Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / Scuba Locations / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Snorkeling - Blue Hole, Belize???

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike - 24 Oct 2004 02:14 GMT
I know this is supposed to be a killer diving spot so I'm wondering if
it's worth the trip just for snorkeling??  I know its a long ride to
get there but I'm more concerned that this popular site has seen
better days with all the boats visiting the site every day.  Has all
the traffic ruined this site for snorkeling or is it
still worth it?  

Any other good snorkel spots and operators in Belize you would
recommend?

Thanks!
Dan Bracuk - 24 Oct 2004 02:27 GMT
lookinforland@yahoo.com (Mike) pounded away at his keyboard resulting
in:
:I know this is supposed to be a killer diving spot so I'm wondering if
:it's worth the trip just for snorkeling??  I know its a long ride to
:get there but I'm more concerned that this popular site has seen
:better days with all the boats visiting the site every day.  Has all
:the traffic ruined this site for snorkeling or is it
:still worth it?  

I don't even think Blue Hole is worth the long boat ride to dive it,
much less snork it.

Dan Bracuk
Is it my imagination, or do Buffalo Wings taste like chicken?
The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/
bjeanneb - 24 Oct 2004 04:29 GMT
> I know this is supposed to be a killer diving spot so I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trip just for snorkeling??  I know its a long ride to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thanks!

You won't see much of anything snorkeling at the Blue Hole.  You don't even
see very much when you go to the depth the divemaster would take you on
scuba.  Only stalactites, maybe a few fish, possibly a shark.  There is an
area around Blue Hole where you could snorkel but it's not particularly
interesting.  I've only been aboard the Belize Aggressor (too expensive a
trip for snorkeling) and on Ambergris Caye (reefs not close enough for
snorkeling.)  Bonaire and Grand Cayman are probably the best best for you.

Jeanne
a - 24 Oct 2004 13:01 GMT
>I know this is supposed to be a killer diving spot so I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trip just for snorkeling??  I know its a long ride to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Any other good snorkel spots and operators in Belize you would
> recommend?

I guess more experienced (divers) are in disagreement, but I did the trip
with my kids and we enjoyed it greatly.  We did it with Frenchie's dive
shuttle out of Caulker (10 pack? with twin yamaha's on back) and it was a
fast and exciting ride out.  SOme folks had a rough time with the swells.
The hole was an interesting experience with lots of fish tho few pelagics
when we were there.  The visibility at the time exceeded 200ft.  On the way
back, we stopped at a location where a very friendly dolphin was found.
Could be local tourist legend, but we were told it had been used in a
hollywood movie and was thus very friendly towards humans.  Dolphin was
exactly where we'd been told he'd (or she?) be, and all had a great time
cooling off in the water and playing tag with it.  My son - 7yrs old at the
time - still talks about it...

Hol Chan marine reserve just off Caulker was also really nice and the
offshore reef had lots of rays, nurse sharks, etc.  There is virtually no
beach snorkelling, but it was very easy to hire someone to take us out for a
couple of hours.

I'd recommend Caulker for a laid back stay and would definately talk to
Frenchie's folks.

All this was 6-7 years ago?  so ymmv...
a
Jason O'Rourke - 25 Oct 2004 09:49 GMT
>I know this is supposed to be a killer diving spot so I'm wondering if
>it's worth the trip just for snorkeling??  I know its a long ride to
>get there but I'm more concerned that this popular site has seen
>better days with all the boats visiting the site every day.  Has all
>the traffic ruined this site for snorkeling or is it
>still worth it?  

I don't think traffic can really ruin this site, at least since a famed
explorer blew up an opening.  It's a geological site, not a lively reef.  
As part of a trip to the island at Lighthouse Reef and snorkeling at other
areas, it might be worth the haul.  For Blue Hole, not a chance, unless you
can free diving to triple digits.  

There are sharks congregating there of decent size and number.  Like many shark
encounters in Belize, it's because they get fed at some point.  

Signature

Jason O'Rourke www.jor.com

Ramone Cila - 25 Oct 2004 18:23 GMT
> >I know this is supposed to be a killer diving spot so I'm wondering if
> >it's worth the trip just for snorkeling??  I know its a long ride to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I don't think traffic can really ruin this site, at least since a famed
> explorer blew up an opening.

Cousteau never did that but it has been repeated so many times as to have
become one of the better known urban myths in the SCUBA world.

> It's a geological site, not a lively reef.

There is a large, diverse, abundant reef in the shallows surrounding the
hole....particularly along the Southwest perimeter and then on up into the
grassy area directly to the West of the hole. In my view it's as good as
anything shallow at Lighthouse or Ambergris, though not as rich as the
mangrove area around Turneffe. This is not from my journal, but my
recollection is that the area was rich in reef fishes Angelfish, Butterfly
Fish, Groupers along with the ever present wealth of macro
subjects...shrimps, gobies, blennies, nudibranchs. That area at night, like
much of Belize, is also rich in squid. There's not really anything
spectacular there, just a large healthy population of fishes and critters,
and elkhorn coral and purple sea fans.

I wouldn't head out there just for the snorkeling, but if having to be there
anyway the snorkeling would be worth it.

<small snip
chilly - 25 Oct 2004 21:21 GMT
> There is a large, diverse, abundant reef in the shallows surrounding the
> hole....particularly along the Southwest perimeter and then on up into the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I wouldn't head out there just for the snorkeling, but if having to be there
> anyway the snorkeling would be worth it.

