Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / UK Scuba / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ad:  Ali Single Tank Travel Backplate - interest?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Huw Porter - 19 Nov 2004 03:22 GMT
OK, I've found a supplier and got a quote, this post is to gauge level
of interest:

Single tank travel back plate in 3mm 5052 marine grade aluminium.  
Cut, folded and finished (no extra work with a file required :-))
Weight about 0.65 kg.

Shape basically the same as
http://www.huwporter.com/scuba/hplate.html
modified slightly based on experience, a few superfluous slots
removed.

Sold basically at cost, if I do a run of 8-10, including postage from
Aus to the UK/Japan, the cost will be in the region of GBP 75-80.

Any takers?

Cheers,
Huw
Signature

http://www.huwporter.com

Jerome Meekings - 19 Nov 2004 04:33 GMT
> Sold basically at cost, if I do a run of 8-10, including postage from
> Aus to the UK/Japan, the cost will be in the region of GBP 75-80.
>
> Any takers?

Yes for me and if you can wait a few days I will talk to the people I
know here and see if there is any interest in that area.

My only comment would be for a couple of slots/ holes at the bottom for
a DSMB, However I can drill holes them myself if nobody else is
interested in that mod.

>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
Lee Bell - 19 Nov 2004 07:35 GMT
> My only comment would be for a couple of slots/ holes at the bottom for
> a DSMB, However I can drill holes them myself if nobody else is
> interested in that mod.

I saw a rather interesting bit of kit this afternoon.  One of the workers at
a local dive shop has sleeves made by Dive Rite attached to the peripheral
holes on his plate.  He carries a roundish lift bag in one and a longer
tubular one in the other.  It appears quite a bit easier to access than the
Halcyon back pad/pocket I'm currently using.  You can find a picture of one
here http://www.scubacenter.com/DiveRite2.htm .  I've tried attaching things
to the bottom of my plate.  Since I don't use a crotch strap, the rear D
ring I used to use is unavailable.  I've not been successful at making
things attached to the bottom of my plate easy to access.  The sleeve looks
like a pretty good option.

Lee
Jerome Meekings - 19 Nov 2004 08:13 GMT
> I saw a rather interesting bit of kit this afternoon.  One of the workers at
> a local dive shop has sleeves made by Dive Rite attached to the peripheral
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> things attached to the bottom of my plate easy to access.  The sleeve looks
> like a pretty good option.

I have something rather along the same lines that I made for my buddy
SMBCi.

The difference is that the one I made opens out flat and has a strip of
200mm velcro that makes into a tube. The reason for the velcro is so it
fits the SMBCi with or without the bottle. I do have a bolt snap on the
loop tape that I clip to a waist belt D-ring so that what ever happens I
don't loose the SMB.

It was made to fit the Buddy ABS backplate so has long attachment straps
at the moment. It fits in the usual rear bottom position and is easy to
access.

>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
Lee Bell - 19 Nov 2004 13:47 GMT
>> I saw a rather interesting bit of kit this afternoon.  One of the workers
>> at
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I have something rather along the same lines that I made for my buddy
> SMBCi.

> The difference is that the one I made opens out flat and has a strip of
> 200mm velcro that makes into a tube. The reason for the velcro is so it
> fits the SMBCi with or without the bottle. I do have a bolt snap on the
> loop tape that I clip to a waist belt D-ring so that what ever happens I
> don't loose the SMB.

Makes sense.  I like the option to adjust the size.  He had a bolt snap on
the loop for the same reason.  If you guys keep giving me all these great
ideas, I may have to get a sewing machine again.  Man, do I ever wish I'd
kept the one my first wife left me.

> It was made to fit the Buddy ABS backplate so has long attachment straps
> at the moment. It fits in the usual rear bottom position and is easy to
> access.

