Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / UK Scuba / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

American Airlines Baggae Allowance

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rob ROOK - 25 Apr 2004 11:10 GMT
Just like to say flew American Airlines to the Caribbean and got 2 x 32 KG
baggae allowance, makes our European  flights seem a bit mean doesn't it.

Also my fiancee flew over from Alabama and she flew US Air and gor 2 x 30KG
baggage allowance.

Incidently American Airlines boast of having the biggest seat room of any
air line, they have rehashed the 777 to be 3 -5 - 3  and not 4 -4 -4 as most
airlines so gaining a seat width. - great for those who spend lots of time
at the CO2 refilling station :-)

Cheers all

Rob

ps oh some stuff has been sold and site updated
Nigel Hewitt - 25 Apr 2004 12:38 GMT
> Just like to say flew American Airlines to the Caribbean and got 2 x 32 KG
> baggae allowance, makes our European  flights seem a bit mean doesn't it.

BA to Finland quoted me 800 quid for 50Kgs excess baggage.
It's half my weight so why do they want over 4 times my ticket price?

Darn it. It would be cheaper to find two people who wanted to go to
Finland for a week with just cabin baggage and pay for their tickets
so they can check my excess as theirs.

i don't want an increased alowance, well it would be nice, I just want
a fair price for the excess.

Sorry.
Touched a nerve.

nigelH
Digs - 25 Apr 2004 13:19 GMT
> > Just like to say flew American Airlines to the Caribbean and got 2 x 32 KG
> > baggae allowance, makes our European  flights seem a bit mean doesn't it.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> nigelH

Duo from Birmingham have worked out fairly well on the baggage front.

6kg hand and 20kg hold for free
?10 each way for an additional 15kg of sports equipment
?4 per kg for each additional kg each way.

so 40kg of extra baggage is costing us ?220 each.  Flights are ?160 each.

Nigel...BA are ripping you off big time.

Digs
Nigel Hewitt - 25 Apr 2004 14:11 GMT
>> Rob ROOK wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Nigel...BA are ripping you off big time.

Yes. I know that.?35 for each 10Kgs to the Canaries in March. Britania.
It may freight. I have the advantage that Combro have a shipping agent.

nigelH
Alasdair Allan - 25 Apr 2004 14:40 GMT
> Darn it. It would be cheaper to find two people who wanted to go to
> Finland for a week with just cabin baggage and pay for their tickets
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Sorry. Touched a nerve.

What annoys the heck out of me is that I (personally!) don't weigh squat.

Why should I have to have the same baggage allowance as someone twice my
weight? Why does taking something out yor carry-on and putting it in your
pockets suddenly make it "not count"?

If they're actually worried about the weight of the bags, charge by
weight, all of it (including the person getting on the flight). If it's
just a way to get more money out of us then I wish they'd just raise the
ticket prices and stop whining about it all... :(

Sorry, you touched a nerve. I fly too much, the entire baggage thing
annoys me...

Al.
Keith Manning - 25 Apr 2004 15:38 GMT
> If they're actually worried about the weight of the bags, charge by
> weight, all of it (including the person getting on the flight).

Hear, hear. I would like to see a price for a person on a flight + x/kg for
hold luggage + 5x/kg for carry on. x would have to be a value that makes 5kg
carry on and 20 kg checked come to the same ticket price. It would kick all
of the people who are too important to stand by the baggage carousel into
touch with their "hand baggage" suitcases & make security faster and more
effective. It would also stop people taking 2 kg of toiletries away for an
overnight trip....

Anyway, taking of rip offs and security, a couple of weeks ago, I had a
disposable razor (that I had forgotten) removed from my hand luggage and
confiscated. Fair enough I thought, so I go through and have a look around
the shops. Boots airside in T2 are selling the exact same thing. Seems to
undermine the whole operation to me.

Sorry, you lanced a nerve!

Keith
Alasdair Allan - 25 Apr 2004 15:56 GMT
> Anyway, taking of rip offs and security, a couple of weeks ago, I had a
> disposable razor (that I had forgotten) removed from my hand luggage and
> confiscated. Fair enough I thought, so I go through and have a look around
> the shops. Boots airside in T2 are selling the exact same thing. Seems to
> undermine the whole operation to me.

Hmm, right hand, left hand... *sigh*

Al.
Vic - 25 Apr 2004 16:04 GMT
> Anyway, taking of rip offs and security, a couple of weeks ago, I had a
> disposable razor (that I had forgotten) removed from my hand luggage and
> confiscated. Fair enough I thought, so I go through and have a look around
> the shops. Boots airside in T2 are selling the exact same thing. Seems to
> undermine the whole operation to me.

