 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / May 2008How to kill babies
http://www.seashepherd.org/seals2008/video.html See how the hakapikadian government protects killing and violates sea law. Att. graphic footage. Not for the faint of heart. Matthias >http://www.seashepherd.org/seals2008/video.html > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Matthias See Watson's stupid remarks... http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2008/04/04/stpierre-watson.html >>http://www.seashepherd.org/seals2008/video.html >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2008/04/04/stpierre-watson.html Seemed pretty much on the mark to me. Hard to feel too much sympathy for people getting killed in a act that most of the world feels is ghastly and repugnant. I mean, you should see what Futile John has to say about all hunters (except his family members, of course) being nutless cowards. According to him, all those fisherman should be going after the seals barehanded. Think of the spectator ticket sales, who needs pelt money? I like how the Canadian government scurrilously denies the rammings that Watson has film of on the net (although to be fair, the ramming may well have been justified). Freedom of the Press and all that American bosh, don't want too many shots of that live pup being skinned on Youtube, eh?  Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:34:01 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: >>>http://www.seashepherd.org/seals2008/video.html >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Seemed pretty much on the mark to me. So you really believe that the deaths of people is less important than the deaths of seals? Watson lost Elizabeth May of the Green Party due to his comments. > Hard to feel too much sympathy for people getting killed in a act that >most of the world feels is ghastly and repugnant. "Most" of the world? How about the part of the world that views seals as cute. I guess you're one of them. Cuteness wins over rational thought. > I mean, you should see what Futile John has to say about all hunters >(except his family members, of course) being nutless cowards. So you're saying the sealers deserved to die and hunters are nutless cowards? > According to him, all those fisherman should be going after the seals >barehanded. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Watson has film of on the net (although to be fair, the ramming may well >have been justified). The Coast Guard says they were rammed. Watson's group is so bizarre that almost nobody gives them any credibility. > Freedom of the Press and all that American bosh, don't want too many shots >of that live pup being skinned on Youtube, eh? Yeah, I believe in freedom of the press, which really isn't just Yankee bosh. But you can't be so naive as to be unaware of manipulation of the press. Don't really care who posts videos of what. > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:34:01 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > So you really believe that the deaths of people is less important than > the deaths of seals? I dunno. How many hundred -thousand- seals equals a Newfie? > Watson lost Elizabeth May of the Green Party due > to his comments. So who the f.ck is she? Watson didn't seem to be too concerned. >> Hard to feel too much sympathy for people getting killed in a act that >>most of the world feels is ghastly and repugnant. > > "Most" of the world? How about the part of the world that views seals > as cute. I guess you're one of them. Cuteness wins over rational > thought. Maybe, if you think clubbing and skinning live baby seals is "rational". As far as "most", I see a pretty universal condemnation of the activity. Can you provide us with any examples of ovet international support? We'll be waiting. >> I mean, you should see what Futile John has to say about all hunters >>(except his family members, of course) being nutless cowards. > > So you're saying the sealers deserved to die and hunters are nutless > cowards? No, I said John pretty much said that. That's what I mean by "you should see what Futile John has to say about" that. If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. >> According to him, all those fisherman should be going after the seals >>barehanded. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > The Coast Guard says they were rammed. Got a cite for that? The few articles I read cite denial of the incident. Down here, the lighter craft has the right of way. > Watson's group is so bizarre > that almost nobody gives them any credibility. Hmmmmm. >> Freedom of the Press and all that American bosh, don't want too many >> shots [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Yankee bosh. But you can't be so naive as to be unaware of > manipulation of the press. Hey, it hasn't stopped any of you over the years. But I'm glad to see you finally have a grasp on the concept. > Don't really care who posts videos of what. Yeah, f.ck that "evidence" sh.t. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message news:.com... > "Mike from Ottawa" <mev at tikaCANOE dot ca> wrote in message >> >> So you really believe that the deaths of people is less important than >> the deaths of seals? > > I dunno. I believe you. You don't know. Let's hope that you don't swerve your big rig to miss a raccoon and take out a family of five heading to vacation in the other lane. I doubt that the local police will be sympathetic to your explanation that the raccoon was cute and deserved to live and you couldn't determine likewise for the family of five. > "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in > message news:.com... [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > rig to miss a raccoon and take out a family of five heading to vacation in > the other lane. <More irrational fear channelling from Team Futile> Y'never know, Kenny, it could happen to -you-. Later today, even. > I doubt that the local police will be sympathetic to your explanation that > the raccoon was cute and deserved to live and you couldn't determine > likewise for the family of five. So, kennybenny begins dragging truck posts into -different- threads. Now how's his clock doing, Bert? ;-) Kennybenny, a post count would help. Maybe down in the corner. >> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in >> message news:.com... [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Later today, even. A man who thinks the lives of four men are less important than the life of a harp seal fanaticizes on killing with his big rig. Thanks for your honesty Doug. Hmmm. This is sounding much like your posts to Black - just before he disappeared. >>> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote >>> in message news:.com... [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > A man who thinks the lives of four men are less important than the life of > a harp seal fanaticizes on killing with his big rig. You're projecting those voices in your head, Kennybenny. But it's better to be on the safe side, eh? Tell me which color car you're driving, so I'll know to be careful. > Thanks for your honesty Doug. Hey, at least one of us has to be. And it gives you so much more latitude to do without. >Hmmm. This is sounding much like your posts to Black - just before he >disappeared. Like, a thousand posts, you mean, before he launched into eternity... Hmmm. You got the wife and twins provided for and all that? Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote >> in message news:.com... [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Now how's his clock doing, Bert? ;-) Like I care enough to count??? > Kennybenny, a post count would help. > > Maybe down in the corner. Signature“TANSTAAFL” ____________________________________________________________________________ America: Ironically, the safest place to be anti-American. ____________________________________________________________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 > I believe you. You don't know. Let's hope that you don't swerve your big > rig to miss a raccoon and take out a family of five heading to vacation in > the other lane. I doubt that the local police will be sympathetic to your > explanation that the raccoon was cute and deserved to live and you couldn't > determine likewise for the family of five. The raccoon is a necessary part of the ecosystem. The vehicle carrying the family is an artificial intruder. If it's allowed to kill the raccoon, who knows how it might upset the delicate balance of forest life? Meanwhile humans propagate like rats, spreading their filth everywhere. Driving for something as unimportant as vacation is an unnecessary waste of precious resources and contributes to global warming. I say save the raccoon. It's not criminal to make an incorrect split-second decision, merely an accident. As long as Popeye's insurance is paid up, it's merely a matter of annoying paperwork and phone calls. And the raccoon will be forever grateful. On Apr 12, 7:15 am, "ben bradlee" <No...@Way.Bite.Me> wrote: > I believe you. You don't know. Let's hope that you don't swerve your big > rig to miss a raccoon and take out a family of five heading to vacation in > the other lane. I doubt that the local police will be sympathetic to your > explanation that the raccoon was cute and deserved to live and you > couldn't > determine likewise for the family of five. The raccoon is a necessary part of the ecosystem. The vehicle carrying the family is an artificial intruder. If it's allowed to kill the raccoon, who knows how it might upset the delicate balance of forest life? Meanwhile humans propagate like rats, spreading their filth everywhere. Driving for something as unimportant as vacation is an unnecessary waste of precious resources and contributes to global warming. I say save the raccoon. It's not criminal to make an incorrect split-second decision, merely an accident. As long as Popeye's insurance is paid up, it's merely a matter of annoying paperwork and phone calls. And the raccoon will be forever grateful. Absolutely! Save the raccoon, the insurance agent, paperwork and phone calls. This is America by God! (I assume the call will be to the lawyer.) Damn the dead - they can bury themselves. Popeye's insurance might be a wee tad of a problem too; but that's another post. On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:34:01 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" >> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > How many hundred -thousand- seals equals a Newfie? How many hundred thousand seals equals a U-all? Newfoundlanders are some of the greatest people on the planet. Hospitable, great sense of humour. But then they're Canadian so you'd automatically hate them. >> Watson lost Elizabeth May of the Green Party due >> to his comments. > > So who the f.ck is she? I already told you. > Watson didn't seem to be too concerned. He *is* a nutter. >>> Hard to feel too much sympathy for people getting killed in a act that >>>most of the world feels is ghastly and repugnant. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > As far as "most", I see a pretty universal condemnation of the activity. "Most" think it's gruesome, but so is working in a slaughterhouse or a hunter skinning a carcass. I'll put you down as a bleeding heart. > Can you provide us with any examples of ovet international support? > > We'll be waiting. Who's "we?" http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2007/02/20/seal-nunavut.html ...wow, native peoples support it. You against them, too? >>> I mean, you should see what Futile John has to say about all hunters >>>(except his family members, of course) being nutless cowards. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. I wouldn't be getting it from you. You never miss a chance to hump John's leg, and that led you off on one of your usual tangents. >>> According to him, all those fisherman should be going after the seals >>>barehanded. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Got a cite for that? http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/31/canada.hunt.ap/ http://www.cbc.ca/cp/Atlantic/080402/t040257A.html ...and there are plenty more. Watson is well-known for ramming other ships. You're welcome to believe Watson, the nutter. > The few articles I read cite denial of the incident. > > Down here, the lighter craft has the right of way. Watson would laugh at that. >> Watson's group is so bizarre >> that almost nobody gives them any credibility. > > Hmmmmm. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/11/05/071105fa_fact_khatchadourian ...ramming is his signature tactic ...he does what he thinks is right, even if it involves a violation of custom or the destruction of property >>> Freedom of the Press and all that American bosh, don't want too many >>> shots [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Hey, it hasn't stopped any of you over the years. Gotta cite for that? > But I'm glad to see you finally have a grasp on the concept. > >> Don't really care who posts videos of what. > > Yeah, f.ck that "evidence" sh.t. Re-read the stuff about naivete & press manipulation. Hey, I already know you're a bleeding heart. This really brings out your inner Pamela Anderson. > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > > If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. > > I wouldn't be getting it from you. You never miss a chance to hump > John's leg, No problem. I always wear my waders when I read his posts. It's a small price to pay for the laughs. I wish I'd realized a lot earlier how I can own him without even posting. 