 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / Scuba Locations / March 2006Borneo vs. Palau
What is the difference in visibility, diversity and ability to snorkel between Sipidan area in Borneo and Palau? We found that Palau was great on all three counts, you could see a great deal without even diving. >From the little I have been able to find, the visibility in Borneo might be less? I ask about snorkling because one of us doesn't dive and would like to still be able to see something. MG > What is the difference in visibility, diversity and ability to snorkel > between Sipidan area in Borneo and Palau? We found that Palau was great > on all three counts, you could see a great deal without even diving. > >From the little I have been able to find, the visibility in Borneo > might be less? I ask about snorkling because one of us doesn't dive and > would like to still be able to see something. First, where do you plan to stay? Sipidan area > > What is the difference in visibility, diversity and ability to snorkel > > between Sipidan area in Borneo and Palau? We found that Palau was great [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > First, where do you plan to stay? > Sipidan area :^) Yes, I understood that. First thing you need to understand is that you can no longer stay on Sipadan. Therefore, you are more likely going to be staying on Mabul, but perhaps Kapalai? It will be easier to answer your question about the snorkelling if you tell us where you plan to stay and which resort. > > > What is the difference in visibility, diversity and ability to snorkel > > > between Sipidan area in Borneo and Palau? We found that Palau was great [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > > > First, where do you plan to stay? I've dived both Palau and Sepidan....Palau is justly famous as the diving destination with the greatest u/w vis in the world some 300 feet, or 100 meters is the norm at Peleliu (sp?) which is a long steam out there. On the other hand, Sepidan is often cloudy and I've been told this by countless other divers who've been there at different times. It certainly was when I was there. The dive people were blaming it on Mt. Pinatubu in the Philippines that was erupting at the time..but I'm told that they always come forward with some excuse or another. > > Sipidan area > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > > > > > First, where do you plan to stay? > First, where do you plan to stay? Second, how'd you fly there? Through Manila? > > First, where do you plan to stay? > > Second, how'd you fly there? Through Manila? Um, on a plane? >>> First, where do you plan to stay? >> Second, how'd you fly there? Through Manila? > > Um, on a plane? Hey. I honestly couldn't find anything funny about that post. I couldn't even make up something funny. I tried! > >>> First, where do you plan to stay? > >> Second, how'd you fly there? Through Manila? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Hey. I honestly couldn't find anything funny about that post. I > couldn't even make up something funny. I tried! :^) You should know by now, that it doesn't have to funny to you or even anyone else. If it's funny to me, I enjoy it. >>>>> First, where do you plan to stay? >>>> Second, how'd you fly there? Through Manila? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > If it's funny to me, I enjoy it. and a second point to chilly! bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post: > and a second point to chilly! What piqued my interest to read Bob Crownfield's post in the most unlikely subject that he could possibly have anything scuba- related to say, since Bob Crownfield has NOT had anything scuba related to post in any forum since the beginning of this millennium and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a single dive during this millennium (because I have given him at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site). Bob has specialized in making a nuisance of himself, in ALL of the scuba forums, since the mid 1990s. Bob Crownfield, of the 10s of thousands of newsgroups, couldn't you find one or two that are NOT scuba forums, to be your sandbox playground? Clearly, the SUBSTANCE of your posts has absolutely, positively, NOTHING to do with anything SCUBA related. Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something that have to do with scuba locations! BTW, there is no need for you to edit a few words out of my post, completely out of context and void of context, just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making. -- Bob. > bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post: >> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > my post, completely out of context and void of context, > just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making. Did I miss it? Is there something about scuba locations in your post? Is your post what you mean by NOISE making? Lee > > bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post: > >> [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Lee Yes Lee. You missed the SUBSTANCE of my entire post, and especially this paragraph: RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something RF> that have to do with scuba locations! Folks, there is a Festival ongoing right NOW, in Scuba-SE (all you have to do is to subscribe to it via: http://raven.utc.edu/archives/scuba-SE.html in which Lee Bell appears to be the subject/star of SPANKING, by members of that group, in the new thread which was carried over from Lee Bell's patented Mouth Dancing in the "A day for visitors thread": Edukashun (Was: Re: A day for visitors) and this is how Lee shot his own foot in the latest exhibit: As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike, Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching, Lee> or hearing, about others that can. RF> That pretty much is a TRUE CONFESSION of WHY Lee Bell is so RF> ignorant about so many scuba facts, priniciples, and physical RF> and scientific Laws! Not to mention Lee's inexperience and ignorance about DIVE LOCATIONS outside of Florida! RF> A dive report or two by you Lee, is a good start, to get you RF> away from your incessant ARGUING, on empty. RF> But, you'll be the same old Lee Bell unless you can CHANGE RF> your attitude and modus operadi, as evidence in your own words: Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching, Lee> or hearing, about others that can. It'll do you MUCH GOOD if you'll watch, hear, and keep your mouth SHUT for a change, Lee! BTW, why are you HERE, posting your vacuous post of my post about Bob Crownfield, while MY POST, excerpted above is waiting for your response in Scuba-SE? :-)) So are other posts to which you have NOT responded, such as: On posting dive reports, Lee> Remind me if I forget. ML> You would not need reminding if you changed your modus operandi... ML> rather than focussing on responses that argue with others why not focus ML> on posts that share your diving experiences??? ML> Then you would not need reminding as it would be common practice to post ML> about your diving experiences, thus making this place more interesting ML> and possibly more educational for others and yourself. Those comments certainly apply to Lee Bell 100% in rec.scuba.locations as well! -- Bob. >> Did I miss it? Is there something about scuba locations in your post? >> Is >> your post what you mean by NOISE making? > Yes Lee. You missed the SUBSTANCE of my entire post, and > especially this paragraph: > RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in > RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something > RF> that have to do with scuba locations! Nothing relating to locations there. Sorry, but your entire post was nothing more than another one of your attacks on someone else. That's known as the Pot calling the Kettle black. Yes, I know I'm doing the same thing, but I'm not the one complaining. BTW you have not been appointed as the spokesperson for rec.scuba.locations > As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike, > Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do > Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching, > Lee> or hearing, about others that can. I thought you were asked to leave Strike out of your rants in other forums. Forget again, did you? Lee > >> Did I miss it? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Nothing relating to locations there. Really? I see "rec.scuba.locations" mentioned twice in the three lines. Lee, your senseless rhetoric in ARGUING is getting to be very very old. > Yes, I know I'm doing the same thing, but I'm not the one complaining. Then what you are doing NOW? Showing your skill in Mouth Dancing with feet dangling from the mouth? > BTW you have not been appointed as the spokesperson for rec.scuba.locations You not only need lessons in scuba, you need lessons in English too, very badly: > > RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself That was the first clause -- I was speaking for MYSELF. And the second clause was: > > RF> and all those folks in > > RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something > > RF> that have to do with scuba locations! Lee Bell and Bob Crownfield are clearly NOT those folks I was speaking for -- and I am quite sure that is not an empty set. > > As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I thought you were asked to leave Strike out of your rants in other forums. You are also very deficient in your recollection of FACTS and LOGIC: 1. I was quoting Lee Bell. Not quoting Strike. 2. Yes, Strike did ask (nicely) that I do not quote him in other forums, (relative to the thread here about Lee lying about my drinking) and I respecfully DECLINED. So, even if I had quoted Strike this round, it would have been within my perogative as Strike and I had mutually agreed that we "march by our own drum beat". My drum beat is that anything that appeared in a PUBLIC FORUM is quotable, as long as it is correctly quoted, in the correct context, and without any derogatory intent nor derogative implication. 3. Strike and I each had a lengthy post in scuba-SE on this matter. It was SETTLED. Fini. It does not need any of Lee Bell's misrepresentation, lies, and obfuscation. In fact, if anyone wants to read what Strike said (in a single post), and what I said (also in a single response) can do so by reading those two posts in scuba-SE, by simply subscribing to http://raven.utc.edu/archives/scuba-SE.html Lee, you are stripped completely naked, of your mindless rhetoric and NOISE, with the help of your own big mouth: > Forget again, did you? > > Lee Hardly. And I pointed everyone to where they can read the FACTS for themselves, not through Lee Bell's fantasy and faulty recollection. -- Bob. Poor Bob. Taking a beating again. Lee > Poor Bob. Taking a beating again. > > Lee Hardly. All it showed are the IDIOTS in rec.scuba.locations -- the same ones, Nasty_Nassau_Grouper, mudshrimp, magilla, and all they have shown are the mentality of the noisemakers in rec.scuba.locations. The LAST time the same kind of crossposting happened, only ONE poster from the three groups outside of rec.scuba.locations followed up on it. And it was a known Troll, Greg Morrow of rec.travel.air. The sci.stat.math group ignored it completely. The rec.travel.cruises group ignored it completely. Only in rec.scuba.locations do we find those members of the Dysfunctional Gang who have the same MENTALITY as Lee Bell. -- Bob. Another of his "no locations content" messages in the same thread he used to whine about no content messages. Priceless. > Only in rec.scuba.locations > do we find those members of the Dysfunctional Gang > who have the same MENTALITY as Lee Bell. and YOU have the NERVE and blissful IGNORANCE to call lee DYSFUNCTIONAL? talk about LOST in the woods... > -- Bob. > Poor Bob. Taking a beating again. > > Lee You wish. What happened to you in Scuba-SE? As I mentioned this morning, you were spanked by EVERYONE who commented on your latest post. There are THREE posts waiting for your follow-up or reply in that group, since early this morning? What happened? You had to rally your idiotic pals in rec.scuba.locations to FORGE posts, crosspost their noise, just to take YOU off your hot seat on which you were sitting in THIS GROUP? Remember this??? Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching, Lee> or hearing, about others that can. It'll do you MUCH GOOD if you'll watch, hear, and keep your mouth SHUT for a change, Lee! BTW, why are you HERE, posting your vacuous post of my post about Bob Crownfield, while MY POST, excerpted above is waiting for your response in Scuba-SE? :-)) So are other posts to which you have NOT responded, such as: On posting dive reports, Lee> Remind me if I forget. ML> You would not need reminding if you changed your modus operandi... ML> rather than focussing on responses that argue with others why not ML> focus on posts that share your diving experiences??? ML> Then you would not need reminding as it would be common practice ML> to post about your diving experiences, thus making this place more ML> interesting and possibly more educational for others and yourself. Those comments certainly apply to Lee Bell 100% in rec.scuba.locations as well! Lee, those comments are STILL waiting for your reply in Scuba-SE! -- Bob. > What happened to you in Scuba-SE? As I mentioned this > morning, you were spanked by EVERYONE who commented > on your latest post. Nothing happened. At the suggestion of others, I simply ignore some posts, particularly yours. Unlike you, I'm under no obligation or compulsion to respond to every a.shole's fantasy. > What happened? You had to rally your idiotic pals in > rec.scuba.locations to FORGE posts, crosspost their > noise, just to take YOU off your hot seat on which you > were sitting in THIS GROUP? Don't let the truth get in the way of your fantasy. Lee > > What happened to you in Scuba-SE? As I mentioned this > > morning, you were spanked by EVERYONE who commented > > on your latest post. > > Nothing happened. At the suggestion of others, I simply ignore some posts, > particularly yours. That's interesting. You haven't ignored ANY of my posts in rec.scuba.locations about Lee Bell, but you ignored mine in scuba-SE. Is it possible that you are posting for the IDIOTS who kiss your a.s here, and are too EXPOSED and RIDICULED by the intelligent readership of Scuba-SE that sent you scrambling for support in rec.scuba.locations by such ninnies as: Large_Nasty_Grouper mudshrimp magilla Bob Crownfield and the rest of your flock? -- Bob. >>> What happened to you in Scuba-SE? As I mentioned this >>> morning, you were spanked by EVERYONE who commented [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Is it possible that you are posting for the IDIOTS who kiss your a.s > here, an ignorant conclusion. 1 > and are too EXPOSED and RIDICULED by the intelligent readership of > Scuba-SE that sent you scrambling for support in rec.scuba.locations > by such ninnies as: another illiterate and fallacious conclusion. 