By rear bottom position, may I assume you mean horizontally across the
bottom of the plate?  If so, that might well be a more convenient option for
a single device, which is all I normally carry.  That may change.  The IANTD
recreational trimix course I'm planning on taking early next month requires
shooting a bag for deco.  They've already expressed reservations about my
Halcyon bag/safety sausage.  That sausage will serve as a DSMB modest lift
bag and, as what I need most on some dives, a surface signaling device.  The
lift bag they prefer is only a DSMB and lift bag.

Speaking of lift bags, I'm going to have to practice shooting a DSMB.  It's
not a skill I've spent much time with.

Those of you that use colored DSMBs as signaling devices may find it
interesting to know that, here, orange is the standard and yellow, rather
than indicating a problem, is what is used to send fish to the surface.

Lee
Jerome Meekings - 19 Nov 2004 14:28 GMT
> Makes sense.  I like the option to adjust the size.  He had a bolt snap on
> the loop for the same reason.  If you guys keep giving me all these great
> ideas, I may have to get a sewing machine again.  Man, do I ever wish I'd
> kept the one my first wife left me.

You don't need / want a sewing machine unless it is a real heavy duty
one. The thin polyester or nylon gets cut easly by the material you sew.
Hand sewing with a thick nylon thread is good enough.

> > It was made to fit the Buddy ABS backplate so has long attachment straps
> > at the moment. It fits in the usual rear bottom position and is easy to
> > access.
>
> By rear bottom position, may I assume you mean horizontally across the
> bottom of the plate?  

That is right

> If so, that might well be a more convenient option for
> a single device, which is all I normally carry.  That may change.  The IANTD
> recreational trimix course I'm planning on taking early next month requires
> shooting a bag for deco.  

I did a normox trimix, I think it is the next one up last new year.

> They've already expressed reservations about my
> Halcyon bag/safety sausage.  That sausage will serve as a DSMB modest lift
> bag and, as what I need most on some dives, a surface signaling device.  The
> lift bag they prefer is only a DSMB and lift bag.

That will be the instructor's choice and they should be flexable on that
point. I can see little point for the diving I do in using a lift bag as
opposed to a safety sausage. Did they say what the reservations were?

> Speaking of lift bags, I'm going to have to practice shooting a DSMB.  It's
> not a skill I've spent much time with.

Have you looked at the GUE video? It is a good example though, IMNSHO,
there is one mistake in it.

> Those of you that use colored DSMBs as signaling devices may find it
> interesting to know that, here, orange is the standard and yellow, rather
> than indicating a problem, is what is used to send fish to the surface.
>
> Lee

>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
Lee Bell - 19 Nov 2004 19:36 GMT
>> They've already expressed reservations about my
>> Halcyon bag/safety sausage.  That sausage will serve as a DSMB modest
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> point. I can see little point for the diving I do in using a lift bag as
> opposed to a safety sausage. Did they say what the reservations were?

Yes.  While I think they will probably accept it.  Their point, which is
reasonably well made, is that they consider the lift bag primarily as a
device for letting the boat know where you are.  The round lift bag, in
their opinion, does that better than the sausage because the sausage will
fall over unless the line is held tightly.  There is, of course, some merit
to their thinking, but for now, I'm just trying to get through the course
with the minimum of equipment I'm not used to.  Armed with new knowledge,
I'll be in a better position to determine how far I want to take this and
how much new equipment I get to buy.  I just love new equipment, but there
is a limit.

I was in the shop yesterday afternoon and came very close to owning a new
twinset.  Generally speaking, people here like Luxfer aluminum tanks for
twinning.  When full, they are slightly negative, when empty, they are
slightly positive.  I've only got one of them now.  All the rest of my tanks
are neutral when empty, ie about 2.5 kg negative when full.  At any rate, I
considered a new tank, twinning bands, isolation manifold and bolt kit, all
for somewhere around $500 US.   Then I realized that I don't have a wing
suitable for twins.  The additional couple hundred US made the difference.
I imagine I can do better on everything, but as an impulse buyer, I'm not
the world's best shopper.  I either want it now, or I don't want it enough
to buy it . . . usually.

