Scuba Forum / General / May 2008
For Mr Dillion Pyron
|
|
Thread rating:  |
hierophantfish@hotmail.com - 02 May 2008 01:22 GMT On Apr 22, 11:08 pm, Dillon Pyron <invaliddmpy...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> [Default] Thus spake hierophantf...@hotmail.com: > > >On Apr 20, 2:27 pm, Dillon Pyron <invaliddmpy...@austin.rr.com> wrote: > >> [Default] Thus spake hierophantf...@hotmail.com: > >> >You say "So it's our fault" ? Who is "our" ? You're the ONLY one > >> >who complained and then Dillon jumped on the bandwagon. And if I had > >> >to go through life with a name like Dillon Pyron, I'd probably be in > >> >a bad mood all the time too. > > >> Oh my God, another witty retort that I am totally unable to answer. Of > >> course, I'm actually Jr. And proud of my father, who was awarded a > >> Silver Star. > > >So they gave him the medal because they felt bad for him having a name > >like Dillon Pyron. (HINT - I don't give a flip about your old man.) > > Just out of curiosity, what's your name? You seem kind of ashamed of > it. > > f.cking coward. Hey Dillon, I have searched the internet records of Silver Star recipients for all US wars and conflicts and they don't show your daddy's name. I'm not surprised at all.
hierophantfish@hotmail.com - 02 May 2008 01:27 GMT On May 1, 8:22 pm, hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 22, 11:08 pm, Dillon Pyron <invaliddmpy...@austin.rr.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I searched under your name since you said this : " Oh my God, another witty retort that I am totally unable to answer. Of course, I'm actually Jr. And proud of my father, who was awarded a Silver Star. "
LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in the military when it's simply a pipe dream up their a.s.
Scott - 02 May 2008 14:40 GMT > LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in the > military when it's simply a pipe dream up their a.s. And you served with whom?
dechucka - 02 May 2008 22:44 GMT >> LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in the >> military when it's simply a pipe dream up their a.s. > > And you served with whom? Did he make that claim?
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 03 May 2008 00:54 GMT >>> LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in the >>> military when it's simply a pipe dream up their a.s. >> >> And you served with whom? > > Did he make that claim? Who is he, or you, to question the military service of others without having performed it?
Find that picture yet, Stupid Dave?
 Signature --
A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper
Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
Scott - 03 May 2008 01:28 GMT > Who is he, or you, to question the military service of others without > having performed it? Lets not let go unaddressed not only all you quickly and efficiently put, but the simple fact that most who did serve are happy to share real name, unit and folks served with, and happy to give any contact info needed.
Bring it, dont whine it.
"They" demand "Identifiable" pictures of your truck, as if these c.nt bubbles had the ability to do anything but whack off in grandmas basement.
I have pics of your tractor parked in my neighbors driveway (a local judge). She would have none of a friend of mine, a Marine, not parking where she had space (and no, there wasnt a trailer for 30 miles or so).
> Find that picture yet, Stupid Dave? Of course it did.
It's just following the Francis script.
Make 'em dance brudda.
they cant help it (capitalization not earned)
dechucka - 03 May 2008 04:52 GMT >>>> LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in the >>>> military when it's simply a pipe dream up their a.s. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Who is he, or you, to question the military service of others without > having performed it? How do you know I haven't?
Anyhow the attack by HH is just as stupid as your threads attacking people
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 03 May 2008 08:47 GMT >>>>> LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in the >>>>> military when it's simply a pipe dream up their a.s. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > How do you know I haven't? Who cares?
> Anyhow the attack by HH is just as stupid as your threads attacking people I'm not the one that keeps bringing up the truck, for over a year now.
I'm not the one that's too STUPID, STUPID, STUPID to work a URL.
I'm not the one that whined and cried for someone, -anyone-, to provide them with a URL that they were TOO STUPID, STUPID, STUPID to use anyway, and then called everybody a liar to cover his own PARAMOUNT STUPIDITY.
I'm not the one, who, now that the correct URLs have been provide directly, is SO FUCKIN RETARDED he can't see a 75 ft long, 35,000 lb vehicle -right- in front of his hebetating face.
