Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / September 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Government Grants - for Grumman & Others

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lee Bell - 13 Sep 2008 21:22 GMT
I have not yet found any word on what grants will be available to victims of
hurricane Ike.  I'm reasonably sure there will be some, but it's still too
early to be sure what they will be and cover.  Here's a bit of information
on previous grant programs:

When Wilma hit, FEMA offered up to $850, after the fact,  to cover the cost
of a generator for those who had lost power, while they were without power.
Those that needed them bought the generators and filed a claim.  It was
necessary for:
1. To have a receipt for the generator showing the cost and date of
purchase.  FEMA checked mine in person.
2. To still have the generator.  In the past, some less scrupulous people
bought generators they didn't need, got their grant and then sold the
generator.  FEMA checked this in person too.
3. For the generator to have been purchased while power was out in your
neighborhood.  They checked this through the local power company.
I completed the application, talked to the FEMA claims adjuster and, after a
while,  got my check.

The rules for chain saws and other tools needed to clear away hurricane
debris weren't as strict, but I don't have the specifics.  I already had a
chainsaw adequate to my needs and, despite Jer's thoughts that those that
make use of government programs they paid for, chose not to be a whore.

There are other programs as well.  I'll keep an eye out for information on
them and spread it as I find it.

Lee
Jer - 13 Sep 2008 23:22 GMT
> I have not yet found any word on what grants will be available to victims of
> hurricane Ike.  I'm reasonably sure there will be some, but it's still too
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Lee

"They paid the bulk of the cost of my Honda, even though I already had
the big generator."

So you already had a big generator, yet there you were, standing in line
for another one.

"If you can get help, don't fail to take advantage of it.  After all,
you paid for it."

This is the biggest problem.  Even if you hadn't acted like a generator
whore, you seem willing to if you see some advantage for yourself.  This
I have a problem with.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Lee Bell - 14 Sep 2008 23:46 GMT
> "They paid the bulk of the cost of my Honda, even though I already had the
> big generator."
>
> So you already had a big generator, yet there you were, standing in line
> for another one.

I did not stand in line for anything.  I purchased a 2000 Watt Honda because
I had a valid use for it.  The program reimbursed me for most of the cost.
The Honda ran a window unit AC in our bedroom while the larger one was
running the water heater.  I shut the water heater down during the day to
allow us to cook, do the wash, etc.

The larger generator, by the way, powered my commercial icemaker 24/7, the
icemaker that provided ice that FEMA never managed to deliver to S. Florida
to every home in my subdivision.  I had the only generator, and was the only
source of ice that the 48 homes around my lake had.

Next time, perhaps you should seek an understanding before using such terms
as whole.

> This is the biggest problem.  Even if you hadn't acted like a generator
> whore, you seem willing to if you see some advantage for yourself.  This I
> have a problem with.

You have a problem with me exercising my right to assistance I paid for, but
you have no problem with others exercising their right to assistance they
didn't pay for?  Figures.

Lee
Jer - 15 Sep 2008 00:14 GMT
>> "They paid the bulk of the cost of my Honda, even though I already had the
>> big generator."
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Next time, perhaps you should seek an understanding before using such terms
> as whole.

I'll recommend to you the same thing you recommended to me not that long
ago - explain yourself completely first so as to avoid
misunderstandings.  Not that I'll expect any better results than you should.

>> This is the biggest problem.  Even if you hadn't acted like a generator
>> whore, you seem willing to if you see some advantage for yourself.  This I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> you have no problem with others exercising their right to assistance they
> didn't pay for?  Figures.

Uh-oh... tossing the 'rights' word around again... is this expected to
convince me that you have some sort of preordained privilege under the
provisions of a government hand-out program?  Please, Lee, stop it,
you're killing me.

My cousin in Beaumont rang up today to let me know they're okay.  No,
they don't have air conditioning nor an ice maker, but they prepared for
this issue differently than a lot of others - they don't need that stuff
just now - their emergency supplies need neither power nor ice.  Even
better, he has a sat phone, the lives of his family, and a tent for all.
 The kids think it's a really cool camping trip.  They don't remember
Carla, but don't need to, dad remembers.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Lee Bell - 15 Sep 2008 01:26 GMT
> I'll recommend to you the same thing you recommended to me not that long
> ago - explain yourself completely first so as to avoid misunderstandings.
> Not that I'll expect any better results than you should.

I did not express an opinion in a form that made it seem like it was
factual.  I simply indicated that I had made a purchase that was partially
reimbursed under a government program.

You did express what you later claimed was intended to express your opinion,
without mentioning that was what it was.

You called me a whore.

I didn't call you one.

>> You have a problem with me exercising my right to assistance I paid for,
>> but you have no problem with others exercising their right to assistance
>> they didn't pay for?  Figures.

> Uh-oh... tossing the 'rights' word around again... is this expected to
> convince me that you have some sort of preordained privilege under the
> provisions of a government hand-out program?  Please, Lee, stop it, you're
> killing me.

It is my right under the program.  Only you used the word preordained.

> My cousin in Beaumont rang up today to let me know they're okay.  No, they
> don't have air conditioning nor an ice maker, but they prepared for this
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> think it's a really cool camping trip.  They don't remember Carla, but
> don't need to, dad remembers.

Glad they're OK.
Jer - 15 Sep 2008 04:17 GMT
>> I'll recommend to you the same thing you recommended to me not that long
>> ago - explain yourself completely first so as to avoid misunderstandings.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> You did express what you later claimed was intended to express your opinion,
> without mentioning that was what it was.

It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if that's
what you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is opinion sans an
independent and reputable source of corroborating information.  Think of
it as a court room, your opinion can be heard, but it may not matter to
anyone what it is.  If that proves problematic for you, perhaps you
should find something else to occupy your free time with.

> You called me a whore.

No sir, you're confused, I didn't.

> I didn't call you one.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> It is my right under the program.  Only you used the word preordained.

