Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / UK Scuba / July 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wave Chieftain Exmouth

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Buster Lung - 29 Jul 2003 19:51 GMT
I started to read the earlier posts entitled 'spam' and then got bored.

I find it weird why people should get so annoyed when a boat skipper informs
you of his services.  If he didn't tell you he was down there taking divers
to wrecks in Lyme Bay, how would you get to hear about it.

I think he's doing us all a favour by keeping us informed and I've got
nothing against any skipper letting me know where and what he's at.
Sheeeeeeeeeet! I'm a diver and if somebody wants to tell me about some
diving I might be interested in then that's alright with me.

Me & Clive are gonna continue with the booking and go and do some cracking
diving.  Hopefully certain people on this newsgroup haven't offended him
enough for him to turn around and ban any future UKRS divers from his boat.
I've seen it happen on other boats to other groups, be warned.

I hate junk mail as much as the next man, but this guy is doing us a favour.

Furthermore.  Is it my imagination or, when somebody posts about a diving
topic they get half a dozen answers to their question, but when somebody
mentions something about computers, the posts coming flooding in, in their
thousands.  I think it's time we renamed this newsgroup uk.rec.computer geek
forum.

That's all

Thanks for listening

Ade G

--
ade.gorst@virgin.net
www.busterlung.co.uk
Alasdair Allan - 29 Jul 2003 20:20 GMT
> I find it weird why people should get so annoyed when a boat skipper
> informs you of his services.

Because its spam, and spam is bad. The government has just passed a law
against it and from September what he just did is actually going to be
illegal.

There are perfectly acceptable ways of informating us of his services,
ways that aren't going to get people upset, he didn't use them. This
gets me upset.

> If he didn't tell you he was down there taking divers to wrecks in Lyme
> Bay, how would you get to hear about it.

Word of mouth usually does it just fine, just about everyone knows who the
decent skippers are...

> I think he's doing us all a favour by keeping us informed and I've got
> nothing against any skipper letting me know where and what he's at.

Thats called opt-in, you ask to recieve news from him that might interest
you. What he did was send opt-out, he just assumed everyone and his dog
would be interested. This is bad, and soon to be illegal.

> Me & Clive are gonna continue with the booking and go and do some cracking
> diving.

Thats your option, but trips from his boat will no longer be listed as
'official' UKRS dives and advertised as such on the website.

> I hate junk mail as much as the next man, but this guy is doing us a favour.

He might be doing you a favour, he isn't doing me one. It takes me a good
hour to work my way through my inbox in the morning, and thats with 99% of
the spam getting caught and automagically junked by my filters before I
see it.

Al.
Zak - 29 Jul 2003 20:51 GMT
"Alasdair Allan" <aa@ukrecscuba.org.uk> wrote in message
news:bg6hed$koq7v$1@ID-188041.news.uni-
> > Me & Clive are gonna continue with the booking and go and do some cracking
> > diving.
>
> Thats your option, but trips from his boat will no longer be listed as
> 'official' UKRS dives and advertised as such on the website.

Hmmmm, actually I got the SPAM too... and whilst it peed me off, I also
recognise that not everyone is internet savvy.

In this case, given the guys background/work environment, Id have thought
maybe a quiet word in his shell would be better than a tantrum and talk of
banning from boats/newsgroups.

Anyway, you lot are the experts of diving and the internet, I'll leave you
to a no doubt extremely protracted debate ;)

/Z
chris - 29 Jul 2003 21:40 GMT
> Word of mouth usually does it just fine, just about everyone knows who the
> decent skippers are...

oh yea, word of mouth works really well between divers....and it doesnt have
to be skippers they are talking about !

> > Me & Clive are gonna continue with the booking and go and do some cracking
> > diving.
>
> Thats your option, but trips from his boat will no longer be listed as
> 'official' UKRS dives and advertised as such on the website.

looking at the number of boats etc in your links page wouldnt it be funny if
the tables are turned and they all got the arse ache with you lot and
demanded to be removed??
would i be wrong in saying that permission was asked from skippers to have
links to their sites on ukrs?

when advertsing trips or writing reports is permission asked for using
photos of their boats...putting their link and contact info in your web
page?

i dont think the divers are asked for permission to show thier e-mail
addresses on the trip web pages..thus opening more oportunity for the diver
or skipper to be hit with something they dont want....but do they bitch
about it publicaly??.....

> > I hate junk mail as much as the next man, but this guy is doing us a favour.

   i agree.....this is a chitty chatty thingy for divers yes??....the guy
may have done wrong ...but hey, none of you lot are perfect....

so if some one blatantly e-mails whatever he did for financial gain...or you
go, "excuse me Mr. Kind dive boat operator..got any spaces?".....whats the
outcome?

he gets yer money ..either way.
Alasdair Allan - 29 Jul 2003 22:06 GMT
> looking at the number of boats etc in your links page wouldnt it be
> funny if the tables are turned and they all got the arse ache with you
> lot and demanded to be removed??

I believe there have been requests in the past for a site to be removed
from the links page, these requests have been honoured.

> would i be wrong in saying that permission was asked from skippers to have
> links to their sites on ukrs?

The web and email (and usenet) are totally different media and operate by
different rules. It is assumed that you can link to a web page unless
you are asked not to, it is assumed that web pages can be automatically
screen scraped unless there is a robots.txt file present.

Conversely, it is assumed that email is private and it is bad manners
to post it publically otherise specified.

Web pages are publication, email is private.

> when advertsing trips or writing reports is permission asked for using
> photos of their boats...putting their link and contact info in your web
> page?