Agreed.  I've had a couple of lovely snorkels there while on surface
interval but again, as Ramone said, I wouldn't make a special trip for it,
unless I was already going to be out there.  However, if you are planning on
taking a trip out to the Atolls, to do some snorkelling and visit Halfmoon
Caye, there is some really great snorkelling spots out at the Atolls.
Unfortunately, I can't tell you the names of the sites or exactly where they
were located.  I was dropped for a snorkel a few times during surface
intervals and really enjoyed myself.
Ramone Cila - 25 Oct 2004 21:42 GMT
> Agreed.  I've had a couple of lovely snorkels there while on surface
> interval but again, as Ramone said, I wouldn't make a special trip for it,
> unless I was already going to be out there.

Thank God! I was afraid, after reading Jason's comments, my memory was
embellishing the reality :^)

My snorkeling there was, like yours, during surface intervals and I remember
it being quite nice. The last time I recall watching the blue hamlets (I
forget their name..maybe Indigo Hamlet?) mating in the water column above
the reef, squid swirling around the surface and sometimes large purple fans
swaying in the current while the reef fish scattered about before bedding
down for the night. A real pretty scene...which is one thing underwater
Belize is rich with: beautiful scenics.
Jim Lea - 26 Oct 2004 01:48 GMT
Go to Hol Chan for snorkelling. Also there is a shallow corral garden inside
the reef a couple of miles north of San Pedro that is good snorkelling.
For both of these, stay either in ay Caulker or San Pedro.
Most dive shops offer snorkelling trips.

> I know this is supposed to be a killer diving spot so I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trip just for snorkeling??  I know its a long ride to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thanks!
chilly - 26 Oct 2004 06:42 GMT
> Go to Hol Chan for snorkelling. Also there is a shallow corral garden inside
> the reef a couple of miles north of San Pedro that is good snorkelling.

Mexico Rocks.

> For both of these, stay either in ay Caulker or San Pedro.
> Most dive shops offer snorkelling trips.

That's part of the problem, as I see it for snorkellers.  You have to take a
boat out.  Adds to the expense.

Now having said that, I love Ambergris Caye anyway, so if you aren't all
about snorkelling, it's still a pretty great vacation.
chilly - 26 Oct 2004 07:10 GMT
I should add that there is decent snorkelling off the end of most docks, in
particular Ramon's dock.  Many fishies to be seen there.

> > Go to Hol Chan for snorkelling. Also there is a shallow corral garden
> inside
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Now having said that, I love Ambergris Caye anyway, so if you aren't all
> about snorkelling, it's still a pretty great vacation.
Stoker - 27 Oct 2004 17:37 GMT
It's not a great spot.  I think people do it mostly to say they did.
The water is, in effect, stagnant and the isn't a lot of life in it.  I
don't know about the outside but I can't imagine snorkle is the way to
go.  What else is on the same trip could make all the difference.
JB

> I know this is supposed to be a killer diving spot so I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trip just for snorkeling??  I know its a long ride to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thanks!
IRBYJR - 28 Oct 2004 20:15 GMT
>It's not a great spot.  I think people do it mostly to say they did.
>The water is, in effect, stagnant and the isn't a lot of life in it.  I
>don't know about the outside but I can't imagine snorkle is the way to
>go.  What else is on the same trip could make all the difference.
>JB>

We all have opinions. While I somewhat agree that most people only need to do
it once I think it was well worth the effort.  But, we have all probably done
many dives and places just to say that we have done them.  IMO.
I would not discourage anyone from doing the hole IF they were anywhere near it
for OTHER sites.
Ramone Cila - 28 Oct 2004 22:12 GMT
> >It's not a great spot.  I think people do it mostly to say they did.
> >The water is, in effect, stagnant and the isn't a lot of life in it.  I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I would not discourage anyone from doing the hole IF they were anywhere near it
> for OTHER sites.

The OP asked if it were good for snorkeling. Some of us replied the area
around it was quite good. From the replies I read here it seems most people
dived the hole but have no experience with the surrounding shallows.

Despite the comments from irbyjr, the water is not stagnant and there is an
incredible amount of life in it, but one has to recognize not to expect reef
life. I also found it to be an excellent photo op, particularly in
silhouette or contrasting divers to the stalactites.

I wouldn't travel to Belize to dive the Blue Hole, but if in Belize and it
is on the boat's itinerary I welcome another dive there. Of all the Blue
Holes I have dived this is one that is quite nice for what a Blue Hole can
provide.
Irbjr - 28 Oct 2004 22:30 GMT
.>The OP asked if it were good for snorkeling. Some of us replied the area
>around it was quite good. From the replies I read here it seems most people
>dived the hole but have no experience with the surrounding shallows.>>

Sorry, I lost the thread start somewhere back

>Despite the comments from irbyjr, the water is not stagnant and there is an
>incredible amount of life in it, but one has to recognize not to expect reef
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Holes I have dived this is one that is quite nice for what a Blue Hole can
>provide.

For the record, irbyjr made no comment about stagnancy.  I commented AFTER that
statement was posted by another..
Ramone Cila - 29 Oct 2004 20:43 GMT
> .>The OP asked if it were good for snorkeling. Some of us replied the area
> >around it was quite good. From the replies I read here it seems most people
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> For the record, irbyjr made no comment about stagnancy.  I commented AFTER that
> statement was posted by another..

OK....whose on 1st?
Irbjr - 29 Oct 2004 23:38 GMT
>> .>The OP asked if it were good for snorkeling. Some of us replied the area
>> >around it was quite good. From the replies I read here it seems most
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>OK....whose on 1st?>

Not me , I hope!!
DrYak - 30 Oct 2004 01:44 GMT
I dove the Blue Hole in January.  I'm not sure aboutthe snorkling, but
it was fun watching one young snorkler in a bikini.  Not sure what she saw.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.