Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
(0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
bottle.
Thanks
Ken Ward
Bardo - 19 Jan 2004 22:14 GMT
> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
> (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
> bottle.
In a nutshell, don't even bother - they're a joke, pure and simple!!!! If
you want redundancy then go for a pony bottle and reg setup - it'll give you
more than a couple of breaths (which is about all you'd get out of a spare
air!) and the price isn't that much different! In my opinion, the Spare Air
shouldn't be touched with a barge pole!!!!!!!!
I'd be *very* surprised if you find a single person in this newsgroup that
has one positive thing to say about them...
Jason - 20 Jan 2004 18:27 GMT
> you want redundancy then go for a pony bottle and reg setup - it'll give you
> more than a couple of breaths (which is about all you'd get out of a spare
> air!) and the price isn't that much different! In my opinion, the Spare Air
Nonsense. They lasted a lot longer than that on Baywatch, so it must be
true.
Jason

Signature
See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ to view UK dive spaces or add your own.
rnf2 - 21 Jan 2004 00:37 GMT
> > you want redundancy then go for a pony bottle and reg setup - it'll give you
> > more than a couple of breaths (which is about all you'd get out of a spare
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Jason
I thought they just used the spare airs as a handy inflator for the girls
implanted chest mounted BCDs...
rhys
Bardo - 21 Jan 2004 12:03 GMT
> > you want redundancy then go for a pony bottle and reg setup - it'll give you
> > more than a couple of breaths (which is about all you'd get out of a spare
> > air!) and the price isn't that much different! In my opinion, the Spare Air
>
> Nonsense. They lasted a lot longer than that on Baywatch, so it must be
> true.
LOL Yes, I remember that episode well! ;-)
Chris Quinn - 21 Jan 2004 15:08 GMT
I want one of the things James Bond (Sean Connery - possibly in Dr No) used
to escape from the shark tank! Looked like a couple of Sparklet CO2
cylinders attached to a mouthpiece - it even had B&W quarters painted on to
show it was carrying compressed air!
> > > you want redundancy then go for a pony bottle and reg setup - it'll give
> you
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> LOL Yes, I remember that episode well! ;-)
Nigel Hewitt - 21 Jan 2004 16:07 GMT
> I want one of the things James Bond (Sean Connery - possibly in Dr
> No) used to escape from the shark tank! Looked like a couple of
> Sparklet CO2 cylinders attached to a mouthpiece - it even had B&W
> quarters painted on to show it was carrying compressed air!
That's obviously a 0.02L/50000 bar twinset.
You wouldn't want one.
It's a pig trying to get fills on the South Coast
and you can't get accurate nitrox mixes.
HTH
nigelH
beanie - 21 Jan 2004 16:57 GMT
> > I want one of the things James Bond (Sean Connery - possibly in Dr
> > No) used to escape from the shark tank! Looked like a couple of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> It's a pig trying to get fills on the South Coast
> and you can't get accurate nitrox mixes.
what does van de wasshisname say the volume of that is then?
Lee Bell - 22 Jan 2004 01:04 GMT
>>> I want one of the things James Bond (Sean Connery - possibly in Dr
>>> No) used to escape from the shark tank! Looked like a couple of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
> what does van de wasshisname say the volume of that is then?
Just a bit less than the contents of Pamela Anderson's bathing suit top.
Lee
Belinda - 21 Jan 2004 16:04 GMT
I made a widgit that fits a reg to a .4 bottl and its good for only about 4
lenghts of a swimming pool or 2 gentle minutes at 1 mtr.
fun but not a safety item
> > Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
> > (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I'd be *very* surprised if you find a single person in this newsgroup that
> has one positive thing to say about them...
Nigel Hewitt - 19 Jan 2004 22:38 GMT
> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
> 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached
> directly to bottle.
I attract a lot of flak by defending the 3L pony
against its detractors but even I can't make a
case for 0.4L
I fear that the deployment time will not pay you
back. I think they were designed for downed
helicopter exits and they have enough for a
duck dive and escape at the surface but depth
just eats into volume.
They might be good but not good enough to be
cost effective.
nigelH
Pete S. - 19 Jan 2004 22:40 GMT
>Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
>(0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
>bottle.
Don't do it. Don't go there.
Is this a troll?
Although on second thoughts, a spare air for the breather may just be
viable.
0.4 litres @ 200 bar, that's 80 litres of gas. My normal O2
consumption is 30 bar per hour out of a 3 litre, or 1.5 litres a
minute. So a spare air full of O2 on the breather would last about 60
minutes. A miracle, a use for a spare air.
So the real question needs to be "Do they do an O2 clean version?"
Pete S.
Darren Soothill - 20 Jan 2004 02:11 GMT
> So the real question needs to be "Do they do an O2 clean version?"