No, no permission is needed. Their webapge and contact info is public
knowledge, and photographs of their boats were taken in public by people
on the trip (they own the copyright to the images). Different media,
different rules.

> i dont think the divers are asked for permission to show thier e-mail
> addresses on the trip web pages..

I've had people ask me to remove their email address from the trips lists
I run, I've done so. I generally drop the email onto the web page more as
a reminder to myself than anything else. They aren't actively linked so
are less likely to be harvested for spam, that said next year I probably
won't do it and maintain the lists in my local LDAP server instead.

> he gets yer money ..either way.

Well he certainly won't be getting mine.

Al.
Jason - 29 Jul 2003 20:25 GMT
> I find it weird why people should get so annoyed when a boat skipper
> informs you of his services.  If he didn't tell you he was down there
> taking divers to wrecks in Lyme Bay, how would you get to hear about it.

I didn't get it. If I had received a 131K email, I'd have been pissed off
too. What he did will soon be illegal under EU law, so obviously you're in
a minority. Spam is annoying, costs ISPs a fortune and we all end up
paying for it.

If he wanted to publicise his boat, all he needed to do was post a short
message on here with a link to his website. The group allows limited
commercial posting. All he's done now is annoy a lot of his potential
customers.

> Me & Clive are gonna continue with the booking and go and do some
> cracking diving.  Hopefully certain people on this newsgroup haven't
> offended him enough for him to turn around and ban any future UKRS
> divers from his boat. I've seen it happen on other boats to other
> groups, be warned.

I think he owes everyone he spammed an apology. It was probably an honest
mistake. He probably isn't that cluey about the internet. And as for being
banned, I can live with it. It's a new boat. We've lived without it so
far. There are alternatives in Exmouth. And when it comes to dive
operations, past experience has shown that all publicity is not good
publicity.

Jason

Signature

See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for Caribbean trip reports
including Cuba, Grand Bahama, Barbados, St Lucia and Mexico

Keith Lawrence - 29 Jul 2003 23:01 GMT
"Jason" <jason.usenet.nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote...

> If he wanted to publicise his boat, all he needed to do was
> post a short message on here with a link to his website.
>The group allows limited commercial posting. All he's done
> now is annoy a lot of his potential customers.

> I think he owes everyone he spammed an apology. It was
> probably an honest mistake. He probably isn't that cluey
> about the internet.

I would hope that just about sums it up Jason. If it was a genuine one-off
mistake then people would accept that, but what the people on this group
will never accept is SPAM, it gets peoples backs up.

SPAM is never the answer, if he or a friend actually asked on this group how
to go about publicising his new services then people would have been
delighted to help. If he had a web site that listed spaces and posted an
occasional link to it then nobody would complain, in fact we would add it to
our web links so that more divers could find him (our links pages get
thousands of hits every week).

UKRS have always supported the dive industry and dive boat skippers, we need
each other! But SPAMming us is an abuse of that support and will always get
the type of response it got this time, perhaps people will eventually get
the message that UKRS doesn't like SPAM!

I think we need to knock this one on the head now. If the guy acknowledges
that he made a genuine mistake and it doesn't happen again then fine. We
would even welcome the occasional commercial post (within the charter) that
advertised his boat, we would willing link to his web site via our links
listing. But please, don't SPAM UKRS, with the number of IT geeks on here it
could do serious damage to your inbox...

Keith L
Nigel Hewitt - 29 Jul 2003 20:26 GMT
> I think he's doing us all a favour by keeping us informed and I've got
> nothing against any skipper letting me know where and what he's at.

If I signed up for his email then I'd be pleased to get
it but I didn't. As it is I have received four copies
so far on various addresses skimmed from various forums.
These are addresses I have never sent email on.

As far as I can see that puts him in the same category
as people who want to sell me prescription drugs, manhood
enhancers, Russian brides, porn, mortgages and the rest.

If we accept one we accept them all. How many charter
boats are there with spare capacity every week? I don't
know. I don't really want to know. eMail was once useful
but it gets to be more of a waste of space every month.

> Furthermore.  Is it my imagination or, when somebody posts about a diving
> topic they get half a dozen answers to their question, but when somebody
> mentions something about computers, the posts coming flooding in, in their
> thousands.  I think it's time we renamed this newsgroup uk.rec.computer geek
> forum.

I think you're right. Often somebody asks a question and
we read the answer and agree, so we move on. However a lot
of us work in the computer field so if you ask a question
you will get more shades of opinion. <shrug> That's usenet.

nigelH
Gareth Attrill - 29 Jul 2003 23:41 GMT
>> I think he's doing us all a favour by keeping us informed and I've got
>> nothing against any skipper letting me know where and what he's at.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>so far on various addresses skimmed from various forums.
>These are addresses I have never sent email on.

[snip]

That's bad. It's not as if it was a list generated by hand from this
group (which would be bad enough) but it's some kind of large list
probably sent to him or paid for in some way ("hey, here's a list of
diver's email addresses - nod nod wink wink")

If you are significantly pissed off you can now complain to the ASA -
www.asa.org.uk  because spam is now part of their remit, not that they
can take any real action about it.

Gareth
Pete Melbourne - 29 Jul 2003 20:54 GMT
>I find it weird why people should get so annoyed when a boat skipper informs
>you of his services.

Some people have to pay to down load emails, he is therefore taking
money from people to advertise to them - that's stealing in my book

Pete
diving 'at' melbourne 'dot' me 'dot' uk
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.