 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / Scuba Locations / December 2006What's really happened to rec.scuba.locations
Well, looks like Boob is trying to be the top poster, all quantity, no quality. Seems he went out of his way to insult people who were leaving his silly little a.s alone, and looked for excuses to release long tirades of gibberish trying to show how superior he is (NOT). Nice job a.shole. Glad you brought along all the neat scuba talk you claim to love. Curtis > Well, looks like Boob is trying to be the top poster, all quantity, no > quality. Why would I ever need to, or WANT to? I am already the top poster in all three stat groups every month -- those are the newsgroups for SERIOUS stat professionals. This month's top posters (sci.stat.math) 40 "Reef Fish" 13 Greg Heath > Nice job a.shole. Glad > you brought along all the neat scuba talk you claim to love. > > Curtis I came to this group to discuss a bit about SCUBA, and before I knew it, I got a FORGER, then Lee Bell, Magilla, Alan Street, Bob Crownfield and the rest of the "Dysfunctional Gang" PLUS Magilla's homosexual partner Greg Morrow from the travel groups, all flaming me for posting a WARNING about my forger? You expect me to keep QUIET? You are DUMBER than I ever thought you could be, Magilla! -- Reef Fish Bob. > > Well, looks like Boob is trying to be the top poster, all quantity, no > > quality. > > Why would I ever need to, or WANT to? I am already the top poster > in all three stat groups every month -- those are the newsgroups for > SERIOUS stat professionals. So what are you doing there? Trying to relive lost glory? > This month's top posters (sci.stat.math) > 40 "Reef Fish" > 13 Greg Heath Gosh, I'm sure the academic community is, like, so impressed that you have 40 posts in an unmoderated newsgroup. I'm sure that will look really good on your CV, should you ever try to re-enter the real world. > > Nice job a.shole. Glad > > you brought along all the neat scuba talk you claim to love. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > You expect me to keep QUIET? No, because keeping quiet would have been the intelligent thing to do. We NEVER expect you to do anything intelligent :-) > You are DUMBER than I ever thought you could be, Magilla! > > -- Reef Fish Bob. > > > Well, looks like Boob is trying to be the top poster, all quantity, no > > > quality. > > > > Why would I ever need to, or WANT to? I am already the top poster > > in all three stat groups every month -- those are the newsgroups for > > SERIOUS stat professionals. But actually the reason Magilla proved that he is an IDIOT is that he was that he talked about my 300-line posts telling others how they can tell the fake Reef Fish and BOTH he and Alan Street were fooled by the forger. If I wanted to be the top poster on COUNT, I could have made 300 posts with one liners of NOISE just like he and Crownfield and others did. Do you see how utterly STUPID all of you are. It's bad enough to make noise when I was talking about SCUBA, to come here to do your idiotic thing when I was merely warning about the forger is a reflection of not only your idiocy but your complete LACK OF character. > So what are you doing there? Trying to relive lost glory? Why do I need to relive it? It's ALL in the archives. > > This month's top posters (sci.stat.math) > > 40 "Reef Fish" [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > have 40 posts in an unmoderated newsgroup. I'm sure that will look > really good on your CV, should you ever try to re-enter the real world. They know how to read my LENGTHY posts of statistical CONTENT. If I had made short posts, my 300 posts in sci.stat.math in some months could have been 3000 posts or 30,000 posts if they were one-liners. Go find something to do rather than being an IDIOT in your posting, Alan! > > > Nice job a.shole. Glad > > > you brought along all the neat scuba talk you claim to love. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > No, because keeping quiet would have been the intelligent thing to do. It's interesting how YOU diagnosed yourself perfectly about YOUR lack of intelligence? That's what you should have done when I post about SCUBA, and that's what YOU should have done when I posted about the forger. > We NEVER expect you to do anything intelligent :-) > > > You are DUMBER than I ever thought you could be, Magilla! You too, Alan Street. I have made enough posts telling the "gang" what's wrong with you while introducing the "Dysfunctional Gang" in rec.scuba to the travel groups became some appear in those groups occationally on their own, such as the Supreme Hypocrite hh (Hugh Huntzinger) and Lee the other Supreme Hypocrite always follow the gang when I post something that are relevant to both groups. I am going to start ignoring the repeat offenders WHEN I WANT TO. The choice is MINE, not any of yours. -- Reef Fish Bob. -- Reef Fish Bob. The alledged Bob Ling wrote: > Do you see how utterly STUPID all of you are. It's bad enough to > make noise when I was talking about SCUBA... Oh, please just stop your whining & simply go diving, "Bob" (alleged). We know that you invariably try to make everything into a competition, but how many dives have you actually done this year? Maybe ten? Now perhaps if you were to just go out for a dive, you would feel better. And we would be happier, because it would stop your whining (at least, for awhile :-) > I am going to start ignoring the repeat offenders WHEN I WANT TO. > > The choice is MINE... Eureka! Yes, the choice is your's ... in theory. Data, however, shows the grim reality: you invariably *do* reply. You try to fool yourself sometimes by making your reply be indirect, but its still a reply. You reply because of your lack of willpower to actually ever invoke that other choice (of ignoring). - Historically, readers may entertain themselves by pulling your chain, which is what makes you so thoroughly owned. Here, the bottom line is that you lack the willpower to NOT reply. -hh > The alledged Bob Ling wrote: hh, it USED to be your way of trying to tarnish my profession. Now that Bob Ling is in my Google Profile and everyone in sci.stat.