Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / UK Scuba / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wing BCD Crunch Time

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Graham Skelly - 27 Jan 2004 19:39 GMT
I'm upgrading from my first Scubapro BCD and need to make the right choice
for the next few years. The Northern Diver Sea Eagle (?295) is in the right
price range/features, but I have yet to see one anywhere. The Custom Divers
TBK Sport Wing (?349) also looks okay and is just about in the price range I
can currently afford.

Anyone got comments on the above mentioned BCDs or similar products? It
needs to handle single/twins and have integrated weights. When deflated, it
should not hang like a badly made sack! I  travel a lot, so I would like the
option of an Aluminium back plate, but I can get one made in the workshop
from aircraft grade ally otherwise.

Okay, start shouting :-)

TIA
Graham
Tricky - 27 Jan 2004 19:49 GMT
> I'm upgrading from my first Scubapro BCD and need to make the right choice
> for the next few years. The Northern Diver Sea Eagle (?295) is in the right
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> TIA
> Graham

Buddy Travelwing?
Nigel Hewitt - 27 Jan 2004 19:56 GMT
> I'm upgrading from my first Scubapro BCD and need to make the right
> choice for the next few years. The Northern Diver Sea Eagle (?295) is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Okay, start shouting :-)

Humph.

Keep the Scubapro for diving a single and when you have a twinset
put a proper twins rig together. My old Scubapro Club went to the
Red Sea last year again and it works well for that. It's getting old but
it likes going on holiday.

If you try to get something to do both jobs it will do both badly and we
will all laugh and say "Told you so!" A wing that is wide enough to work
well with a twinset will wrap up a single and give you a wonderful
horizontal trim on the surface just where you don't want it. A wing that is
small enough for a single is tucked in behind a twinset and pushes at
you as you inflate it.

nigelH
david - 27 Jan 2004 20:04 GMT
> If you try to get something to do both jobs it will do both badly and we
> will all laugh and say "Told you so!" A wing that is wide enough to work
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> nigelH

or get two wings and one back plate the harness remains the same and you can
dive what you like.

david
Nigel Hewitt - 27 Jan 2004 20:32 GMT
> Nigel wrote
>> If you try to get something to do both jobs it will do both badly
>>
> or get two wings and one back plate the harness remains the same and
> you can dive what you like.

But he's already got the BCD and modern BCDs are
good kit and last for years. Don't throw his money away.
Let him save it for the twinset. That will cost enough.

I'm unconvinced about Single Tank Adapters on twinset
plates. I don't see the point. The argument that is always
thrown up is that it's nice to always dive the same rig but
I have three and I like a bit of variety. I want to keep my
hand in with skills and I'm not so old and decrepit yet that
if the secondary isn't where it was last week I'm going to
go all wobbly and drown. When the senility really begins
to bite I'll have to go DIR and have people tell me where
to put things.

nigelH
Simon - 28 Jan 2004 02:26 GMT
> I'm unconvinced about Single Tank Adapters on twinset
> plates. I don't see the point.

Trim.

There is a lot more to DIR than where you hang your gear.

Using a SS backplate you move a lot of your weight further up your
body which makes it easer to keep horizontal in the water, which is a
much better swimming position. This does not happen with an AL BP
which is why they are only recommended (well actually thay are not
really recommended at all) for tropical diving where it is assumed you
are not going to be wearing much weight.

Of course, this may not bother you, so if it doesn't... don't worry
about it. It does bother me though, so my girlfriend is inheriting my
Buddy Franken Wing (16kg buddy travelwing-a-like made from parts) and
I have a nice new single tank wing which arrived yesterday.
Nigel Hewitt - 28 Jan 2004 07:15 GMT
>Nigel wrote
>> I'm unconvinced about Single Tank Adapters on twinset
>> plates. I don't see the point.
>
> There is a lot more to DIR than where you hang your gear.

That's what they all say.

> Using a SS backplate you move a lot of your weight further up your
> body

Woo. Stop there. My plate weighs 2.4 kilos. The center of the plate isn't
more than six inches above my waist so it's effect on my trim, compared
with 2.4Kgs on the belt,  is negligable.

>  which makes it easer to keep horizontal in the water, which is a
> much better swimming position.

So on the single I adjust this by where I put the cam band round the tank.
I was taught this in OW.

> This does not happen with an AL BP
> which is why they are only recommended (well actually thay are not
> really recommended at all) for tropical diving where it is assumed you
> are not going to be wearing much weight.

I thought the reason for a plate was as a jumping off point for the 5 point
harness which allows the rig to be attached to you with nothing tight.
Then it also does a weight distribution job to prevent a twinset twisting
and digging into your back when out of the water by putting the force
against the big bones of your pelvis not into the soft muscles of your back.
Certainly that's what Bill Main seemed to think when he introduced it.