>
> Pete S.
No but they do do a Nitrox version though that is OK for 40% so using it
semiclosed with 40% means you wouldnt need to do a 1 in 3 dump on the loop
which means you may get a half decent amount of time out of one. :-)
Peter Slegg - 31 Jan 2004 16:03 GMT
>>Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
>>(0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Pete S.
Everyone laughed when I suggested this at my club. My idea
was to use AP Valves Emergency bottles.
Great minds think alike ;-)
Peter S.
(a different one)
PS Does anyone want to give me an Inspiration so that I can
develop the idea ?
Lee Bell - 20 Jan 2004 03:26 GMT
> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
> 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached
> directly to bottle.
They are, at best, marginally useful and, considering how much they cost,
not a good value.
Lee
ahar - 20 Jan 2004 13:16 GMT
I could keep the 40% Nitrox version in my desk drawer ready for those
hungover Friday mornings I may do a web search right now...
> > Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
> > 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Lee
Dominic Humphries - 20 Jan 2004 09:02 GMT
> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
> (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
> bottle.
>
> Thanks
> Ken Ward
http://diveweb.oneandoneis2.com/spareair.htm
Pete Melbourne - 20 Jan 2004 09:03 GMT
>Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
>(0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
>bottle.
0.4 * 207 bar litres at 20 L per minute surface at say 20m depth gives
you a grand total of 82 seconds of bail out. Add in a bit of stress
and your breathing rate is likely to double or more so your down to
something like half a minute of bailout.
How much use is that ?
CAS - 20 Jan 2004 10:22 GMT
> >Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
> >(0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> How much use is that ?
My sums (assuming 5l lungs, 9m/min ascent rate and 3 breaths per minute,
first breath from bottle @ 30m) reckon you will run out of that bottle when
you try to take a breath at 18m.
That is still a long way from the waves.
From 21m you will mathematically make it to the surface... just.
Sod it...
Here's the working...
Surface Surface
Volume Volume Pressure
Depth Required Left Left
----- -------- ------- --------
30m 20l 60l 150Bar
27m 18.5l 41.5l 103Bar
24m 17l 24.5l 61.25Bar
21m 15.5l 9l 22.5Bar
18m 14l Oooops!
and for 21m...
Surface Surface
Volume Volume Pressure
Depth Required Left Left
----- -------- ------- --------
21m 15.5l 64.5l 161.25Bar
18m 14l 50.5l 126.25Bar
15m 12.5l 38l 95Bar
12m 11l 27l 67.5Bar
9m 9.5l 17.5l 43.75Bar
6m 8l 9.5l 23.75Bar
3m 6.5l 3l 16.25Bar
0m 5l
CAS
--
Well, we've done it... report will follow shortly at
http://divesite.calumscott.me.uk/ukrs/rescue_diver_2004
Temperature @ Stoney? Find it or share it @
http://stoneytemps.calumscott.me.uk/
Keith Manning - 20 Jan 2004 12:36 GMT
"CAS" <calumscottTAKETHISBITOUT@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> My sums (assuming 5l lungs, 9m/min ascent rate and 3 breaths per minute,
> first breath from bottle @ 30m)
And assuming that the regulator on a spare air will deliver at 30m
CAS - 20 Jan 2004 13:20 GMT
> "CAS" <calumscottTAKETHISBITOUT@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > My sums (assuming 5l lungs, 9m/min ascent rate and 3 breaths per minute,
> > first breath from bottle @ 30m)
>
> And assuming that the regulator on a spare air will deliver at 30m
Any volunteers to test that one?
<fx:tumbleweed passes by>
<fx:distant bell blowing in wind>
<fx:small dust cloud>
Hmmmm...
Dave Appleby - 20 Jan 2004 13:29 GMT
"CAS" <calumscottTAKETHISBITOUT@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > And assuming that the regulator on a spare air will deliver at 30m
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Hmmmm...
Close your tags.
There's a good chap!
DaveA
CAS - 20 Jan 2004 13:52 GMT
> "CAS" <calumscottTAKETHISBITOUT@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> DaveA
Begging you pardon... </fx></fx></fx>
That is going to look *really* crap in the archive... ;-)
CAS
--
Well, we've done it... report will follow shortly at
http://divesite.calumscott.me.uk/ukrs/rescue_diver_2004
Temperature @ Stoney? Find it or share it @
http://stoneytemps.calumscott.me.uk/
Rage - 20 Jan 2004 15:06 GMT
> > And assuming that the regulator on a spare air will deliver at 30m
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Hmmmm...
I'll find out for you, if I can get my hands on one!
If anyone wants to get rid of a 0.4L version (in good working order and must
be cheap), contact me.
Discretion assured =)
S.C.
rnf2 - 21 Jan 2004 00:39 GMT
> > "CAS" <calumscottTAKETHISBITOUT@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Hmmmm...
