Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / UK Scuba / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Aladin Air-X Failure

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DaveA - 24 Aug 2005 10:04 GMT
Once again equipment failure question.

Background: On the weekend of the 19th -21st of August I did five
dives, these were the first dives in a month.

The first four were trial dives with inexperienced divers, the maximum
time on any dive was 30 minutes and the maximum depth recorded was 17m.
In general they were in the region of 30 minutes at 8-12m depths. There
were 2 dives a day on Friday and Saturday, two hours plus surface
intervals, with the last dive being approximately 21 hours before the
incident in question.

On Sunday the 21st August, I went for a pleasure dive with my partner.
On setting up the scuba unit I noted contents at 198bar, air
temperature was 29 degrees. Checks were done and we entered the water.
We dropped to a wreck after about a 5 minute swim descending to 26-28m,
at this point I noted my contents at 170bar. Then what I can only
describe as all hell broke lose with the unit. In the space of 5-6
breaths the contents went from 170 Bar to 140, 114, 102, 89 then back
up to 140. The unit then totally failed into ERR... mode.

Obviously we aborted immediately and recovered. On recovering after a
10 minute swim it was established, by independent test, I had 150 Bar
remaining.

I spoke to Scubapro yesterday but wasn't particuarly happy with the
response I'm just interested to see if anyone else has had a similar
problem with one?

I know it's an older unit and I can get a reasonably priced upgrade,
however, given the way it failed and the fact that I could have been in
serious problems had I gone into deco with no contents or depth
readings.

Any help appreciated.

DaveA
Ben Panter - 24 Aug 2005 10:36 GMT
> I spoke to Scubapro yesterday but wasn't particuarly happy with the
> response I'm just interested to see if anyone else has had a similar
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> serious problems had I gone into deco with no contents or depth
> readings.

My Aladin Nitrox went "Err" as I was entering the water while, oddly
enough, teaching a nitrox course. It's what they do when the battery is
dying - I would guess that the battery was on the edge (this happens
when the indicator reads less than about 50% unfortunatly) and the cold
water slowed the reaction in the cell sufficiently that some flip-flop
switch in the unit determined that there was not enough power. Once that
flip-flop has flipped (flopped?) the only solution is to change the battery.

For me it was fine - I was teaching the course from tables and switched
to my dive timer - but I agree it was pretty annoying.

Top tip for extending the battery life is to clean the computer with
freshwater and dry it before it goes back in the box (preferably in a
place where it won't get wet). All that beeping and cycling through the
display eats the battery pretty sharpish. Beyond 50% battery you're
living on borrowed time.

HTH.

  Ben
Nigel Hewitt - 24 Aug 2005 10:37 GMT
> .....I could have been in
> serious problems had I gone into deco with no contents or depth
> readings.

You would go into deco without backup depth readings?

You are a braver man than I am.

I used to have two contents gauges on the twinset too.

nigelH
DaveA - 24 Aug 2005 10:50 GMT
Nigel,

The emphisis was on 'had I'

I did have my old Octopus II as a backup timer / depth gauge.

The idea wasn't to do a deco dive, however more of a 'what if'
scenario.

Ben,

Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.

Scubapro have said it sounds like a TX failure throwing erronious
tank readings therefore the unit shuts down. Given the 57% on the
battery it was 'unlikely' to be that.

I was quite surprised to be told to take it back to a dealer who'd
upgrade to
an Air-Z for £95.00 and if I wanted to be on the 'safe' side they's
replace the
TX for an additional £57.50. The second part there surprised me given
that the first suspected fail point WAS the TX.

All in all

They just seemed to show no interest in why the unit failed. As they no
longer support the Air-X the upgrade was on the cards anyway. I just
thought they'd show a little more interest in why it failed in the way
it did.

Thanks for the replies so far.

DaveA
Jason - 24 Aug 2005 11:31 GMT
First of all, congratulations on actually going diving Dave. Assume it
wasn't in the UK.

> I was quite surprised to be told to take it back to a dealer who'd
> upgrade to
> an Air-Z for £95.00 and if I wanted to be on the 'safe' side they's
> replace the
> TX for an additional £57.50. The second part there surprised me given
> that the first suspected fail point WAS the TX.

If you shop around, you can get a 2 mix Apeks Quantum for that money and
go back to an old fashioned, and reliable, pressure gauge.

Jason

Signature

See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for Caribbean trip reports
including Aruba, Cuba, Grand Bahama, Barbados, St Lucia and Mexico

McBad - 24 Aug 2005 18:19 GMT
> If you shop around, you can get a 2 mix Apeks Quantum for that money and
> go back to an old fashioned, and reliable, pressure gauge.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for Caribbean trip reports
> including Aruba, Cuba, Grand Bahama, Barbados, St Lucia and Mexico

Exactly.  Really puzzles me why people have to make something which is
mechanical, simple, reasonably bomb-proof and works fine (like a pressure
gauge on a hose) into something complex, electronic, non-user-serviceable
and unreliable...  It's the old story about the American astronauts
space-pen versus the comonauts pencil.  I know which I'd rather have!