Your overt expectations makes it preordained.  To you.

>> My cousin in Beaumont rang up today to let me know they're okay.  No, they
>> don't have air conditioning nor an ice maker, but they prepared for this
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Glad they're OK.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Lee Bell - 15 Sep 2008 10:40 GMT
> It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if that's what
> you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is opinion sans an
> independent and reputable source of corroborating information.

My purchase of a generator under the FEMA program was, and is, a statement
of fact.

You had no trouble calling me a whore based on it.  Interesting response if,
in fact, you only believed it to be opinion.

You and Greg should be good friends.  You're both willing to lie in an
attempt to make your mistakes appear to be someone else's.
Jer - 15 Sep 2008 16:02 GMT
>> It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if that's what
>> you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is opinion sans an
>> independent and reputable source of corroborating information.
>
> My purchase of a generator under the FEMA program was, and is, a statement
> of fact.

Not a point in contention.

> You had no trouble calling me a whore based on it.  Interesting response if,
> in fact, you only believed it to be opinion.

My stated opinion was you were acting like a whore, predicated on your
stated opinion of expecting something returned from your prior
contributions.  Had those contributions been voluntary, you'd have a
valid point - but they weren't, and you don't.  In my opinion.

> You and Greg should be good friends.  You're both willing to lie in an
> attempt to make your mistakes appear to be someone else's.

Greg will have to speak for himself, but I don't believe my opinion
contains errors.  I believe your opinion does.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Lee Bell - 15 Sep 2008 16:08 GMT
>>> It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if that's
>>> what you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is opinion sans an
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Not a point in contention.

So, everything is opinion, not fact, but the fact is not a point of
contention.

I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation with
someone who can't remember what they said, even when it's right there in
front of them.  You choose to represent what you like as whatever is most
convenient, for you, at the moment.  Like I said, you and Greg have a lot in
common.

> My stated opinion was you were acting like a whore, predicated on your
> stated opinion of expecting something returned from your prior
> contributions.

I did not say that.  What I said was that I expect to be treated equally.

> Had those contributions been voluntary, you'd have a valid point - but
> they weren't, and
> you don't.  In my opinion.

Feel free to provide your list of my contributions . . . or are you, once
again, assuming something you have no basis for knowing about?
Greg Mossman - 15 Sep 2008 16:24 GMT
> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation with
> someone who can't remember what they said, even when it's right there in
> front of them.  You choose to represent what you like as whatever is most
> convenient, for you, at the moment.  Like I said, you and Greg have a lot in
> common.

Sure we do.  We both think it's tragic that you abuse disaster relief
assistance for air conditioning and ice cubes for your rum cocktails
when there are people who actually suffer through these events.

You, Lee, are scum of the earth and the more you post, the more it
becomes obvious to all.  I sincerely hope that the next time you apply
for disaster assistance it's because you truly need it.
-hh - 15 Sep 2008 18:38 GMT
> We both think it's tragic that you abuse disaster relief
> assistance for air conditioning and ice cubes for your
> rum cocktails when there are people who actually suffer
> through these events.

Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
refrigerators weren't working without power.

Afterall, if all that ice were really for cocktails, then there would
have had to have been mention of also needing to allot power to run
the blender aka smoothie machine.

-hh
Lee Bell - 15 Sep 2008 19:45 GMT
Greg Mossman wrote:

> We both think it's tragic that you abuse disaster relief assistance for
> air conditioning and
> ice cubes for your rum cocktails when there are people who actually suffer
> through these
> events.

I don't drink rum cocktails and ice given to others could hardly be for mine
if I did.

My ice took the place of the ice that FEMA didn't manage to get closer than
Alabama.  If you want to address abuse of disaster relief assistance that
might be a good place to start.

Thanks for confirming that you and Jer are two of a kind.  Both of you are
more than willing to twist the truth, make things up, and lie whenever you
think it makes you look better or someone else look worse.

How much food did you send from those grocery stores you own to Florida,
Louisianna or, Houston?

Lee
Joe - 16 Sep 2008 02:17 GMT
> Greg Mossman wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Lee

Thank you Lee

Have any of you been without power for more than 24 hours??

I was without and my kids for 10 days from any ice storm we needed heat,
we could have use power to heat food(my granddaughter was 13
months(actually two of them)

Running a generator is expensive - inconvenient - and a nusisance

I witness Ike 2 days out and 1/3 the strength - thank God - I would have
hated to face that storm head on
Jer - 16 Sep 2008 07:42 GMT
>> Greg Mossman wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Have any of you been without power for more than 24 hours??

yup.

> I was without and my kids for 10 days from any ice storm we needed heat,
> we could have use power to heat food(my granddaughter was 13
> months(actually two of them)
>
> Running a generator is expensive - inconvenient - and a nusisance

That's why people with hurricane planning skills and plan to live where
they occur plan to not need one.  In a life-critical disaster scenario,
a generator is the last thing I want to depend on, unless I like having
to defend my life keeping it.  Which I don't.

> I witness Ike 2 days out and 1/3 the strength - thank God - I would have
> hated to face that storm head on

You don't face a storm like that head on - you get your a.s out of there
and into an assistance center the first chance you get.  You don't stay
behind and afterward expect the government to help you buy a third
generator.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Grumman-581 - 17 Sep 2008 06:20 GMT
> I witness Ike 2 days out and 1/3 the strength - thank God - I would
> have hated to face that storm head on

We lost power at around 02:00 that morning... It was making quite a bit of
noise, so I walked outside and surveyed my property... That was when I
first discovered that I had a *lot* less fence standing that it was just a
few hours previously... Of neighborhood was pretty good about putting up
stuff so that it wasn't blowing around during the storm... My nextdoor
neighbor's "whirlybird" type wind vent on his garage came flying into my
yard and ended up underneath my truck... I had wired mine down, so it just
ended up a bit crooked, but still attached... Walking around during the
height of it really impressed upon you how strong it was...