2 > Large_Nasty_Grouper > mudshrimp > magilla > Bob Crownfield > > and the rest of your flock? 3 three strikes in a row. you struck out. arrogantly and pompously. > -- Bob. > >>> What happened to you in Scuba-SE? As I mentioned this > >>> morning, you were spanked by EVERYONE who commented [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > an ignorant conclusion. 1 Bob Crownfield is the first to be caught in the ass-kissing act. Strike 1. > > and are too EXPOSED and RIDICULED by the intelligent readership of > > Scuba-SE that sent you scrambling for support in rec.scuba.locations > > by such ninnies as: > > another illiterate and fallacious conclusion. 2 Crownfield has NOT read anything in Scuba-SE where Lee Bell was ridiculed and exposed for his lies and obfuscation acts. Strike 2. > > Large_Nasty_Grouper > > mudshrimp [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > 3 three strikes in a row. Bob Crownfield appeared to claim his place in the flock. Strike 3. > you struck out. arrogantly and pompously. I couldn't have said it better, Bob Crownfield -- a non-scuba diver without a LIFE. -- Bob. >>>>> What happened to you in Scuba-SE? As I mentioned this >>>>> morning, you were spanked by EVERYONE who commented [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > I couldn't have said it better, Bob Crownfield -- a non-scuba diver > without a LIFE. what a pompous twit you are. i was never and never will be in scuba se. i did not post there. i never mentioned it. how did a twit like you bring it in? and why are you so completely obsessed with a.s kissing. ( you seem to be the only one so obsessed. ) do you dream of a.ses and a.s kissing? > -- Bob. > >>>>> What happened to you in Scuba-SE? As I mentioned this > >>>>> morning, you were spanked by EVERYONE who commented [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > what a pompous twit you are. Let's examine the evidence given by the twit (Bob Crownfield): > i was never and never will be in scuba se. > i did not post there. > i never mentioned it. > how did a twit like you bring it in? You certainly know how to shoot your own foot -- just like the favorite a.s that you like to kiss. This was how (you have to exercise a bit of LOGIC now): Below was what I said of Lee Bell: >>> and are too EXPOSED and RIDICULED by the intelligent readership of >>> Scuba-SE that sent you scrambling for support in rec.scuba.locations >>> by such ninnies as: Crownfield>> another illiterate and fallacious conclusion. 2 How did you come to that conclusion since you were NEVER in scuba-SE? That was why I said, > Crownfield has NOT read anything in Scuba-SE where Lee Bell > was ridiculed and exposed for his lies and obfuscation acts. Strike 2. Bob Crownfield, you have really PROVEN yourself to be a twit now. > and why are you so completely obsessed with a.s kissing. > ( you seem to be the only one so obsessed. ) When I observe Bob Crownfield kissing Lee Bell's a.s every time Lee pops his head out to lie, it's very easy to note both the ACT of Crownfield kissing a.s, and WHOSE a.s. It's called "statistical observation". Bob Crownfield, when was the LAST time (the YEAR will do) you posted ANYTHING in rec.scuba.locations that is related to SCUBA or scuba locations? -- Reef Fish Bob. "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > > Let's examine the evidence given by the twit: Let's not. Let's take these babbling posts back to rec.scuba where they belong. > "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > > > > Let's examine the evidence given by the twit: > > Let's not. Let's take these babbling posts back to rec.scuba where they > belong. Bendover Ben, that's the first good idea you had for years. Why didn't you follow it? > When I observe Bob Crownfield kissing Lee Bell's a.s every time > Lee pops his head out to lie, it's very easy to note both the ACT > of Crownfield kissing a.s, and WHOSE a.s. you have trouble reading and comprehending written english.(ESL) you consistently are so prejudiced that you fail to approach analysis with a clear mind. you analyze incorrectly. you jump to false conclusions. hardly signs of an educated mind. signs of an inability to think even at a college undergraduate level. you spread your ignorant conclusions net wide, without shame or redemption. > -- Reef Fish Bob. > > When I observe Bob Crownfield kissing Lee Bell's a.s every time > > Lee pops his head out to lie, it's very easy to note both the ACT > > of Crownfield kissing a.s, and WHOSE a.s. > > you have trouble reading and comprehending written english.(ESL) Crownfield> i was never and never will be in scuba se. Crownfield> i did not post there. Crownfield> i never mentioned it. Crownfield> how did a twit like you bring it in? This was how (you have to exercise a bit of LOGIC now): Below was what I said of Lee Bell: >>> and are too EXPOSED and RIDICULED by the intelligent readership of >>> Scuba-SE that sent you scrambling for support in rec.scuba.locations >>> by such ninnies as: Crownfield>> another illiterate and fallacious conclusion. 2 RF> How did you come to that conclusion since you were NEVER RF> in scuba-SE? Is that English too deep for you to comprehend? That was why I said, RF> Crownfield has NOT read anything in Scuba-SE where Lee Bell RF> was ridiculed and exposed for his lies and obfuscation acts. Strike 2. RF> Bob Crownfield, you have really PROVEN yourself to be a twit now. No need to prove it again. >>> When I observe Bob Crownfield kissing Lee Bell's a.s every time >>> Lee pops his head out to lie, it's very easy to note both the ACT [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > RF> How did you come to that conclusion since you were NEVER > RF> in scuba-SE? ESL: comprehension / bad editing / attribution error > Is that English too deep for you to comprehend? > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > RF> Bob Crownfield, you have really PROVEN yourself to be a twit now. ESL error and thinking error. again. you need a course in logic, and a course in reading comprehension. > No need to prove it again. Bob, Are we straight on my mistake and intent on the issue you brought to my attention in a private post? Lee > Bob, > > Are we straight on my mistake and intent on the issue you brought to my > attention in a private post? absolutely! > Lee > You struck out. arrogantly and pompously. Must be true. Nobody knows more about being arrogant and pompous than you. > That's interesting. You haven't ignored ANY of my posts in > rec.scuba.locations. We weren't talking about rec.scuba.locations, were we Bob. In fact, I've ignored quite a few of your posts here. Having problems with Google, are we? That makes three times in one week. You're on a roll. Lee > > That's interesting. You haven't ignored ANY of my posts in > > rec.scuba.locations. > > We weren't talking about rec.scuba.locations, were we Bob. We were talking about all YOUR non-scuba activities in scuba forums: Borneo vs. Palau rec.scuba.locations moments ago Borneo vs. Palau rec.scuba.locations moments ago florida getting ready for bent divers once aircraft carrier is sunk rec.scuba moments ago Borneo vs. Palau rec.scuba.locations 3 hours ago florida getting ready for bent divers once aircraft carrier is sunk rec.scuba 3 hours ago Borneo vs. Palau rec.scuba.locations 11 hours ago Borneo vs. Palau rec.scuba.locations 12 hours ago Hats off to Don. rec.scuba 12 hours ago Cozumel Trip Report rec.scuba 20 hours