My 2p worth!

M
Jason - 24 Aug 2005 19:33 GMT
> Exactly.  Really puzzles me why people have to make something which is
> mechanical, simple, reasonably bomb-proof and works fine (like a pressure
> gauge on a hose) into something complex, electronic, non-user-serviceable
> and unreliable...  It's the old story about the American astronauts

Agreed, I love a gadget as much as the next man, but the minor convenience
of having my pressure gauge on my wrist really isn't worth it in terms of
expense and reliability.

And the time left at this depth isn't much use to me because on a deep
dive, I know I've got loads more gas than I need. And on a shallow one, I
can just go up.

Jason

Signature

http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/boatspaces/ for UK dive spaces

Cliff Coggin - 24 Aug 2005 16:17 GMT
Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.

DaveA
----------------------------------------

57% of capacity or 57% of voltage? If it's capacity (i.e. ampere-hours) it
does seem surprising to have let you down, but if it's voltage then it is
well past the time to change it. After all, you wouldn't expect to start a
car on a battery that was so clapped out that it only produced 7 volts
instead of 12.

Cliff.
Matthias Voss - 24 Aug 2005 17:31 GMT
> Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.
>
> Scubapro have said it sounds like a TX failure throwing erronious
> tank readings therefore the unit shuts down. Given the 57% on the
> battery it was 'unlikely' to be that.

Where in the manual is anything said about battery
life/remaining capacity vs. percentage shown?

One should expect that with 57 percent remaining capacity
you have 57 percent left in terms of operating time, until a
battery warning goes off.

Unles they say something different in their handbook,
according to europeen laws, which demand trhuthness in
manuals, the balll is in Scubapro#s field. They have to
explain why computers breakdown with a remaining life in the
50% region.

Matthias
Jason - 24 Aug 2005 19:34 GMT
> Unles they say something different in their handbook, according to
> europeen laws, which demand trhuthness in manuals, the balll is in
> Scubapro#s field. They have to explain why computers breakdown with a
> remaining life in the 50% region.

I'll think you find they say that there's a time factor in the manual too.
My Aladin Pro Nitrox stopped working when the battery got to about 50%.
Ought to get a new one and sell it really.

Jason

Signature

http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for Aussie diving reports including
the Coral Sea, Ningaloo reef, the Solitaries and Byron Bay

Robert C. Helling - 29 Aug 2005 13:36 GMT
>> Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> explain why computers breakdown with a remaining life in the
> 50% region.

There is a number of reports of similar behaviour on the net
(including one from myself). The problem with your line of argument of
course is to show that it is really the battery that had failed. My
local dealer (who is usually trustworthy) claims to have seen Aladins
that have a proper low battery warining on the display and that all
the ones with 'Err' have a fault in either one of the sensors or of
the PCB board. The problem with the fix is not so much the price
(roughly 80 Euros given that I have taken my Aladin to seven years of
diving) but the time of several months it takes
Uwatec/Scubapro/Johnson Outdoor to fix it.

In the meantime, I've bought a Suunto Vyper off ebay, see my other
posting.

Robert

Signature

.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO
Robert C. Helling     School of Science and Engineering
                     International University Bremen
print "Just another   Phone: +49 421-200 3574
   stupid .sig\n";   http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/~helling

Morten Reistad - 24 Aug 2005 22:31 GMT
>> .....I could have been in
>> serious problems had I gone into deco with no contents or depth
>> readings.
>
>You would go into deco without backup depth readings?

I bring a SMB with indications on the line as a last resort backup.
This, and breatning from the longhose, is the last items from technical
diving I will give up, even on "blue water" dives.

>You are a braver man than I am.
>
>I used to have two contents gauges on the twinset too.

Whatever happened to proper gas planning for deco dives?

-- mrr
Nigel Hewitt - 25 Aug 2005 07:21 GMT
>> I used to have two contents gauges on the twinset too.
>
> Whatever happened to proper gas planning for deco dives?

I gave it up when I stopped diving the twinset. 8-)

The two gauges were to cater for re-planning a deco dive
after a serious breakage leading to closing the manifold.
Also, after having an SPG hang up on me, some confirmation
of readings helped.

The alternative is to rely on my diver skills and training
but, once I have a couple of bar of Nitrogen in my brain,
I see no reason to trust them.

nigelH
Chris - 26 Aug 2005 01:51 GMT
> >> I used to have two contents gauges on the twinset too.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> nigelH

My Buddy & I have replaced our three Air-X's with Air-Z's now. They all
failed around the 40-50% battery-life mark. The Air-Z's are fine. I have
done around 200 dives on my Aladins, my buddy (an instructor) has about
2000 on hers! We both use a backup contents gauge. If diving solo I also
wear my Suunto Spyder.

Pip pip
Signature

Chris Notton
Replace "nospam" with my surname to reply by email
Sostituisca il "nospam" con il mio cognome per rispondere
}<////(*>

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.