Scuba Forum / Scuba Locations / January 2005
Tsunami: American diver underwater during catastrophe
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Eric Berg - 29 Dec 2004 19:27 GMT Thought this might be of interest to fellow divers:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/12/29/tsunami.diver/index.html CNN) -- An American woman who was scuba diving with her husband in Thailand as one of Sunday's tsunamis roared overhead said she was oblivious to the disaster until after they surfaced, her mother told CNN on Tuesday. Faye Wachs, 34, was diving with her husband, Eugene Kim, Sunday morning off Ko Phi Phi Island in Thailand when they noticed the water visibility worsened and felt as though they were being sucked downward, Helen Wachs said.
Their dive master signaled to them to surface, "but we still didn't know what happened," Faye wrote in an e-mail to her mother Tuesday.
The enormity of what was happening while they were scuba diving was not immediately apparent after they surfaced, Helen Wachs said her daughter told her.
"She said she saw a lot of trash in the water. The dive master said it was really rude for people to throw trash. Then they saw large bits of debris and thought there might have been a boat crash," Helen Wachs said.
She said her daughter didn't know what had happened until the dive master got a text message from his wife telling him about the catastrophe.
Soon they saw bodies floating past them, Wachs' mother said in an interview from Oakland, California, where she lives.
Once they returned to shore, the couple did what they could to help, Helen Wachs said. [...]
Adam Helberg - 31 Dec 2004 02:58 GMT > Thought this might be of interest to fellow divers: > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > Once they returned to shore, the couple did what they could to help, Helen > Wachs said. Very interesting. It seems the tsunami only gets dangerous close to shore as the water becomes shallow.
Adam
Gordon Dewis - 31 Dec 2004 03:18 GMT > Very interesting. It seems the tsunami only gets dangerous close to shore > as the water becomes shallow. That's it, basically. The word "tsunami" comes from two Japanese words meaning "harbour" and "wave". They're relatively benign when you're in deep water, but they become quite destructive when they enter constricted areas such as fjords, harbours and the shallows at shore. The energy in the wave has nowhere to go but up, resulting in very large powerful waves as it is constricted.
String - 01 Jan 2005 21:06 GMT >> Very interesting. It seems the tsunami only gets dangerous close to shore >> as the water becomes shallow. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the wave has nowhere to go but up, resulting in very large powerful waves > as it is constricted. A bit more detail:
http://www.tulane.edu/~sanelson/geol204/tsunami.htm
http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami-hazard/tsunami_faqs.htm -- general FAQ
http://www.geophys.washington.edu/tsunami/general/physics/transform.html -- what happens when they approach land
http://www.geophys.washington.edu/tsunami/general/physics/transform.html -- how they differ from normal waves
Bsically a tsunami wave has a very long wavelength - in the region of several hundred kilometers in some cases meaning rather than a wave which may have a few meters this can have the effect of raising the effective sea level when it hits land by a certain amount for a time period as opposed to being a splash and gone.
It also means on open ocean a tsunami would be pretty much indetectable by boat users and incredibly hard to detect by satellite as the actual height of it could well be lost in the noise of normal ocean swells.
The most dangerous type of land is a gradual sloping and shallowing sea bed which gives a lot of time for the height to increase due to the bunching effect before hitting land. That goes some way to explaining why Sri Lanka was hit fairly badly but Diego Garcia about the same distance away which has very deep water very close to shore suffered a slight surge and no more.
Im also led to believe that whereas a normal wave is surface driven by friction and its affects at most go to 150m a tsunami is a whole-body of water motion from the bottom up so its a key difference in terms of propagation.
http://wcatwc.gov/physics.htm here is a better description.
There've been reports of divers emerging from this totally unaware anything had happened what so ever whereas others reported a temporary pull of a current which quickly vanished. The safest place to be during this appears to be either underwater or on a boat in deep water which tends to conflict with what seems like common sense.