ago Borneo vs. Palau rec.scuba.locations 21 hours ago What scuba activities or LOCATIONS have you discussed in rec.scuba.locations lately? Or in recent MONTHS? -- Bob. to "Lee Bell" > What scuba activities or LOCATIONS have you discussed in > rec.scuba.locations lately? Or in recent MONTHS? Read for effect. I do say you missed some comment about diving on the Oriskany. Dumbass. > bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post: >> and a second point to chilly! both well deserved. > and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a > single dive during this millennium (because I have given him > at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because > he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site). and i would give a sh.t what you thought because... > BTW, there is no need for you to edit a few words out of > my post, completely out of context and void of context, > just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making. but, you poor silly senility, they were your words, and they captured the essential intellect of your tedious post. > -- Bob. > > bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post: > > >> and a second point to chilly! As if rec.scuba.locations needs a non-diving IDIOT to assign points to anyone's post. > > and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a > > single dive during this millennium (because I have given him > > at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because > > he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site). > > and i would give a sh.t what you thought because... You keep coming back for more of your impertinence every time I exposed you for that mindless dysfunctional clown wannabee that you are. You are not even funny. Bob Crownfield, you're giving all the Bobs in ngs a bad name. -- Reef Fish Bob. Rules for Making Oneself a Disagreeable Companion RULES, by the Observation of which, a Man of Wit and Learning may nevertheless make himself a disagreeable Companion. Your Business is to shine; therefore you must by all means prevent the shining of others, for their Brightness may make yours the less distinguished. To this End, 1. If possible engross the whole Discourse; and when other Matter fails, talk much of your-self, your Education, your Knowledge, your Circumstances, your Successes in Business, your Victories in Disputes, your own wise Sayings and Observations on particular Occasions, etc. etc. etc.; 2. If when you are out of Breath, one of the Company should seize the Opportunity of saying something; watch his Words, and, if possible, find somewhat either in his Sentiment or Expression, immediately to contradict and raise a Dispute upon. Rather than fail, criticise even his Grammar. 3. If another should be saying an indisputably good Thing; either give no Attention to it; or interrupt him; or draw away the Attention of others; or, if you can guess what he would be at, be quick and say it before him; or, if he gets it said, and you perceive the Company pleas'd with it, own it to be a good Thing, and withal remark that it had been said by Bacon, Locke, Bayle, or some other eminent Writer; thus you deprive him of the Reputation he might have gain'd by it, and gain some yourself, as you hereby show your great Reading and Memory. 4. When modest Men have been thus treated by you a few times, they will chuse ever after to be silent in your Company; then you may shine on without Fear of a Rival; rallying them at the same time for their Dullness, which will be to you a new Fund of Wit. Thus you will be sure to please yourself. The polite Man aims at pleasing others, but you shall go beyond him even in that. A Man can be present only in one Company, but may at the same time be absent in twenty. He can please only where he is, you where-ever you are not. Large_Nasty_Grouper@yahoo.com, having been confirmed by Yahoo to be both a forger of "Reef Fish" and a forger of the Yahoo posting ID, was at it again. If you read the FORGED post from http://groups.google.com from any of the four crossposted newsgtroups, and click "view proflle", google will show all 7 forgeries of this worthless scum, who hails from rec.scuba.locations. -- The REAL Reef Fish Bob. > Large_Nasty_Grouper@yahoo.com, having been confirmed by > Yahoo to be both a forger of "Reef Fish" and a forger of the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > -- The REAL Reef Fish Bob. You know, this group was a lot more on-topic, quieter and civil while you were in Cozumel. Is it possible that most of the off-topic bluster and noise in this group originates from the man in your mirror? > > Large_Nasty_Grouper@yahoo.com, having been confirmed by > > Yahoo to be both a forger of "Reef Fish" and a forger of the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > > > -- The REAL Reef Fish Bob. Alan must have felt left out when the Dysfunctional IDIOTS appeared one after another without him putting in his impertinence. > You know, this group was a lot more on-topic, quieter and civil while > you were in Cozumel. Was it possible that it was because I was discussing scuba and the Mardi Gras with Greg Mossman, and NONE of the present crop of NOISE MAKING IDIOTS: Alan Street Magilla mudshrimp Nasty_nassau_grouper Lee Bell Bob Crownfield had anything SCUBA or NOISE to post during my absence? What's the matter Alan? You used to make a federal case every time I posted something when I was on a trip. What happened to THAT stupid tune of yours? You have NO LIFE, just like Bob Crownfield and the rest of your Dysfunctional Gang members. > Is it possible that most of the off-topic bluster > and noise in this group originates from the man in your mirror? Which of these do you have in mind "in your mirror"? Alan Street Magilla mudshrimp Nasty_nassau_grouper Lee Bell Bob Crownfield -- Reef Fish Bob. Was it possible that it was because I was discussing scuba and the Mardi Gras with Greg Mossman, and NONE of the present crop of NOISE MAKING IDIOTS: Very possible we were reading Greg's posts, and snickering at your blatant bragging points. Shame when a self proclaimed genius cannot figure out the caps lock release. Curtis > You know, this group was a lot more on-topic, quieter and civil while > you were in Cozumel. Is it possible that most of the off-topic bluster > and noise in this group originates from the man in your mirror? My initial response was: RF> Was it possible that it was because I was discussing scuba and RF> the Mardi Gras with Greg Mossman, and NONE of the present RF> crop of NOISE MAKING IDIOTS: Alan Street Magilla mudshrimp Nasty_nassau_grouper Lee Bell Bob Crownfield RF> had anything SCUBA or NOISE to post during my absence? I was reading rec.scuba.locations everyday (and POSTING about the Mardi Gras and my DIVING with Greg Mossman) during the week I was in Cozumel! Now it came to light, through google's "view profile" on Lee Bell's noise making rec.scuba.location that Lee and his noisy gang were busy in REC.SCUBA (which I no longer read regularly) Lee Bell's latest posting profile: >Borneo vs. Palau rec.scuba.locations 63 minutes ago >florida getting ready for bent divers once aircraft carrier is sunk [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >florida getting ready for bent divers once aircraft carrier is sunk >rec.scuba 26 I saw Lee's pal Bob Crownfield (who had not dived a single time this millenium OR posted anything SCUBA related, but are always present in Lee's flock) in the "Borneo vs Palau" thread and