They take nail scissors off you because they constitute a weapon, but
then sell you litre (glass) bottles of spirits.

I know which "weapon" I'd rather have in a rumble...

Vic.
Keith Manning - 25 Apr 2004 17:22 GMT
"Vic" <vic@innocent.com> wrote in message

> They take nail scissors off you because they constitute a weapon, but
> then sell you litre (glass) bottles of spirits.
>
> I know which "weapon" I'd rather have in a rumble...

But you could cut the pilots fingernails painfully short ;-p

I think that the problem is that security won't get in the way of retail.

Keith
Ben Panter - 27 Apr 2004 12:18 GMT
>>Darn it. It would be cheaper to find two people who wanted to go to
>>Finland for a week with just cabin baggage and pay for their tickets
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> weight? Why does taking something out yor carry-on and putting it in your
> pockets suddenly make it "not count"?

Well, to be fair, there are quite a few of us who are large not through
choice but by nature - and if you're going to charge by mass, fine, but
make sure you give me a seat that I can actually get my frame into and
be as comfortable as anyone else.

Trust me, on an 8 hour flight people who are over the "Mr Average" size
pay plenty in terms of comfort - have you ever sat in a seat where your
knee - seat length is higher than the space? Have you ever leant back in
your chair and realised that you are looking at the person behind you?

Ben

Signature

Ben Panter, Edinburgh
My name (no spaces)@bigfoot which is a com.

CAS - 27 Apr 2004 12:36 GMT
<snip>

> Trust me, on an 8 hour flight people who are over the "Mr Average" size
> pay plenty in terms of comfort - have you ever sat in a seat where your
> knee - seat length is higher than the space? Have you ever leant back in
> your chair and realised that you are looking at the person behind you?
>
> Ben

<smug>
Hehehe - its in threads like this that I realise that there are some
considerable advantages to being a shortarse.  I can't think of the last
time I was particularly uncomfortable on a plane...even in cattle class!

CAS
</smug>
--
Temperature @ Stoney?  Find it or share it @
http://stoneytemps.calumscott.me.uk/
"The measure of a man's wealth is the fewness of his wants" - Jack
Mullholand
david - 27 Apr 2004 15:02 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> </smug>
> --
CAS is so small you could put him in your carry on luggage ;-

> Temperature @ Stoney?  Find it or share it @
> http://stoneytemps.calumscott.me.uk/
> "The measure of a man's wealth is the fewness of his wants" - Jack
> Mullholand
CAS - 27 Apr 2004 15:07 GMT
> CAS is so small you could put him in your carry on luggage ;-)

Not quite, but I would fit quite happily in a squashy-bag, add weezle to
prevent freezing...

...anyone heading to the Red Sea with spare luggage capacity?

CAS
--
Temperature @ Stoney?  Find it or share it @
http://stoneytemps.calumscott.me.uk/
"The measure of a man's wealth is the fewness of his wants" - Jack
Mullholand
Digs - 27 Apr 2004 18:04 GMT
> > CAS is so small you could put him in your carry on luggage ;-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> "The measure of a man's wealth is the fewness of his wants" - Jack
> Mullholand

and so we get around full circle.  Cas we just explained, buying a seat is
cheaper than shipping the weight in excess, and no one on here going to the
Red Sea is going to have "spare" luggage capacity!

Digs
CAS - 27 Apr 2004 20:11 GMT
> and so we get around full circle.  Cas we just explained, buying a seat is
> cheaper than shipping the weight in excess, and no one on here going to the
> Red Sea is going to have "spare" luggage capacity!
>
> Digs

Oh aye!  So we have...

...I'm about to see what I can get out of Globespan (Scottish charter
operator) for when I go to Spain in October.  Their website lists all kinds
of stuff that they can carry for fixed sums (golf clubs ?10, bike ?15 etc)
but no sign of SCUBA gear.

I will report my findings in due course!

CAS

PS.  Take your point about the Red Sea "spare luggage" capacity - that
really *was* wishful thinking!
Jason - 25 Apr 2004 16:50 GMT
> BA to Finland quoted me 800 quid for 50Kgs excess baggage.
> It's half my weight so why do they want over 4 times my ticket price?

Surely if you've got enough money to waste on a rebreather, a few quid
excess luggage charges is a mere bagatelle?

Next time one of you is bragging about how much you've saved on helium
costs this year, I'll remind you of this conversation.

