Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / UK Scuba / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cressi Ellipse Titanium

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Martin J. Green - 04 Apr 2006 13:45 GMT
Just a quick question about the above.

Went to LIDS at the weekend, got myself a shiny new Cressi Titanium Ellipse
and Ellipse octopus. We met some chap on the DLR on the way home, who
suggested that Titanium regs are no good for nitrox.

Now a spot of googling and emailing seems to reveal that titanium 1st stages
are indeed no good for nitrox, but titanium second stages are fine to 40%.
AS I understand it, the Ellipse only uses titanium in the second stage, and
thus is fine for nitrox to 40%.

Can anyone enlighten me further?

On another note, does anyone know the intermediate operating pressures of
both Mares & Oceanic? My gf got a nice shiny proton ice, but skimped on the
octopus and bought a cheap Oceanic alpha 8. Now as I understand it, unless
Mares & Oceanic happen to have the same intermediate pressure it's not gonna
work. Anyone know?

Fankoo,
Martin

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Imagine a school with children that can read and write, but with teachers
who cannot, and you have a metaphor of the Information Age in which we
live."   - Peter Cochrane

Martin J. Green
URL: http://www.martinjgreen.me.uk
Email: mail@NOSPAM.martinjgreen.me.uk

Lee Bell - 04 Apr 2006 15:14 GMT
> Now a spot of googling and emailing seems to reveal that titanium 1st
> stages are indeed no good for nitrox, but titanium second stages are fine
> to 40%. AS I understand it, the Ellipse only uses titanium in the second
> stage, and thus is fine for nitrox to 40%.
>
> Can anyone enlighten me further?

I know of no reason why titanium would be OK for one and not for the other.
The exposure to O2, which is the issue, is the same for both the first and
second stages.

I've heard, and seen pictures, of damage due to higher levels of oxygen.  I
don't think I've heard much that suggests that titanium regulators aren't
suitable for normal recreational nitrox diving.

> On another note, does anyone know the intermediate operating pressures of
> both Mares & Oceanic? My gf got a nice shiny proton ice, but skimped on
> the octopus and bought a cheap Oceanic alpha 8. Now as I understand it,
> unless Mares & Oceanic happen to have the same intermediate pressure it's
> not gonna work. Anyone know?

Check with the shop.  Most regulators allow the intermediate pressure to be
adjusted.  I don't know much about the Alpha 8, but if your girlfriend
really purchased a cheap, as opposed to inexpensive, second stage, get her a
new one.  Keep in mind that, in an emergency, you may be the one breathing
from that second stage.

Lee
Keith Manning - 04 Apr 2006 17:32 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net>
Newsgroups: uk.rec.scuba
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: Cressi Ellipse Titanium

>> Now a spot of googling and emailing seems to reveal that titanium 1st
>> stages are indeed no good for nitrox, but titanium second stages are fine
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I don't think I've heard much that suggests that titanium regulators
> aren't suitable for normal recreational nitrox diving.

Quoting DSAT Gas blender manual
"Particle impingement is when heat is generated as particles stike a
material with sufficient velocity to ignite the particle and/or the
material"

I guess that due to the higher pressures, there is more velocity available
in the first stage rather than the second stage. The best thing to do in
this situation is to call the manufacturer and get their advice.

>> On another note, does anyone know the intermediate operating pressures of
>> both Mares & Oceanic? My gf got a nice shiny proton ice, but skimped on
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Lee

I agree with Lee here. I don't get this thing with saving a few (and it is a
few) quid on getting the cheapest equipment possible for use in an
emergency. There was recently an article from the HSE that criticised the
use of mis-matched second stages from the same manufacturer on one first
stage. This is because the better regualtor will get the lions share of the
gas and the person who is OOA, panicing and breathing heavily gets less.

I know that the article has its critics. But it made sense to me and I don't
want to wait until there is a problem and 2 divers both going at 40+ litres
per minute to see if it is right or wrong.

As for second stages from different manufacturers, if the IP is not right,
then it isn't going to work properly. You will also not get that set up
serviced as it stands.

Knock out the oceanic on ebay, get another Mares Ice and there you go.

Safe Diving

Keith
Martin T - 05 Apr 2006 22:58 GMT
Captain's log. On StarDate Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:32:56 GMT received comm from
"Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> on channel uk.rec.scuba:

: I agree with Lee here. I don't get this thing with saving a few (and it is a
: few) quid on getting the cheapest equipment possible for use in an

I agree.

: emergency. There was recently an article from the HSE that criticised the
: use of mis-matched second stages from the same manufacturer on one first
: stage. This is because the better regualtor will get the lions share of the
: gas and the person who is OOA, panicing and breathing heavily gets less.

You configured smart enough to give away your main reg to person OOA and use the
octo your self.

martin

Signature

Martin Törnsten - http://martin.tornsten.com/

Keith Manning - 05 Apr 2006 23:09 GMT
> You configured smart enough to give away your main reg to person OOA and
> use the
> octo your self.
>
> martin

Some people like to do that. It is an even better reason to buy a decent
occy.

Keith
Martin J. Green - 04 Apr 2006 19:13 GMT
> I know of no reason why titanium would be OK for one and not for the
> other. The exposure to O2, which is the issue, is the same for both the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I don't think I've heard much that suggests that titanium regulators
> aren't suitable for normal recreational nitrox diving.

