02:40 |
> On Jan 28, 5:11 pm, Alan Browne<alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > normal offgassing process enough to cause problems. If you want to > snorkel after a dive, stay on the surface. oh. I would have though it's zero sum since I'm taking "surface air" with me, not 'pressed.
>> I get that. (On one submersion I was breathing from my snorkel when I >> bled the BCD. That was really rude). But does equipment "do that"? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > others, that will fail "closed" and make you wish you stayed within > arm's length of your buddy like they told you in class. Now that you bring up my other bad habit...
> What's statistically more likely, at least according to the > statistics, is inadvertently running out of air. That's plain > stupidity, since everyone has a gauge (or should be smart enough to > abort when the gauge fails), so those victims don't garner much > sympathy. That I can manage, but I may have PO'd buddies as I signal end-of-dive earlier than they're ready.
> Not that I haven't done a few gaugeless dives out of what I considered > "necessity" (i.e., I needed to dive!), but only after assuring myself [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > try it at the beginning of a dive day, before you've accumulated too > much nitrogen and a too-rapid ascent becomes a real issue. Certainly - not all on the same day, or even consecutive days, either!
 Signature gmail originated posts are filtered due to spam.
|
| Greg Mossman | 29 Jan 2010 02:13 |
On Jan 28, 5:11 pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
> You're right of course. I did mention this to them and said sorry in > the same breath. They didn't seem too upset. They didn't "flag" the > bottle either - which makes one wonder. Hey, it's Colombia :) Third-world dive practices often vary from the first-world agency dictates. The thirder the world, the scarier the dive op.
> I'm quite happy to snorkel (been doing that for a long time) when on the > surface. Actually, the boat captain didn't like me much as after I got > all my gear in the boat, I'd often dive right back in for a snorkel (and > piss call) waiting for the others to arrive. He liked to have all his > ducks sitting on the bench. Snorkeling to 20 feet isn't as easy as it > was 20 years ago though... It's also not as safe, now that you're a diver. Don't forget that right after the dive, you still have plenty of residual nitrogen left inside your tissues, just (presumably) not enough to cause any decompression sickness at a normal rate of offgassing. However, repetitive free dives post-scuba have been shown to shake up the normal offgassing process enough to cause problems. If you want to snorkel after a dive, stay on the surface.
> I get that. (On one submersion I was breathing from my snorkel when I > bled the BCD. That was really rude). But does equipment "do that"? > eg: just fail in one go? Are there stats? No, well-maintained equipment will rarely fail and when/if it does, most regulators will fail "open", i.e. they'll free-flow instead of cutting off the air supply. Free-flows are messy and noisy, but they won't keep you from breathing normally long enough to maintain a slow ascent back to the surface when you abort your dive. However, there are some regs, a few Poseidons that I can think of and probably some others, that will fail "closed" and make you wish you stayed within arm's length of your buddy like they told you in class.
What's statistically more likely, at least according to the statistics, is inadvertently running out of air. That's plain stupidity, since everyone has a gauge (or should be smart enough to abort when the gauge fails), so those victims don't garner much sympathy.
Not that I haven't done a few gaugeless dives out of what I considered "necessity" (i.e., I needed to dive!), but only after assuring myself that the tank was full, knowing my air consumption intimately, sticking relatively close to a buddy, and staying shallower than 30'. Don't try this at home :)
> On some dive in the future, under well considered conditions, I'd like > to try a one breath assent from 30, then 45 then 60 feet. There are > more interesting things to do, of course, but that's one for the "try > it" jar. Just keep exhaling as you go, keep the ascent slow, and make sure you try it at the beginning of a dive day, before you've accumulated too much nitrogen and a too-rapid ascent becomes a real issue.
|
| Alan Browne | 29 Jan 2010 01:11 |
> On Jan 28, 3:30 pm, Alan Browne<alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > potentially into the tank itself. That really pisses off dive ops if > you're using their rental gear. You're right of course. I did mention this to them and said sorry in the same breath. They didn't seem too upset. They didn't "flag" the bottle either - which makes one wonder.