Jason

Signature

See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for UK diving reports including
trips to Plymouth, Weymouth, Falmouth, Exmouth and Scapa Flow

Nigel Hewitt - 25 Apr 2004 18:25 GMT
>> BA to Finland quoted me 800 quid for 50Kgs excess baggage.
>> It's half my weight so why do they want over 4 times my ticket price?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Next time one of you is bragging about how much you've saved on helium
> costs this year, I'll remind you of this conversation.

Hey this is me! I never pretend diving is cheap.
I just choose to do it and pay the rate.

nigelH
Pete S. - 25 Apr 2004 22:18 GMT
>>> BA to Finland quoted me 800 quid for 50Kgs excess baggage.
>>> It's half my weight so why do they want over 4 times my ticket price?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Hey this is me! I never pretend diving is cheap.
>I just choose to do it and pay the rate.

It's just that our rate is cheaper than Jasons rate.....

And I fly Emirates because if you join the frequent flyers club they
carry sports equipment FREE.

In general though I agree with all the sentiments expressed about
airlines and baggage and.... and....  When we went to G Cayman, we had
enough luggage allowance for 1 Inspiration, 1x20kg tub of lime, and
enough left for all the "other" things people take on holiday.

Pete S.
Jason - 25 Apr 2004 23:30 GMT
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:18:47 +0000,  wrote:

>>Hey this is me! I never pretend diving is cheap.
>>I just choose to do it and pay the rate.
>>
> It's just that our rate is cheaper than Jasons rate.....

If you're only diving nitrox, it isn't. It's about the same.

> In general though I agree with all the sentiments expressed about
> airlines and baggage and.... and....  When we went to G Cayman, we had
> enough luggage allowance for 1 Inspiration, 1x20kg tub of lime, and
> enough left for all the "other" things people take on holiday.

Britannia got very arsey on my last trip to the Maldives. My hand luggage
was a whole 7kgs. It only really had my camera, housing, flash and a spare
set of clothes in it. Next time I'm going to put everything in my pockets,
get my bag weighed, and then put it all back in there. What a farce.

Jason

Signature

http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for Aussie diving reports including
Stradbroke Island, Terrigal, Jervis Bay and Portsea

Dave Appleby - 26 Apr 2004 10:20 GMT
> Britannia got very arsey on my last trip to the Maldives. My hand luggage
> was a whole 7kgs. It only really had my camera, housing, flash and a spare
> set of clothes in it. Next time I'm going to put everything in my pockets,
> get my bag weighed, and then put it all back in there. What a farce.
>
> Jason

That's the opposite of what I had last year on a Malta trip.

22Kg Hold
5Kg Hand

5Kg Extra free for Diving kit.

I came in at 32 Kg for Hold Baggage and they didn't bat an eyelid
at check in.

Might be because it was short haul though.

JMC on the other hand *shudder*

DaveA :-)
Dave Appleby - 26 Apr 2004 16:05 GMT
On another note I've just booked with
Air Malta for October.

Allowances:

22Kg Standard Hold

5Kg Cabin

15Kg FREE allowance for dive gear on production
of diving cert card!

That's the way to do it!

And they were cheaper from Manchester than BA from
Gatwick with sensible flight times as well!

BA Dep LGW 16:45 arr MLA 21:15
  Dep MLA 21:15 arr LGW 23:30 (10 mins AFTER the last train!)

and the Manchester to London travel on top

Cost £215.00 + train fares (£70 (ish) )

Air Malta Dep MAN 12:40 arr MLA 17:00
         Dep MLA 17:00 arr MAN 19:15

Cost £207.00

I like BA but not *that* much

DaveA
Jason - 26 Apr 2004 18:23 GMT
> That's the opposite of what I had last year on a Malta trip.
>
> 22Kg Hold
> 5Kg Hand

Not really. You've still only got 5kgs of hand luggage. Decent airlines
are now giving 7kgs. As the bag weights about 1-2kgs empty, you can't get an
awful lot in 5kgs. And I'm not putting my camera in the hold.

> I came in at 32 Kg for Hold Baggage and they didn't bat an eyelid
> at check in.

I had 31.4kgs hold. They told me not to put anything else in it or it
would hit the new 32kgs limit.

> JMC on the other hand *shudder*

No, MyTravel have got to be the worst. At everything.

Jason

Signature

See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ to view UK dive spaces or add your own.

Keith Manning - 26 Apr 2004 21:16 GMT
"Jason" <jason.usenet.nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message

> And I'm not putting my camera in the hold.

For damage or theft reasons?

It shouldn't get damaged in a decent aluminium case properly packed in firm
foam. The problem with a lot of the new cases is that the foam in them is
like blancmange and it just doesn't do it.

I've never had a single breakage or theft in all of my years of checking in
pro camera gear.