Signature

See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

Greg Mossman - 16 Sep 2008 05:13 GMT
> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
> refrigerators weren't working without power.
>
> Afterall, if all that ice were really for cocktails, then there would
> have had to have been mention of also needing to allot power to run
> the blender aka smoothie machine.

Glad you have more faith in Lee Bell than I do, hh.  Maybe if Lee
didn't suck up too much of the disaster relief funds for his own
selfish needs, his neighbor could also have gotten generators and made
their own cocktails.
-hh - 16 Sep 2008 11:06 GMT
> Glad you have more faith in Lee Bell than I do, hh.

I certainly do.   After all, I know that he has been proactive in his
storm planning and damage minimization, by actually spent his own time
& money to do so.   Since his actions result in a tangible benefit to
me, it is also appreciated.

> Maybe if Lee didn't suck up too much of the disaster relief funds for
> his own selfish needs, his neighbor could also have gotten generators ...

Perhaps you should ask Lee to estimate how much of his own money he
spent ... never reimbursed ... to support his neighbors with those
resources that they apparently hadn't themselves been nearly as
proactive in acquiring on their own.  For example, just how many
gallons of water do you think that people should have in storage in
their home when living in regions subject to catastrophic events?
Five gallons?  Ten?  One?  None?

And speaking of proactive planning, what kind of slip-on shoes do you
& Janna each have right next to your bed?

-hh
Greg Mossman - 16 Sep 2008 16:10 GMT
> Perhaps you should ask Lee to estimate how much of his own money he
> spent ... never reimbursed ... to support his neighbors with those
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> their home when living in regions subject to catastrophic events?
> Five gallons?  Ten?  One?  None?

I didn't know Lee was self-appointed neighborhood wonder dog.  Maybe
he could be proactive in helping his neighbors prepare for the storms
instead of bringing them ice for their cocktails after the damage is
done?  Surely a government shill like Lee must be a master of red
tape.  That's the expertise that he could use to help his neighbors,
not his bartending skills.

> And speaking of proactive planning, what kind of slip-on shoes do you
> & Janna each have right next to your bed?

Shoes are for fools.  Real men walk barefoot.

But I do have some fuzzy slippers with rubber soles and a few steps
more leads to a closet with several more pairs that I could slip on
and probably a hundred or so of Janna's slip-on shoes.  Ya think she
could get a government handout to buy her more shoes like Imelda
Marcos?

And I have 25 gallons sitting in my living room.  Will the government
pay for that as well, or can I at least deduct it on my tax return?
-hh - 16 Sep 2008 16:27 GMT
> > And speaking of proactive planning, what
> > kind of slip-on shoes do you & Janna
> > each have right next to your bed?
>
> Shoes are for fools.  Real men walk barefoot.

Which then means that you're choosing to not take very remedial steps
to not be a victim.  Yours is relevant to living in Earthquake
country.

FYI, having shoes by the bedside are recommended because when a
meaningful quake hits on the overnight hours (and there's roughly a
40% chance of that), that "barefoot men" jump up and run around on all
of the freshly broken glass in the home, incuring foot lacertions that
through preparation would have otherwise been a very avoidable
injury.

-hh
Greg Mossman - 16 Sep 2008 16:42 GMT
> > > And speaking of proactive planning, what
> > > kind of slip-on shoes do you & Janna
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> through preparation would have otherwise been a very avoidable
> injury.

But there wouldn't be any broken glass by my bedside, certainly none
in between myself and the closet where the rest of my shoes are
located (though the slippers would do a fine job of walking over
broken glass were there any).  I've lived in earthquake country my
entire life and I've lacerated my feet as a result of that far less
than Lee has worked up a sweat trying to switch his power over to the
FEMA-bought generator.  In earthquake country, people learn not to
keep glass and other breakables in precarious places.

Can I apply for a FEMA grant to buy me some new shoes?  I'm sure Lee
would approve.  After all, I'd only use the shoes to walk over to my
neighbors and see if they needed some ice.
-hh - 16 Sep 2008 18:19 GMT
> But there wouldn't be any broken glass by my bedside...

Ah, so you live in a windowless room.  Certainly explains a lot.

-hh
Greg Mossman - 16 Sep 2008 18:32 GMT
> > But there wouldn't be any broken glass by my bedside...
>
> Ah, so you live in a windowless room.  Certainly explains a lot.

Windows don't blow in with enough force to scatter glass all over my
bedroom.  You're confusing earthquakes with hurricanes.   One shakes,
the other blows.

Besides, a quake big enough to break windows hasn't hit this house
since it was built over 50 years ago.  Will it handle the Big One?
Who knows?
Joe - 18 Sep 2008 03:17 GMT
>> Glad you have more faith in Lee Bell than I do, hh.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> -hh

Greg, why didn't you have crutches or a wheel chair available, or at
least a rescue helicopter standing by?
Jer - 16 Sep 2008 07:42 GMT
>>  We both think it's tragic that you abuse disaster relief
>> assistance for air conditioning and ice cubes for your
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
> refrigerators weren't working without power.

What perishable foods would that be?

> Afterall, if all that ice were really for cocktails, then there would
> have had to have been mention of also needing to allot power to run
> the blender aka smoothie machine.
>
> -hh

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Lee Bell - 16 Sep 2008 11:44 GMT
>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
>
> What perishable foods would that be?

Baby formula and medications were the top two.  Those, I kept in my
refrigerators.
Greg Mossman - 16 Sep 2008 16:15 GMT
> >> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
> >> refrigerators weren't working without power.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Baby formula and medications were the top two.  Those, I kept in my
> refrigerators.

That's pretty stupid.  Now you're in my area of expertise since I sell
about $50K of baby formula every week.  Guess what?  None if it needs
to be refrigerated.  Canned liquid concentrate formula needs to be
refrigerated after it's opened, but there's no reason why Floridian
disaster "victims" can't buy the same powdered formula, no
refrigeration necessary, that comprises over 80% of my sales.