>> That's why I was at 20 feet and climbing. I just leisurely swam >> straight up, slower than my bubbles, turning to look for surface [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > descend quickly. You'll really be appreciating even a drop of air > left in your tank at that point. Excellent point. That side (west) of the island had very little boat traffic (east side is very heavy). But you're right, it would be good to avoid boats, esp. as I surfaced a good way away from the dive boat.
I'm quite happy to snorkel (been doing that for a long time) when on the surface. Actually, the boat captain didn't like me much as after I got all my gear in the boat, I'd often dive right back in for a snorkel (and piss call) waiting for the others to arrive. He liked to have all his ducks sitting on the bench. Snorkeling to 20 feet isn't as easy as it was 20 years ago though...
>> On one of the instruction dives where I had to recover a lost 2nd stage, >> I actually couldn't find it (30 ft). After trying all the techniques [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > conscious certification agencies don't like to let the instructors > actually hide stuff from you during open-water training nowadays. Opportunity knocked. It's not that I'm Mr. Ice, but as I was trying to find the primary at some point I saw the yellow spare down on the clip. At some point I said "screw it!" and took that.
>> This raises a question, though. Is it feasible to go from 60 feet to >> the surface on one breath of air? That is to say, while continuously [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > "one breath of air" left. If your air source conks out right after > exhalation, you're screwed! I get that. (On one submersion I was breathing from my snorkel when I bled the BCD. That was really rude). But does equipment "do that"? eg: just fail in one go? Are there stats?
On some dive in the future, under well considered conditions, I'd like to try a one breath assent from 30, then 45 then 60 feet. There are more interesting things to do, of course, but that's one for the "try it" jar.
 Signature gmail originated posts are filtered due to spam.
|
| Greg Mossman | 29 Jan 2010 00:20 |
On Jan 28, 3:30 pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
> > where was your buddy, with her octopus and lower air consumption rate?) > > I was fully aware of my air state as I had the pressure guage in front > of my face during the climb-swim to the boat. No panic, worry or > anticipation over it and when it ran out it was no surprise at all. We're not worried about you, we're worried about the equipment. When you eliminate the positive pressure, i.e. no more air, then you allow backflow of sea water into the regulator's first and second stages and potentially into the tank itself. That really pisses off dive ops if you're using their rental gear.
> That's why I was at 20 feet and climbing. I just leisurely swam > straight up, slower than my bubbles, turning to look for surface [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > prefer not to do this "regularly" of course, but this was "school" time > in any case. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Some people swear by the need to maintain some air at the surface, because they don't like ocean swells. But if you're comfortable and don't need to breathe through a regulator at the surface, you still need to consider the immediate need to re-descend, especially in areas with boat traffic. If you surface and a boat is motoring down on you at high speed, your immediate instinct will be to let the air back out of your BC and descend quickly. You'll really be appreciating even a drop of air left in your tank at that point.
> On one of the instruction dives where I had to recover a lost 2nd stage, > I actually couldn't find it (30 ft). After trying all the techniques [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > then finally resorting to the backup than if I'd actually done it right > in the first place. More advanced classes, and certainly tech classes, will actually train you like that. It's good that you "trained" yourself, since safety conscious certification agencies don't like to let the instructors actually hide stuff from you during open-water training nowadays.
> This raises a question, though. Is it feasible to go from 60 feet to > the surface on one breath of air? That is to say, while continuously > exhaling, slowly, rise right to the surface over a period of one minute? > Would one feel that they were "out of oxygen?" If you're a free diver that can easily hold his/her breath for 5 minutes? Of course not. For the rest of us, you'll be fighting an instinct to breathe, but you'll still have plenty of oxygen. It's all in your head. That said, there's no guarantee that you'll have that "one breath of air" left. If your air source conks out right after exhalation, you're screwed!
|
| Alan Browne | 28 Jan 2010 23:30 |
>> On another dive, there I was at 20 ft with 0 air >> left, I could suck in a few last breaths as I slowly made my way up. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > have air left. Being out of air at 20 feet doesn't "just happen" (and > where was your buddy, with her octopus and lower air consumption rate?) I was fully aware of my air state as I had the pressure guage in front of my face during the climb-swim to the boat. No panic, worry or anticipation over it and when it ran out it was no surprise at all.