Keith
Pete S. - 26 Apr 2004 21:25 GMT
>"Jason" <jason.usenet.nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>I've never had a single breakage or theft in all of my years of checking in
>pro camera gear.

I check in all my camera gear. And the breather. It give me a warm
glow (fear mainly) to watch ?10k of kit disapearing up a conveyor at
Heathrow......

So far, so good.

But there just isn't any other way to do it. So you may as well just
make sure it's well insured, check it all in, and walk away from it. I
mean, it's not like I'm flying KLM or something.

Pete S.
Robert ROOK - 27 Apr 2004 16:12 GMT
>>"Jason" <jason.usenet.nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>Pete S.

Damned right not KLM - hadf them steal a DV cam from baggage,  and in
Schipol (sp) airport watched them throw a long bag - say 5 to 6 frrt
long and about 18" diameter out from the hold into the trolley sadly
it landed on the back rail and then just snapped in two, you saw the
guys laughing their heads off. KLM is the reason I won't got to
Bonaire, all this on Aruba trip.

Rob
Keith S. - 27 Apr 2004 16:26 GMT
> Damned right not KLM - hadf them steal a DV cam from baggage,  and in
> Schipol (sp) airport watched them throw a long bag - say 5 to 6 frrt
> long and about 18" diameter out from the hold into the trolley sadly
> it landed on the back rail and then just snapped in two, you saw the
> guys laughing their heads off. KLM is the reason I won't got to
> Bonaire, all this on Aruba trip.

KLM is not as bad as its Caribbean sister, ALM, which stands for 'All
Luggage Mislaid'.

- Keith
Jason - 27 Apr 2004 18:17 GMT

> Damned right not KLM - hadf them steal a DV cam from baggage,  and in
> Schipol (sp) airport watched them throw a long bag - say 5 to 6 frrt
> long and about 18" diameter out from the hold into the trolley sadly
> it landed on the back rail and then just snapped in two, you saw the
> guys laughing their heads off. KLM is the reason I won't got to
> Bonaire, all this on Aruba trip.

But the baggage handlers aren't KLM, are they? So you're going to get the
same people no matter who you fly with.

Jason

Signature

See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ to view UK dive spaces or add your own.

Jason - 27 Apr 2004 18:15 GMT
> For damage or theft reasons?

Both really.

> It shouldn't get damaged in a decent aluminium case properly packed in firm
> foam. The problem with a lot of the new cases is that the foam in them is
> like blancmange and it just doesn't do it.

But isn't an aluminium case going to be very expensive and use up half of
my hold allowance in weight anyway?

Jason

Signature

See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ to view UK dive spaces or add your own.

Keith Manning - 27 Apr 2004 22:25 GMT
"Jason" <jason.usenet.nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message

> But isn't an aluminium case going to be very expensive and use up half of
> my hold allowance in weight anyway?
>
> Jason

It's not going to be expensive compared to the contents, and the ally ones
aren't that heavy really. It those Pelican cases that generally weigh more
than their contents.

Keith
Dave Noble - 26 Apr 2004 04:03 GMT
>Just like to say flew American Airlines to the Caribbean and got 2 x 32 KG
>baggae allowance, makes our European  flights seem a bit mean doesn't it.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>air line, they have rehashed the 777 to be 3 -5 - 3  and not 4 -4 -4 as most
>airlines so gaining a seat width. -

The standard layout for a 777 is 9 across. Common configs are 3-3-3 or
2-5-2. AA uses the 2-5-2 version. There are a few airlines that use a
10 across 3-4-3 layout. None could fit 12 across

2x32 is the standard alowance on all flights between Europe and
US/Canada regardless of airline

Dave
Duncan - 26 Apr 2004 12:59 GMT
flew to Truck Lagoon   on Continental  ( the long way :( )

 2 x 32kg     AND    18kg  hand luggage

 Must be the Yanks  fly heavy  it was  almost embarasing  checking in
with only 1 bag  just over 20kg (had to rush round adding stuff to
get it up a bit)  and  3kg hand luggage

 if i had  gone the  shorter route round the globe it would have been
a lot more money and only  20Kg limit

 Still the  26 hrs flying  from Japan to Huston and thru to London
with only 2 films repeated every 2 hrs   was  Fun  :)

ATB

 Dunc
rich - 26 Apr 2004 13:38 GMT
> flew to Truck Lagoon   on Continental  ( the long way :( )
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> get it up a bit)  and  3kg hand luggage
>  
Nice one.. When I arrived at Truk (a few years ago), I was shocked to
see a large american pull out a weight belt in the airport.. and this
weight belt looked like it weighed as much as Al, and then some..
Bari Pollard - 26 Apr 2004 22:24 GMT
> Just like to say flew American Airlines to the Caribbean and got 2 x 32 KG
> baggae allowance, makes our European  flights seem a bit mean doesn't it.
>
> Also my fiancee flew over from Alabama and she flew US Air and gor 2 x 30KG
> baggage allowance.