>> Speaking of lift bags, I'm going to have to practice shooting a DSMB.
>> It's
>> not a skill I've spent much time with.

> Have you looked at the GUE video? It is a good example though, IMNSHO,
> there is one mistake in it.

Is this something that GUE allows non GUE people access to . . . for free?
I considered a GUE course, but, quite frankly got quite annoyed when I
noticed that the standards include prerequisite GUE courses and are way, way
more expensive than what I've scheduled for next month.  The Fundamentals
course is substantially more expensive than the Recreational Trimix course I
signed up for and the first level GUE Trimix course is several times as
expensive.  Even if they could give that much more value, I don't have the
time to follow their prescribed training path.

At any rate, if you know of a source for the video, I'm interested.

I've discussed shooting DSMB's with folks here on more than one occasion.
If good advice is of value, I've collected more than my share of value.  I
do, however, need practice.  It's not something I do often.

Lee
timppa - 19 Nov 2004 19:59 GMT
> > Have you looked at the GUE video? It is a good example though, IMNSHO,
> > there is one mistake in it.
>
> At any rate, if you know of a source for the video, I'm interested.
>
> Lee

http://www.fifthd.com/fifthdnew/education/videos.asp?from=education&level=1
Lee Bell - 20 Nov 2004 08:04 GMT
>> > Have you looked at the GUE video? It is a good example though, IMNSHO,
>> > there is one mistake in it.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.fifthd.com/fifthdnew/education/videos.asp?from=education&level=1

Thanks for the link.  So far, the video has not worked.  I live in hope.

Lee
timppa - 20 Nov 2004 11:00 GMT
> >> > Have you looked at the GUE video? It is a good example though, IMNSHO,
> >> > there is one mistake in it.
> >>
> >> At any rate, if you know of a source for the video, I'm interested.
> >>
> >> Lee

http://www.fifthd.com/fifthdnew/education/videos.asp?from=education&level=1

> Thanks for the link.  So far, the video has not worked.  I live in hope.
>
> Lee

I see what you mean.

Another possibility is http://www.frogkick.nl/ -> technieken -> hefballon
oplate -> the mpg at the bottom. Did not work in my QT plugin, but a direct
link in RealPlayer did the job.

timo
Lee Bell - 20 Nov 2004 15:03 GMT
> Another possibility is http://www.frogkick.nl/ -> technieken -> hefballon
> oplate -> the mpg at the bottom. Did not work in my QT plugin, but a
> direct
> link in RealPlayer did the job.

No joy there either, perhaps because I don't speak the right language.  I
didn't see an mpg at the bottom and even stumbling around like a stroke,
didn't find any working video.

Lee
Iain Smith - 22 Nov 2004 08:30 GMT
> No joy there either, perhaps because I don't speak the right
> language.  I didn't see an mpg at the bottom and even
> stumbling around like a stroke, didn't find any working
> video.

You need to scroll down to the bottom of the text. It's marked: "Hefballon
oplaten (Mpeg 17.2Mb)". The direct link is:

http://www.frogkick.nl/movies/boei_oplaten.mpg

It's extremely jerky in Media Player on the first run through (might have
something to do with it being a 17.2Mb file!) but plays fine if you hit play
again.

Iain
Jerome Meekings - 20 Nov 2004 16:27 GMT
> Yes.  While I think they will probably accept it.  Their point, which is
> reasonably well made, is that they consider the lift bag primarily as a
> device for letting the boat know where you are.  The round lift bag, in
> their opinion, does that better than the sausage because the sausage will
> fall over unless the line is held tightly.  

There are other points of view to that. Mine is that while a sausage may
not stand up at all times it does stand up and can therefore be seen at
a much greater distance than any lift bag can. Also when at the surface
it can be waved and for sure will be more visable.