And it can't be obvious that the ice was to preserve the perishables
if you're keeping them in your fridge, right?  (This is so easy, just
like shooting cute little fuzzy prairie dogs with a high-powered rifle)
Jer - 17 Sep 2008 07:15 GMT
>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
>> What perishable foods would that be?
>
> Baby formula and medications were the top two.  Those, I kept in my
> refrigerators.

You were the only one that had a fridge?

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 17 Sep 2008 09:04 GMT
>>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>>>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You were the only one that had a fridge?

 They sure work a lot better with electricity.

Signature

--
                                  Popeye
        "If one does as God does enough times, one
        will become as God is."  -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

                   www.finalprotectivefire.com

Dennis (Icarus) - 17 Sep 2008 12:36 GMT
>>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>>>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You were the only one that had a fridge?

Uhm...Jer.....they lost power...remember?
Most refridegerators require electricity. Without electricity, they stop
refridgerating, eventually warming up to ambient.
That's why it's handy to have....generators. iright

Dennis
Lee Bell - 17 Sep 2008 13:25 GMT
>>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>>>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You were the only one that had a fridge?

I was the only one with power, you idiot.  That's what started all of your
sh.t.
dechucka - 18 Sep 2008 04:03 GMT
>>>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>>>>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I was the only one with power, you idiot.  That's what started all of your
> sh.t.

that's because you bludged one off the government
Jer - 18 Sep 2008 08:41 GMT
>>>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>>>>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I was the only one with power, you idiot.  That's what started all of your
> sh.t.

Well, I guess it takes one to know one.  I'm intimately aware of what
started your sh.t.

So, these other people had fridges, but no generators.  You have two
fridges, and two generators.  So, you get a third generator with the
expectation of being reimbursed by FEMA, and you did, but you're not
willing to help the other people get their own FEMA reimbursed
generators.  So, this third generator that FEMA bought is still being
used along side your other two?

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

dechucka - 18 Sep 2008 08:51 GMT
>>>>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods,
>>>>>> since
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> So, this third generator that FEMA bought is still being used along side
> your other two?

Has to run his air conditioner
Lee Bell - 18 Sep 2008 13:20 GMT
> So, these other people had fridges, but no generators.  You have two
> fridges, and two generators.

Two refrigerators and a freezer.

> So, you get a third generator with the expectation of being reimbursed by
> FEMA . . .

Never happened.  You're making things up again.  I bought the generator and
later found out that there was a program covering part of the cost.  I had
forgotten this until last night, but at the same time, I gave away an 850
watt Honda to a family in a trailer park that was about to lose all their
tropical fish which require continuous aeration.

> . . . and you did, but you're not willing to help the other people get
> their own FEMA reimbursed generators.

You're making this up, right?  Where the hell did this come from?  Did you
forget my offer to check to see what programs were available to Grumman and
others in the Houston area?  Do you somehow think that the only people I
ever associate with are in this group?  Note the generator given away to a
less affluent family above.

> So, this third generator that FEMA bought is still being used along side
> your other two?

No, one of the "other two" is permantly mounted in a 32 foot boat, in a
marine across town.  It's a marine generator and isn't real practical for
home use.  It takes an abundance of water flow to cool the motor.  It's hard
to install a through hull port in my back yard.  The other of my "other two"
isn't all that portable.  It can be moved in and out of the garage in an
emergency and for periodic testing and operation, but you and I together
would have trouble lifting it into my truck, a lot of trouble.  The small
one is out where I can get to it.  Being portable, it goes with me any time
I need power someplace where power's not readily available.  That happens
fairly often.

You keep trying to paint me as something I'm not.  Those I have helped,
understand better.  While I'm not real big on programs that take my money
and give it to people I don't believe deserve it, particularly people who
aren't here legally, I'm quite a bit more generous on a voluntary basis,
both financially and with my time.  One of my most treasured posessions is a
small plaque given to me by some hurricane victims.  It reads "My Hero."
It's one of only two that they've ever given out.  Maybe one day, you'll
earn something similar.  Maybe you already have.

Lee
Greg Mossman - 18 Sep 2008 16:54 GMT
> You keep trying to paint me as something I'm not.  Those I have helped,
> understand better.  While I'm not real big on programs that take my money
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It's one of only two that they've ever given out.  Maybe one day, you'll
> earn something similar.  Maybe you already have.

My Hero.

What a friggin' loser.
Joe - 18 Sep 2008 13:18 GMT
>>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>>>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You were the only one that had a fridge?

might have been the only one with power or room in a refrigerator.
Besides it is irrelevant anyway.  He had a refrigerator, he used it, he
let his neighbors use it.  Good for Lee!
dechucka - 18 Sep 2008 22:27 GMT
>>>>> Gosh, its obvious that the ice was to preserve perishable foods, since
>>>>> refrigerators weren't working without power.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> it is irrelevant anyway.  He had a refrigerator, he used it, he let his
> neighbors use it.  Good for Lee!

and of course he was using another generator to run his airconditioner as
others suffered. Bad for Lee
Joe - 16 Sep 2008 02:08 GMT
>> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation with
>> someone who can't remember what they said, even when it's right there in
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> becomes obvious to all.  I sincerely hope that the next time you apply
> for disaster assistance it's because you truly need it.