8) Sooner or later it's gonna sink in just exactly who this clown is that he's cheering for. Perhaps one day when Watson and his own merry band of Metoos sink an American fishing boat, or a Coast Guard cutter, all in the name of saving the planet of course. It's odd that all these do-gooder types jump on this particular bandwagon while they ignore meat packing plants and fishing boats where the treatment of the little critters is at least as gruesome and violent as that given the seals. I suppose it's different when there's a steak in it for you instead of oil and furs. Popeye should watch the routine when divers gut the lobsters they catch. It's a very humane procedure, car aerial and all. We live in a very violent world, as evidenced by the number of wars going on today. Why should our interaction with fish, seals etc be any less violent than that with the other humans? Seems to me only a hypocritical prick would be worrying about the seals and taking little interest in all the misery being foisted on humans by other humans today in so many parts of the world. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that this is one little issue that doesn't draw blowback on Popeye's political heroes. 8) JF >> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > where the treatment of the little critters is at least as gruesome and > violent as that given the seals. I think what it comes down too is the hypocrisy. Enough said cause you'll will never understand or see it I suppose it's different when there's > a steak in it for you instead of oil and furs. Popeye should watch the > routine when divers gut the lobsters they catch. It's a very humane [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > JF > >> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > I think what it comes down too is the hypocrisy. Enough said cause > you'll will never understand or see it You may be right, but could you take a little try at explaining what you mean, just to humour me. I'm kinda curious to see what you mean. JF >>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" >>>>> If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > JF some people see nothing wrong in bludgeoning to death poor baby seals, but have a sh.t fit when shown practices at meat packing companies or fisheries. There are others that think hunters who got out and kill an animal (whatever it is) used it for food and clothing is horrid. But have no problem sitting down to dinner consisting of the very same types of food. Deer or not cute - they are destructive. I live basically in a rural area. 68 of my farm ground is in corn or soybeans every year. The deer in the area can wreak havoc on a large area of corn in very short order. We have coyotes that we can shoot year round, they help keep the deer population down. Many that protest these very actions see no problem with pro-choice and late term abortions. No one has to look far to see our liberal legislatures attacking more gun rights/hunting areas,fees,and daily bag limits, but doctors who perform abortions have no daily 'bag' limit'. The same ones that fight hunting and gun rights are liberalizing the conditions of abortion. A 13 year-old girl can walk into an abortion clinic and get an abortion. A 13 year old boy can not go hunting without gun safety and hunting training. Which procedure nearly always guarantees a kill? > >>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > >>>>> If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > without gun safety and hunting training. Which procedure nearly always > guarantees a kill?- So are you actually saying that all this concern for the seals is misguided, or at least disproportionate, when there are more important inhumane transgressions to be addressed? Popeye speaks for the seals. Perhaps you should ask him why they're more important than the things you mentioned. JF >>>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" >>>>>>> If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > JF no I'm not saying that at all, just that some people see the bludgeoning of seals as okay while believing abortion is abhorrent or that the baby seal killings as abhorrent, while justifying abortion > no I'm not saying that at all, just that some people see the bludgeoning > of seals as okay while believing abortion is abhorrent or that the baby > seal killings as abhorrent, while justifying abortion Perhaps we just need a way to salvage the human fetus skins and use those in place of baby seals. If nothing is smoother than a baby's bottom, a fetal bottom has to be even better. This way everyone is satisfied. >> no I'm not saying that at all, just that some people see the bludgeoning >> of seals as okay while believing abortion is abhorrent or that the baby [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > bottom, a fetal bottom has to be even better. This way everyone is > satisfied. You can't satisfy everyone..... No where is there better proof than right here on rec.scuba > >> no I'm not saying that at all, just that some people see the bludgeoning > >> of seals as okay while believing abortion is abhorrent or that the baby [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > No where is there better proof than right here on rec.scuba Truer words were never spoken, Joe. JF > >>>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > >>>>>>> If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > of seals as okay while believing abortion is abhorrent or that the baby > seal killings as abhorrent, while justifying abortion- Fair enough. So just out of curiosity, how do you feel about the way they kill sheep, cattle and hogs in a slaughterhouse? JF >>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" >>>>>>>>> If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > JF to be a complete hypocrite - I rather not know the details. I know that they are killed in the most efficient method available - which may not (I'm sure it isn't) be very humane. While I see the reports on the seal slaughter - it doesn't affect me much (isn't that a great answer) while Peta is a rather radical group - if it were up to them we wouldn't be even allowed to fish, certainly not hunt, I do believe in the ehtical treatment of some animals (I'm a bigot) I certainly don't believe in PETA.att (People for the Ethical Treatment of Attorneys (Sorry, Greg), I do find PETA.NET (People for Eating Tasty Animals) A friend of mine has a butcher shop - he electrocutes the pigs - I have to put animals down by shooting them - I don't particularly like that either. > >>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > >>>>>>>>> If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > to put animals down by shooting them - I don't particularly like that > either.