 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / March 2008Hillary's Heroic Trip to Bosnia
http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html ________________________________ It is useless for sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion. WILLIAM RALPH INGE, D. D. 1860-1954 > http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html Oh, it's just getting rolling. More and more is coming out now, but somehow all the dumbocrat blogs are either silent or screaming conspiracy (even though Karl Rove is no where to be seen)... Why does all this seem so familiar.... >>http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Why does all this seem so familiar.... I'm surprised she didn't nominate herself for a "button". > I'm surprised she didn't nominate herself for a "button". Her Ole Man has an "easy" button on his forehead. > "nitespark" <nitesp...@cox.net> wrote in message Well, since most of you guys voted for Bush.. - Twice I'll sit back, see what your general consensus is on who to vote for then vote for The Other Candidate ( - & Don't Blame me, I voted for Al Gore ) Harvey . . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction > > "nitespark" <nitesp...@cox.net> wrote in message > Well, since most of you guys voted for Bush.. > - Twice Love it. More leftist bigotry and projection. > I'll sit back, see what your general consensus is on who to vote for then vote for The Other Candidate. Cool. Then we can count on you to *not* vote for HillBillary. > ( - & Don't Blame me, I voted for Al Gore ) > > Harvey . . Just so you know, I didn't vote for Dubya the first time, and had to the second time because you rocket surgeons proposed Lurch and The Breck Girl. > <Harveyat8c4...@aol.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > Just so you know, I didn't vote for Dubya the first time, and had to the > second time because you rocket surgeons proposed Lurch and The Breck Girl. Scotty, you didn't vote for Dubya? Do you know that makes you real liberal, leftist scum? Janusz >> <Harveyat8c4...@aol.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Janusz not it doesn't it only means he didn't vote George Bush when he ran against Al Gore. It means nothing else > not it doesn't it only means he didn't vote George Bush when he ran > against Al Gore. It means nothing else. Don't bother trying to educate an ignorant, bigoted, f.cking polish fire hydrant. Just piss on it and move on. > > not it doesn't it only means he didn't vote George Bush when he ran > > against Al Gore. It means nothing else. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Just piss on it and move on. True mongrel way of solving problems. Janusz > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> <Harveyat8c4...@aol.com> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > not it doesn't it only means he didn't vote George Bush when he ran > against Al Gore. It means nothing else I know you're shocked, but let's face the truth. He voted for liberal and he would have done the same in the next elections if there had been different candidate. That's make him real, dedicated liberal or like he prefer real leftist scum. Janusz > I know you're shocked, but let's face the truth. He voted for liberal > and he would have done the same in the next elections if there had been > different candidate. That's make him real, dedicated liberal or like he > prefer real leftist scum. Compared to me, Scott is a liberal... Then again, so is the president of the NRA... Scott's got a good excuse though... He's stuck up in the Pacific Northwest and those java-heads up there have corrupted his thinking...  SignatureSee NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email. On Mar 27, 8:26 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman581-usenet-2...@spambob.net> wrote: > > I know you're shocked, but let's face the truth. He voted for liberal > > and he would have done the same in the next elections if there had been [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Pacific Northwest and those java-heads up there have corrupted his > thinking... Actually, with all the clear air up there along with all the pretty trees, I'm surprised Scott is such a right-winger. It's far more understandable in Houston with the humidity/smog/heat combo that deprives your lungs of oxygen and makes you all crazy. Is it possible that Scott was born in Texas? On 28 Mar, 04:26, Grumman-581 <grumman581-usenet-2...@spambob.net> wrote: > > I know you're shocked, but let's face the truth. He voted for liberal > > and he would have done the same in the next elections if there had been > > different candidate. That's make him real, dedicated liberal or like he > > prefer real leftist scum. > > Compared to me, Scott is a liberal... A couple more Darwinian accidents and there is a chance you two will be like twin brothers ;-)))) > Then again, so is the president of > the NRA... Scott's got a good excuse though... He's stuck up in the > Pacific Northwest and those java-heads up there have corrupted his > thinking... That's not a good excuse. In his case I would rather blame inbreeding. You know, the state when it is difficult to say if one's relative is grand dad, dad , brother or all. Janusz >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >>>> <Harveyat8c4...