Post me one and I'll count how many breaths at 30 M to empty, If I get to
keep it after...
I wanna make an April fools underwater vid of my cat... and a spare air is
just the right size :)
rhys
Mick Penfare - 20 Jan 2004 14:36 GMT
Tried one many years ago in Crystal Palace pool, max depth 5m IIRC. It
had a pressure relief valve to limit the fill to about 180 bar so
there's even less air than you might think. As you'd expect, the valve
was not a top performer and I think the most I managed was 10 or 12
breaths. That might not sound too bad but remember it was in a nice
warm pool, relaxed and unencumbered by kit. OOA in open water would be
a different story altogether.
Don't waste your money on something that will give a false sense of
security.
regards
Mick
ferret - 20 Jan 2004 15:29 GMT
>Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
>(0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
>bottle.
They might be good for blowing up. Especially a nitrox one.
Paging Danny...
Danny Burchett - 20 Jan 2004 15:49 GMT
>>Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
>>(0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Paging Danny...
Cylinders are actually a complete pain in the a.s to blow up, they are
designed to contain pressure, therefore to actually damage what is in the
end quite a strong bit of metal aint that easy. As for the nitrox, wouldn't
make a jot of difference, explosives are self oxygenating :-( Now, if you
can get the cylinder to catostrophically fail, that gets more impressive.
Nigel has the calculations on his web site, they scare the hell out of me!
There was a couple of tests done where they used an axe to take a cylinder
valve off (re-creating something from a film, forget which one) There is
quite a bit of energy in there, that is still not the cato that you require
to get the full potential, that would require something more.
As always this is entirely hearsay and I have no knowledge of these things
in the real world....
Danny (K3WL B0Mb3R DuD3)

Signature
The box said windows 98 or better, so I installed Linux
Header is false, correct is Danny at danshome dot org
ferret - 20 Jan 2004 18:12 GMT
[snip]
>As always this is entirely hearsay and I have no knowledge of these things
>in the real world....
Danny, mate, I was expecting something a little more 'Hollywood',
there, ackchewly.

Signature
ferret
Best before: see end
Keith Lawrence - 20 Jan 2004 19:21 GMT
> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller
> than 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator
> attached directly to bottle.
Wrong newsgroup. Ask on rec.scuba, they love the things ;-)
K
Alasdair Allan - 20 Jan 2004 22:04 GMT
> > Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
> > 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached
> > directly to bottle.
>
> Wrong newsgroup. Ask on rec.scuba, they love the things ;-)
Now, does that tell you more about the Spare Air or rec.scuba?
Al.
PS. See the group FAQ section 5.5
Nigel Hewitt - 20 Jan 2004 23:36 GMT
>>> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
>>> 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Now, does that tell you more about the Spare Air or rec.scuba?
I don't know. I know they aprove of guns and
interventionist international politics but I never
quite saw a concensus on diving.
nigelH
rnf2 - 21 Jan 2004 00:42 GMT
> >>> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
> >>> 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> nigelH
the consensus I gathered was 6cf spareairs might as well be filled with
cyanide gas for all the use they'd be to a diver who needs spare air...
rhys
Lee Bell - 21 Jan 2004 01:20 GMT
> the consensus I gathered was 6cf spareairs might as well be filled
> with cyanide gas for all the use they'd be to a diver who needs spare
> air...
OK, so everybody, including me, has panned the Spare Air. Here's the other
side:
1. Some air is better than no air . . . always.
2. The Spare Air, as limited as it is, will get a no deco diver safely to
the surface from somewhere around 30 meters, at least it will if he can
remain calm.
3. A diver is more likey to remain calm with gas than without.
4. If nothing else, a spare air may allow an OOA diver to reach his, or
somebody else's buddy, particularly in bright clear water.
5. An OOA diver who gets to his buddy breathing from a Spare Air is more
likely to be reational when he gets there, reducing risk to the OOA diver
and buddy.
Having said all of that, it's still a poor cost benefit.
Lee
Keith Manning - 21 Jan 2004 10:07 GMT
> > the consensus I gathered was 6cf spareairs might as well be filled
> > with cyanide gas for all the use they'd be to a diver who needs spare
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Lee
Lots of "ifs" and "likelys" though.
Keith
Lee Bell - 22 Jan 2004 01:03 GMT
>>> the consensus I gathered was 6cf spareairs might as well be filled
>>> with cyanide gas for all the use they'd be to a diver who needs
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Lots of "ifs" and "likelys" though.
No more than in the opposed posts. Contingency management is always about
ifs and likelies. This case is no different.
Lee
matts - 21 Jan 2004 12:31 GMT
??>> the consensus I gathered was 6cf spareairs might as well be filled
??>> with cyanide gas for all the use they'd be to a diver who needs spare
??>> air...