* knows that Reef Fish IS Bob Ling, that even the biggest Quack in that group quit mimicking you hh. You should wake up too. EVERYTHING I post can be found by Google under author "Reef Fish" and NONE under "Bob Ling". > > Do you see how utterly STUPID all of you are. It's bad enough to > > make noise when I was talking about SCUBA... > We know that you invariably try to make everything into a competition, > but how many dives have you actually done this year? Maybe ten? More than that in the week I was in the Mardi Gras in February diving with Greg Mossman. How would YOU know? You only follow the Dysfunctional gang to flame. > > I am going to start ignoring the repeat offenders WHEN I WANT TO. > > > > The choice is MINE... > > Eureka! Yes, the choice is your's ... in theory. And in practice. I CHOSE to debunk Hugh Huntzinger's STUPIDITY. I would ignore the Magila, Bob Crownfield, Alan Street and a few others who had already been properly introducted documented about THEIR stupidity. You hh (Hugh Huntzinger) dabble in the rec.travel groups of .air and .cruises without having been adequately introduced about your Supreme Hypocricy and your stupidity. Here's to the rec.travel groups about Hugh Huntzinger. > Historically, readers may entertain themselves by pulling your chain, > which is what makes you so thoroughly owned. > > Here, the bottom line is that you lack the willpower to NOT reply. Here is when I CHOSE to, for the reasons stated above, about YOU. These are my most recent posts (Hypocrite Hugh): Rolling up variance sci.stat.math 17 minutes ago How well-known is the acronym ASA ? sci.stat.math 29 minutes ago How well-known is the acronym ASA ? sci.stat.math 50 minutes ago How well-known is the acronym ASA ? sci.stat.math 2 hours ago Infinity / Practical Zero sci.stat.math 3 hours ago Looking for feedback for regression tool... sci.stat.edu 4 hours ago Consumer Price Index Calculations sci.stat.math 4 hours ago Bayes inference for comparing stock portfolios sci.stat.math 4 hours ago And Hugh Huntzinger tried for YEARS to tarnish me in my profession when everything I posted in rec.scuba groups had NOTHING to do with my statistics profession. > -hh Hugh, you are the worst and most ignorant of all the hypocrites running around in newsgroups! You even argued about a MODE being an average bragging about a few stat course you have had (but learned nothing). If you want to learn some STATISTICS, go to any of those groups and you can get plenty of FREE lessons that you badly need, just like you needed the lessons in scuba in the rec.scuba groups. -- Reef Fish Bob. The alleged Bob Ling wrote: > EVERYTHING I post can be found by Google under author > "Reef Fish" and NONE under "Bob Ling". <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.hp.mpe/msg/1f07005ca0e2c63f?hl=en&> Plus Bob's "dysfunctional_fan@yahoo.com" (amongst others) sockpuppet. It is becoming increasingly trival to debunk Bob's lies. -hh > And in practice. I CHOSE to debunk Hugh Huntzinger's STUPIDITY. > I would ignore the Magila, Bob Crownfield, Alan Street and a few > others who had already been properly introducted documented about > THEIR stupidity. W T F?? "... who had already been properly introducted documented about > THEIR stupidity." That is not even a sentence! Its not even English. ESL strikes feesh hard! what damn school for dummies would let an illiterate professor on staff? Is not competent mastery of English required? It is so god damn pisant poor illiterate language that thus you win "The Laugh of the Day Award" congratulations! what a maroon!! what a retard! dance, feeshy, dance. > -- Reef Fish Bob. > just like you needed the lessons in scuba in the rec.scuba groups. Funny, cumming from the Great Reef Fish (cough), who with his own words (or is it LNG's?) brags about doing some of the stupidist things done by modern divers. In article <in3eh.446956$QZ1.327171@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, > > just like you needed the lessons in scuba in the rec.scuba groups. > > Funny, cumming from the Great Reef Fish (cough), who with his own words > (or is it LNG's?) brags about doing some of the stupidist things done by > modern divers. True. On the other hand, maybe he's a walking (posting?) poster child for the long-term effects of deep air? > In article > <in3eh.446956$QZ1.327171@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > True. On the other hand, maybe he's a walking (posting?) poster child > for the long-term effects of deep air? I think it more likely he's a walking poster child for the long-term effects of no air at all. > I think it more likely he's a walking poster child for the long-term > effects of no air at all. Or an overdose of hot air. We should offer him to Goodyear or Fuji, maybe we'd get a deal on all the Helium he could replace.......no propane tanks or burners either, just one reef fish, stick his head in the blimp inlet & give him the laughed at of the day award. > > I think it more likely he's a walking poster child for the long-term > > effects of no air at all. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > one reef fish, stick his head in the blimp inlet & give him the laughed at > of the day award. In any case b00b's aquariam REALLY needs cleaning...it's kinda "slimy"...  SignatureBest Greg |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.