> Of course, this may not bother you, so if it doesn't... don't worry
> about it. It does bother me though, so my girlfriend is inheriting my
> Buddy Franken Wing (16kg buddy travelwing-a-like made from parts) and
> I have a nice new single tank wing which arrived yesterday.

Now I am perplexed. Couldn't you fix the old wing on a plate?
Don't tell me. It's a Halcyon?

However you are clearly made of sterner stuff than I am. If I had ever
said to one of the girls in my life "This isn't good enough for me. You
can have it and I'm getting a new one" it would probably have cost
me blood.

nigelH
Simon - 28 Jan 2004 23:23 GMT
<snip>

> Woo. Stop there. My plate weighs 2.4 kilos. The center of the plate isn't
> more than six inches above my waist so it's effect on my trim, compared
> with 2.4Kgs on the belt,  is negligable.

So, having half your weight further up your back than your waist will
not effect your trim?

> So on the single I adjust this by where I put the cam band round the tank.
> I was taught this in OW.

That's another part of the equation, but with the Buddy I had the tank
about as high as I could reasonably get it I was still not as
horizontal as I wanted. And, your solution to this would be...

> I thought the reason for a plate was as a jumping off point for the 5 point
> harness which allows the rig to be attached to you with nothing tight.
> Then it also does a weight distribution job to prevent a twinset twisting
> and digging into your back when out of the water by putting the force
> against the big bones of your pelvis not into the soft muscles of your back.
> Certainly that's what Bill Main seemed to think when he introduced it.

This may be(?), however we were dicussing the difference between AL
and SS backplates, not the reason for having a BP in the first place.

> Now I am perplexed. Couldn't you fix the old wing on a plate?

I could have... and this will more than likely happen in the future.

At the moment we have a SS BP and a backpack. I could have said f@ck
off and buy your own, but since she has been borrowing it for ages,
and likes it, I gave it too her.

> Don't tell me. It's a Halcyon?

Nope. http://www.blackart.com.au.
Pete Young - 28 Jan 2004 09:24 GMT
>much better swimming position. This does not happen with an AL BP
>which is why they are only recommended (well actually thay are not
>really recommended at all)

This is not true. Most if not all of the GUE people recommend that
you use an Al. backplate and Al cylinders if diving with a wetsuit
and 'doubles' in the sea.

Pete

Signature

 ____________________________________________________________________
 Pete Young            pete@antipope.org         Remove dot. to reply  
     "Just another crouton, floating on the bouillabaisse of life"

Simon - 28 Jan 2004 23:34 GMT
> >much better swimming position. This does not happen with an AL BP
> >which is why they are only recommended (well actually thay are not
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> you use an Al. backplate and Al cylinders if diving with a wetsuit
> and 'doubles' in the sea.

Do they? Who?

Even if they do, they would also recommend a drysuit over a wetsuit
for doubles, even in the tropics.

The reason for all these recommendations is to have a balanced rig
i.e. not overweighted and good trim. To quote, more or less, Andrew
Georgitsis from my DIRF course "Having good trim is the root of DIR".
Pete Melbourne - 29 Jan 2004 08:02 GMT
>Do they? Who?

Page 70 of Doing It Right by JJ

Pete
diving 'at' melbourne 'dot' me 'dot' uk
Bardo - 27 Jan 2004 23:53 GMT
> I'm upgrading from my first Scubapro BCD and need to make the right choice
> for the next few years. The Northern Diver Sea Eagle (?295) is in the right
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> option of an Aluminium back plate, but I can get one made in the workshop
> from aircraft grade ally otherwise.

Personally I went for a Halcyon 40lb Eclipse (for single tank diving) and a
55lb Explorer wing (for twinset diving) which share a Halcyon stainless
steel backplate and harness. It's not the cheapest set up on the planet (ie.
you won't get much change from ?750!) but it surely is nice!!! :-)
Nigel Hewitt - 28 Jan 2004 00:11 GMT
> Personally I went for a Halcyon 40lb Eclipse (for single tank diving)
> and a 55lb Explorer wing (for twinset diving) which share a Halcyon
> stainless steel backplate and harness. It's not the cheapest set up
> on the planet (ie. you won't get much change from ?750!) but it
> surely is nice!!! :-)

Two wings, a backplate and a harness? ?750 !

Gulp !

I know I get ribbed for spending a lot on kit but
at least I have a lot of kit to show for it.

nigelH
Bardo - 28 Jan 2004 00:19 GMT
> > Personally I went for a Halcyon 40lb Eclipse (for single tank diving)
> > and a 55lb Explorer wing (for twinset diving) which share a Halcyon
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I know I get ribbed for spending a lot on kit but
> at least I have a lot of kit to show for it.

