> Fair enough, but I think my post was of a similar gist. No-one has any
> idea when a bomb wll go off other than those who plant them.
Of course not, but you do have an idea of what areas in what countries have
been active and are likely to remain active. Southern Thailand is definately
one of those places.
> I live in
> Singapore (apparently was a target after 9/11).
Which would be relevant if a terror attack had killed 7 people as late as
Nov. 4, 2004.
> I have been to Bali
> about half a dozen times since the bomb and Phuket many times.
Don't you get it? That doesn't mean anything. I'm heading to Bali for a week
before my Wakatobi trip. I was in Phuket to board Ocean Rover in February of
this year. Big deal. I can't, and shouldn't, tell anyone those places are
absolutely safe just because nothing happened when I was there. I can tell
them southern Thailand, outside of Iraq, has the highest incident of
terror/separatist attacks in 2003/2004 in the world. That's pertinen. And I
can tell them to consider the possibilties. That's humane.
> also a Brit and was in a high tower at london bridge when the docklands
> bomb went off so actually saw it (to those outside the US, most of
> western europe has lived with terrorism for a long time let alone those
> in Asia, red army, IRA, basque separatists etc).
Much of western Europe has not lived with terrorism, some areas of Europe
has. All of Britain hasn't lived with terrorism, only some areas. Same in
the US. We all get to live with the ramifications, but it would be an
abolsute lie for me, a Denver resident, to say I have lived with terrorism
because 9/11 happened in my country.
The notion that all of Europe has experienced terror is as skewed as the
notion that since Europe is old and historical the residents are much wiser
in the ways of the world and war than us in the US. This is particulalry
curious in light of the fact that two World Wars found their allowed genesis
in Europe in the last 90 years.
> Be careful but if you
> worry that much you will never leave home.
Apprently you didn't read my comments. I never suggested not leaving home, I
said be aware of what areas of a country have terrorist activity and give
thought to the possibilities. How you turned that into a suggestion to never
leave home is stupifying.
> Have also been to NY since
> Bin Laden's effort, suppose I shouldn't have done that either?
Well, you'd have been damn thoughtless to visit certain areas of New York
two weeks after 9/11. New York is a large place, I doubt the Bronx was a
target, I suspect Canarsie was safe, Staten Island was unlikely to be hit,
uptown was probably as safe as Humbolt, Nebraska, but I have no doubt Wall
Street was a place one should have considered dangerous immediately after
the towers fell.
Simon - 16 Nov 2004 15:14 GMT
>>Fair enough, but I think my post was of a similar gist. No-one has any
>>idea when a bomb wll go off other than those who plant them.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Which would be relevant if a terror attack had killed 7 people as late as
> Nov. 4, 2004.
It is relevant for two reasons.
First - there was a very specific threat here. Several terrorists were
arrested and a reccy tape of probable targets was recovered. As I
advised people who were worried to do in an earlier post most people
started avoiding certain areas as would be prudent in parts of Thailand
at the moment.
Secondly living in South East Asia it is just possible I may see more
local/regional news than someone living in, say, Denver. It is
therefore just possible I may be better placed to comment on certain
matters relating to South East Asia.
>>I have been to Bali
>>about half a dozen times since the bomb and Phuket many times.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> terror/separatist attacks in 2003/2004 in the world. That's pertinen. And I
> can tell them to consider the possibilties. That's humane.
I get it fine - you either don't or didn't read very carefully. People
should be aware of risks and act accordingly. The Bali point was
similar although I didn't spell it out. I went there a month after the
bomb. I would not have stayed in Kuta but was actually in Tulamben.
Tulamben is a lot closer to Kuta than Phuket is to Malaysia by the way.
You however don't appear to know anything about the siutation in
Thailand at all. Yes - avoid the border and in Phuket stay away from
Bangla Rd if you are worried.
This is currently however largely civil in nature and it is expected the
most likely target is Bangkok in response to the govt troops killing
loads of Muslims. While there may be terror attacks aimed at Westerners
that is not the main likelihood and not necessarily related to current
problem. Also bear in mind Phuket has a very large Muslim minority -
why not go for Pattaya instead.
Also you may like to know there was some terrorist activity in Kendari
just North of Wakatobi last month. There are issues in Sulawesi in
general relating to the some Muslim fanatics wanting an Islamic state
and the Christians kicked out of the North. Never know they may decide
kidnapping a bunch of divers off an island as a leverage point/ransom is
a good idea (a la Sipadan - it has happened before). Personally I
wouldn't worry about it and you should enjoy your holiday but based on
your conservative approach you may want to consider going somewhere
else.....