LB> OK, so everybody, including me, has panned the Spare Air. Here's the
LB> other side:
One of our club instructors used to carry one, not sure if he still does.
His reasoning was that he could get it into a panicked divers mouth faster
than an octo. I don't know if he ever got to try out the theory but I
borrowed it to clear a prop once.
Nick Bown - 21 Jan 2004 12:47 GMT
> One of our club instructors used to carry one, not sure if he still does.
> His reasoning was that he could get it into a panicked divers mouth faster
> than an octo. I don't know if he ever got to try out the theory but I
> borrowed it to clear a prop once.
You hit the prop with with SpareAir until it freed? ;-)
Nick
ferret - 21 Jan 2004 16:15 GMT
>You hit the prop with with SpareAir until it freed? ;-)
I don't think he meant that.
One theory is that any given rugby forward will move very freely if a
spare air is strategically inserted and activated...

Signature
ferret
Best before: see end
Ken Ward - 23 Jan 2004 18:48 GMT
> > the consensus I gathered was 6cf spareairs might as well be filled
> > with cyanide gas for all the use they'd be to a diver who needs spare
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Lee
Thanks all for the comments. Lee came up with the kind of usage I was
thinking about when I asked the question.
Particularly when diving abroad without my own kit. In the UK I have my
Buddy AutoAir for such a situation.
Now tell me they are dangerous!
Ken
Steve Barlow - 23 Jan 2004 21:47 GMT
>Thanks all for the comments. Lee came up with the kind of usage I was
>thinking about when I asked the question.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Ken
That is you on the troll list now Ken. :-)
-
Steve Barlow
"Holy Snapping Arseholes---We agree"
Popeye
Steve Barlow - 23 Jan 2004 21:40 GMT
>> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller
>> than 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>K
I'll ask Popeye to give you his views :-)
--
Steve Barlow
"Sausages are not DIR" Lee Bell
Alun Harford - 21 Jan 2004 00:23 GMT
> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
> (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
> bottle.
If you're doing a very shallow dive (say... 10 metres) then they can get you
out of a tight spot.
At 15 metres, they'll probably JUST get you out of a tight spot.
At 20 metres, they might get you to a depth from which you can do a swimming
ascent - or if you ran your tank dry you might then be able to breathe a
little bit more from it.
Below that, you don't stand a chance.
They do, however, have a place if you're doing very shallow dives on holiday
and can't hire a pony - they're much easier to transport because of their
size, and you don't need to worry about finding somewhere willing to fill
it.
Alun Harford
Steve Barlow - 23 Jan 2004 21:42 GMT
>> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
>> (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>size, and you don't need to worry about finding somewhere willing to fill
>it.
I suppose they are better than finning for the surface quickly to get
that extra breath when the reg stops.
--
Steve Barlow
"Profanity is the linguistic crutch of inarticulate
motherf..kers"Airhog
Bob Rowlette - 22 Jan 2004 01:23 GMT
>Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than 3 ltr
>(0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached directly to
>bottle.
>
>Thanks
>Ken Ward
Wow another Spare Air discussion. It's inevitable I suppose These are
simply helicopter emergency egress bottles that have been foisted on
the diving public. The limits of the meager gas supply make the Spare
Air's usefulness at any but shallowest depths extremely dubious.
BTW It is my understanding that the company that makes Spare Air lost
the contract for providing HEED bottles to the US military to Aqua
Lung. So even the military is no longer using these things.
-bob
Nigel Hewitt - 23 Jan 2004 22:14 GMT
> Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
> 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached
> directly to bottle.
I was revisiting this thread and wondered what they cost.
It seems to be $200 from a US discount shop and the only
UK price I could find was ?183 (?209 for nitrox!)
What I did find was the twinset version!
http://www.waterbitz.co.uk/acatalog/SA_E_TwinAirSilver.jpg
Is it something wrong with me that I find that hugely funny?
nigelH
Lee Bell - 24 Jan 2004 15:30 GMT
in message news:bus6bb$3r7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> > Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
> > 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is it something wrong with me that I find that hugely funny?
No, it's a sure sign that you're recovering from whatever was wrong before.
Lee
Lee Bell - 24 Jan 2004 15:32 GMT
> > Views please on application and value of spare cylinder smaller than
> > 3 ltr (0.4ltr?) believe these are available with a regulator attached
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is it something wrong with me that I find that hugely funny?
I wonder if there's some way to hook that regulator up to a couple of real
tanks. I think it would be a lot of fun to show up for a tech dive with a
couple of full size tanks, linked with a Spare Air minifold and regulator.
Maybe when I win the lottery. The shock value of such a system still isn't
worth the cost.
Lee