I checked with the retailer (actually it was a different retailer selling
the same thing, but still) who confirmed its good to 40%. A number of
reviews/product specs found via google confirm the same. Further research on
google confirmed a titanium first stage can't be used with nitrox (which the
ellipse doesn't have). I assume the reason the first stage can't be titanium
is because of the higher pressures - something which isn't an issue with a
second stage. AFAIK, the cressi site also says its good to 40%

> Check with the shop.  Most regulators allow the intermediate pressure to
> be
> adjusted.  I don't know much about the Alpha 8, but if your girlfriend
> really purchased a cheap, as opposed to inexpensive, second stage, get her
>  > a new one.  Keep in mind that, in an emergency, you may be the >one
> breathing from that second stage.

Well, I'd be breathing from my pony bottle but I get your point :D

I'm more concerned about her... if it all goes belly up at depth it wouldn't
be exactly nice. The retailer wasn't a mares retailer so couldn't be sure,
but he said he was fairly certain mares and oceanic used the same
intermediate pressure. It wasn't *really* cheap, it was £49.95 new...
Oceanic's a well known brand so shouldn't be an issue with the regulator
itself, just the mixing of manufacturers, which as I understand it can cause
problems.

I'm considering just buying her a proton ice octopus on ebay to match, only
a little more expensive.
Keith Manning - 04 Apr 2006 23:02 GMT
> I checked with the retailer (actually it was a different retailer selling
> the same thing, but still) who confirmed its good to 40%. A number of
> reviews/product specs found via google confirm the same.

With all repect to them, they were both trying to sell you something.  I
would still ask the manufacturer.

> I'm more concerned about her... if it all goes belly up at depth it
> wouldn't be exactly nice. The retailer wasn't a mares retailer so couldn't
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I'm considering just buying her a proton ice octopus on ebay to match,
> only a little more expensive.

Good move. "Fairly" certain is also sales talk.

Keith
Pete Young - 05 Apr 2006 10:14 GMT
> I checked with the retailer (actually it was a different retailer selling
> the same thing, but still) who confirmed its good to 40%. A number of

This is truly surprising - virtually all Manufacturers refuse to admit
that their kit should be used with anything more than 23% , unless
further expensive and largely un-necessary modifications are carried
out.

> reviews/product specs found via google confirm the same. Further research on
> google confirmed a titanium first stage can't be used with nitrox (which the
> ellipse doesn't have).

My understanding is that all the research is based on a single
documented incident with a regulator on a bottle of 80% which caught
fire underwater.

> I'm more concerned about her... if it all goes belly up at depth it wouldn't
> be exactly nice. The retailer wasn't a mares retailer so couldn't be sure,
> but he said he was fairly certain mares and oceanic used the same
> intermediate pressure. It wasn't *really* cheap, it was £49.95 new...

Fairly certain?

This is a life support system we're talking about here. I dunno which is
worse, retailers putting people with zero knowledge of the kit they're
selling on the stand, or people wanting to believe the advice they're
given in order to save a few quid.

Oceanic and Mares use an interstage pressure of 9.5 bar above ambient,
and these days so does virtually everyone else. Older Poseidon kit
used to run at 12-13 bar above, but I understand from my local dive
shop that Poseidon are also running a lower pressure.

> Oceanic's a well known brand so shouldn't be an issue with the regulator
> itself, just the mixing of manufacturers, which as I understand it can cause
> problems.

The issue it will cause is when you come to have it serviced. Mixing and
matching different manufacturers second stages 'invalidates the CE
marking', which means that dive shops will probably refuse to service it
unless you take it to pieces, and it will be returned to you in pieces.

Signature

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Pete Young            pete@antipope.dot.org         Remove dot. to reply
     "Just another crouton, floating on the bouillabaisse of life"

Matthias Voss - 05 Apr 2006 12:02 GMT
> Oceanic and Mares use an interstage pressure of 9.5 bar above ambient,
> and these days so does virtually everyone else. Older Poseidon kit
> used to run at 12-13 bar above, but I understand from my local dive
> shop that Poseidon are also running a lower pressure.

Yes.
We only use 11-12 bar at 20 bar supply pressure to allow
newly installed hp seats to settle.
A wise move not to use full supply pressure here.
Then the IP is adjusted to 9-9.5 bar.

Matthias
Jason - 04 Apr 2006 23:38 GMT
>> Can anyone enlighten me further?
>
> I know of no reason why titanium would be OK for one and not for the
> other. The exposure to O2, which is the issue, is the same for both the
> first and second stages.

Because when it comes to chemical reactions, which is what we're talking
about, there are two important factors, pressure and temperature.
Increased pressure normally makes a reaction more likely, and in parts of
a first stage we're talking over 200 times normal pressure, which
simplistically means there are 200 times more molecules to react.

Have to agree with Keith. Stick with brass. About as inert as it gets. Bit
heavy, but it all comes off your weightbelt ultimately.

Jason

Signature

http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for Maldivian trip reports including Kuredu,
Fesdu, Meedhupparu, Ranveli, Summer Island Village and Velidhu

Keith S. - 04 Apr 2006 19:29 GMT
> Can anyone enlighten me further?

As a material for regulators titanium is just a gimmick
by some manufacturers to extract more money out of unsuspecting
punter's pockets.

Stick with brass - doesn't catch fire under any circumstances,
works well, YKIMS.

- Keith
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.