Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / UK Scuba / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

computer help ? strange message when IE fails

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
david - 29 Mar 2005 11:11 GMT
I keep getting a message box pop up telling me that IE wont work.
some times I can reload a page and it ok other times I can not open a page
at all the one below is one of them. I assume there is some script being run
that my pc falls over ever time it comes across it.

http://www.7dayshop.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=86474

This is message :-
Internet Explorer has encountered a problem and needs to close.
we are sorry for the inconvenience

can anyone think of why this happens or what I should do.

Regards David.

ps sorry its not diving but answer here tend to be very humberling
TAW - 29 Mar 2005 13:10 GMT
> I keep getting a message box pop up telling me that IE wont work.
> some times I can reload a page and it ok other times I can not open a page
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> ps sorry its not diving but answer here tend to be very humberling

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Internet+Explorer+has+encountered+a+probl
em+and+needs+to+close.&btnG=Google+Search&meta
=

Top two links looks like your answer
david - 29 Mar 2005 13:49 GMT
>> I keep getting a message box pop up telling me that IE wont work.
>> some times I can reload a page and it ok other times I can not open a
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Top two links looks like your answer

Thanks  wish I had looked there first :-)

I am working through them as I type

David
Keelworm - 29 Mar 2005 15:09 GMT
While choking on an orange the asphixiatingly tight latex collar began to
take effect as *david* gapsed to *uk.rec.scuba* with a dying breath:

> I am working through them as I type

Multitasking... the marvels of modern technology ;o)

--
PG
david - 30 Mar 2005 22:25 GMT
> While choking on an orange the asphixiatingly tight latex collar began to
> take effect as *david* gapsed to *uk.rec.scuba* with a dying breath:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> --
> PG

It did make me laugh   good one Worm :-)

this link

> http://www.7dayshop.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=86474

is still giving me problems I have messed around with the MS stuff but got
fed-up with nothing
helping so I installed Firefox which did show page But it also told me that
it had blocked a pop up
so I turned pop up blocking on "again" in IE and then the page would load.
I can not get into the Firefox Vs IE bit  but what is this pop up doing that
can cause IE to crash

Many Thanks to all in this non diving thread and I apologise to the real
divers for this off topic post.

David :-)
Keelworm - 31 Mar 2005 10:16 GMT
While choking on an orange the asphixiatingly tight latex collar began to
take effect as *david* gapsed to *uk.rec.scuba* with a dying breath:

>> While choking on an orange the asphixiatingly tight latex collar began to
>> take effect as *david* gapsed to *uk.rec.scuba* with a dying breath:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I can not get into the Firefox Vs IE bit  but what is this pop up doing
> that can cause IE to crash

There's any amount of stuff it may be doing via active-x, a java servlet
maybe, or something else...  FWIW, it's loading fine for me under IE6
running on SuSE Linux under crossover, so can't be all that screwed.  Try
re-installing and updating IE, it may be damaged.

PG

> Many Thanks to all in this non diving thread and I apologise to the real
> divers for this off topic post.
>
> David :-)
NoJags Neil - 29 Mar 2005 14:13 GMT
> I keep getting a message box pop up telling me that IE wont work.

Dump IE and use Firefox.  Problem solved, plus you get a much better
browser.
Michael Wolf - 29 Mar 2005 14:29 GMT
>>I keep getting a message box pop up telling me that IE wont work.
>
> Dump IE and use Firefox.  Problem solved, plus you get a much better
> browser.

Hear, hear

Signature

Michael Wolf

-----

Cthulhu For President.
Why settle for the lesser evil?

remove stopspam to reply

David Walker - 29 Mar 2005 15:09 GMT
> Dump IE and use Firefox.  Problem solved, plus you get a much better
> browser.

Matter of opinion i'm afraid.  Firefox is still slower to load up and load
pages than IE on my computer.  Yes IE may only be faster because its part of
the core of the OS, but it doesn't matter to me how it does it, fact is it
does everything it needs to do, and does it more quickly than any other
browser i've tried.