I'm not the one that is TOO LAZY and TOO f.ck-WITTED to provide cites that he chimps about over and over, so that two fine charities would get $1000.
I'm not the one who runs around leg-humping in other threads to cover his -abject- humiliation.
That would all be Futile David Frank of Team Futile.
I'm not the a.shole buddy that scurried and shanked you when he could have -easily- helped-
That's your Godhead Futile John Francis, the spineless, quivering squid who's a.s you keep your nose up.
Who -I- am, is the guy with the spine and integrity to bet a THOUSAND DOLLARS on my word.
$1000 on Team 3.
The bet stands, while you and Johnny Boy do the Usenet Electric Slide Scurry, and the archives, as they always do, back me 100%
YOUR LORD AND MASTER.
 Signature --
A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper
Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
dechucka - 03 May 2008 21:58 GMT >>>>>> LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in the >>>>>> military when it's simply a pipe dream up their a.s. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Who cares? exactly as it is irrelevant to most comments made on this ng
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 04 May 2008 01:57 GMT >>>>>>> LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in the >>>>>>> military when it's simply a pipe dream up their a.s. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > exactly as it is irrelevant to most comments made on this ng Right, STUPID.
Most comments on the NG don't relate to somebody else's service.
Those lists are -notoriously- inaccurate, and who the f.ck is he (besides your backchannel buddy carl) to point fingers at anyone?
Listen, did you find your picture yet?
After two weeks of holding your hand and leading you about like a retard, Grumman can't do any more except tattoo it on your forehead.
You'd probably still miss it though, because you're STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.
 Signature --
A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper
Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
dechucka - 04 May 2008 11:20 GMT >>>>>>>> LOL Yeah right. Another one here who claims to be involved in >>>>>>>> the [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Most comments on the NG don't relate to somebody else's service. Wow a glimmer of comprehension of popeyes part even more wow it is relevent
> Those lists are -notoriously- inaccurate, and who the f.ck is he (besides > your backchannel buddy carl) to point fingers at anyone? stuffed if I know which is why I said his ad hominem attack was "Anyhow the attack by HH is just as stupid as your threads attacking people"
-hh - 04 May 2008 12:53 GMT > stuffed if I know which is why I said his ad hominem attack was >"Anyhow the attack by HH is just as stupid as your threads attacking people" What "attack" are you talking about, Bub?
Cite please.
You have got to be joking if you think that this 4/17/08 comment was an attack:
HH> In any case, its downright rude to provide a poor reference. HH> Its the writer's responsibility to facilitate making himself HH> understood by most readers.
Now if you want my advice on responsible posting, I've already done that...back in 1998.
Since the situation that lead to the above comment was from someone (you?) doing a crappy job of making a citation, the exercise is now left up to you to go find that citation, rather than for me to simply provide a URL. yes, I know this is 'rude', but it is to prove the point by being rude. Happy web searching...don't die of old age looking.
-hh
dechucka - 04 May 2008 13:00 GMT On May 4, 6:20 am, "dechucka" <dechu...@vomithotmail.com> wrote:
> stuffed if I know which is why I said his ad hominem attack was >"Anyhow the attack by HH is just as stupid as your threads attacking >people" =What "attack" are you talking about, Bub?
Your opening post I'm not sure what the purpose of this thread was except to start another flame war
snip
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 04 May 2008 14:26 GMT > On May 4, 6:20 am, "dechucka" <dechu...@vomithotmail.com> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > snip Perchance was he referring to -H-ierofuckfacefish at -H-otmail?
Futile Dave Frank gets confused, and he doesn't speak english very well.
 Signature --
A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper
Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
Dennis (Icarus) - 04 May 2008 13:06 GMT On May 4, 6:20 am, "dechucka" <dechu...@vomithotmail.com> wrote:
> stuffed if I know which is why I said his ad hominem attack was >"Anyhow the attack by HH is just as stupid as your threads attacking people" What "attack" are you talking about, Bub?
Cite please.