@aol.com> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Janusz it means squat, I not shocked at all seems that Scot picked a candidate by what the candidate stood for instead of what the party affiliation stood for. Too bad more don't blindly lead the party's declarations > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > by what the candidate stood for instead of what the party affiliation > stood for. Joe, can you read with comprehension? He clearly stated that he is declared Democrat. He voted for Democrat candidate and would have done the same next time. It was his choice to become leftist scum. >Too bad more don't blindly lead the party's declarations as you do? Janusz >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Janusz Yes I read very well with comprehension. Because Scott voted for a particular candidate doesn't make him a leftist scum. It is with deep pity that I feel for you not to be able to understand simple concepts. Sometimes with our political parties and the selection of candidates you have to pick a candidate that is the lesser of two evils. It must be hell being you > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > Yes I read very well with comprehension. You must be kidding. > Because Scott voted for a > particular candidate doesn't make him a leftist scum. Of course not. It's his clear preference for liberals. "and had to the second time because you rocket surgeons proposed...." It's clear for anyone with even elementary reading skills - Scotty wanted to vote for a democrat. > It is with deep > pity that I feel for you not to be able to understand simple concepts. Joe, read the whole text couple more times, but very, very slowly and maybe you'll catch up. (frankly speaking I doubt if it is possible). > Sometimes with our political parties and the selection of candidates you > have to pick a candidate that is the lesser of two evils. > > It must be hell being you Oh Yes, I'm hell of a man. Janusz >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > Janusz if I was a man as you define I'd castrate myself with a very dull knife > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > > if I was a man as you define I'd castrate myself with a very dull knife Thank you for appreciation. At least I have balls. Can you say the same? Interesting remark of "very dull knife". Are you a member of Skoptsy sect? Janusz >> http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Why does all this seem so familiar.... Well, like David Geffen said, the Clintons have raised lying to an art form. > Well, like David Geffen said, the Clintons have raised lying to an art > form. And Rove/Bush elevated it to a profession. The Clintons do seem a bit amateur after 7 years of pro lying. They keep making the mistake of lying about irrelevant stuff. On Mar 26, 7:25 pm, john_k...@hotmail.com (John Kulp) wrote: > Well, like David Geffen said, the Clintons have raised lying to an art > form. And Rove/Bush elevated it to a profession. The Clintons do seem a bit amateur after 7 years of pro lying. They keep making the mistake of lying about irrelevant stuff. "Clinton is an unusually good liar....unusually good" Bob Kerrey. Dennis On Mar 27, 11:21 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <ala_dir_di...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 26, 7:25 pm, john_k...@hotmail.com (John Kulp) wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > "Clinton is an unusually good liar....unusually good" > Bob Kerrey. You wouldn't want an amateur running the country, would you? > http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html > ________________________________ > It is useless for sheep to pass resolutions in favor of > vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion. > WILLIAM RALPH INGE, D. D. 1860-1954 Small lie story. Even Douggy can invent something better. BTW on the web page you missed really interesting story about new self defense invention. There is big field for improvements. You can work out how to carry it concealed. http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=68244 Janusz >> http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html >> ________________________________ [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Janusz she blames it on sleep deprivation - even though she repeated the lies several times who would figure she would lie maybe if she would have wagged her finger they would have believed her > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > >>http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > maybe if she would have wagged her finger they would have believed her I don't care about her petty lies. It's nothing in comparison with some politicians who created some real lies, which cost many human lives. Janusz >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >>>> http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Janusz typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here Bosnia trip is not petty. But then most here don't care what you think > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here > Bosnia trip is not petty. To make your task easier. Answer the question How many have died due to that lie? > But then most here don't care what you think Did you mean that most of Metoos don't care? Are you the club speaker? Janusz >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > To make your task easier. Answer the