Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / Scuba Locations / July 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

California: Great White Shark Diving Essentially Over

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kevin - 09 Jul 2003 00:00 GMT
California Shark Diving:2003 Update

Shark dive operators have agreed to a "150 foot viewing distance" from
the GWS they take paying divers to cage dive with at the Gulf of the
Farallons Marine Sanctuary, effectively shutting down this dive site
to any diver wanting to actually see a Great White shark in person.

From California Dive News July 2003
http://www.saintbrendan.com/cdnjuly03/Kelp7.html

New Regulations for Diving With Sharks In The Works
For the past decade scientists, conservationists, researchers,
surfers, shark divers, and government officials have been arguing over
how to regulate the growing shark diving industry. In the mid 1990s,
shark diving was banned in near shore waters within the Monterey Bay
National Marine Sanctuary, and a similar move was begun at the
Farallon Islands. All parties have tentatively agreed to a set of
guidelines that will probably result in new regulations. They include
prohibition of chumming, limitations on the use of decoys, and
establishes a 150-foot minimum distance to view a natural feeding
event. Researchers and recreational divers will follow the same rules.
For more information check out:
http://www.prbo.org/marine/sharkreg.htm.
Jason O'Rourke - 09 Jul 2003 01:18 GMT
>Shark dive operators have agreed to a "150 foot viewing distance" from
>the GWS they take paying divers to cage dive with at the Gulf of the
>Farallons Marine Sanctuary, effectively shutting down this dive site
>to any diver wanting to actually see a Great White shark in person.

Good riddance.  Anyone diving in a cage at the Farallones missed the point
of that rather unpleasant boat ride out.  Just get in the water and see
what happens.  

I'm a bit surprised the operators would voluntarily agree to a 150ft
distance, though.  While the viz is generally pretty good out there,
we're still talking about norcal where often you wouldn't be able
to see the entire shark body at a time.  

Signature

Jason O'Rourke www.jor.com

Hank Sweet - 16 Jul 2003 01:38 GMT
But I see from prbo that chumming is still allowed by "by commercial and
sports fisheries".    Bizarre!!

> California Shark Diving:2003 Update
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> For more information check out:
> http://www.prbo.org/marine/sharkreg.htm.
Jason O'Rourke - 16 Jul 2003 01:34 GMT
>But I see from prbo that chumming is still allowed by "by commercial and
>sports fisheries".    Bizarre!!

Putting bait on a hook is essentially chumming.

Signature

Jason O'Rourke www.jor.com

Lee Bell - 16 Jul 2003 04:53 GMT
> >But I see from prbo that chumming is still allowed by "by commercial and
> >sports fisheries".    Bizarre!!
>
> Putting bait on a hook is essentially chumming.

Not hardly.  That's about like equating the glider you got in a Cracker
Jacks box to a 747.  Think a slick of fish oil a mile long.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.