>>also a Brit and was in a high tower at london bridge when the docklands
>>bomb went off so actually saw it (to those outside the US, most of
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> curious in light of the fact that two World Wars found their allowed genesis
> in Europe in the last 90 years.
Most of Britain - certainly most of England. Then again being from
Denver you would know more about that than someone who lived in the UK
through the mainland bombings. Regardless to get as far from
London/Manchester (notable large bombing incidents among others) as
Phuket is from Malaysia you would need to be somewhere around Aberdeen.
>>Be careful but if you
>>worry that much you will never leave home.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> thought to the possibilities. How you turned that into a suggestion to never
> leave home is stupifying.
I wasn't the only one - read the other posts in the thread. Maybe you
didn't intend that but you were scaremongering and that is how such
things are interpreted.
>>Have also been to NY since
>>Bin Laden's effort, suppose I shouldn't have done that either?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Street was a place one should have considered dangerous immediately after
> the towers fell.
I was in mid-town, not that it matters much. Check a map. I think you
will find the Malay/Thai border is a fair bit further from Phuket than
the Bronx is from Wall Street. Anyway, what makes you think putting a
bomb on the subway would't occur to someone, how about Yankee stadium.
Also, you want to tar the entire South of a county with the same brush,
by your own viewpoint Alaska should be avoided given it is North US yet
strangely you seem to limit the danger there to a small area of a little
island. This is clearly ridiculous (both the Alaska and small island
parts) but so is labelling all of Southern Thailand the same.
Finally - yes be aware of the risks and make your decisions accordingly
and potentially decide to still go but avoid some places. However don't
go round scaremongering based on something you clearly know nothing
about (also observed by other posters). Enjoy Wakatobi, I'm sure it
will be fantastic.
Ramone Cila - 16 Nov 2004 16:19 GMT
<snip>
> You however don't appear to know anything about the siutation in
> Thailand at all. Yes - avoid the border and in Phuket stay away from
> Bangla Rd if you are worried.
It is not a matter of being "worried". It is a matter of being aware.
As for the rest of your post about "scaremongering" and "not knowing" about
Thailand: it's the same Euro-talk about Americans being unaware of the world
at large. It's a shame some of you are so narrow minded.
You will note that at no time during any of your replies to the OP did you
mention some of the activities Thailand has experienced recently. He was
entitled....not to your opinion of what is or what is not risky, but of the
simple facts of recent violence in Thailand.
So long..........
Simon - 16 Nov 2004 16:29 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Thailand: it's the same Euro-talk about Americans being unaware of the world
> at large. It's a shame some of you are so narrow minded.
Kettle, black, pot - for a sentence.
Many American's do have some idea, many don't. You unfortunately are
one of the latter. You think on an island the size of Manhatten 90% is
ok but a country the size of Thailand half is dangerous. BTW - look at
the relative sizes of Phuket and Manhatten.
I'm not narrow minded. The US suffered a tourist drop which was way
beyond reasonable after 9/11, you are causing the same issues elsewhere.
I didn't think the backlash againt US travel was fair and people like
you don't help elsewhere.
> You will note that at no time during any of your replies to the OP did you
> mention some of the activities Thailand has experienced recently. He was
> entitled....not to your opinion of what is or what is not risky, but of the
> simple facts of recent violence in Thailand.
>
> So long..........
Errr - you can't read. Which bit of "avoid Bangla Road" did you miss.
That was in reply to you. I tend to assume people are not stupid until
proven otherwise. Maybe OP was aware of Thai issues and had made his
own decision without idiots like you trying to scare him off.
Simon - 16 Nov 2004 16:50 GMT
>> <snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> world
>> at large. It's a shame some of you are so narrow minded.
Incidentally, I did't post at any time anthing specific to US citzens
knowledge of outside affairs. If someone from Manchester was posting
about Liverpool then I would defer to their knowledge. If they started
posting about Bali I wouldn't. I live in SE Asia you don't, I wouldn't
presume to know more than you about Colorado and it's surroundings,
might be nice if you showed the same courtesy.
> Kettle, black, pot - for a sentence.
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> proven otherwise. Maybe OP was aware of Thai issues and had made his
> own decision without idiots like you trying to scare him off.