>I used to ski "A" basin myself when I lived in Colorado-- skiied into May,
>if I
> recall correctly.
June every year, and July most years...though you wouldn't want to ski
you're favorite boards :^)
> One year I clocked in over 80 days of skiing. I even thought
> that was wonderful until I discovered heli-skiing with Canadian Mountain
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> a week of glory in early March. After that, Colorado skiing became a dim
> memory.
I like skiing a lot of places. I went to college at Udub so I was skiing BC
30 years ago whenever the opportunity arose. But Colorado is my backyard now
so if I want to ski 80 days a year, very few of them will be in Canada. We
make a single heli-ski trip per year up there, but it's become more popular
over the years and the solitary experience it used to provide has been
diminished somewhat. It used to be like drawing on a virgin canvas, but
these days you have to have the luck of the weather to see it that way.
Still, it's a nice experience, but skiing powder eliminates the more
tactical aspects of skiing and in many ways makes one a less accomplished
skier. I enjoy Utah and Colorado immensely, but feel the best skiing is
found in the Alps because of the aggressive terrain and incredible fall.
They don't always get our quality of snow, and neither does BC, but those
mountains will tax your abilities in ways that North America will not. I
think this is the main reason European skiers, the real skiers, are
technically so superior to NA skiers. They just have to be.
> Again, unlike some others (of his groupies) on the boat charter, I did NOT
> come
> along to learn his skills. Get real! I never asked him to show me
> ANYTHING!
I can only go by what you yourself posted over the years.
> When his groupies were busy hovering around Chris and his gear after
> dinner-- I was down below deck in my stateroom "zzzzzzzzzzz" I couldn't be
> bothered, particulary manipulating all of the u/w paraphernalia he brings
> along
> -- and that's fine for him, if it works for him!
If it's fine for him, why take the time to mention it. You give yourself
away at every single utterance on this subject. And why ridicule people who
like the guy? He's not the first person proficient at a craft that others
like to be around. Isn't this why college grads and students try to get
internships with the best at whatever area of study they have chosen? Isn't
it true that if you spend time around people particularly successful or
proficient at a given task, you yourself may learn a thing or two?
Of the people on this trip you may already have been proficient at uw-photo.
But why ridicule those who may not have been and were looking for any sort
of laser-like learning improvement. I enjoy racing cars and you'd better
believe I jump at the chance to get a pit or garage pass to a major
successful team, and try to pickup on any little advantage I otherwise would
never learn. Am I a "groupie" because of that? Your dislike of Chris is so
immense that you seemingly attack anyone who likes him or patronizes his
business.
> That you suggest that I could have just geared up and jumped into the
> water
> shows your ignorance on how things are done on a dive charter boat under
> the
> control of the skipper and the dive guide/dive master.
Bullshit. I've traveled as much or more than you, for as many or more years,
and to locales equally or more diverse. Please don't employ the stupid
Usenet obfuscation tricks. It's below both of our considerable experience
with the subject at hand.
> Yes, Chris continued throughout the trip to be the one to give the signal
> that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> likely to
> startle interesting sea creatures who will immediatley take off!
I never have bought into that, and have never thought that surprising a
startled fleeing subject would very often result in a good snapshot, let
alone a managed image. I tend to be the last into the water. I tend to let
everyone else move away, and then I settle and move along at my pace, rather
than a pace that keeps me ahead of "the pack". More often than not the
subjects come back, or reappear. I have never thought first in was as
advantageous as was letting the other 13 or 14 divers go first, then seeing
where most head, and then, meandering off to settle down and wait by myself.
The difference between the first in and the second, third and fourth in, is
but a matter of seconds. Maybe mine is not the best strategy, but I am more
comfortable with that than the very very occasional advantage "first in"
generates. I have always found that "for me", aggression underwater is isn't
the best tactic for acquiring the preferable photo op.
I suspect he was looking to cop a couple shots before the following herd
stirred up the particulate and made the water bubble like champagne, than he
was trying to be the one seeing the big or interesting animal first.
> Chris
> certainly knew that -- and was determined that he alone would be that
> person.
> He would be Mister "noblesss oblige"...and I was stuck being a peon in his
> realm
> of imposed rules put in place with the skipper (and Chris).
I personally wouldn't have had a problem with it, but if it mattered to you,
you should have dealt with it earlier in the trip, rather than seeming so
bitter more so many years later. Really, your thing with Chris seems to be
much more about his success, rather than this week shared on a boat.