Greg you can sure be an a.shole

#1 Lee supplied ice and refrigeration to his neighbors.

why shouldn't Lee be reimbursed for his expenditures, after all has we
just paid every citizen of new Orleans with $100,000 we would be money
ahead - another democratic debacle - please don't blame George Bush or
he administration - the democratic leadership refused to heed republican
help and warnings

I hope when Janna's leg is better - she kicks you in your a.s! :-)
-hh - 16 Sep 2008 03:32 GMT
> Greg you can sure be an a.shole
> ...
> I hope when Janna's leg is better - she kicks you in your a.s! :-)

I suspect that we might need a special independent investigation into
how Janna _really_ broke her foot.  Maybe she was trying to prod
'Leadbottom' Greg to go fetch some ice for her drink :-)

-hh
Jer - 16 Sep 2008 07:42 GMT
>>> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation with
>>> someone who can't remember what they said, even when it's right there in
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> #1 Lee supplied ice and refrigeration to his neighbors.

I'm gonna ask this just one more time...

Why can't Lee's neighbors get their own generators?

> why shouldn't Lee be reimbursed for his expenditures, after all has we
> just paid every citizen of new Orleans with $100,000 we would be money
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I hope when Janna's leg is better - she kicks you in your a.s! :-)

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Lee Bell - 16 Sep 2008 11:39 GMT
> I'm gonna ask this just one more time...
>
> Why can't Lee's neighbors get their own generators?

That's been answered in some detail already.  The simple answer, though, is
that, for whatever reason, they chose not to be prepared.  Once the
hurricane has hit, it's too late to be prepared.  Most still don't have
them.

What's interesting about this issue is that it's the same think we've been
talking about relative to guns, insurance, and a host of other things that
have been discussed.  Some people take personal responsibility for
themselves.  The choose not to be victims, but, rather, to do what it takes
to protect themselves as much as possible.  While we are willing to take
help, we plan not to need it.  When we get some, as I did with the generator
purchase, it's not being a whore, it's getting just a little of what those
that made no effort and spent no money in preparation, got in quantity.
It's a slight payback for the thousands in expense and hours or effort put
into making ourselves safe that those you refer to as "victims" didn't
spend.

What you missed the first time through, because you were so quick to attack
that you neither looked to see what you could find out from the past, nor
asked before you climbed all over me, was what others have since told you.
Despite the fact that others, having been told over and over, failed to
prepare, I stepped up to help them in their time of need.  Here's a few
things right off the top of my head.  Not all of these people failed to
prepare.  Some needed help just because they did.

1. Things start when newer residents of Florida start looking for someone to
help them plan.  God bless those people who start early enough.  They do
fine.  I not only help them understand what they need, I direct them to
places most likely to be able to supply their hurricane preparation needs.

2. Once the hurricane hits, I'm out with everybody else, clearing debris,
particularly debris clogging the four roads in our community.  City, county
and federal services clear the major roads.  We don't wait for them to get
around to ours.  We do them ourselves, usually in the first 24 hours.  I
have a full sized pick up truck, two ATVs with winches and a variety of
saws, axes and a chain saw as well as fuel and spare parts for them.  I can
go and I can do, what others can't, so I do.

3. One of my neighbors is disabled.  I, and others, do everything for her.
Another of my neighbors is a group home for mentally challenged people.  We
provide special support for them as well.

4. Several of my best friends work for local police departments.  After
hurricanes, they work 16 on 8 off schedules.  I fed their pets, looked after
their homes and worked to help clear their yards of trees and debris.and,
after Wilma, sat in lines to get fuel when and where I could.  When
available, almost two weeks after Wilma, I also pick up water and ice for
them from FEMA.  If they don't need it, most of them don't, I add it to the
supplies I distribute to my neighbors that do.

5. I have a stand up freezer and two full sized refrigerators.  I provide
refrigeration for of critical supplies, baby formula, medication and the
like, for anybody that  didn't think to prepare for it themselves.  I may be
critical of those that can't, or won't go to the bother themselves, but that
doesn't stop me from doing what I can to help.

6. We've already discussed ice.  I paid over $1,000 for my commercial
icemaker.  It makes somewhere between 150 and 200 lbs of ice a day, but only
stores 80.  After Wilma, it ran 24 hours a day, on my gas, at a cost of as
much as $10 a gallon, so that I could provide ice to help preserve the food
supplies of people who didn't plan for their own needs.  People that didn't
plan includes the local grocery stores.  Almost every one of them lost
everything they had that required refrigeration.  Contrary to Greg's smart
a.s comments, almost 100% of my ice production capacity went to others.
Note that Greg has still not mentioned how much food he sent from his stores
to those in need in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi or Texas.

And you call me a whore for accepting a few dollars back under a government
program I fully and legally qualify for.
Jer - 17 Sep 2008 07:15 GMT
>> I'm gonna ask this just one more time...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> And you call me a whore for accepting a few dollars back under a government
> program I fully and legally qualify for.

Wow, you're a regular boy scout, aren't you?  Okay, you do a lot of good
things for stupid folks, just as I sure many others did, but that
doesn't excuse your own culpability on the generator issue.  IMO, it
would've been better to assist them to get their own generators to power
their own medicine cabinets - this way, they'd still have that generator
for themselves (since they were the ones that needed it in the first
place) - they'd have one, and you'd have your two instead of you having
all three.  For that baby formula business, I would recommend they use
the powder version, or tits - neither needs power.  Also, IMO, just
because it's legal don't mean it's the right or smart thing to do.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Dennis (Icarus) - 17 Sep 2008 12:42 GMT
>>> I'm gonna ask this just one more time...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
> things for stupid folks, just as I sure many others did, but that doesn't
> excuse your own culpability on the generator issue.  IMO, it

There is no "culpability".
> would've been better to assist them to get their own generators to power
> their own medicine cabinets - this way, they'd still have that generator

You mean like paying taxes to fund FEMA programs, advising neighbors as to
what do do?
They still have to buy the things, as sime folks have since.

> for themselves (since they were the ones that needed it in the first
> place) - they'd have one, and you'd have your two instead of you having
> all three.  For that baby formula business, I would recommend they use the
> powder version, or tits - neither needs power.  Also, IMO, just because
> it's legal don't mean it's the right or smart thing to do.