wondered what on earth he could possibly have to say about those two dive locations! So the thread "Bornew vs Palau" referred to Lee and his pals FLAMING me, forging my posting name, and polluted other newsgroups by posting their impertinence to those newsgroups while ALL of the noise makers were Lee Bell's gang in rec.scuba. THAT was why rec.scuba.locations was so quiet, on topic, during my week in Cozumel!! What about Lee's participation in the thread "Cozumel Trip Report" in rec.scuba? That was precisely MY question when I saw it in Lee's posting profile. The "Cozumel Trip Report" was introduced by "Schmoe" and its scuba content prompted terminated at post #2, on Feb 25, by Scott> All you Coz junkies need to buck up and come Scott> dive the Pacific Northwest. and the thread continued through post #32, covering everything under the sun BUT scuba. That's rec.scuba -- which I no longer read. It was only through google's "view proflle" on Lee that I wondered what HE had to say about "Cozumel Trip Report". This was it, below: > "The former Beatle and his wife, Heather Mills McCartney, arrived > Wednesday night in this fishing community on Canada's Atlantic coast and > intend to land a helicopter on the ice in the Gulf of St. Lawrence Lee> Apparently you missed it. We roared about this one for Lee> a week, well, all us Americans did. At least some of Lee> the Canadians see no problem. THAT was why rec.scuba.locations was so quiet that week before Lee and his pals (in that thread in rec.scuba) was busy in REC.SCUBA, "roared about" the former Beatle. Alan, that's why rec.scuba.LOCATIONS was so civil and quiet because YOU, Bob Crownfield, and Lee were posting your NON-SCUBA noise in rec.scuba! -- Bob. crop of NOISE MAKING IDIOTS: > Alan Street > Magilla > mudshrimp > Nasty_nassau_grouper > Lee Bell > Bob Crownfield And who is Nasty nassau grouper? "Magilla" wrote: > crop of NOISE MAKING IDIOTS: > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > And who is Nasty nassau grouper? You should know. A piece of chicken sh.t just like the rest of you NOISE MAKING IDIOTS, except he is yellow-bellied while the rest of you are shitty yellow all over. sh.ts of the same color mesh together, don't cha know? -- Bob. >> And who is Nasty nassau grouper? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > sh.ts of the same color mesh together, don't cha know? You seem to have the fake screen name wrong, self-proclaimed genius. Ding-a-Ling, Ding-a Ling, how we can make the little man sing. >> > Alan Street >> > Magilla [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > sh.ts of the same color mesh together, don't cha know? Large_Nasty_Grouper vs Nasty_nassau_grouper? Notice a difference here Ding-a-Ling? Or all all three really you? "Magilla" wrote: > >> > Alan Street > >> > Magilla [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > > > sh.ts of the same color mesh together, don't cha know? You and Bob Crownfield must have attended the same DING DONG school. Both of you have a severe handicap in comprehending simple English. > You and Bob Crownfield must have attended the same DING DONG > school. Both of you have a severe handicap in comprehending > simple English. Other than occasional small grammatical errors, it's not us who gets all flustered and has trouble even putting simple English words together in a coherent fashion. "Magilla" wrote: >> You and Bob Crownfield must have attended the same DING DONG >> school. Both of you have a severe handicap in comprehending [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > flustered and has trouble even putting simple English words together in a > coherent fashion. he makes simple ESL errors. > "Magilla" wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > school. Both of you have a severe handicap in comprehending > simple English. pompous snot error. > "Magilla" wrote: >> Magilla >>> mudshrimp >>>> Nasty_nassau_grouper >>>>> Lee Bell > > You and Bob Crownfield must have attended the same DING DONG > > school. Both of you have a severe handicap in comprehending > > simple English. > > pompous snot error. Indeed. The named gang above certainly has exhibited much SNOT, in its collective miscomprehension of English. You can go back to play in your rec.scuba sandbox now. The REAL SHOW is ongoing in Scuba-SE, and I have serious discussions to tend to in other groups. But none of you snot-makers will get past 1/100 of the SUBSTANTIVE debate -- in Lee's conspicuous absence, about his BS, because : 1. You have to subscribe to Scuba-SE to read the thread. 2, Given your attention span, it may take you 1 week or more to get through reading one post there. 3. Even if you managed to read through one post there, 3 lines at a time (then recess to rec.scuba for your gun/politics noise) and resume to read 3 more lines, your capacity to comprehend English will still fail you because your reading vision is so blocked and made opague by your snot, and your brains are already snot-filled. Caio. Your 15 minutes of important trash from rec.scuba have run its noisy course. -- Bob. > The REAL SHOW is ongoing in Scuba-SE, and I have serious > discussions to tend to in other groups. I beg to differ, the real show of Ding-a-Ling being handed his a.s in a doggie bag fit for a toothless hound is right here. "Magilla" wrote: >> The REAL SHOW is ongoing in Scuba-SE, and I have serious >> discussions to tend to in other groups. > > I beg to differ, the real show of Ding-a-Ling being handed his a.s in a > doggie bag fit for a toothless hound is right here. * * * * * > "Magilla" wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > * * * * * I have to agree with Reef Fish. The show with Bob-a-Ling being handed his a.s in Scuba-SE by one of his "friends" who has had enough of his BS is much better than this one. To quote Bobs "friend": "You're both f.cking, know-nothing, self-centred idiots with only a ha'pence of diving experience each. My advice to anyone who contemplates getting into the water with either of you, is to get out immediately. (And do feel free to quote this in rec.scuba!)" > and I have serious discussions to tend to in other groups. so don't let the door slam you in the a.s on your was out. > Indeed. The named gang . . . Ahhh, it's not a group of individuals, all of whom find Bob to be obnoxious, it's another conspiracy against him. It's a wonder how many conspiracies there are in the newsgroups and how Bob always seems to be the victim. Scuba-L, Scuba SE, rec.scuba, rec.scuba.equipment, rec.scuba.locations, everywhere you look, another conspiracy against Bob. Lee > > Indeed. The named gang . . . > > Ahhh, it's not a group of individuals, all of whom find Bob to be obnoxious, > it's another conspiracy against him. It's a wonder how many conspiracies > there are in the newsgroups and how Bob always seems to be the victim. Glad you volunteer your own foot for shooting again! > Scuba-L, Scuba SE There was NO conspiracy against me in Scuba-L or Scuba-SE, in spite of your wishful thinking. The only conspiracy there was between Lee Bell and Chuck Hopf, who claimed to have killfiled me, but always manager to pop out to shoot their own feet. I have now identified "mudshrimp" and the FORGER of "Reef Fish", "Large_Nasty_Grouper" to be most probably the forger "Robert Lung" in Scuba-SE, whose identity Dan Crawford of Scuba-L, was concealed by Chuck Hopf, through Chuck's LIES -- but whose identity was revealed to me, by the person Chuck TOLD about the identity of the forger Robert