Adam Helberg - 08 Jan 2005 07:56 GMT Alan Street - 31 Dec 2004 03:41 GMT > > Thought this might be of interest to fellow divers: > > [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > Very interesting. It seems the tsunami only gets dangerous close to shore as the > water becomes shallow. Of course. In deep water it's just a very fast moving, relatively shallow wave.
nospam@all.please.net - 31 Dec 2004 05:40 GMT > � "Eric Berg" <ericmarcia@earthlinknospam.net> wrote in message > � news:cyDAd.1672$Cc.851@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > Of course. In deep water it's just a very fast moving, relatively > shallow wave. Most people (and their paraphernalia) are located near the shallows.
Alan Street - 31 Dec 2004 06:45 GMT > > � > > � Very interesting. It seems the tsunami only gets dangerous close to [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Most people (and their paraphernalia) are located near the shallows. Yes, but divers underwater usually are not.
nospam@all.please.net - 31 Dec 2004 07:21 GMT > > > � > > > � Very interesting. It seems the tsunami only gets dangerous close to [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Yes, but divers underwater usually are not. Indeed they are.
Lee Bell - 31 Dec 2004 08:00 GMT > ? > Of course. In deep water it's just a very fast moving, relatively > ? > shallow wave. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Yes, but divers underwater usually are not. Sure they are. In this context, pretty much all recreational diving is shallow. A lot is very shallow.
Adam Helberg - 31 Dec 2004 05:43 GMT > ? "Eric Berg" <ericmarcia@earthlinknospam.net> wrote in message > ? news:cyDAd.1672$Cc.851@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > Of course. In deep water it's just a very fast moving, relatively > shallow wave. I wonder if the wave would show up in satellite images, perhaps with Doppler?
Diver - 31 Dec 2004 06:40 GMT Here's another account from a diver in the water during the tsunami.
*************************
Paradise then terror for vacationing scuba diver By TERI SFORZA The Orange County Register
USA - She was always afraid of the ocean.
When a friend invited Lea Kreidie on a Christmas break trip to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, then Thailand, to learn scuba diving, Kreidie hesitated. I don't like the water, Kreidie told her mother. I don't like being submerged. It hurts my ears.
Little did she know.
Kreidie's mother, Lina Kreidie, teaches political science at UC Irvine. She took a logical approach to her daughter's phobia. "I told her to do it and overcome this fear," Lina Kreidie said Tuesday from her Laguna Niguel home. "I said, 'Go. You will visit different countries. It will be wonderful.'"
On Dec. 21, Kreidie, a 21-year-old studying communications and political science at UC Berkeley, headed to Malaysia with her friend's family. They spent time in Kuala Lumpur - a gleaming fusion of the ancient and the modern - and then headed to the idyllic Thai island of Phi Phi , a tropical paradise of soaring limestone cliffs, powdery white beaches and brilliant crystalline waters. Swallowing her fear, Kreidie checked into a hotel and began working on her scuba-diving certification.
The world beneath the waves was a revelation. It was a glittering jewel box of coral reefs and fish that gleamed like shards of stained glass - parrot fish, clown fish, ghost pipe fish, angel fish, sea snakes, silky sea anemones.
"This island is like paradise," she wrote in an e-mail to her family on Saturday. "I do not know what heaven is like, but if it is anything like this, I will be content."
The next day was going to be a very big day, her e-mail said: her final open-water dive. After that, she would be a certified scuba diver. She was feeling so much more comfortable in the water. She'd come such a long way.
The next morning was Sunday. The morning a monstrous earthquake rocked the coast of Sumatra. The morning murderous waves began pulsing through the Indian Ocean and South China Sea.
It was early Sunday in Laguna Niguel when Kreidie's family first heard the news of the devastation in Southeast Asia. An icy panic coursed through her mother. "I saw her island on TV," Lina Kreidie said. The seaside hotels were obliterated. "If she's scuba diving, she's gone," she said. "If she was in the hot tub, she's gone."
Panic turned to hysteria. "I went crazy," Lina Kreidie said.