> In demanding my money's worth -- how am I behaving like "a little girl?"
This is years and years later. How is it that in 2005 you are demanding your
money's worth from a trip that took place before most of the people on this
ng had every heard of a liveaboard dive boat? As soon as it bothered you,
you should have spoken to him in private, just like you do with any other
issue aboard a liveaboard. Instead, all these years later, you're still
pouting. (sorry, you asked)
> How do you behave when people start pushing you
> around? Do you take it on the chin?
Well, first of all I don't get pushed around. It's not that people don't
try, it's just that I am pretty square on what I will allow and what I will
not. So in the case of the tour leader wanting to be first in the water...I
don't care. Let 'em go, it doesn't matter to me and I'm not getting pushed
around just because that person may believe they are forcing an advantage
for themselves. What they think isn't my business.
Because the human chemistry aboard a dive boat is sometimes a sensitive
thing, I generally react only when something is really an imposition on my
ability to enjoy the trip. But when that is evident to me I make no delay in
speaking to whoever it is at issue, and I do it in private. Liveaboards
aren't anything if they aren't compromises, which is why many "tour
providers", at least those with a strong enough clientele, screen guests and
delete from future trips or mailings those who were less than compatible.
When you have been shooting Great Whites from a cage, how many times did you
let the other people in the cage with you ruin you ops by getting their
strobe arms in your perspective. I suspect, not many times. I've got to
think you were for some reason intimidated by Chris and for that reason did
not cure this irritancy earlier in the trip. That was probably all that was
needed to either get Chris to stop being first in, or for you to stop caring
that he was.
> Also, I think you're being a little unfair to Carl Roessler
I am not being unfair to Carl in any degree.
> -- he did some good things and for many years
Yes he did, but that is no defense for the loses sustained by individual
divers as well as liveaboard dive boat owners and operators because of his
choice of actions. (and besides.......he *placed* that Rhinopias in the
red gorgonia :^)
>....ran a 1st rate company
No he didn't. But he is, in my mind, singularly responsible for the wealth
of liveaboard options we enjoy today, and he was singularly responsible for
making 3rd world countries recognize the advantages of opening their doors,
societies and laws to the diving community.
Those of us who enjoy liveaboard diving in remote locales owe him a high
debt of gratitude for his foresight and perseverance. He was indeed a
break-trail-pioneer
> only to be brought to
> penury by that monster of a wife (his second one) Jessica. They're no
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> co-signee of
> checks in a joint account.
I don't know that to be true, but I also don't care. It's a partisan excuse
for his actions, not a reason they should be accepted or a reason he should
be exonerated. I like Baby's Little Pumpkin too, but it's not an excuse for
whatever mistakes I have made, or those I have allowed in my name, in life.
I don't want to tear him up on a public forum so I won't go further than
this: People lost money because of choices he made. He could have stopped
taking money from people when it became evident he wasn't going to be able
to provide to them the trips they thought they were buying. Your notion that
he is innocent to some degree because she wasn't judicious in spending,
isn't very considered.
So even if Chris, or anyone else for that matter, were trying to
disassociate themselves from Sea & See, it is likely he was being nothing
more than a prudent businessperson. Hell, even Carl doesn't want anything to
do with that company!!!!
Compared to the ruination the manner of Sea & See's closure created (which
you seem to be defending), jumping into the water before you do seems a
minor offense, and not one to publicly denigrate a person over.
Michael Short - 16 Mar 2005 12:39 GMT
Ladies (Daniel and Daniel). There is no need to get so personal. Bizarre
how a simple enquiry into diving in Madang can turn into a raft of personal
slights. Regardless of whether they are all done in jest or not its just
not the forum.
Let's get back to dive travel and, of course, Madang.
Michael Short
Remember
Its not the bottom time that counts, its the time at the bottom.
Never dive with a guzzler.
> >I used to ski "A" basin myself when I lived in Colorado-- skiied into May,
> >if I
[quoted text clipped - 196 lines]
> you seem to be defending), jumping into the water before you do seems a
> minor offense, and not one to publicly denigrate a person over.
Daniel Arrepas - 16 Mar 2005 16:32 GMT
> Ladies
Go f.ck yourself Michael.....
......how's that for personal?
Michael Short - 17 Mar 2005 11:50 GMT
You need to get out more.
> > Ladies
>
> Go f.ck yourself Michael.....
>
> ......how's that for personal?