Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / Scuba Locations / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

diver hit by boat

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
captkeywest - 17 Jul 2005 12:33 GMT
"my tank exploded" says...

http://www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s050716.html
chilly - 17 Jul 2005 18:46 GMT
> "my tank exploded" says...

(snip rag link)

I guess he should have signed up for your check-out dive.  I'm sure that
would have made all the difference.
Gary Owens - 17 Jul 2005 20:20 GMT
"He remembers ducking and the boat's propeller hitting his oxygen tank."

Maybe if he was using air instead of oxygen he would have been better off.
Don't you love the informed press.
gary

> "my tank exploded" says...
>
> http://www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s050716.html
Dillon Pyron - 17 Jul 2005 23:45 GMT
>"He remembers ducking and the boat's propeller hitting his oxygen tank."
>
>Maybe if he was using air instead of oxygen he would have been better off.
>Don't you love the informed press.

I call oxymoron!

"informed press"

>gary
>
>> "my tank exploded" says...
>>
>> http://www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s050716.html

Signature

dillon
Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
of life.

And a damn fine one, at that.

Joe - 21 Jul 2005 00:41 GMT
I have not read so much disinformation in one article, with one
exception, here in this newsgroup.

For you all............If the tank "really" would have "exploded". He
would have been desintegrated. Therefore no "explosion" really
ocurred. All is hype.

Too bad the hungry bull sharks are on the Gulf Side.

>"my tank exploded" says...
>
>http://www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s050716.html
Reef Fish - 21 Jul 2005 03:49 GMT
> For you all............If the tank "really" would have "exploded". He
> would have been desintegrated. Therefore no "explosion" really
> ocurred. All is hype.

Joe,

I am convinced you are either:

1.  The dumbest a.s that has ever been a certified diver to wander
   into this group.

2.  You are not really a diver.  Your summer grade school teacher
   made an assignment for you to write about some diving topic
   and that's why you're here.

I assess Pr(1) = 0.2      No body can be THAT dumb.
        Pr(2) = 0.8      There ARE lots of dumb kids like Joe.

-- Bob.
Joe - 21 Jul 2005 17:44 GMT
This guy did not like my HP/LP blown hose explanation of facts.

Carries a big chip on his shoulder.

Your ignorance is documented by you own message.

enough said.

>> For you all............If the tank "really" would have "exploded". He
>> would have been desintegrated. Therefore no "explosion" really
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>-- Bob.
Alan Street - 21 Jul 2005 18:11 GMT
> This guy did not like my HP/LP blown hose explanation of facts.

That's because it was devoid of factual information.

Have you tried the experiment yet?

> Carries a big chip on his shoulder.

Indeed he does. And in this case, I'd like to see him use it a bit more
to humiliate you.

> Your ignorance is documented by you own message.

"by you own message?"

It takes a bit of intelligence to understand some of the more complex
things in life, like why air flow is slower from a HP port than it is
from a LP port. You obviously lack even this tiny bit of intelligence.

> enough said.

Oh, no. We're just getting started with you :-)

> >> For you all............If the tank "really" would have "exploded". He
> >> would have been desintegrated. Therefore no "explosion" really
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >
> >-- Bob.
Alan Street - 21 Jul 2005 18:32 GMT
> > This guy did not like my HP/LP blown hose explanation of facts.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> things in life, like why air flow is slower from a HP port than it is
> from a LP port. You obviously lack even this tiny bit of intelligence.

Oops, meant to say "lower" not "slower" (the air flow is really fast,
there just isn't much of it :-).

> > enough said.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> > >
> > >-- Bob.
Lee Bell - 22 Jul 2005 13:21 GMT
Joe wrote:

> This guy (Bob) did not like my HP/LP blown hose explanation of facts.

Perhaps because it was a bit shy of facts.  You got it wrong, pure and
simple.

> (Bob) Carries a big chip on his shoulder.

Yes, but he generally has the smarts and knowledge to back it up.  Bob and I
don't particularly like each other (understatement) but when he's right,
he's right.  This time, he's right.

> It takes a bit of intelligence to understand some of the more complex
> things in life, like why air flow is slower from a HP port than it is
> from a LP port. You obviously lack even this tiny bit of intelligence.

I don't think it's a matter of intelligence.  Much more likely, it's a
matter of ignorance combined with a completely closed mind.

> Oh, no. We're just getting started with you :-)

8^)

Lee
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.