The POV they express strikes me as DIR blind thinking.

They should probably read JARROD JABLONSKI's opinion of SMBs

>>    A surface marker buoy is a non-gas-permeable bag designed to
>>float at the surface, serving as a communication device for a
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>alert markers. The increased height and starkly contrasting
>>color offer improved visibility from a distance.

> There is, of course, some merit
> to their thinking, but for now, I'm just trying to get through the course
> with the minimum of equipment I'm not used to.  

A very good thing to do.

> Armed with new knowledge,
> I'll be in a better position to determine how far I want to take this and
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Is this something that GUE allows non GUE people access to . . . for free?

It seems so <http://www.gue.com/equipment/feature/liftbag/index.shtml>

>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
Huw Porter - 20 Nov 2004 20:30 GMT
> There are other points of view to that. Mine is that while a sausage may
> not stand up at all times it does stand up and can therefore be seen at
> a much greater distance than any lift bag can. Also when at the surface
> it can be waved and for sure will be more visable.
>
> The POV they express strikes me as DIR blind thinking.

How did you get the idea a sausage isn't DIR?

Anyone trying to tell you sausages are not DIR, doesn't know what they
are talking about.

> They should probably read JARROD JABLONSKI's opinion of SMBs

...Well, exactly!  :-)

Cheers,
Huw
Signature

http://www.huwporter.com

--

Huw Porter - 20 Nov 2004 20:35 GMT
> > The POV they express strikes me as DIR blind thinking.

P.S. blind thinking, certainly, but not DIR blind thinking.

Cheers,
Huw
Signature

http://www.huwporter.com

--

Lee Bell - 21 Nov 2004 03:55 GMT
> There are other points of view to that. Mine is that while a sausage may
> not stand up at all times it does stand up and can therefore be seen at
> a much greater distance than any lift bag can. Also when at the surface
> it can be waved and for sure will be more visable.

I don't think the two views are mutually exclusive.  I have my sausage,
which is considerably larger than the small diameter ones used by many US
divers, for a specific purpose.  You hit it on the head.  It projects well
above waves and can be seen from a long distance.  When I dive the Dry
Tortugas, I'm a long way from the nearest land and the boat does multiple
drops.  I really, really want to be seen when it's time to be picked up.

> The POV they express strikes me as DIR blind thinking.
> They should probably read JARROD JABLONSKI's opinion of SMBs

I don't think DIR thinking applies in this case.  My sausage was made by
Jarrod's company, Halcyon.

>>> A surface marker buoy is a non-gas-permeable bag designed to
>>> float at the surface, serving as a communication device for a
>>>decompressing dive team and its surface contingent. Not intended
>>>for lifting, these markers are usually small and compact, but
>>>highly visible on the surface.

Interestingly, my sausage is marketed, and rightfully so, as both surface
marker and lift bag.  I forget its lift capacity, but it's easily robust
enough to be an effective backup to my wing.  What Jarrod says is certainly
true of the more common variety of sausage.

Lee
Jerome Meekings - 21 Nov 2004 04:16 GMT
> Interestingly, my sausage is marketed, and rightfully so, as both surface
> marker and lift bag.  I forget its lift capacity, but it's easily robust
> enough to be an effective backup to my wing.  What Jarrod says is certainly
> true of the more common variety of sausage.

My guess is that lift bags can dump gas from the top so controlling the
boyancy. So my Buddy SMBCi though being very robust is not a lift bag.

>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
Lee Bell - 21 Nov 2004 13:10 GMT
>> Interestingly, my sausage is marketed, and rightfully so, as both surface
>> marker and lift bag.  I forget its lift capacity, but it's easily robust
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> My guess is that lift bags can dump gas from the top so controlling the
> boyancy. So my Buddy SMBCi though being very robust is not a lift bag.