Kreidie's sister Lana immediately called the American Embassy in Thailand. They had no information about Phi Phi; all communication lines were down. She kept calling and calling, and was eventually able to get a list of people taken to the hospital; Kreidie wasn't on it.
Soon, friends and relatives crammed the house, phones welded to their ears. They called the Red Cross: nothing. They called every hotel on Phi Phi island they could reach; none listed Kreidie as a guest. They prayed she had made it to high ground. They prayed she wasn't in the water.
When the tsunami swept through Sunday morning, Kreidie was in the open ocean, deep under water. The fish were acting strange. Rather than swimming away, the fish were bunching up below the divers, almost as if they were trying to find shelter.
She felt pressure. They all started drifting. Then a mighty thrust launched her forward, sucked her down some 45 feet, and shot her up again. She lostcontrol over herbody, her movements, her orientation in space. The water, once so clear, became sandy and dense. But she didn't panic; she had so little experience diving that she didn't know how strange it was.
When they finally surfaced, the instructor said that was no ordinary current.
A Thai ship plucked them from the sea, and they soon learned they would not be going back to Phi Phi. There was nothing left of their hotel. No one knew if another rogue wave was on the way. Soon, they could see debris floating in the ocean - trees, food, bottles of water.
"I was scared out of my mind," Kreidie said.
Kreidie was transported to Phuket, then to Bangkok. Kind locals made sure she had food and a place to sleep. But she had no passport. No clothes. No money. She called home with a borrowed cell phone.
About 4 p.m. Sunday, the phone rang in Laguna Niguel. Mom Lina Kreidie answered. She screamed, then fainted.
Sister Lana grabbed the phone. Kreidie was in tears. "Lana, are you guys OK?" Kreidie said, worried about the agony she put her family through. "You should see around here," she said. "It's horrible. I've never seen anything like this."
Sister Lana sprang to action, getting back on the phone with the embassy, faxing over proof of Kreidie's citizenship, explaining to her sister what she must do next. Today, Kreidie flies back to Kuala Lumpur. Her mother will meet her there, hug her so tight she won't be able to breathe and then accompany her back to America.
"It's just unbelievable. It's a miracle," Lina Kreidie said. "I'm sure thousands are suffering now, and I feel for them. I told her, 'God has plan for you, and you have to help these people. You survived.' "
Kreidie's first instinct was to say she'd never dive again. "But after thinking about it, I feel like I could handle anything at this point," she said from Bangkok. "I just dove in a tsunami.
"I feel like I should definitely devote part of my life to helping people. I feel lucky to be alive; I can't even tell you. Somebody is watching me. I thank God every single moment."
Sister Lana has learned a powerful lesson. "Your worst enemy will save your life," she said. "Face your fears and try to overcome, whether it be the ocean or anything. That's the moral of the story."
Alan Street - 31 Dec 2004 07:15 GMT > > > Very interesting. It seems the tsunami only gets dangerous close to shore > > as the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I wonder if the wave would show up in satellite images, perhaps with Doppler? Probably not, mainly because the amplitude of the wave is small and it would be very difficult to differentiate the tsunami from normal surface chop without some advanced signal processing that would have to be done onboard the satellite. Most of our satellite imaging systems were designed to see relatively slow moving phenomena, so I doubt there's any hardware or software in place in the satellites themselves to do an FFT or Doppler analysis of an image.
The present tsunami warning system uses underwater pressure transducers to detect the pressure wave from a seismic event or eruption (or even a meteor strike, were one to occur) measure and evaluate the potential effect of a tsunami. Here are a couple of interesting links:
http://www.magazine.noaa.gov/stories/mag153.html
http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami/Dart/Flash/CODEframe4DART.html
Since this system has been working well in the Pacific ocean for quite a while, I expect it would be easiest to just duplicate it in the Indian Ocean. Of course, detecting the wave is only half the challenge, the second half is getting the information out to the people in danger and getting them to take the appropriate action.
Alan
|
|
|