Dennis
Jer - 18 Sep 2008 08:41 GMT
>>>> I'm gonna ask this just one more time...
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
>
> There is no "culpability".

Obviously, your opinion differs from mine.

>> would've been better to assist them to get their own generators to
>> power their own medicine cabinets - this way, they'd still have that
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Dennis

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Lee Bell - 17 Sep 2008 13:29 GMT
> Wow, you're a regular boy scout, aren't you?

An Eagle Scout, in fact.
Joe - 18 Sep 2008 13:19 GMT
>>> I'm gonna ask this just one more time...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
> the powder version, or tits - neither needs power.  Also, IMO, just
> because it's legal don't mean it's the right or smart thing to do.

But in this case it was the right thing and the smart thing to do - way
to go, Lee!
Lee Bell - 18 Sep 2008 13:36 GMT
> But in this case it was the right thing and the smart thing to do - way to
> go, Lee!

Thanks, Joe.  As many here know, I'm a native of S. Florida.  I've learned a
lot about preparation and hurricane survival the hard way.  It's nice to be
able to use that knowledge and preparation to help those less fortunate and
very gratifying when they express their thanks.  You can't buy that feeling,
you can only earn it.

Lee
Joe - 18 Sep 2008 03:15 GMT
>>>> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation
>>>> with
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Why can't Lee's neighbors get their own generators?

Which has what to do about the what we were talking about?

Maybe they could not afford one

Maybe there were no left to be bought

When we had our ice storm there were very few generators in the entire
St Louis Area to be bought.  Of those store that had them they could not
run a credit card, check approval or a debit card.  Pretty tough coming
up with $850 - $900 cash with no power available no atms
Grumman-581 - 18 Sep 2008 03:34 GMT
> Pretty tough coming up with $850 - $900 cash with no power available
> no atms

You don't keep a couple of thousand on hand just in case your wife needs to
bail you out of jail?  Damn, I thought that was just proper emergency
preparedness...

Signature

See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

Greg Mossman - 18 Sep 2008 04:30 GMT
> >>>> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation
> >>>> with
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> run a credit card, check approval or a debit card.  Pretty tough coming
> up with $850 - $900 cash with no power available no atms- Hide quoted text -

Sure, it's not like anyone anticipated a hurricane in Florida.  What a
freak occurrence.
Jer - 18 Sep 2008 08:41 GMT
>>>>> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation
>>>>> with
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>
> Which has what to do about the what we were talking about?

I was trying to ascertain if there were better options for Lee's help.
Lee's plan means Lee is still the only one with a FEMA bought generator,
and presumably used exclusively be Lee now.  If Lee has enough money to
buy a generator, and is willing to help, why can't Lee offer to loan his
neighbors the money for them to get their own generator?  I'm sure
they'd be grateful enough to reimburse him after they get their FEMA check.

> Maybe they could not afford one

Let Lee loan them what they need.

> Maybe there were no left to be bought

Then where did Lee get his?

> When we had our ice storm there were very few generators in the entire
> St Louis Area to be bought.  Of those store that had them they could not
> run a credit card, check approval or a debit card.  Pretty tough coming
> up with $850 - $900 cash with no power available no atms

I've always got enough on hand to do what I need to do on.  Doesn't
everyone that lives in a disaster prone area?  Fail to plan, plan to fail.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Lee Bell - 18 Sep 2008 13:33 GMT
> I was trying to ascertain if there were better options for Lee's help.

This is one of the biggest problems with the Democratic party.  They're all
the time trying to decide what may be a better way for somebody else to
help.  You might find it more productive to think about how you might better
help.

I'm sure you saw me ask Greg how much food he sent from his stores to those
in desperate need in Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.  If you were
paying attention, you probably also noticed he didn't respond.

Now it's your turn.  What did you do for the people in all of those states
in their time of need?

> Lee's plan . . .

Send me a copy of  "Lee's plan" so we both know what it is you're talking
about.

> . . . means Lee is still the only one with a FEMA bought generator . . .

Send me something relating to your source of information.  I was under the
impression that a lot of people qualified, and used the program.

It's quite funny that we all pay for insurance, and neither you, nor Greg
has a problem filing a claim under that insurance, but that, when we all pay
for FEMA protection, you have such a large problem when somebody fully
entitled, files a claim under that and then go on to claim, with absolutely
no basis at all, that the person committed criminal fraud in filing the
claim.

> . . . and presumably used exclusively be Lee now.

You have some basis for this presumption?

> If Lee has enough money to buy a generator, and is willing to help, why
> can't Lee offer to loan his neighbors the money for them to get their own
> generator?

Funny you should mention that.  You'll note, in a recent post, that I did
better than that.  I gave them a generator.

While I have not recently loaned anybody money for a generator, I have, very
recently, loaned someone being evicted from a trailer park that has been
sold, the money they needed for a down payment on a new home.

> Let Lee loan them what they need.

You're being a bit free with my money.  Tell you what, give me contact
information.  I'll share it with the next people I see that need help so
they can contact you.  My charity, is my business.  Perhaps you should pay a
bit more attention to your own.

> I've always got enough on hand to do what I need to do on.  Doesn't
> everyone that lives in a disaster prone area?  Fail to plan, plan to fail.

I assume that you know the answer to this one.  I planned, and managed to
help a lot of people that didn't plan as well.  All you've done, at least
all you've said you've done, is see to yourself and, of course, call those
that did more, whores.  Feel free to send a check next time a hurricane hits
Florida.  Let me know how you'd like it distributed and I'll make sure you
hear the thanks from those it helped.  Until you have, may I suggest you
STFU?

Lee
Greg Mossman - 18 Sep 2008 16:58 GMT
> I'm sure you saw me ask Greg how much food he sent from his stores to those
> in desperate need in Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.  If you were
> paying attention, you probably also noticed he didn't respond.

I responded.  Your big head is stuck in the sand again.

