> >I'm not sure why anyone would use nicads these days when Ni-Mh are so much better?
> >I've thrown my Nicads out long time ago.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> David
> NiCad and NiMH need pretty much identical charging regimes so you can
> use the same charger. Lead Acid has totally different requirements
Typically yes, but not quite. Please see for instance:
http://www.greenbatteries.com/documents/Battery_Charger_FAQ.htm
> NiCad are still popular in power tools. They are more robust tham
> NiMH and can take a lot more abusive use. Also NiCads last around
> 1000 full cycles but NiMH last around 500. Pays your money etc..
AFAIK, the main real difference is the discharge current capacity.
NiCd can take larger discharge currents, hence are more applicable to
powertools where you need as much ompf as possible.
BTW, I just upgraded my Omersub Technolight from what must have been
NiCd cells (counting backwards from burn times), to NiMH cells (4/3A
sized 4000mAh Sanyo's), and the burn times increased very nicely. There
is a noticable "overdrain" though. I was runing the test with a 35W
bulb, and after the lighgt went off I let it be for a while, and then
tested again. It came back up real bright and all. With the NiCd once
it discharged, it was pretty drained. This suggests that the NiCd had a
flatter discharge curve than the current pack.
I am yet to see what happens to the battery pack with a 50W bulb
(4.2A dischage current, i.e. 1.05C of the cells, as this is already
beyond the recommended optimal range.
/Marcin
rads - 25 Aug 2004 09:57 GMT
>> NiCad and NiMH need pretty much identical charging regimes so you can
>> use the same charger. Lead Acid has totally different requirements
>
> Typically yes, but not quite. Please see for instance:
>
> http://www.greenbatteries.com/documents/Battery_Charger_FAQ.htm
Marcin
Excellent link, all my questions answered.
Thanks.
David