You have got to be joking if you think that this 4/17/08 comment was an attack:
HH> In any case, its downright rude to provide a poor reference. HH> Its the writer's responsibility to facilitate making himself HH> understood by most readers.
Now if you want my advice on responsible posting, I've already done that...back in 1998.
Since the situation that lead to the above comment was from someone (you?) doing a crappy job of making a citation, the exercise is now left up to you to go find that citation, rather than for me to simply provide a URL. yes, I know this is 'rude', but it is to prove the point by being rude. Happy web searching...don't die of old age looking.
// Dennis I'm pretty sure it was hierophantfish. // Dennis
dechucka - 04 May 2008 13:40 GMT On May 4, 6:20 am, "dechucka" <dechu...@vomithotmail.com> wrote:
> stuffed if I know which is why I said his ad hominem attack was >"Anyhow the attack by HH is just as stupid as your threads attacking >people" What "attack" are you talking about, Bub?
Cite please.
You have got to be joking if you think that this 4/17/08 comment was an attack:
HH> In any case, its downright rude to provide a poor reference. HH> Its the writer's responsibility to facilitate making himself HH> understood by most readers.
=Now if you want my advice on responsible posting, I've already done that...back in 1998.
=Since the situation that lead to the above comment was from someone (you?) doing a crappy job of making a citation, the exercise is now left up to you to go find that citation, rather than for me to simply provide a URL. yes, I know this is 'rude', but it is to prove the point by being rude. Happy web searching...don't die of old age looking.
Please accept my abject apologies on this matter I have got my HH and H*****fish mixed up. It is not you who I should of made comment about ad hominem attacks but the fish person.
Very sorry, In my experiance you have always factually and in good faith
-hh
dechucka - 04 May 2008 13:41 GMT > On May 4, 6:20 am, "dechucka" <dechu...@vomithotmail.com> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > Very sorry, In my experiance you have always factually and in good faith and a posted in there would have helped
hierophantfish@hotmail.com - 07 May 2008 01:30 GMT > > <hierophantf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >news:34251e20-b36a-4bca-9270-4d6b2d4c68e1@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Did he make that claim? Dillon Pyron claimed that his father won a Silver Star. However, none of the websites that support info on vets have his name for a Silver Star. None. Not for any war or conflict from WW1 to the smallest battles. None. Imagine that.
Scott - 07 May 2008 04:57 GMT God forgive me for ever trying to defend you.
I have three family members who served that don't show up on any lists.
Again, who did you serve with, *bitch*?
On May 2, 5:44 pm, "dechucka" <dechu...@vomithotmail.com> wrote:
> "Scott" <n...@home.com> wrote in messagenews:xQESj.4$xb2.1@newsfe06.lga... > > <hierophantf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Did he make that claim? Dillon Pyron claimed that his father won a Silver Star. However, none of the websites that support info on vets have his name for a Silver Star. None. Not for any war or conflict from WW1 to the smallest battles. None. Imagine that.
hierophantfish@hotmail.com - 09 May 2008 07:25 GMT > God forgive me for ever trying to defend you. If you truly defended me then thats great. But when you signed up for the military, it also became your f.cking job and not something to whine about.
> I have three family members who served that don't show up on any lists. Then why aren't you doing your part to get them put on the freaking lists? Why are you sitting here typing insults to everyone instead of doing something to help your family members and their honor?
> Again, who did you serve with, *bitch*? Your momma. I already told you that. And you know that if YOU thought someone here claimed to be military and they weren't, YOU wouldn't let that slide. Why are you so busy defending Dillon's dick about it?
> <hierophantf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Silver Star. None. Not for any war or conflict from WW1 to the > smallest battles. None. Imagine that. -hh - 09 May 2008 14:39 GMT hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Dillon Pyron claimed that his father won a Silver Star. However, > none of the websites that support info on vets have his name for a > Silver Star. None. Not for any war or conflict from WW1 to the > smallest battles. It doesn't take much effort at all to find out that there are no online resources that are complete lists of all recipients. If you look a bit further, you'll find that this even includes the Bronze and/ or Silver Stars awarded within the past year.
