I have seen several reports in the papers of divers who were underwater
when the tsunami passed, who then surfaced to find their resorts
obliterated. It would be interesting from a scientific point of view to
see the dive profiles from their computers, assuming the sampling frequency
of the computers was high enough to record the waves passing overhead.
Chris Q
Stimp - 30 Dec 2004 16:44 GMT
> I have seen several reports in the papers of divers who were underwater
> when the tsunami passed, who then surfaced to find their resorts
> obliterated. It would be interesting from a scientific point of view to
> see the dive profiles from their computers, assuming the sampling frequency
> of the computers was high enough to record the waves passing overhead.
didn't the wave 'pulse' travel along the sea-bottom as opposed to a wave
overhead?

Signature
"I hear ma train a comin'
... hear freedom comin"
Mike Ross - 30 Dec 2004 16:53 GMT
>I have seen several reports in the papers of divers who were underwater
>when the tsunami passed, who then surfaced to find their resorts
>obliterated. It would be interesting from a scientific point of view to
>see the dive profiles from their computers, assuming the sampling frequency
>of the computers was high enough to record the waves passing overhead.
Very little to see, I suspect. In open water, a tsunami is normally
nothing more than a slight to heavy swell.
In shallow near-shore water, the computer would record a change from a
comfortable depth to the top of a tree, at something considerably
exceeding any recommended ascent rate.
Mike

Signature
http://www.corestore.org
"All I know is that I'm being sued for unfair business practices by Microsoft. Hello pot? It's kettle on line two" -
Michael Robertson