I've paid over a million in taxes.  Whatever portion of that went to
people dumb enough to live in the hurricaned swamps and beg for
government handouts, I have no idea.  Maybe you can figure it out.

Now if people locally need help, and they do, I help.  f.ck Florida,
let it rot.

> While I have not recently loaned anybody money for a generator, I have, very
> recently, loaned someone being evicted from a trailer park that has been
> sold, the money they needed for a down payment on a new home.

My Hero.  Trailer park SuperLee!
Jer - 19 Sep 2008 06:39 GMT
>> I was trying to ascertain if there were better options for Lee's help.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Send me a copy of  "Lee's plan" so we both know what it is you're talking
> about.

Lee's plan is chisel money from a emergency fund when he really doesn't
need it.

>> . . . means Lee is still the only one with a FEMA bought generator . . .
>
> Send me something relating to your source of information.  I was under the
> impression that a lot of people qualified, and used the program.

Really?  Perhaps you'd care to offer those figures.

> It's quite funny that we all pay for insurance, and neither you, nor Greg
> has a problem filing a claim under that insurance, but that, when we all pay
> for FEMA protection, you have such a large problem when somebody fully
> entitled, files a claim under that and then go on to claim, with absolutely
> no basis at all, that the person committed criminal fraud in filing the
> claim.

I believe I'm familiar with FEMA's requirements, and in my opinion, I'm
not convinced you meet them.

>> . . . and presumably used exclusively be Lee now.
>
> You have some basis for this presumption?

Only what I've read here.

>> If Lee has enough money to buy a generator, and is willing to help, why
>> can't Lee offer to loan his neighbors the money for them to get their own
>> generator?
>
> Funny you should mention that.  You'll note, in a recent post, that I did
> better than that.  I gave them a generator.

Yeah, I read that, and was the first mention of it that I recall.

> While I have not recently loaned anybody money for a generator, I have, very
> recently, loaned someone being evicted from a trailer park that has been
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> they can contact you.  My charity, is my business.  Perhaps you should pay a
> bit more attention to your own.

My own charity business is doing well.  You needn't concern yourself
with it.

>> I've always got enough on hand to do what I need to do on.  Doesn't
>> everyone that lives in a disaster prone area?  Fail to plan, plan to fail.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> hear the thanks from those it helped.  Until you have, may I suggest you
> STFU?

Yup, I see to myself first, so I'll be around long enough to do more.
And BTW, I already have an aid distribution network, it doesn't depend
on a government program, it doesn't wait for a disaster, and I think it
works better than FEMA.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 15 Sep 2008 22:38 GMT
> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation with
> someone who can't remember what they said, even when it's right there in
> front of them.

   Trust me, you get used to it.

Signature

--
                                  Popeye
        "If one does as God does enough times, one
        will become as God is."  -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

                   www.finalprotectivefire.com

Lee Bell - 16 Sep 2008 00:36 GMT
>> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation with
>> someone who can't remember what they said, even when it's right there in
>> front of them.
>
>    Trust me, you get used to it.

Do I have to?
Dennis (Icarus) - 16 Sep 2008 01:51 GMT
>>> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation with
>>> someone who can't remember what they said, even when it's right there in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Do I have to?

Nope. When you get tired of it, just block 'em.

Dennis
Joe - 16 Sep 2008 02:18 GMT
>>> I wish you'd get it straight.  It's hard to carry on a conversation with
>>> someone who can't remember what they said, even when it's right there in
>>> front of them.
>>    Trust me, you get used to it.
>
> Do I have to?

Please - don't! It is the only thing that separates us from the idiots
Jer - 16 Sep 2008 07:42 GMT
>>>> It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if that's
>>>> what you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is opinion sans an
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Feel free to provide your list of my contributions . . . or are you, once
> again, assuming something you have no basis for knowing about?

I can certainly understand why you're so terribly confused about all
this.  Acting like a true victim must be a real burden.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 15 Sep 2008 13:03 GMT
> It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if that's what
> you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is opinion sans an
> independent and reputable source of corroborating information.

 For you, you mean.

 When you utter this sort of sophistry, you should make clear the fact
you're speaking for yourself.

>Think of it as a court room, your opinion can be heard, but it may not
>matter to anyone what it is.  If that proves problematic for you, perhaps
>you should find something else to occupy your free time with.

 These points are either facts, or they aren't.

 They are not subject to your personal ignorances and angst.

 Lee's experiences, and the simple fact of where he lives, are a matter of
easily verifiable record here, since you seem to be so predisposed by it.

 Going back several years worth of hurricanes.

 Why don't you educate yourself before damaging your credibility further.

 Also a recorded fact is how he has selflessly shared the benefits of his
preparation foresight, the generator in particular, to his neighbors.

 You started off being stupid here, and you're just working up more
momentum.

Signature

--
                                  Popeye
        "If one does as God does enough times, one
        will become as God is."  -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

                   www.finalprotectivefire.com

Dennis (Icarus) - 15 Sep 2008 13:11 GMT
>> It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if that's
>> what you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is opinion sans an
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>  Why don't you educate yourself before damaging your credibility further.

Is that possible?

>  Also a recorded fact is how he has selflessly shared the benefits of his
> preparation foresight, the generator in particular, to his neighbors.

Perhapsm he thinks they're victims, while Lee isn't?

Dennis
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 16 Sep 2008 01:31 GMT
>>> It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if that's
>>> what you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is opinion sans an
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Perhapsm he thinks they're victims, while Lee isn't?

 Apparently, like most windbags here, he believes it's his place to chose
who is and isn't.

Signature

--
                                  Popeye
        "If one does as God does enough times, one
        will become as God is."  -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

                   www.finalprotectivefire.com

Dennis (Icarus) - 16 Sep 2008 01:51 GMT
<snip>

>>>  Also a recorded fact is how he has selflessly shared the benefits of
>>> his preparation foresight, the generator in particular, to his
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>  Apparently, like most windbags here, he believes it's his place to chose
> who is and isn't.