See:
<http://wiki.answers.com/Q/ Is_there_a_list_of_World_War_2_Bronze_Star_winners>
<http://www.amervets.com/ssmedl.htm#prp> <http://www.amervets.com/bsmedl.htm#prp>
> Imagine that. Imagine that all it then takes to prove you as a pathetic liar is for any one reader here to provide a .jpg of any Vet's original award certificate that you can't find online.
But that is rather trivial to do, so rather than simply proving that you're an a.shole, here's a more useful opportunity:
First, you agree to the following offer, and put some money into Escrow with Greg so that you can't Welch Out of what follows:
Second, the posters here provide some reasonble documentation of a Silver or Bronze Star having being awarded, such as a .jpg of an old photo of the individual wearing it, a .jpg of the original award certificate, letter from a Service, etc. This represents the challenge.
Third, you then must provide a credible online citation that 'documents' the above 'challenge' award recpient, to demonstrate your claim that all Stars are currently documented through online services.
If you fail to do so within 24 hours, then $100 of your Escrowed funds are sent by Greg to Reef Relief as a charitable donation.
But if you *can* provide a credible online citation that the above award recipient was documented (within 24 hours), then only $50 of your Escrowed funds are sent to Reef Relief as a charitable donation, and the poster who submitted the Vet's name will double that amount and provide a $100 donation to Reef Relief.
Finally, if after a week you have gone "Oh Fer" by not being able to match up any Vets with online records in part 3, then your total donations to Reef Relief are doubled.
Deal? Or will you Cut & Run?
-hh
Grumman-581 - 09 May 2008 16:03 GMT > It doesn't take much effort at all to find out that there are no online > resources that are complete lists of all recipients. If you look a bit > further, you'll find that this even includes the Bronze and/ or Silver > Stars awarded within the past year. With the use of computers, service records are a bit more complete these days than they were even as recently as 30 years ago... The government is pretty good about keeping records of things, they're just not necessarily that accurate with the records sometimes (i.e. quantify vs quality)... Back in the old days, everything was paper and you carried your record with you from one duty station to another... Things got lost (or even added)... There was probably a record somewhere else, but who know how long a service member might go before a discrepancy was found... Military payroll records have probably always had problems with them... It was quite common aboard ship to see quite a few people down at the disbursing office trying to straighten out their pay records... If they can't get the pay right, I have no doubt that they might screw up the records on citations also... Assuming the Dillon's father was in WWII, I would not be the least surprised to learn that the government had the records screwed up... A few years ago, I was working on a fault tolerant communication layer for replication of personnel information between ship and shore... Basically keeping the databases in sync... During my testing, I looked up some names of individuals whom I had served with while in the Navy many yeas ago... Some were listed, some weren't... Others who were still in the Navy were listed at a different rank than they currently held... All in all, considering the number of 'employees' and 'former employee's, the military does pretty good, but with that many people, it's not uncommon for things to kind of slip through the cracks...
 Signature See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 11 May 2008 10:18 GMT hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Dillon Pyron claimed that his father won a Silver Star. However, > none of the websites that support info on vets have his name for a > Silver Star. None. Not for any war or conflict from WW1 to the > smallest battles. It doesn't take much effort at all to find out that there are no online resources that are complete lists of all recipients. If you look a bit further, you'll find that this even includes the Bronze and/ or Silver Stars awarded within the past year.
See:
<http://wiki.answers.com/Q/ Is_there_a_list_of_World_War_2_Bronze_Star_winners>
<http://www.amervets.com/ssmedl.htm#prp> <http://www.amervets.com/bsmedl.htm#prp>
> Imagine that. Imagine that all it then takes to prove you as a pathetic liar is for any one reader here to provide a .jpg of any Vet's original award certificate that you can't find online.
But that is rather trivial to do, so rather than simply proving that you're an a.shole, here's a more useful opportunity:
First, you agree to the following offer, and put some money into Escrow with Greg so that you can't Welch Out of what follows:
Second, the posters here provide some reasonble documentation of a Silver or Bronze Star having being awarded, such as a .jpg of an old photo of the individual wearing it, a .jpg of the original award certificate, letter from a Service, etc. This represents the challenge.
