Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com (Reef Fish) pounded away at his
keyboard resulting in:
:Don't you mean "Awful Time II"? Are they still in business?
I'm not sure. It's not googling well.
I found the boat to be cramped and uncomfortable. What didn't you
like about it?
Dan Bracuk
If at first you don't succeed, you run the risk of failure.
The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/
Reef Fish - 26 Jul 2004 05:03 GMT
> Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com (Reef Fish) pounded away at his
> keyboard resulting in:
> :Don't you mean "Awful Time II"? Are they still in business?
I've found the answer to my own question by going to the "web" section
of Google search, with "Bottom Time II". It's apparently the same
boat and operation as the one I was on in the early 1990s.
The name "Awful Time II" was adopted by me after it was suggested by
some other reviewers because I thought it fit the liveaboard so well.
Actually, to be fair, I was on Bottom Time I twice -- that was a much
smaller boat, had a drunken captain, and was indeed AWFUL all around.
My trip on Bottom Time II was a discounted trip offered by the owner
to me for what happened on Bottom Time I.
I found this post of mine in google (in 1994) with reference to
Bottom Time II and Awful Time II and how it had been rated by the
readership of IN DEPTH:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?B272134E8
> I'm not sure. It's not googling well.
>
> I found the boat to be cramped and uncomfortable. What didn't you
> like about it?
Being cramped was the least of my problem with it. :-) I think I
just disliked it all around as a liveaboard.
-- Bob.