Seems to be that way.

Dennis
Jer - 16 Sep 2008 07:42 GMT
>>>> It's okay, Lee, you're welcome to construe anything as fact if
>>>> that's what you want to do.  AFAIC, everything I read here is
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>  Apparently, like most windbags here, he believes it's his place to
> chose who is and isn't.

When it comes to an opinion, that's exactly what it means.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Greg Mossman - 15 Sep 2008 16:27 GMT
On Sep 15, 5:03 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:

>   Also a recorded fact is how he has selflessly shared the benefits of his
> preparation foresight, the generator in particular, to his neighbors.

Using FEMA money so he can drink cold rum cocktails with his other
government-teat sucking buddies?  Yeah, what a saint.  I'm surprised
he doesn't bill his cases of rum to the government as necessary
disaster supplies.

I'm also surprised you back his abuse of the system.  I've seen you
support some real low things that your friends have done but this
takes the cake.  Do you really appreciate that your tax money buys
Lee, who probably is wealthier than you, air-conditioning and cocktail
ice?
Joe - 16 Sep 2008 02:10 GMT
> On Sep 15, 5:03 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
> <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Lee, who probably is wealthier than you, air-conditioning and cocktail
> ice?

I am sure most of the conclusions you have jump to never happened - but
rather typical of you to assume that they did
Greg Mossman - 16 Sep 2008 05:16 GMT
> > Using FEMA money so he can drink cold rum cocktails with his other
> > government-teat sucking buddies?  Yeah, what a saint.  I'm surprised
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I am sure most of the conclusions you have jump to never happened - but
> rather typical of you to assume that they did-

Why are you so sure?  Have you even met the government teat-sucking
scumball?
Lee Bell - 16 Sep 2008 11:41 GMT
Greg Mossman wrote:

>> I'm also surprised you back his abuse of the system.  I've seen you
>> support some real low things that your friends have done but this
>> takes the cake.  Do you really appreciate that your tax money buys
>> Lee, who probably is wealthier than you, air-conditioning and cocktail
>> ice?

Typical lying sack of sh.t lawyer tactics.  Make up something about somebody
and then criticize them for it.

One more time, Greg, how much food did you sent to the hurricane ravaged
parts of the country.
Greg Mossman - 16 Sep 2008 16:25 GMT
> One more time, Greg, how much food did you sent to the hurricane ravaged
> parts of the country.

?

This isn't about our individual charitable contributions, this is
about applying for disaster relief when you don't need it.

It's not charity when you get government money to help others, it's
when you help out of your own pocket.

My stores make small food donations for lots of causes.  I think the
only large one this year was about $5,000 worth of cereal donated to
the L.A. Food Bank.  The idiots who are dumb enough to live in the
swamps of the hurricane belt aren't the only Americans in need of
help, ya know.  Thinking so is yet another form of your myopic
selfishness.
Gary Owens - 14 Sep 2008 16:32 GMT
You got something out of FEMA, you must be one of those disadvantaged
groups, or a government worker.

gary
Deltona Fl

>I have not yet found any word on what grants will be available to victims
>of hurricane Ike.  I'm reasonably sure there will be some, but it's still
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Lee
Greg Mossman - 14 Sep 2008 19:29 GMT
> You got something out of FEMA, you must be one of those disadvantaged
> groups, or a government worker.

Both, if you consider Republicans disadvantaged.
Lee Bell - 14 Sep 2008 23:48 GMT
> You got something out of FEMA, you must be one of those disadvantaged
> groups . . .

Yep, I was one of those that had no power after a hurricane.

If you don't file for assistance from FEMA, you don't get assistance from
FEMA.  Funny how that works.

Lee
Gary Owens - 18 Sep 2008 04:41 GMT
I filed all kinds of papers after Charlie and his little sisters, My son
spent 2 days filing papers, he had lost his roof, shingles and wood. We
didn't qualify, not enough need.  My son ended up paying the whole thing out
of pocket, he had let his insurance lapse. FEMA is only for disadvantaged
minorities and/or government workers.  Even though we had a direct hit and
the South Florida area missed most of it most of the aid went south. Its not
a Republican, or a Democratic thing, Its a extreme corrupt bureaucracy.

gary
Deltona, Fl

>> You got something out of FEMA, you must be one of those disadvantaged
>> groups . . .
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Lee
dechucka - 18 Sep 2008 04:47 GMT
>I filed all kinds of papers after Charlie and his little sisters, My son
>spent 2 days filing papers, he had lost his roof, shingles and wood. We
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>went south. Its not a Republican, or a Democratic thing, Its a extreme
>corrupt bureaucracy.

He lives in a cyclone prone area and let his insurance lapse. Hope the money
he saved in premiums covered the cost of the damage
Greg Mossman - 18 Sep 2008 05:20 GMT
> I filed all kinds of papers after Charlie and his little sisters, My son
> spent 2 days filing papers, he had lost his roof, shingles and wood. We
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the South Florida area missed most of it most of the aid went south. Its not
> a Republican, or a Democratic thing, Its a extreme corrupt bureaucracy.

Too bad you weren't real victims like Lee Bell.  After all, he only
has 7 boats and didn't lose any of them but I bet he was darn worried
that he'd have to file further FEMA claims if he did.  What a trauma!

But I doubt Lee let his insurance lapse.  He's a smart guy.  You gotta
be smart to get the most out of your local government disaster relief
emergency funding when all you need it for is to get ice for your
cocktails.  Heck, a smart guy like Lee should be the Republican
candidate for President.  He's a lot smarter than the dummy in office
now.  Bush still hasn't gotten around to filing the FEMA application
for his generator.
Jer - 15 Sep 2008 00:15 GMT
> You got something out of FEMA, you must be one of those disadvantaged
> groups, or a government worker.

Why is that an 'or' question?

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.