Its OK, i'm sure the EU in all their wisdom will soon make Microsoft take IE
out of Windows too, like they have done with Media Player.  Pearls of wisdom
there, who else could have made a company remove the media playing software
from a Media Edition operating system?  Now everyone who ends up with this
version, whether they wanted to or not, has to go to the trouble of finding
and downloading new software where once it worked fine out of the box.
Genius - I love the EU!

David
Keith Manning - 29 Mar 2005 15:19 GMT
"David Walker" <stuff@scuby.co.uk> wrote in message

> Matter of opinion i'm afraid.  Firefox is still slower to load up and load
> pages than IE on my computer.  Yes IE may only be faster because its part
> of the core of the OS, but it doesn't matter to me how it does it, fact is
> it does everything it needs to do, and does it more quickly than any other
> browser i've tried.

I don't have any problem with IE, as you say, it does everything that I ask
it to with very little fuss. I also use Netscape 7 sometimes and I have used
Mozilla. They all do the same thing in a slightly different way. I still
don't see a reason to change.

Keith
TAW - 29 Mar 2005 16:00 GMT
> "David Walker" <stuff@scuby.co.uk> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Keith

There is one very good reason for using Thunderbird rather than OE - TB
automatically unspoofs links sent in email, you know the one that look
like www.ebay.com, but actually would take you to a fraud site.
In TB you are taken to the genuine site.
Firefox isn't brillant, but bookmarks are better than IE and it doesn't
seem to be prone to toolbar hijacking like IE is.
David Walker - 29 Mar 2005 18:12 GMT
> There is one very good reason for using Thunderbird rather than OE - TB
> automatically unspoofs links sent in email, you know the one that look
> like www.ebay.com, but actually would take you to a fraud site.
> In TB you are taken to the genuine site.
> Firefox isn't brillant, but bookmarks are better than IE and it doesn't
> seem to be prone to toolbar hijacking like IE is.

But both of those are only benefits if you are too quick to click 'yes' to
everything that pops up on your screen.  Given that to use
Thunderbird/Firefox would mean that you specifically went looking for them,
to me that would imply that you should have a good understanding of
computers and the potential risks and so not be taken in by dodgy links.
I've never been hijacked by a dodgy toolbar I didn't want, because when
things pop up saying "do you want to install/accept/..." i won't click yes
or OK unless i know i clicked on something I wanted from a reasonably legit
looking site.  And apart from being able to recognise a dodgy e-mail a mile
off, if you mouse-over the link in IE you get the real address in the
toolbar.
Some of the features would be nice to have in IE, but in reality 99% of IEs
problems seem to be down to user error.

David
Keith S. - 29 Mar 2005 20:11 GMT
> Some of the features would be nice to have in IE, but in reality 99% of IEs
> problems seem to be down to user error.

Firstly, given that CERT have recommended not using IE,
it seems that expert opinion does not agree with you.

Secondly, if 99% of IEs problems are indeed user error,
a number that I presume you made up without any rational
thought, then I would put it to you that it's a very
poorly designed piece of software.

- Keith
David Walker - 30 Mar 2005 12:52 GMT
> Secondly, if 99% of IEs problems are indeed user error,
> a number that I presume you made up without any rational
> thought, then I would put it to you that it's a very
> poorly designed piece of software.

Well no, I mean things like asking "do you want to install spam-o-matic
version 10", and someone clicking "yes" just because it popped up.  It's
weakness is that it allows you to do things.  It could very easily block
every extension, extra option and install settings, but then its limited in
its functionality.  It may be that most people wouldn't notice the loss, but
if people do use thinks like ActiveX and it gets removed completely then
they're stuck.  It might be worth having everything disabled by default, so
that users are never asked if they want to install crap from websites, and
it might improve things for many users, but if they didn't all just click
"yes" to everything they wouldn't have half the problems they do.  Funny
really - IE says "do you want to install...", you say yes, it installs it,
then people complain that it's faulty software for doing what you told it to
do!  Crazy!

David
Jason - 29 Mar 2005 20:10 GMT
> I don't have any problem with IE, as you say, it does everything that I
> ask it to with very little fuss. I also use Netscape 7 sometimes and I
> have used Mozilla. They all do the same thing in a slightly different way.
> I still don't see a reason to change.

Reasons for using firefox:
Tabbed browsing
The BugMeNot extension
And the fact that it doesn't support ActiveX which is a security nightmare
and was done by MS for political reasons.