Lung!! > rec.scuba, rec.scuba.equipment, rec.scuba.locations, > everywhere you look, another conspiracy against Bob. Isn't it amazing it's the SAME few posters in rec.scuba and rec.scuba.locations, isn't it? I have not posted in rec.scuba.equipment in YEARS, and have not even read it. Isn't it amazing that your pals flame me in groups in which I don't even participate, isn't it? What about my OTHER groups of ACTIVE participation? sci.stat.math, sci.stat.edu, sci.stat.consult in which I have posted 10 times as much in 2005 than in the scuba groups combined? And where are the conspiracy in rec.travel.air or rec.travel.cruises?? The few attempts of you FORGER pals to cross post in those groups resulted ONLY in revealing that the only groups of IDIOTS reside in REC.SCUBA, and they came to rec.scuba.location only to make NOISE about my posts, and NEVER had anything about scuba locations to discuss ... JUST LIKE Lee Bell! Are you proud of your Dysgunctional pals? -- Bob. > Lee > There was NO conspiracy against me in Scuba-L or Scuba-SE, in spite > of your wishful thinking. My statement was based on the well-known fact, confesses by Lee many times, that he had been asked to join the "underground conspiracy" in Scuba-L, and this was ONE of the very tangible evidence that Lee was involved in the conspiracy, regardless whether it was successful or not, in Lee's own words. So, I confessed that I was asked to join a conspiracy, making it certain that I was involved in one, but no conspiracy eer existed. Check. My foot's doing fine. How's yours doing? >> There was NO conspiracy against me in Scuba-L or Scuba-SE, in spite >> of your wishful thinking. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > My foot's doing fine. How's yours doing? I forgot Techdiver in the list of places where everybody ganged up on Bob through no fault of his own. Wouldn't want to understate his accomplishments. Lee > > There was NO conspiracy against me in Scuba-L or Scuba-SE, in spite > > of your wishful thinking. That covered Scuba-L from 1988 until May 2000, the incident Lee dug up below, the consipiracy between Hugh Hunzinger and Nick Simicich to have CENSORSHIP on me, in May 2002 while I was diving in Cozumel. That was what sent the ENTIRE group of Scuba-L (except a handful) to Scuba-SE, in protest. That was the HISTORY of Scuba-L's downfall in 2000 everyone knew about -- that Lee has to stoop so low to NIT PICK my statement. If you want to find out first hand the DEATH of Scuba-L, read HERE: http://raven.utc.edu/cgi-bin/WA.EXE?A1=ind0005&L=scuba-se Notice in particular the dates May 24 and May 25 of 2000. Those are the first two DAYS after the mass exodus of Scuba-L to Scuba-SE, if you can even count the number of posts during those two days. Go to 19. Hello everybody on this list. That's only PART of those who abandoned Scuba-L, on March 24, 2000! > My statement was based on the well-known fact, confesses by Lee > many times, that he had been asked to join the "underground [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > So, I confessed that I was asked to join a conspiracy, making it certain > that I was involved in one, but no conspiracy eer existed. Wonder why Lee was only one of TWO (out of hundreds) in scuba-L who was asked to conspire by the clandesdine group of 4 or 5?? > Check. > > My foot's doing fine. How's yours doing? Mine had been busy kicking your a.s, Lee, every time you had to dig deep into some OTHER group to lie, obfuscate, and distort. Remember how you brought up the EPIRB in rec.scuba.locations? Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:10:36 GMT Lee> I wonder if Bob has figured out what an EPIRB is yet. RF> ROTFLMAO! Lee had his head in the hole where the sun don't RF> shine for so long that RF> (1) He had to dig deeeeeep to come up with a topic that was RF> FIVE YEARS old, discussed in a listserv LIST, and NOT RF> in rec.scuba.locations, or any of the three newsgroups. RF> (2) He didn't realized that he had already been thoroughly RF> trashed on the EPIRB topic the LAST time he brought it out RF> and I had already responded on July 13: RF> http://tinyurl.com/bdws6 RF> Well folks, thanks to DING-DONG Lee, you now know more about RF> EPIRBs and mini-EPIRBs than you ever wanted to know. :-) and remember this? It's back in current discussion in scuba-SE: Discussant E. Rather than bastardizing the gas laws, and continuing your intellectual strip-tease show, may I suggest that you adhere instead to Denis Healey's First Law of Holes: "When you find yourself in one, stop digging!" That was said about Lee Bell of course. Lee> My foot's doing fine. How's yours doing? As I said, busy kicking Lee Bell's a.s. Lee, you just don't know when you quit, when you're digging a hole deeper and deeper for yourself, while keep shooting your own foot that is always dangling in your mouth. You're running out of old HISTORY that you're trying to re-write. -- Bob. > That covered Scuba-L from 1988 until May 2000, the incident > Lee dug up below, the consipiracy between Hugh Hunzinger and > Nick Simicich to have CENSORSHIP on me, in May 2002 while > I was diving in Cozumel. So, you admit that your statement that there was no conspiracy is a lie? > Mine had been busy kicking your a.s, Lee, every time you had to dig > deep into some OTHER group to lie, obfuscate, and distort. It's not my lie that's being discussed here. It's yours and it's not an old lie, it's a brand new one. Lee > > That covered Scuba-L from 1988 until May 2000, the incident > > Lee dug up below, the consipiracy between Hugh Hunzinger and > > Nick Simicich to have CENSORSHIP on me, in May 2002 while > > I was diving in Cozumel. > > So, you admit that your statement that there was no conspiracy is a lie? Lee, that's the kind of statement used ONLY by clueless newbies in rec.scuba in ARGUING. It was your failed conspiracy, if you want to insist on that NIT. That was what sent the ENTIRE group of Scuba-L (except a handful) to Scuba-SE, in protest. That was the HISTORY of Scuba-L's downfall in 2000 everyone knew about -- that Lee has to stoop so low to NIT PICK my statement. If you want to find out first hand the DEATH of Scuba-L, read HERE: http://raven.utc.edu/cgi-bin/WA.EXE?A1=ind0005&L=scuba-se Notice in particular the dates May 24 and May 25 of 2000. Lee was wagging his tail that was tugged behind his legs and followed the REST of the group. > > Mine had been busy kicking your a.s, Lee, every time you had to dig > > deep into some OTHER group to lie, obfuscate, and distort. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Lee Well, it really takes a SUPER MORON -- nah, making that an IDIOT, to call that a lie. Your kindergarten sandbox rhetoric doesn't even fool the first graders in rec.scuba! -- Bob. >> So, you admit that your statement that there was no conspiracy is a lie? > > Lee, that's the kind of statement used ONLY by clueless newbies > in rec.scuba in ARGUING. It was your failed conspiracy, if you > want to insist on that NIT. Not my conspiracy. You claimed people in Scuba L were ganging up agaisnt you, claimed they were doing it in rec.scuba, claimed they were doing it an Techdiver, claimed they were doing it in rec.scuba.locations and soon will be doing it in Scuba SE. They were all conspiracies against you and, I suppose, in your twisted mind, all organized by me. Now you say there were no conspiracies. I wish you'd make up your mind which lie you like better and stick with it. > >> So, you admit that your statement that there was no conspiracy is a lie? > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Not my conspiracy. You claimed people in Scuba L were ganging up agaisnt > you, Lee DING DONG Bell claimed it. > claimed they were doing it in rec.scuba, I don't even read rec.scuba. > claimed they were doing it an Techdiver, I don't even read Techdiver. Lee DING DONG Bell claimed it. > claimed they were doing it in rec.scuba.locations Your gang of Dysfunctional morons like yourself. All came from rec.scuba. Any fool, even YOU, can see it. > and soon will be doing it in Scuba SE. Keep dreaming, DING DONG Bell. You have lost ALL credibility there. I spoke up plenty there on my own behalf, You couldn't even whimper there. Did anyone spoke up FOR Lee Bell's stupid claims? Look around Lee. Even your Dysfunctional gang in rec.scuba.location has abandoned you, to their credit, because even they could see through your silly kindergarten level of idiotic argument. You have nowhere to run to anymore, Lee. -- Bob. > Look around Lee. Even your Dysfunctional gang in rec.scuba.location > has abandoned you, to their credit, It's to our credit that we're staying quiet and letting you make a fool out of yourself, all by yourself. The only reason I'm chiming in now is quickly dispel any notion that we're not on Lee's side. He doesn't need our help (actually, a five year-old wouldn't need our help), but I'd hate to let you think you'd finally won an argument. because even they could see > through your silly kindergarten level of idiotic argument. We see your level of infantile logic for what it is, and ignore it as a complete and total waste of time. > You have nowhere to run to anymore, Lee. > > -- Bob. > ? > ? Look around Lee. Even your Dysfunctional gang in rec.scuba.location [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > We see your level of infantile logic for what it is, and ignore it as a > complete and total waste of time. :^) realizing that DING DONG has been barking elsewhere:. Lee> I have no gang, there, here, or anywhere else. DING DONG !! > The only reason I'm chiming in now is > quickly dispel any notion that we're not on Lee's side. and quickly establish that you ARE a member of the Dysfunctional GANG who has been disrupting rec.scuba.location and other ngs behaving like kindergarten kids in a sandbox. Then the drooling IDIOT Bob Crownfield of course tags along to show his GANG MEMBERSHIP. Where Lee Bell was LYING out of his teeth: Lee> I have no gang, there, here, or anywhere else. You kids should get your PARTY LINE straight! You're kicking your gang leader DING DONG Lee now! chilly, who has been nwatching on the sideline was observant of your GANG behavior to add, chilli> All you conspirators should quit picking on poor Bob. chilli, as you well know, an ex-member of the GANG (Kudos to you), they are just little GNATS showing their infantile behavior. They'll grow up in a few years. -- Bob. > NOT realizing that DING DONG has been barking elsewhere:. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The only reason I'm chiming in now is > > quickly dispel any notion that we're not on Lee's side. The notion is being spread by your gang leader LEE BELL!!! > and quickly establish that you ARE a member of the Dysfunctional GANG > which has been disrupting rec.scuba.location and other ngs behaving like > kindergarten kids in a sandbox. > Then the drooling IDIOT Bob Crownfield of course tags along to show > his GANG MEMBERSHIP. All the while ................ Lee Bell was LYING out of his teeth: > Lee> I have no gang, there, here, or anywhere else. > You morons should get your PARTY LINE straight! You're kicking your > gang leader DING DONG Lee now! ROTFLMAO!!! > chilly, who has been nwatching on the sideline was observant of > your GANG behavior to add, chilli> All you conspirators should quit picking on poor Bob. > chilli, as you well know, an ex-member of the GANG (Kudos to you), > they are just little GNATS showing their infantile behavior. They'll grow up in a few years. I am just putting on my Asbestos Drysuit <tm; vintage 1990> show them how they are kicking themselves. I leave whenever I get tired of telling them to go back to their sandboxes. I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE. > -- Bob. > NOT realizing that DING DONG has been barking elsewhere:. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The only reason I'm chiming in now is > > quickly dispel any notion that we're not on Lee's side. The notion is being spread by your gang leader LEE BELL!!! > and quickly establish that you ARE a member of the Dysfunctional GANG > which has been disrupting rec.scuba.location and other ngs behaving like > kindergarten kids in a sandbox. > Then the drooling IDIOT Bob Crownfield of course tags along to show > his GANG MEMBERSHIP. All the while ................ Lee Bell was LYING out of his teeth: > Lee> I have no gang, there, here, or anywhere else. > You morons should get your PARTY LINE straight! You're kicking your > gang leader DING DONG Lee now! ROTFLMAO!!! > chilly, who has been nwatching on the sideline was observant of > your GANG behavior to add, chilli> All you conspirators should quit picking on poor Bob. > chilli, as you well know, an ex-member of the GANG (Kudos to you), > they are just little GNATS showing their infantile behavior. They'll grow up in a few years. I am just putting on my Asbestos Drysuit <tm; vintage 1990> show them how they are kicking themselves. I leave whenever I get tired of telling them to go back to their sandboxes. I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE. > -- Bob. > I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE. > > > -- Bob. Yet you immediately replied to my message, then twice to your own reply. > ? I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE. Ding-a-ling, you live online, how many newsgroups and how many thousands of posts, even on vacation you post. Pathetic. > Yet you immediately replied to my message, then twice to your own reply. As he has nothing better to do than defend his imaginary position in life, and try to insult everyone who exceeds his level in some way. Curtis > > I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE. > > > > > -- Bob. > > Yet you immediately replied to my message, then twice to your own reply. Because I noticed an immediate gathering of the SAME gang members, Alan Street, Magilla, Bob Crownfield, while Lee was denying this GANG's existence -- the same morons!!! You also forgot to read: RF> I leave whenever I get tired of telling them to go back to their RF> sandboxes. > > I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE. I just dropped in here to check to see whether the same idiots (GANG memb ers) are still mouthing. Sure enough. Go back to your sandbox, Alan. This is the last time you'll hear from me today. I'll be reading and posting in OTHER groups where THIS disruptive rec.scuba.locations gang of Lee Bell, Alan Street, Magilla, Bob Crownfield DON'T exist. -- Bob. > > > I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE. > > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Alan Street, Magilla, Bob Crownfield, while Lee was denying this GANG's > existence -- the same morons!!! Indeed. The mounting threat of Usenet gangs is a scourge upon society. You must be vigilant! Strong! Willing to impersonate a moron and infiltrate the gang! Nay, even be stupider than a moron and set a shining example of a true and utter fool! Only then will Usenet be safe for those who would