> > ? "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > ? news:8fb7380b.0410091914.6b74b0c6@posting.google.com...
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> with this, pointing interested readers to what I had already
> posted about Barbados, compared to some other locations:
You see, Feesh, that's a fundamental difference between us. You prefer
to do a massive data dump, as much to show off as to convey
information, while I prefer to put some constraints around my
information, tailoring it to more concisely answer a posters question.
The OP asked a very broad question, and the very first thing I asked
was, "compared to where?" If the OP has only dove in NE quarries, then
he's going to find the warm water and decent visibility of Barbados a
treat, regardless of what more experienced divers think. On the other
hand, if he's spent some time in some of the world's better dive spots,
he might be dissapointed in the relatively boring reefs of Barbados.
Finally, if he likes wrecks, then the Stavronikita is an unusual dive
for the Caribbean and worth diving on it's owm merits.
> RF> I did a groups.googles.com advanced search using ONLY
> RF> "Barbados" as keyword, and "Reef Fish" as author, and google
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> other than it's better than most lakes in the midwestern US, say
> so, by all means.
Again, one man's treat is another man's poison. I asked a clarifying
question before deluging the OP with my opinions.
> Do try to make a nuisance of yourself by posting crap such as
> what you've posted, to remove any doubt that you're nothing but
> an ignoranmus and an ankle-biter.
Aw, Feesh, you say the nicest things :-)