As for the original question, it could frankly be a problem with any one
of about 200 files. Every time you install an application, a badly written
install script can break existing programs. It's what's know as DLL hell.

Jaosn

Signature

http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for trip reports including diving
the wreck of the President Coolidge in Santo, Vanuatu

NoJags Neil - 30 Mar 2005 08:58 GMT
>> I don't have any problem with IE, as you say, it does everything that I
>> ask it to with very little fuss. I also use Netscape 7 sometimes and I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> And the fact that it doesn't support ActiveX which is a security nightmare
> and was done by MS for political reasons.

Plus...
- The search box in the top right corner that can be set to your favourite
search engine.  (You're supposed to be able to change the default IE search
box from MSN search but I've never managed it).
- Greatly improved speed and lack of bloat.
- The little icon specific to each site starts working (sorry, can't
remember the proper name for this).
- Some sites that don't work properly under IE start working again.
Example: the animated weather charts on the met office web site.

The only minus I can think of is that the Odeon website doesn't work
properly under firefox, but they've finally bowed to public pressure and put
an alternative html-compliant version up.

I thing the tabbed browsing is the killer, though.  I really don't know how
we managed without it.  I wonder if Ladbrokes are taking bets as to whether
IE7 will have tabbed browsing...

I'm actually less convinced about Thunderbird as it seems a bit buggy to me.
The RSS feeds are great, but I find quite a few errors getting thrown up
with usenet groups.  Also, if you spend time on multimedia newsgroups, there
doesn't seem to be a "combine & decode" like there is in OE.  Having said
that, it understands yenc, which OE doesn't.
David Walker - 30 Mar 2005 12:45 GMT
>> Tabbed browsing
Never use it even when I do use Mozilla - nothing wrong with just
alt-tabbing between windows, and in fact I prefer that (and I often have
20-30 windows open at a time)  :O\

>> The BugMeNot extension
Never heard of it.  But as IE can block popups and won't install crap unless
you click 'yes' to everything presented to to I can't see it improving much
for me.

>> And the fact that it doesn't support ActiveX which is a security
>> nightmare
>> and was done by MS for political reasons.
Which you can turn off in IE much more quickly than you can download
Firefox.

> - The search box in the top right corner that can be set to your favourite
> search engine.  (You're supposed to be able to change the default IE
> search box from MSN search but I've never managed it).
Well mine's currently set to Yahoo, but when i'm searching I prefer to just
to to the google website.

> - Greatly improved speed and lack of bloat.
I find IE far faster than any other browser, and i've used various
incarnations of all of them.

> - The little icon specific to each site starts working (sorry, can't
> remember the proper name for this).
Hmmm - hardly a key feature, although it doesn't always work in IE so...
:o/

> - Some sites that don't work properly under IE start working again.
> Example: the animated weather charts on the met office web site.
Can't find any animated weather charts on the meto website so can't look.

David
jasonp@bigfoot.com - 30 Mar 2005 13:09 GMT
> >> The BugMeNot extension
> Never heard of it.  But as IE can block popups and won't install crap unless
> you click 'yes' to everything presented to to I can't see it improving much
> for me.

That's not what it does. There's a database of sites that require you
to register to use them, like some of the newspapers for instance. When
you get to the login screen, you right click and the extension logs you
into the site using a known login. No need to hand your personal
details over in future. And no need to go through the hassle of
registering just to read one news story.

As for IE not installing crap unless you click "yes", that is
completely and utterly wrong. Any program that's not written absolutely
perfectly can be persuaded to run arbitrary code. And no program is
perfect. There have been countless examples in IE and loads of other
programs where things like invalid headers or passing back data that is
too long for the declared size have made programs run malicious code.

That's why everyone should keep their systems patched at all times. No
system that's connected to a network is invulnerable. Unfortunately
there are known, unpatched problems with IE.

> >> And the fact that it doesn't support ActiveX which is a security
> >> nightmare
> >> and was done by MS for political reasons.
> Which you can turn off in IE much more quickly than you can download
> Firefox.

If it's in there, it can be switched back on. You're relying on IE to
enforce the security.

Jason
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.