Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / Scuba Locations / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Key Largo...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
morgand@cix.compulink.co.uk - 04 May 2005 08:55 GMT
Try AquaNuts at mile marker 104............

http://www.morg.co.uk/malaysia/seaventures/index4.html
Dave Morgan at work in UK
Todd H. - 04 May 2005 15:41 GMT
> Try AquaNuts at mile marker 104............

Before anyone jumps on that advice, be advised that these are the
folks that plead guilty to negligence for stranding 2 divers overnight
back in 2000, according to this pleading:

http://www.uscg.mil/d7/d7dl/AQUANUTS%20Press%20Release.doc

Story from teh stranded couple here:
http://www.undercurrent.org/UCnow/articles/LeftAtSea200104.shtml

Best Regards,
--
Todd H.  
http://www.toddh.net/
morgand@cix.compulink.co.uk - 04 May 2005 17:32 GMT
> > Try AquaNuts at mile marker 104............
>
> Before anyone jumps on that advice, be advised that these are the
> folks that plead guilty to negligence for stranding 2 divers overnight
> back in 2000, according to this pleading:

As i say..........try aqua nuts............you can bet that their safety
procedures are NOT lacking now..........kinda like the best time to fly is
after 911........

I dived with them in Jan 2000........i guess i should count me and my wife
as lucky not to be the two that got left behind..........

Dave Morgan @ Work in the UK
Take out the "goes diving" bit....
Trip photos on line at www.morg.co.uk
Daniel Arrepas - 04 May 2005 18:32 GMT
>> > Try AquaNuts at mile marker 104............
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> procedures are NOT lacking now..........kinda like the best time to fly is
> after 911........

After the Australian incident, and given that this was year 2000, there
wasn't anyone who didn't understand the importance of confirming passenger
presence before departing a dive site. To me this just seems like callous
negligence. We should want to reward outfits that have proven to practice
safe procedures for the guests, not those who have proven
otherwise....regardless of how good they have become of late.
morgand@cix.compulink.co.uk - 05 May 2005 08:56 GMT
>  We should want to reward outfits that have proven to practice
> safe procedures for the guests, not those who have proven
> otherwise....

Yea........i can go with that.

Dave Morgan @ Work in the UK
Take out the "goes diving" bit....
Trip photos on line at www.morg.co.uk
Dr. Yak - 11 May 2005 03:03 GMT
Actually, AquaNuts problem predates the one in Australia.  (And Open Water.)

>>>>Try AquaNuts at mile marker 104............
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> safe procedures for the guests, not those who have proven
> otherwise....regardless of how good they have become of late.
Daniel Arrepas - 11 May 2005 15:20 GMT
> Actually, AquaNuts problem predates the one in Australia.  (And Open
> Water.)

Actually, unless AquaNuts has done it more than once.......it doesn't.
Lee Bell - 11 May 2005 15:51 GMT
>> Actually, AquaNuts problem predates the one in Australia.  (And Open
>> Water.)
>
> Actually, unless AquaNuts has done it more than once.......it doesn't.

Actually, it doesn't matter which was first.  It does not take a rocket
scientist to know that you are supposed to return to the dock with the same
number of people you left with or to figure out how to know that you will.

Lee
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.