Third, you then must provide a credible online citation that 'documents' the above 'challenge' award recpient, to demonstrate your claim that all Stars are currently documented through online services.
If you fail to do so within 24 hours, then $100 of your Escrowed funds are sent by Greg to Reef Relief as a charitable donation.
But if you *can* provide a credible online citation that the above award recipient was documented (within 24 hours), then only $50 of your Escrowed funds are sent to Reef Relief as a charitable donation, and the poster who submitted the Vet's name will double that amount and provide a $100 donation to Reef Relief.
Finally, if after a week you have gone "Oh Fer" by not being able to match up any Vets with online records in part 3, then your total donations to Reef Relief are doubled.
Deal? Or will you Cut & Run?
-hh
Team Pathetic?
Cut & run.
5 Bucks (or whatever is required) on Team 3.
 Signature Popeye "I mean to kill you in one minute, Ned, or see you hanged, at Fort Smith, at Judge Parker's convenience. Which'll it be?" - Cogburn www.finalprotectivefire.com
hierophantfish@hotmail.com - 07 May 2008 01:27 GMT > <hierophantf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > And you served with whom? With your mother, of course. After your father died. The first time he died. Did he die again ? You posted here a few months ago that your father was ailing hard and was ready to pass away from some lung problem. And then someone put up a post you made a FEW YEARS AGO which showed that you said your father died then. So your dad died years ago and came back? Is he gonna die again? If so, can he come back again? Does he have a limit on the number of times he can die and then come back? I remember several people laughing at you and asking if you had many more than one father. You and Dillion Pyshit have this thing in common about your fathers. You both have illusions. You have the illusion that your father died and was resusurercted. Dillion has the illusion that his father won a silver star. Is there a medical psycholigical term for it ? Maybe something like "Paternalofantasy." Hey, tell your mother that I said hello but that I won't be around to spank her for awhile cause I'm getting ready for a scuba trip. I know she'll miss me. You're such a duiker.
Scott - 07 May 2008 04:56 GMT In all her glory, for all to see.
On May 2, 9:40 am, "Scott" <n...@home.com> wrote:
> <hierophantf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > And you served with whom? With your mother, of course. After your father died. The first time he died. Did he die again ? You posted here a few months ago that your father was ailing hard and was ready to pass away from some lung problem. And then someone put up a post you made a FEW YEARS AGO which showed that you said your father died then. So your dad died years ago and came back? Is he gonna die again? If so, can he come back again? Does he have a limit on the number of times he can die and then come back? I remember several people laughing at you and asking if you had many more than one father. You and Dillion Pyshit have this thing in common about your fathers. You both have illusions. You have the illusion that your father died and was resusurercted. Dillion has the illusion that his father won a silver star. Is there a medical psycholigical term for it ? Maybe something like "Paternalofantasy." Hey, tell your mother that I said hello but that I won't be around to spank her for awhile cause I'm getting ready for a scuba trip. I know she'll miss me. You're such a duiker.
hierophantfish@hotmail.com - 09 May 2008 07:14 GMT > In all her glory, for all to see. What a weird way to evade the question. I'll state it over again :
> With your mother, of course. After your father died. The first time > he died. Did he die again ? You posted here a few months ago that [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > I'm getting ready for a scuba trip. I know she'll miss me. You're > such a duiker. Can you answer the question now? Did you realize that your momma and I got it on? She wasn't bad but I pulled out so you couldn't be my son. I don't want to be added to the list of fathers you might have.
> <hierophantf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > I'm getting ready for a scuba trip. I know she'll miss me. You're > such a duiker. Scott - 09 May 2008 14:44 GMT On May 6, 11:56 pm, "Scott" <n...@home.com> wrote:
> In all her glory, for all to see.
> What a weird way to evade the question. I'll state it over again : Not evading anything but allowing you to show everyone what a real lowlife you are.
|
|
|