- I'm probably just doing a Dennis here, but are you saying you really don't care whether or not the seals are hunted? When you jumped into the thread I assumed you were anti-sealing. JF >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" >>>>>>>>>>> If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > > JF No, I couldn't care less about seal-hunting. My point was that there are many that are anti-hunting anti-gun but pro seal hunting. And there are those that are anti seal-hunting but pro-hunting and/or pro-gun - kinda weird >>>>>>>> On Apr 12, 6:41 pm, Mike from Ottawa <mev at tikaCANOE dot ca> >>>>>>>> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >>>>>>>> band >>>>>>>> of Metoos sink an American fishing boat, or a Coast Guard cutter, You may worry about him sinking a Canadian cutter. We have no such fears. Besides, you guys privateered him just like an enemy combatant. What a slick act of overt piracy -that- was. Who'da thought you guys had the balls? >>>>>>>> all in the name of saving the planet of course. >>>>>>>> It's odd that all these do-gooder types jump on this particular [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > A friend of mine has a butcher shop - he electrocutes the pigs - I have to > put animals down by shooting them - I don't particularly like that either. Well Joe, do you take the piglets, declare them "adult" after -three- weeks, stun then with a club, skin them alive, and throw away all the meat? That's what Futile John gets with his "just like a slaughterhouse", and our resulting "hypocrisy". He's obviously been to the Kennybenny Johnson-Bradlee School of Usenet Parity. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >>>>>>> On Apr 12, 11:05 pm, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> >>>>>>> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 103 lines] > He's obviously been to the Kennybenny Johnson-Bradlee School of Usenet > Parity. can't say that I have - I would see much thrill in it - but heck who am I to say such a national past time is bad for anyone - they sure haven't tried to tell us how to live and how stupid we are >>>> Fair enough. So just out of curiosity, how do you feel about the way >>>> they kill sheep, cattle and hogs in a slaughterhouse? [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > can't say that I have - I would see much thrill in it - but heck who am I > to say such a national past time is bad for anyone I don't think the seals are too fond of it. >- they sure haven't tried to tell us how to live and how stupid we are <cough> Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" >>>>>>> Frederick" [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > of seals as okay while believing abortion is abhorrent or that the baby > seal killings as abhorrent, while justifying abortion I haven't received Futile John's posts yet, so I haven't responded to any of his clap-trap. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > no I'm not saying that at all, Of course youre not, and Francis knows it. > just that some people see the bludgeoning > of seals as okay while believing abortion is abhorrent or that the baby > seal killings as abhorrent, while justifying abortion > So are you actually saying that all this concern for the seals is > misguided, or at least disproportionate, when there are more important > inhumane transgressions to be addressed? > > Popeye speaks for the seals. Perhaps you should ask him why they're > more important than the things you mentioned. I cannot remember having read that Doug put an order of importance to the things you mention . Matthias >> So are you actually saying that all this concern for the seals is >> misguided, or at least disproportionate, when there are more important [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I cannot remember having read that Doug put an order of importance to the > things you mention . His mind wanders. It could have been a classmate from the third grade. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > It's odd that all these do-gooder types jump on this particular > bandwagon while they ignore meat packing plants and fishing boats > where the treatment of the little critters is at least as gruesome and > violent as that given the seals. No, I don't ignore fishing boats which put out illegal practice. They'll remember. I suppose it's different when there's > a steak in it for you instead of oil and furs. Popeye should watch the > routine when divers gut the lobsters they catch. It's a very humane > procedure, car aerial and all. We live in a very violent world, as > evidenced by the number of wars going on today. Why should our > interaction with fish, seals etc be any less violent than that with > the other humans? Because we are human to be able to make a difference. Some. >Seems to me only a hypocritical prick would be > worrying about the seals and taking little interest in all the misery > being foisted on humans by other humans today in so many parts of the > world. See? Make a difference and decide where to take action. Nobody can be everywhere. Matthais > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > How many hundred thousand seals equals a U-all? Hey, we'll starve a hundred logger's families over a couple of frikkin owls too stupid to move to another tree. > Newfoundlanders are some of the greatest people on the planet. Yeah, dude, I been there. > Hospitable, great sense of humour. But then they're Canadian so you'd > automatically hate them. Just to clarify- It's not all Canadians I hate, it's just you and a select few. There's a half dozen Rec.scubans I'd die for, Dan Bracuk, Dave from Edmonton, Bians Nadwidny and the ones that enjoy diving and keep their cultural and political traps shut. Just think how lucky we are to have you for neighbors when it could have been the Belgians or the Poles, fer christ sake. >>> Watson lost Elizabeth May of the Green Party due >>> to his comments. >> >> So who the f.ck is she? > > I already told you. And I then asked... >> Watson didn't seem to be too concerned. > > He *is* a nutter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Watson Sounds like the guy has more balls than you and I will ever have. >>>> Hard to feel too much sympathy for people getting killed in a act that >>>>most of the world feels is ghastly and repugnant. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > "Most" think it's gruesome, but so is working in a slaughterhouse or a > hunter skinning a carcass. I'll put you down as a bleeding heart. You won't be worrying for elbow room. >> Can you provide us with any examples of ovet international support? >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2007/02/20/seal-nunavut.html > ...wow, native peoples support it. Well, that was pretty shallow, even for you. "We'll continue to be one of the defenders of the seal hunt because it's in our interest to see and spread the market," Okalik said. Well, what a shock. I was thinking more like people in other countries, not others that participate, or have similar campaigns. >You against them, too? Now that you mention it, probably. I don't cut our "native Americans" too much slack, and I doubt I'd cut yours any more. >>>> I mean, you should see what Futile John has to say about all hunters >>>>(except his family members, of course) being nutless cowards. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I wouldn't be getting it from you. You never miss a chance to hump > John's leg, and that led you off on one of your usual tangents. Which has no bearing on what was written. But, if I can't help you, Dennis may be along. >>>> According to him, all those fisherman should be going after the seals >>>>barehanded. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/31/canada.hunt.ap/ > http://www.cbc.ca/cp/Atlantic/080402/t040257A.html http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/407816 The high-seas skirmish, which was hotly denied by federal fisheries officials, comes on the heels of a rescue operation gone awry that cost the lives of four seal hunters over the weekend. But you're also correct, and I'll stand corrected on the point. http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/413940 Check -that- out: "Hearn rejected that claim, saying the Mowat was seized legally in Canada's "internal waters," without providing the specific location of the seizure." "Watson has argued that his vessel never entered Canada's 12-nautical-mile territorial limit, but Hearn said the Fisheries Act gave him the authority to take action beyond that line." > ...and there are plenty more. Watson is well-known for ramming other > ships. You're welcome to believe Watson, the nutter. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Gotta cite for that? I'll get right on it. >> But I'm glad to see you finally have a grasp on the concept. >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > know you're a bleeding heart. This really brings out your inner > Pamela Anderson. Now, now. No name calling like Scott and Popeye. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:32:56 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" >> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: <snip> >>> How many hundred -thousand- seals equals a Newfie? >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Yeah, dude, I been there. But you like pissing on Canadians. They're included. >> Hospitable, great sense of humour. But then they're Canadian so you'd >> automatically hate them. > > Just to clarify- It's not all Canadians I hate, it's just you and a select >few. You've never met me, but you hate me. That says a lot about you. I don't hate you. I just have a lot of pity for you. > There's a half dozen Rec.scubans I'd die for, Dan Bracuk, Dave from >Edmonton, Bians Nadwidny and the ones that enjoy diving and keep their >cultural and political traps shut. Yet it's OK for you to keep opening your cultural & political trap? How hypocritical of you. You'd really die for them? How well do you know them? Would they die for you? Or is just more BS from the King of BS. You never miss a chance to hump Canada's leg, yet I never see any apology to Dan/Dave/Brian. You don't just respond to posts with your anti-Canadian bile, you add posts just to take a poke at us. You don't exclude Dan/Dave/Brian from these attacks, so you must be attacking all of them, too. Or are you just attacking all Canadians except those 3? Whatever the case, it makes you look pathetic. > Just think how lucky we are to have you for neighbors when it could have >been the Belgians or the Poles, fer christ sake. So we're the lesser evil? Whatever. I'm sure the Belgians and Poles are much happier being far away from you. >>>> Watson lost Elizabeth May of the Green Party due >>>> to his comments. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > And I then asked... Clueless in Tennessee... >>> Watson didn't seem to be too concerned. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Sounds like the guy has more balls than you and I will ever have. He likes to parade around in some grandiose, phony admiral's uniform, is a pompous windbag and can be dangerous or at least appear to be dangerous. I can see why you like him. >>>>> Hard to feel too much sympathy for people getting killed in a act that >>>>>most of the world feels is ghastly and repugnant. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >>> >>> Maybe, if you think clubbing and skinning live baby seals is "rational". Here's some news for you... http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/sealhunt/ >>> As far as "most", I see a pretty universal condemnation of the activity. >> >> "Most" think it's gruesome, but so is working in a slaughterhouse or a >> hunter skinning a carcass. I'll put you down as a bleeding heart. > > You won't be worrying for elbow room. Why should I? You're the bleeding heart. Besides, I have nothing to worry about. >>> Can you provide us with any examples of ovet international support? >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Well, that was pretty shallow, even for you. That was a pretty dumb comment, even for you. > "We'll continue to be one of the defenders of the seal hunt because it's >in our interest to see and spread the market," Okalik said. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I was thinking more like people in other countries, not others that >participate, or have similar campaigns. They keep their traps shut. It's not a pretty spectacle. There is an Irish politician who's supported us, and others, but most just keep quiet. They're quite happy to have world-focus on us and not them. >>You against them, too? > > Now that you mention it, probably. As you've said about yourself: As for me being an a.shole, I herald it. I've been a major prick, all my life. > I don't cut our "native Americans" too much slack, and I doubt I'd cut >yours any more. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Which has no bearing on what was written. Then why mention John and his take on things? I imagine you'll skate around that one. Again. > But, if I can't help you, Dennis may be along. Whatever. I'm trembling in my boots. <snip> >> http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/31/canada.hunt.ap/ >> http://www.cbc.ca/cp/Atlantic/080402/t040257A.html [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >territorial limit, but Hearn said the Fisheries Act gave him the authority >to take action beyond that line." You believe Watson, a known blow-hard. Good for you. Shows you to be a true critical-thinker. >> ...and there are plenty more. Watson is well-known for ramming other >> ships. You're welcome to believe Watson, the nutter. <snip> >>>>> Freedom of the Press and all that American bosh, don't want too many >>>>> shots [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >>> >>> Hey, it hasn't stopped any of you over the years. Does the "you" include Dan/Brian/Dave? Or is it just all of us except them? Hint: it's time for you to skate again. >> Gotta cite for that? > > I'll get right on it. Of course you won't. That doesn't stop you from demanding cites from everyone else, or placing dumb-a.s bets. >>> But I'm glad to see you finally have a grasp on the concept. >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > No name calling like Scott and Popeye. What name-calling? You don't like Pamela? Must be because she's Canadian. > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:32:56 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > [quoted text clipped - 232 lines] > > - Show quoted text - On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest amount for applause, I give you 10 to the 10th power. You're rocking off the chart bro !! :-) > On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest amount for > applause, I give you 10 to the 10th power. You're rocking off the > chart bro !! :-) Do you posses an education ? David Edmonton, Alberta > > On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest amount for > > applause, I give you 10 to the 10th power. You're rocking off the > > chart bro !! :-) > Do you posses an education ? > David > Edmonton, Alberta Ask him about clams and secret squirrels... SignaturePolitical Correctness A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. > > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest amount for [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Ask him about clams and secret squirrels... Hmm. Sounds like a Tennessee love ritual. JF > > > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > > On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest amount for [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > JF I think Scott was high when he posted that. But then again, that would differ from any other post he's dropped on us by how ? > I think Scott was high when he posted that. But then again, that > would differ from any other post he's dropped on us by how? What you think would fill an inverted thimble. > > > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > > On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest amount for [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > JF Sounds like a sock puppet to me. Stop and listen. I'm sure you'll hear the distinct "caw, caw. On Apr 21, 6:10 pm, JOF <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 21, 6:09 pm, "Scott" <n...@home.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > JF Sounds like a sock puppet to me. Stop and listen. I'm sure you'll hear the distinct "caw, caw. Dave? A well known senior Rec.scuba, arguably the smartest guy here. 10 year posting history under his own name. You? Now -there's- a sockpuppet, carl. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >> > "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote in >> > > Do you posses an education ? > Sounds like a sock puppet to me. Stop and listen. I'm sure you'll > hear the distinct "caw, caw. I noticed you did not answer the question. Really, it was not a hard one. Need some time to formulate a response ? David Edmonton, Alberta > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> > "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote in [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Need some time to formulate a response ? Are you sure yer not a Dennis sockpuppet? JF On Apr 30, 11:17 pm, "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote: > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> > "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote in [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Need some time to formulate a response ? Are you sure yer not a Dennis sockpuppet? Wow. Then you have to follow him from thread to thread and bully him. Just a couple days, and he already owns you. You do all the work, Futile John. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > >> > "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote in [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > JF He could be a Dennis sockpuppet. His history is short, like he was just created. How convenient for Poopeye. > He could be a Dennis sockpuppet. His history is short, like he was > just created. How convenient for Poopeye. Is this a demonstration of that education you claim to possess ? David Edmonton, Alberta > > He could be a Dennis sockpuppet. His history is short, like he was > > just created. How convenient for Poopeye. > > Is this a demonstration of that education you claim to possess ? Yes. Funny, or sad? Dennis >"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:0ca8e743-b1ad-4794-a09f-07cb1a77f650@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com... >> hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: >> >> > "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote in [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Are you sure yer not a Dennis sockpuppet? I'm sure he's not. I don't use sock puppets. Dennis > Are you sure yer not a Dennis sockpuppet? Are you still working on a response to my last question ? I notice you have time for this response. David Edmonton, Alberta >> Are you sure yer not a Dennis sockpuppet? > > Are you still working on a response to my last question ? > > I notice you have time for this response. That's SOP for their team. They just chant vitriol over and over, and sling crap to see what sticks. If they actually -answered- a single question, assuming they could, they'd be terrified you'd ask another. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > > Are you sure yer not a Dennis sockpuppet? > > Are you still working on a response to my last question ? > > I notice you have time for this response. It called "sliding". :-) Dennis > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> > "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote in [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > David > Edmonton, Alberta > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> > "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote in [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > David > Edmonton, Alberta I answered you. You chose not to listen. Need some time to drop your MEETOO association ? > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest amount for > > applause, I give you 10 to the 10th power. You're rocking off the > > chart bro !! :-) > Do you posses an education ? > > David > Edmonton, Alberta Ok... you said "Do you posses an education ?" posses ? WHat is the word that you attempting to use ?! I have an education and I've been told via email that you are trying to get yours. Please don't ask me to contribute to your fund. I'm the product of poor black sharecroppers. If I can work my way through my college years, then so can you. Get a job and work toward your education. ANd by the way, you seem like a sockpuppet. On Apr 21, 6:05 pm, "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote: > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest amount for > > applause, I give you 10 to the 10th power. You're rocking off the > > chart bro !! :-) > Do you posses an education ? > > David > Edmonton, Alberta Ok... you said "Do you posses an education ?" posses ? WHat is the word that you attempting to use ?! I have an education and I've been told via email that you are trying to get yours. Already quoting the "silent majority", via backchannel. A shoe-in for Team Futile. Please don't ask me to contribute to your fund. I'm the product of poor black sharecroppers. If I can work my way through my college years, then so can you. Get a job and work toward your education. ANd by the way, you seem like a sockpuppet. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > I have an education ... Perhaps you could make a demonstration of it. David Edmonton, Alberta > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > I have an education ... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > David > Edmonton, Alberta Ready, set, draw. You're a sockpuppet for sure. On Apr 30, 11:25 pm, "Wm. David Maddin" <sojou...@telus.net> wrote: > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > I have an education ... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > David > Edmonton, Alberta Ready, set, draw. You're a sockpuppet for sure. That's hysterical coming from someone who's had as many as you, carl. Let me educate you. Take "David" and "Edmonton, Alberta" and stick them up your GAGS. Let me do it for you, because you're obviously as stupid as STUPID, STUPID, STUPID Futile Dave. http://deadsmall.com/3K1 ** Soooo Eaaasy, (unless you're stupid Dave Frank...) Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com ** FUTILE DAVID FRANK, kennybenny, and other STUPID motherf..kers: Place the CURSOR ARROW THINGY ON THE bbblllluuuueeeee llleeeetttttttterrrrs. And SHAZAM!!!!!!, a REAL, LIVE CITE will MAGICALLY APPEAR!!!!!!!!!! Contrary to Team Futile policy, cites -do-, in fact, exist. >> hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: >> > I have an education ... [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Ready, set, draw. > You're a sockpuppet for sure. That is a rather poor demonstration. Care to try again ? David Edmonton, Alberta > >> hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> > I have an education ... [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Care to try again ? I would think an adequate demonstration was not being able to understand that "posses" was "possess". :-) Dennis On May 1, 8:03 pm, hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > I have an education ... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > You're a sockpuppet for sure. I sense a pattern. Has anyone else noticed how the syllable "fish" in someone's name is a mark of idiocy on rec.scuba? -ReeFish(LargeNassauGrouper)/Robert F.Ling -Fishbre396 and now this one, hierophantfish > On May 1, 8:03 pm, hierophantf...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > -Fishbre396 > and now this one, hierophantfish Hey, I like Da Feeeesh! But you're certainly right about the other two. I had access to Fishbags' name, address, and web site, but it was given to someone else in confidence, so due to that integrity others say I don't have, I didn't harvest it. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > >> Hospitable, great sense of humour. But then they're Canadian so you'd > >> automatically hate them. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I don't hate you. I just have a lot of pity for you. But I heard he was trying to get outa Tennessee. On the plus side his trucking job gets him a lot of Canuck time. > > There's a half dozen Rec.scubans I'd die for, Dan Bracuk, Dave from > >Edmonton, Bians Nadwidny and the ones that enjoy diving and keep their [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > You'd really die for them? How well do you know them? Would they die > for you? Or is just more BS from the King of BS. Actually, he probably would. In a peculiar sorta way he's highly principled. > You never miss a chance to hump Canada's leg, Some rec.scubans are kinda hot for Canadian leg. Spend a little time in off the beaten track Tennessee bars and you'll understand why. I guess they like teeth in their wimmenfolk, and perhaps a few pounds less weight. > >>>> Watson lost Elizabeth May of the Green Party due > >>>> to his comments. > > >>> So who the f.ck is she? One who was too smart to put up with Watson's crap any longer. > > Sounds like the guy has more balls than you and I will ever have. Some folks confuse arrogance and self-interest with balls. I thought you'd be smarter than that. I'm amazed that you of all people have fallen for his vacuous schtick, or is just that you jump on any opp to hump Canuck gams? > http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/sealhunt/ > > >>> As far as "most", I see a pretty universal condemnation of the activity. Just from the professional bleeding hearts and those who lack a mind of their own. > > I don't cut our "native Americans" too much slack, and I doubt I'd cut > >yours any more. > > >>>>> I mean, you should see what Futile John has to say about all hunters > >>>>>(except his family members, of course) being nutless cowards. Remind me what you think I said. > >>>> So you're saying the sealers deserved to die and hunters are nutless > >>>> cowards? > > >>> No, I said John pretty much said that. So remind me what I said. Was it in the last 4 years, and was it about anything relevant? > >>> That's what I mean by "you should see what Futile John has to say about" > >>>that. > > >>> If you need a clearer explanation of plain English, let me know. I do. I always get a kick out of the machinations you go through to sling crap. > >> I wouldn't be getting it from you. You never miss a chance to hump > >> John's leg, and that led you off on one of your usual tangents. He's particularly fond of Canuck legs. It may well be a fetish he has. > > Which has no bearing on what was written. > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > >Canada's "internal waters," without providing the specific location of the > >seizure." Should he have provided GPS readings just to prove that it was all on the up and up? > > "Watson has argued that his vessel never entered Canada's 12-nautical-mile > >territorial limit, but Hearn said the Fisheries Act gave him the authority > >to take action beyond that line." > > You believe Watson, a known blow-hard. Good for you. Shows you to be > a true critical-thinker. Birds of a feather. Rec.scuba is perhaps the best, and worst, thing to happen to Popeye. > >> ...and there are plenty more. Watson is well-known for ramming other > >> ships. You're welcome to believe Watson, the nutter. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > > I'll get right on it. I musta missed your response to that. I'm sure you wouldn't drop this ball. > Of course you won't. That doesn't stop you from demanding cites from > everyone else, or placing dumb-a.s bets. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > What name-calling? You don't like Pamela? Must be because she's > Canadian.- Hooters are hooters, even when they're fake, and Canuck. He's salivating but hates to admit it. JF I don't use a sig line often but I've been quoted so many times here I thought turnabout is only fair. Popeye's nothing if not honest, charming at times, and a major prick at others. He keeps us all off balance. To him that's apparently a good thing. "As for me being an a.shole, I herald it. I've been a major prick, all my life." - Popeye > Actually, he probably would. In a peculiar sorta way he's highly > principled. Yet, you failed to recognize this in all the exchanges over these many years. David Edmonton, Alberta > Yet, you failed to recognize this in all the exchanges over these many > years. It's clearly recognized and distinctly resented. Eric Hoffer put it more eloquently; "It has often been said that power corrupts. But it is perhaps equally important to realize that weakness, too, corrupts. Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many. Hatred, malice, rudeness, intolerance, and suspicion are the faults of weakness. The resentment of the weak does not spring from any injustice done to them but from their sense of inadequacy and impotence." > Eric Hoffer put it more eloquently; > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > not spring from any injustice done to them but from their sense of > inadequacy and impotence." So he did. David Edmonton, Alberta > > Actually, he probably would. In a peculiar sorta way he's highly > > principled. > > Yet, you failed to recognize this in all the exchanges over these many > years. Not at all. You just failed to jump on his bandwagon earlier. Try to keep up. JF JF I don't use a sig line often but I've been quoted so many times here I thought turnabout is only fair. Popeye's nothing if not honest, charming at times, and a major prick at others. He keeps us all off balance. To him that's apparently a good thing. "As for me being an a.shole, I herald it. I've been a major prick, all my life." - Popeye Hey, -I'm- not the one who denies his own writing, sometimes within the same post it's written in. Instead of answering this hack of yours, why don't you respond to the original (that you seem to have missed), and I'll take it from there: "Mike from Ottawa" <mev at tikaCANOE dot ca> wrote in message news:67h10459229pieuso17goooaiiu1l66u4n@4ax.com... > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:55:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > How many hundred thousand seals equals a U-all? Hey, we'll starve a hundred logger's families over a couple of frikkin owls too stupid to move to another tree. > Newfoundlanders are some of the greatest people on the planet. Yeah, dude, I been there. > Hospitable, great sense of humour. But then they're Canadian so you'd > automatically hate them. Just to clarify- It's not all Canadians I hate, it's just you and a select few. There's a half dozen Rec.scubans I'd die for, Dan Bracuk, Dave from Edmonton, Bians Nadwidny and the ones that enjoy diving and keep their cultural and political traps shut. Just think how lucky we are to have you for neighbors when it could have been the Belgians or the Poles, fer christ sake. >>> Watson lost Elizabeth May of the Green Party due >>> to his comments. >> >> So who the f.ck is she? > > I already told you. And I then asked... >> Watson didn't seem to be too concerned. > > He *is* a nutter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Watson Sounds like the guy has more balls than you and I will ever have. >>>> Hard to feel too much sympathy for people getting killed in a act that >>>>most of the world feels is ghastly and repugnant. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > "Most" think it's gruesome, but so is working in a slaughterhouse or a > hunter skinning a carcass. I'll put you down as a bleeding heart. You won't be worrying for elbow room. >> Can you provide us with any examples of ovet international support? >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2007/02/20/seal-nunavut.html > ...wow, native peoples support it. Well, that was pretty shallow, even for you. "We'll continue to be one of the defenders of the seal hunt because it's in our interest to see and spread the market," Okalik said. Well, what a shock. I was thinking more like people in other countries, not others that participate, or have similar campaigns. >You against them, too? Now that you mention it, probably. I don't cut our "native Americans" too much slack, and I doubt I'd cut yours any more. >>>> I mean, you should see what Futile John has to say about all hunters >>>>(except his family members, of course) being nutless cowards. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I wouldn't be getting it from you. You never miss a chance to hump > John's leg, and that led you off on one of your usual tangents. Which has no bearing on what was written. But, if I can't help you, Dennis may be along. >>>> According to him, all those fisherman should be going after the seals >>>>barehanded. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/31/canada.hunt.ap/ > http://www.cbc.ca/cp/Atlantic/080402/t040257A.html http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/407816 The high-seas skirmish, which was hotly denied by federal fisheries officials, comes on the heels of a rescue operation gone awry that cost the lives of four seal hunters over the weekend. But you're also correct, and I'll stand corrected on the point. http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/413940 Check -that- out: "Hearn rejected that claim, saying the Mowat was seized legally in Canada's "internal waters," without providing the specific location of the seizure." "Watson has argued that his vessel never entered Canada's 12-nautical-mile territorial limit, but Hearn said the Fisheries Act gave him the authority to take action beyond that line." > ...and there are plenty more. Watson is well-known for ramming other > ships. You're welcome to believe Watson, the nutter. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Gotta cite for that? I'll get right on it. >> But I'm glad to see you finally have a grasp on the concept. >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > know you're a bleeding heart. This really brings out your inner > Pamela Anderson. |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message