Interesting guess.  I would not have guessed at such a fine distinction, but
I've been surprised before.  Historically, I've gone by how the device was
marketed, whether or not there was some form of pressure release (my
traditional sausage does not have a release, my Halcyon one does) and
whether I thought the design was sturdy enough to take the load.  You've
given me something to think about.

Lee
Pete Young - 22 Nov 2004 10:50 GMT
> Yes.  While I think they will probably accept it.  Their point, which is
> reasonably well made, is that they consider the lift bag primarily as a
> device for letting the boat know where you are.  The round lift bag, in
> their opinion, does that better than the sausage because the sausage will
> fall over unless the line is held tightly.  There is, of course, some merit
> to their thinking,

Actually, no. There's no merit in their thinking. Lifting bags are for
lifting objects, not marking the position of divers. Boat crews around
these parts are likely to go and recover a lift bag by hauling it
out of the water with a boathook. This is not something you want
to happen if you are a diver decompressing under the bag.

Pete

Signature

 ____________________________________________________________________
 Pete Young            pete@antipope.dot.org     Remove .dot to reply      
     "Just another crouton, floating on the bouillabaisse of life"

Huw Porter - 19 Nov 2004 10:05 GMT
> > Sold basically at cost, if I do a run of 8-10, including postage from
> > Aus to the UK/Japan, the cost will be in the region of GBP 75-80.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yes for me and if you can wait a few days I will talk to the people I
> know here and see if there is any interest in that area.

Cool - let me know.  huw (at) huwporter (dot) com - I'm away for the
next week or so though.

> My only comment would be for a couple of slots/ holes at the bottom for
> a DSMB, However I can drill holes them myself if nobody else is
> interested in that mod.

Ali is a lot easier to work than SS, that's for sure.  :-)

Cheers,
Huw
Signature

http://www.huwporter.com

--

Lee Bell - 19 Nov 2004 07:27 GMT
One day I'll learn to look at how your name is spelled before I write it.
Sorry.

Lee
Tony Howard - 19 Nov 2004 09:11 GMT
Huw,

Save your time & effort as I've already designed and make just this product in the UK and can supply these ex-stock, including UK postage for £50.  In addition our product is HARD anodised to reduce corrosion.   The weight of the BP is just under 700g.

It is complete with slots for standard cam-bands (located to accept the halcyon Pioneer wing and similar wings), there are holes drilled to accept the Halcyon storage pouch, two pairs of bolt-holes (standard 11" spacing) for flexibility of bolting through twinning bands and has chamfered contour at the bottom corners of the plate to eliminate digging in on buttocks.  

I have a PDF of the product.  I can also supply a simple single tank adaptor which allows the wing and backplate to be bolted together as a complete unit, with the tank secured by two standard cam-bands.  The kit of a Ally BP and Ally STA is £75 inc first class postage in UK.

Best regards,

Tony Howard

> OK, I've found a supplier and got a quote, this post is to gauge level
> of interest:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Cheers,
> Huw
Tony Howard - 19 Nov 2004 09:13 GMT
PS the peripheral holes can also be used for attachment of other items as some of you have already shown an interest fro (been there, done that!)

 Huw,

 Save your time & effort as I've already designed and make just this product in the UK and can supply these ex-stock, including UK postage for £50.  In addition our product is HARD anodised to reduce corrosion.   The weight of the BP is just under 700g.

 It is complete with slots for standard cam-bands (located to accept the halcyon Pioneer wing and similar wings), there are holes drilled to accept the Halcyon storage pouch, two pairs of bolt-holes (standard 11" spacing) for flexibility of bolting through twinning bands and has chamfered contour at the bottom corners of the plate to eliminate digging in on buttocks.  

 I have a PDF of the product.  I can also supply a simple single tank adaptor which allows the wing and backplate to be bolted together as a complete unit, with the tank secured by two standard cam-bands.  The kit of a Ally BP and Ally STA is £75 inc first class postage in UK.

