> Is November a good month to go diving in the Great Barrier Reef? (i.e.
> visibility, absence of Cyclones, etc.) Thanks!
> > Is November a good month to go diving in the Great Barrier Reef? (i.e.
> > visibility, absence of Cyclones, etc.) Thanks!
>
> Hi LeBelgo,
> I've dived November on the reef and the coral sea.
Tack did it in 2003. I did it in November 2002. Just a few comments
to compare notes here.
> In a few words - great time.
Good time, but not great. Part of the reason was the coral bleaching
and devastation in 2002. For example, the Kingdom of Doom site was
almost 60 percent dead elk-horn and finger corals -- a site raved
(during better times) by my very experienced Aussie friends .
In s different report posted last year, I had this SUBJECTIVE
comparison (Abbreviated version shown below):
RF> At the risk of some inevitable apple-vs-orange effect, I shall put
a
RF> rating number (0-10) on each of the dives, with reference to some
of the
RF> best sites/locations in which I've have done many dives:
Site/Locations Approx. # Times dived Rating
Coco's Island sites 40 9.5
Palau (Blue Corner) 10 9.2
Punta Tunich, Cozumel 30 9.0
Bloody Bay Wall, Little Cayman 100 8.6
Punta Sur, Punta Sur II, Cozumel 85 8.5
Palancar Reef, Cozumel 500 8.2
North Walls, Grand Cayman 50 8.1
Turks & Caicos 120 7.5
The Great Barrier Reef, Australia 14 7.3
The Bahamas 200 7.2
The ranking ORDER above (without the rating numbers) is actually about
what I would rate the visibility of typical sites in those locations.
> Water temp around 24-26 Celsius
About the same, perhaps a degree or so higher. Did all my dives
in a 1 mm titanium suit.
> Visibility varies ( Better in the coral sea) but can expect 15-20m minimum
> and up to 50m in the coral sea.
Agree with the low end of mininum, but didn't see any site with
greater than 30 meter vis.
> I have a trip report on the Great barrier Reef November 2003 on my web site
> with photos.....
> www.DivingTheBlue.com
Great photos, though mostly the macro and nudibranch type -- I prefer
the big open water and palagic type, but that's a personal preference.
The trip report I read only showed the Cod Hole portion, and a TWO day
itinerary. Surely it was longer than that on the trip.
> HTH
> Tack
-- Bob.
Tack - 22 Mar 2004 08:40 GMT
"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > Great
photos, though mostly the macro and nudibranch type -- I prefer
> the big open water and palagic type, but that's a personal preference.
> The trip report I read only showed the Cod Hole portion, and a TWO day
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -- Bob.
Bob,
thanks for your comments - I guess the essence of YMMV :-)
My trip report was for "3 diving days" as mentioned in the introduction -
admittedly still a short live aboard trip!
Have done a couple of the 7 day coral sea trips, but they don't count as the
great barrier reef :-)
Agree about pelagic /open water type photos - something to aim for when the
visibility is better I guess - still working on that!
Tack
Reef Fish - 22 Mar 2004 16:37 GMT
> "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > Great
> photos, though mostly the macro and nudibranch type -- I prefer
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> My trip report was for "3 diving days" as mentioned in the introduction -
> admittedly still a short live aboard trip!
My trip on Taka II was longer by only a day, but I saw enough in
the 14 dives to get a first-hand feel of what diving was like there.
> Have done a couple of the 7 day coral sea trips, but they don't count as the
> great barrier reef :-)
Only among pedants. :-)
> Agree about pelagic /open water type photos - something to aim for when the
> visibility is better I guess - still working on that!
> Tack
I wasn't criticizing your photos at all, not even at the scarcity of
pelagic/open-water type. As a matter of fact, there aren't many
pelagics at the GBR other than the Potato Cod and the one I was
within an arm's length was only the size of a small Italian car,
not quite the size of a VW. :-)
you can hardly find any place in the continental shelf of the GBR
below 80 fsw without carrying a big shovel, until you get to
the OUTER portion of the GBR, and pelagics tend to be in
those areas not often visited by the popular liveaboards.
-- Bob.