follow in the footsteps of the great Feesh! (it's lonely out there all by yourself, isn't it Feesh?) > You also forgot to read: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I just dropped in here And dropped in, and dropped in, and dropped in, and dropped in until someone finally put you out of your misery and answered your post. Desperation ain't an attractive quality, Feesh. to check to see whether the same idiots (GANG > memb ers) are still mouthing. Sure enough. Yeah, you're right. Most casual posters (wisely) ignore you. To be honest, most of "the usual gang" should too. You're really just amusement, and even that is wearing thin. > Go back to your sandbox, Alan. This is the last time you'll hear > from me today. I'll be reading and posting in OTHER groups [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > DON'T exist. You're getting bitchslapped in multiple groups at once? Damn, that's some pretty impressive masochism :-) > -- Bob. > > > > I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE. > > > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Alan Street, Magilla, Bob Crownfield, while Lee was denying this GANG's > > existence -- the same morons!!! > Indeed. The mounting threat of Usenet gangs is a scourge upon society. > You must be vigilant! Strong! Willing to impersonate a moron and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > (it's lonely out there all by yourself, isn't it Feesh?) If you think THIS is lonely, kicking a mere gang of FOUR thugs who have been doing nothing but DISRUPT scuba discussion in rec.scuba.locations, you should go to the archives of the late 1990s and see how many "Aldora IDIOTS" there were that formed a GANG in doing the same thing your little gang is doing. At least they were doing it over something that is SCUBA related -- about the Aldora shop in Cozumel, even though they were as misguided in their GANG activities as you are now. Where are they now? I can NAME at least two DOZEN from that gang. Actually, Bob Crownfield was one of the gang members too. But what's happened to the rest of them? Most left in shame. Some are still around and the GREW UP and matured. Lee Bell was here trying to sell some bogus sympathey for YOUR gang by saying how I am hated and conspired by every group I participated. Here's something you probably didn't see THIS MORNING, because it was in a SCUBA related thread. OPEN YOUR EYES to what a scuba discussion group was like, and should be like: http://tinyurl.com/mp3mw I came across that MONTH looking for info for the GBR thread. RF> That was the archives of the entire MONTH of Scuba-SE RF> in Nov 2002. If you folks want to see what a REAL and RF> healthy Scuba Discussion was like, that month (and many RF> of the adjacent months) are good examples. I was amazed RF> at the number of threads (and their diversity of SCUBA topics) RF> and the number of POSTS (from DIFFERENT divers in that group). Just SKIM the Month of Nov 2002 in Scuba-SE. It has more scuba posts and substance than a YEAR in rec.scuba.locations now. Where are those alleged "conspiracy" Lee Bell was making noises about? You should clip the paragraph below and FRAME IT on your wall right in front of your PC which produced all the noise and garbage Slan Street manufactures everyday, 24/7: RF> Alas, the good ole days of SCUBA discussion are gone forever, RF> I'm afraid, no thanks to Lee and his likes in his disruptive GANG RF> that's ruining whatever little scuba discussion that REMAINS RF> in rec.scuba. locations. <sigh> Perhaps that should help YOU and your GANG sober up from your intoxication from the pollution that came from your own posts! > > Go back to your sandbox, Alan. This is the last time you'll hear > > from me today. I'll be reading and posting in OTHER groups [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > You're getting bitchslapped in multiple groups at once? Damn, that's > some pretty impressive masochism :-) Wishful thinking on your part Alan! There aren't THAT many worthless IDIOTS in all the other newsgroups (in which I post) put together than you FOUR who are giving this group a bad name while making complete fools of yourself. -- Bob. > Lee Bell was here trying to sell some bogus sympathey for YOUR > gang by saying how I am hated and conspired by every group I > participated. You're the one claiming others are ganging up on you. > > Lee Bell was here trying to sell some bogus sympathey for YOUR > > gang by saying how I am hated and conspired by every group I > > participated. This is the verbatim quote of Lee: RF> Indeed. The named gang . . . Lee> Ahhh, it's not a group of individuals, all of whom find Bob Lee> to be obnoxious, it's another conspiracy against him. It's Lee> a wonder how many conspiracies there are in the Lee> newsgroups and how Bob always seems to be the victim. Lee> Scuba-L, Scuba SE, rec.scuba, rec.scuba.equipment, Lee> rec.scuba.locations, everywhere you look, another Lee> conspiracy against Bob. And Lee even made a separate post to mention Techdiver which I had only asked Carl Heinzl to post the news about Chuck Jones for me -- who George said should be shot at the spot when three days later Chuck and his archological team was completely vindicated. Lee, how far do you go to stick you foot in your mouth to be immediately shot down by QUOTING YOU, as in below: > You're the one claiming others are ganging up on you. Give it up, Lee. Your true color had been exposed thoroughly. I claimed YOU and those in REC.SCUBA,LOCATIONS ganged up on me, as in a GANG of thugs. I even named Lee and the specific gang members in rec.scuba.locations. And Lee Bell claimed, and NOW denied that he claimed (but I did): Lee> newsgroups and how Bob always seems to be the victim. Lee> Scuba-L, Scuba SE, rec.scuba, rec.scuba.equipment, Lee> rec.scuba.locations, everywhere you look, another Lee> conspiracy against Bob. Lee, don't you have SHAME? Don't you ever check on what you post YOURSELF? I rest my case now, given the scuba-SE month and other months: http://tinyurl.com/mp3mw in which Lee, Reef Fish, and the ENTIRE membership of Scuba-SE showed what a scuba discussion group should be like ... WITHOUT the kind of irresponsible Lee Bell and his GANG! -- Bob. > Lee> Ahhh, it's not a group of individuals, all of whom find Bob > Lee> to be obnoxious, it's another conspiracy against him. It's [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Lee> rec.scuba.locations, everywhere you look, another > Lee> conspiracy against Bob. Right you are. It was a direct response to your claim that people were ganging up on you, just like you claimed in Scuba-L and other forums. Your opinion. Not mine. Everybody else got it. No surprise you didn't. You're disliked in every forum you've ever been in. It has nothing to do with gangs. It has nothing to do with conspiracies. It has everything to do with the fact that you are the most pompous, obnxious, south end of a north bound horse in the entire newsgroup/listserve universe. You're one of a kind, a kind that the world would be much better without. Lee You're disliked in every forum you've ever been in. It has nothing to do with gangs. It has nothing to do with conspiracies. It has everything to do with the fact that you are the most pompous, obnoxious, south end of a north bound horse in the entire newsgroup/listserve universe. You're one of a kind, a kind that the world would be much better without. succinctly precisely put. > Lee |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message