That's why I was at 20 feet and climbing. I just leisurely swam straight up, slower than my bubbles, turning to look for surface obstacles. At the surface there was some pressure left for the BCD and I added to that through the low pressure tube. The net consequence of all that was I had to swim a hundred meters to the boat on the surface and I learned more about what to expect when pressure is low. I'd prefer not to do this "regularly" of course, but this was "school" time in any case.
On one of the instruction dives where I had to recover a lost 2nd stage, I actually couldn't find it (30 ft). After trying all the techniques (rolling all the way right, using my left hand to tilt/lift the tank, finding the first stage and trying to trace the 2nd ... and failing (Lord knows why)) finally, without panic I took backup regulator and used it. Immediately after that failed attempt, I did it again with no problem. Not really sure at all why I couldn't do it the first time. The instructor said later he was more impressed by that slow process and then finally resorting to the backup than if I'd actually done it right in the first place.
This raises a question, though. Is it feasible to go from 60 feet to the surface on one breath of air? That is to say, while continuously exhaling, slowly, rise right to the surface over a period of one minute? Would one feel that they were "out of oxygen?"
(For the sake of this question, let's assume that the dive was no deeper than 60 feet).
> If your instructor failed to make you a self-reliant, self-aware diver, > your instructor did you wrong, but since you are certified, it's now > your problem to make yourself self-responsible and self-aware, since > that is what certification is supposed to indicate. This is a common > failing of some (not all) resort-area tropical dive "instructors." He was very aware of my high rate of consumption and gave me the check air signal quite a lot until he was satisfied I knew my state (eg: he'd ask and I'd have a ready reply as I'd recently checked).
To be sure, I've become quite sensitive to status.
> In the minor fiddles department, when you and your buddy board a dive > boat, while you are checking that all of your tanks for the trip have > air and setting up your gear before you leave the dock, note the > pressure in them all, and put the higher-pressure ones on your side of > the area (there's nearly always a little variation in the fills.) I was doing that from about the 4th dive as I realized what an air pig I am. Most of the bottles were right at 3k on each dive bud discovered a couple times they were at 2800 and switched to 3k bottles.
Thx, Alan
 Signature gmail originated posts are filtered due to spam.
|
| Ecnerwal | 28 Jan 2010 22:38 |
> On another dive, there I was at 20 ft with 0 air > left, I could suck in a few last breaths as I slowly made my way up. Forgot to address this point in my first reply - you, only you, and nobody but you are responsible for checking your air before and during the dive, and making sure that you (and your buddy) come up in time to have air left. Being out of air at 20 feet doesn't "just happen" (and where was your buddy, with her octopus and lower air consumption rate?)
If your instructor failed to make you a self-reliant, self-aware diver, your instructor did you wrong, but since you are certified, it's now your problem to make yourself self-responsible and self-aware, since that is what certification is supposed to indicate. This is a common failing of some (not all) resort-area tropical dive "instructors."
In the minor fiddles department, when you and your buddy board a dive boat, while you are checking that all of your tanks for the trip have air and setting up your gear before you leave the dock, note the pressure in them all, and put the higher-pressure ones on your side of the area (there's nearly always a little variation in the fills.)
 Signature Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by
|
| Alan Browne | 28 Jan 2010 22:03 |
I just got my PADI OW, and added a night, wreck and deep (110') dives, and others for a total of 12 dives. (San Andres, Columbia).
My key issue is that I'm 6'2" and broad/deep chested and go through air like crazy even when I do my level best to be slow and calm. For my deep dive, the instructor dragged down an extra bottle/regulator set. When I got to 600 psi, I took and carried the extra under one arm for the rest of the dive... not how I'd like to operate in the future. (Even on a shallower off the rocks dive, I ended up going to my SO (who is thin) and using her air for nearly 10 minutes before going to the surface on my own air - 200 psi left - She had 1300 left even with me stealing her air). On another dive, there I was at 20 ft with 0 air left, I could suck in a few last breaths as I slowly made my way up.
Now starting to look at buying gear (all I have are fins, mask and snorkel, though my 30 year old mask needs replacing, leaks too much water during dives).
I've found a BCD that takes one or two tanks, so I assume their are regulars with a cross manifold? (whatever it's called). Can this be 'mix and match'? eg: dive with 1 or 2 bottles as needed?
 Signature gmail originated posts are filtered due to spam.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|