I read somewhere that you are allowed to carry your camera on and it is not
included in the weight. So just make sure it is in it's housing as well as
that will save a few Kg's.

Apparently News Cameramen used to take their professional cameras on by hand
so they weren't weighed!

What drives me mad is all the weighing at check in then everyone coming into
the plane with twenty duty free bags. Which is then okay!!!!

Baz.
Keith Manning - 26 Apr 2004 23:39 GMT
"Bari Pollard" <news@barijohnDOTplus.com> wrote in message

> Apparently News Cameramen used to take their professional cameras on by hand
> so they weren't weighed!

No, that's cos they're newsos and they are sure that they will miss out on
the big one if they don't. Most of them take it to the toilet too.

> What drives me mad is all the weighing at check in then everyone coming into
> the plane with twenty duty free bags. Which is then okay!!!!

Agreed. Duty Free should be bought at the destination airport. The cost in
unnecessary fuel that is passed on to the passengers eventually and the cost
in unnecessary pollution that is passed on to our grandchildren is too high.

Keith
Vic - 27 Apr 2004 00:23 GMT
> Agreed. Duty Free should be bought at the destination airport. The cost in
> unnecessary fuel that is passed on to the passengers eventually and the cost
> in unnecessary pollution that is passed on to our grandchildren is too high.

..But if they did that, we'd have to pay airline prices for beer on the
plane...

Vic.
Dave Noble - 27 Apr 2004 08:38 GMT
>Agreed. Duty Free should be bought at the destination airport.

If they did that then fares would definately rise since the airports
make a significant amount of revenue from the duty free sales. iirc,
ports like LGW and LHR make more money from the shopping concessions
than they do from aircraft movements.

At some places duty free can be purchased on arrival. Australia
airports have duty free shops positioned immediately before
immigration

Dave
Keith Manning - 27 Apr 2004 09:07 GMT
"Dave Noble" <dave.noble@cableway.co.uk> wrote in message

> If they did that then fares would definately rise since the airports
> make a significant amount of revenue from the duty free sales. iirc,
> ports like LGW and LHR make more money from the shopping concessions
> than they do from aircraft movements.

Yes, but they would get the revenue from their incoming trade to replace it.

> At some places duty free can be purchased on arrival. Australia
> airports have duty free shops positioned immediately before
> immigration

So has Terminal 1.

Keith
Nick Eden - 27 Apr 2004 10:19 GMT
>>Agreed. Duty Free should be bought at the destination airport.
>
>If they did that then fares would definately rise since the airports
>make a significant amount of revenue from the duty free sales. iirc,
>ports like LGW and LHR make more money from the shopping concessions
>than they do from aircraft movements.

How would that make a net difference? Almost everyone is on a return
ticket.

-------------------------------------
York BSAC Web Page:
http://website.lineone.net/~york_bsac
Dave Noble - 27 Apr 2004 13:33 GMT
>>>Agreed. Duty Free should be bought at the destination airport.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>How would that make a net difference? Almost everyone is on a return
>ticket.

Not true at all. LHR is a major connecting point. e.g. people flying
from ORD-LHR-CDG and then returning CDG-LHR-ORD. At neither point
through LHR would they be able to buy duty free since they are
departing passengers in both directions

Also, Based on the subset of passengers returning from a trip... When
departing, many people travelling on holidays et al arrive at the
airport shopping centre with a couple of hours to kill. To pass the
time many people ( particularly those not making a beeline for the
airline lounges ) will visit the duty free and make purchases. When
returning, (a) the airport wants to get the passengers out and away as
quickly as possible and (b) people don't have the same amount of time
to kill as when departing. If people were limited to purchases on
arrival, the number of purchases would decrease since only those with
specific purchases to make would be likely to visit the shops.

Dave
rich - 27 Apr 2004 14:17 GMT
> Apparently News Cameramen used to take their professional cameras on by hand
> so they weren't weighed!
>
> What drives me mad is all the weighing at check in then everyone coming into
> the plane with twenty duty free bags. Which is then okay!!!!

note to self... pack all camera and scuba gear in duty free bags ;)
John Smith - 27 Apr 2004 18:51 GMT
> Apparently News Cameramen used to take their professional cameras on by hand
> so they weren't weighed!

Used to?  They still do!  (saw it about two weeks ago on a flight to
Brussels)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.