 Best regards,

 Tony Howard

 "Huw Porter" <huwporter@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:8f80c64f.0411181922.703ad06c@posting.google.com...
 > OK, I've found a supplier and got a quote, this post is to gauge level
 > of interest:
 >
 > Single tank travel back plate in 3mm 5052 marine grade aluminium.  
 > Cut, folded and finished (no extra work with a file required :-))
 > Weight about 0.65 kg.
 >
 > Shape basically the same as
 > http://www.huwporter.com/scuba/hplate.html
 > modified slightly based on experience, a few superfluous slots
 > removed.
 >
 > Sold basically at cost, if I do a run of 8-10, including postage from
 > Aus to the UK/Japan, the cost will be in the region of GBP 75-80.
 >
 > Any takers?
 >
 > Cheers,
 > Huw
 > --
 > http://www.huwporter.com
Huw Porter - 19 Nov 2004 09:42 GMT
> Save your time & effort as I've already designed and make just this product in the UK and can supply these ex-stock, including UK postage for £50.  In addition our product is HARD anodised to reduce corrosion.   The weight of the BP is just under 700g.
>
> It is complete with slots for standard cam-bands (located to accept the halcyon Pioneer wing and similar wings), there are holes drilled to accept the Halcyon storage pouch, two pairs of bolt-holes (standard 11" spacing) for flexibility of bolting through twinning bands and has chamfered contour at the bottom corners of the plate to eliminate digging in on buttocks.  
>
> I have a PDF of the product.  I can also supply a simple single tank adaptor which allows the wing and backplate to be bolted together as a complete unit, with the tank secured by two standard cam-bands.  The kit of a Ally BP and Ally STA is £75 inc first class postage in UK.

Pictures?  Sounds like a standard Halcyon copy backplate rather than my
no-compromise single tank design.  <Shrug> I'm not in competition with
anyone - I'm going to make at least one for myself, batch size dependent
on anyone else wanting one.

Cheers,
Huw
Signature

http://www.huwporter.com

--

Tony Howard - 21 Nov 2004 17:32 GMT
> Pictures?  Sounds like a standard Halcyon copy backplate rather than my
> no-compromise single tank design.  <Shrug> I'm not in competition with
> anyone - I'm going to make at least one for myself, batch size dependent
> on anyone else wanting one.

I'm a bit confused as to why you call yours a 'no compromise single tank
design' as it looks a lot like a standard backplate which you've made less
useful.

The only difference I can see is the shape of the central channel which
makes the provision of the drilled holes for twinning irrelevant as any bolt
or nut would obviously dig into the divers back.

Also it's made of steel and therefore weighs only 0.5Kg (about 1Lb) less
than that of a normal steel BP, rather than an aluminium plate which weighs
700g, almost 1/4 of the weight of a steel backplate and nearly a third of
you 'travel' steel item.   Both have slots for standard cam-bands, so there
seems no advantage to your plate and a two distinct disadvantages.

Although yours looks OK, its nothing unusual or unique, except that you
cannot twin-up easily

Obviously any weight saving is beneficial, especially for those European
short haul carriers which only give a 20Kg allowances, which makes the
saving of 1.8KG (4Lb) of an aluminium plate even more preferential.

I never said my plate was unique, in fact most backplates have many common
design features with all other back-plates as there is a limit to what can
be changed whist still fulfilling the basic requirements.   All I stated was
that my plates were high quality, well designed and good value for money.
Huw Porter - 28 Nov 2004 20:33 GMT
<snip>

Woo honey.  Put DOWN the handbag, step AWAY FROM the handbag...  ;-)

Cheers,
Huw
Signature

http://www.huwporter.com

Vicente Goyanes - 31 Mar 2005 13:11 GMT
Hi

I'm interested. Can you send me the PDF to vgoya@uvigo.es ?

Thanks

Best Regards
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.