Yeah, it is a bit 'minimal' (not to mention being tough on the pocket!) but
it's a wonderful little setup to dive on!
Vic - 28 Jan 2004 00:35 GMT
> Personally I went for a Halcyon 40lb Eclipse (for single tank diving) and a
> 55lb Explorer wing (for twinset diving) which share a Halcyon stainless
> steel backplate and harness. It's not the cheapest set up on the planet (ie.
> you won't get much change from £750!) but it surely is nice!!! :-)

I went for a Buddy Redwing - you can get them for about £130 brand
spankers (I bought second-hand). One of Nigel's backplates is £40
delivered, odds and sods will still see you with change from £200.

Maybe not to everyone's taste, but somehow I seem to have avoided dying
the heinous death many predicted, and that one wing seems to have done
everything I asked it to...

Vic.
Bardo - 28 Jan 2004 00:43 GMT
> > Personally I went for a Halcyon 40lb Eclipse (for single tank diving) and a
> > 55lb Explorer wing (for twinset diving) which share a Halcyon stainless
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the heinous death many predicted, and that one wing seems to have done
> everything I asked it to...

You came back alive - that's always a result in my book! ;-)
david - 28 Jan 2004 19:26 GMT
> > Personally I went for a Halcyon 40lb Eclipse (for single tank diving) and a
> > 55lb Explorer wing (for twinset diving) which share a Halcyon stainless
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> spankers (I bought second-hand). One of Nigel's backplates is ?40
> delivered, odds and sods will still see you with change from ?200.

I bought in to the halcycon stuff and got a 40lb + ally plate I love it.the
reason
I decided to fork out loads of dosh was the air bladder is a doughnut and
should not
trap air in one side. Then Dominic Humphries turns up with his tec wing also
a doughnut type wing.
Have a look here http://diveweb.oneandoneis2.com/wings.htm

if I had a second chance would I buy a halcyon 40 eclipse or a set up like
Dominic's.
I think I would buy the halcyon, value for money must be the tec wing.

when learning to dive  a stab jacket type bcd it is easy to get it right and
comfortable so you can then worry
about drowning with out any distractions. Later when you can dive you
probably own a bcd. the choice then is
to go diving or go buying kit. Ive just booked two weeks in sipadan borneo.

David
Vic - 28 Jan 2004 19:47 GMT
> Then Dominic Humphries turns up with his tec wing also
> a doughnut type wing.
> Have a look here http://diveweb.oneandoneis2.com/wings.htm

..Which is exactly the same wing as the Redwing I mentioned earlier...

The Tekwing is sold with an ABS backplate (very useful for when you go
abroad, but not the best choice for domestic diving...) and the Redwing
without. The Redwing is, of course, that bit cheaper.

Vic.
Nigel Hewitt - 28 Jan 2004 20:30 GMT
> if I had a second chance would I buy a halcyon 40 eclipse or a set up like Dominic's.
> I think I would buy the halcyon, value for money must be the tec wing.

I haven't recovered from ?750 for plate, harness and two wings.
I can do a week off Northern Ireland including 'mix for that.
The difference between Halcyon prices and real world prices
can finance a lot of diving.

> when learning to dive  a stab jacket type bcd it is easy to get it
> right and comfortable so you can then worry
> about drowning with out any distractions. Later when you can dive you
> probably own a bcd. the choice then is
> to go diving or go buying kit. Ive just booked two weeks in sipadan
> borneo.

OK if you're into fish I suppose. I can't muster all that much interest.
I'd rather dive the Volnay. 8-)

nigelH
david - 28 Jan 2004 21:22 GMT
> OK if you're into fish I suppose. I can't muster all that much interest.
> I'd rather dive the Volnay. 8-)

do you mean this pile of rust

http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Union/Diving/TheDiving/Locations/PK/pkdiving.html

The Volnay was a 4609 tonne steamship laden with 18-pounder shrapnel shells
which sank at Christmas 1917 after hitting a German mine. She lies in about
20m and can be found from the following transits, which should plonk you on
the boilers - keep an eye on the echosounder:

each to his own  Ill take a good shrimp anyday.
Nigel Hewitt - 28 Jan 2004 21:56 GMT
>> OK if you're into fish I suppose. I can't muster all that much
>> interest. I'd rather dive the Volnay. 8-)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> each to his own  Ill take a good shrimp anyday.

Sorry. Running joke.
I rather expected somebody else to bite.

nigelH
david - 28 Jan 2004 22:02 GMT
> >> OK if you're into fish I suppose. I can't muster all that much
> >> interest. I'd rather dive the Volnay. 8-)
> >
> > do you mean this pile of rust
> Sorry. Running joke.
> I rather expected somebody else to bite.
nothing to be sorry about :-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.