question > How many have died due to that lie? what lie that she was under attack in Bosnia, that is the lie she wasn't >> But then most here don't care what you think > > Did you mean that most of Metoos don't care? Are you the club > speaker? I'm not aware of any metoo club. I am not the speaker for any club YMMV > Janusz > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > I'm not aware of any metoo club. I am not the speaker for any club What is it? Denial or Alzheimer? Janusz >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Janusz You are slower than I thought It really does suck to be you There will be no more replies from me I would at least like a challenge - you are not worth the bandwidth > You are slower than I thought > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I would at least like a challenge - you are not worth the bandwidth Thanks to whatever deity you worship, or better yet, thank you for being American. > > You are slower than I thought > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Thanks to whatever deity you worship, or better yet, thank you for being > American. Scotty, as usual you forgot to add some adjectives like for example - dumb. Janusz > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > You are slower than I thought You thought????????? > It really does suck to be you Not at all :-))))))))) > There will be no more replies from me That's good. Do your fellow metoos call it SCURRY? > I would at least like a challenge - you are not worth the bandwidth challenge? Janusz > typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here > Bosnia trip is not petty. But then most here don't care what you think A lot more petty than the lies about WMDs in Iraq that have costs thousands of lives. A lot more petty than "Mission Accomplished" and "Major combat is over." But then most here know that you don't think. gc >> typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here >> Bosnia trip is not petty. But then most here don't care what you think [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > gc Contrary to popular media lies, the current Iraqi conflict was based on Sadaam Hussein's direct violation of the terms the first Iraqi conflict was stopped. The United Nations gave Sadaam plenty of chances to live up to his agreement - he disobeyed nearly everyone. There is no dispute about WMD's. In case you were unaware he used them - he used them on the Iranis. If he had no more after the first Gulf War is still a matter of discussion but not what the war was about. Sadaam nay not have had them, someday we may find some in one of his neighboring countries or buried in the desert. If he never had them why not let the inspections be done as he agreed. Looks to me like he was hiding something. But again no matter how many time you repeat that the Iraqi War was over WMDs it doesn't change the fact that it was over the violations of the term of surrender from the first Iraqi Conflict > Contrary to popular media lies, the current Iraqi conflict was based on > Sadaam Hussein's direct violation of the terms the first Iraqi conflict [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > WMDs it doesn't change the fact that it was over the violations of the > term of surrender from the first Iraqi Conflict Don't worry Joe, Cathcart is just doing the usual cheap-shot drive by. It's what defines him. > >> typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here > >> Bosnia trip is not petty. But then most here don't care what you think [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > was stopped. The United Nations gave Sadaam plenty of chances to live > up to his agreement - he disobeyed nearly everyone. OMG Joe, it's even worse than I thought. You need something to read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War > There is no dispute about WMD's. In case you were unaware he used them > - he used them on the Iranis. Iranis? Joe, inhabitants of Iran are called Iranians or Persians. BTW chemical weapons were used against Iran with full blessing and guidance of you peace loving country. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Iraq_War#Chemical_weapons "the CIA began in 1984 secretly to give Iraq intelligence that Iraq used to "calibrate" its mustard gas attacks on Iranian troops. In August, the CIA establishes a direct Washington-Baghdad intelligence link, and for 18 months, starting in early 1985, the CIA provided Iraq with "data from sensitive U.S. satellite reconnaissance photography...to assist Iraqi bombing raids." The Post's source said that this data was essential to Iraq's war effort." > If he had no more after the first Gulf War is still a matter of > discussion but not what the war was about. Sadaam nay not have had > them, someday we may find some in one of his neighboring countries or > buried in the desert. If he never had them why not let the inspections > be done as he agreed. Looks to me like he was hiding something. Are you WMD or intel expert? I don't think so. Definitely you're the dream of politicians - citizen who buys any BS delivered to him by propaganda. > But again no matter how many time you repeat that the Iraqi War was over > WMDs And I in my naivety all the time thought that it was Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld and couple of others, who used to repeat this lie. >it doesn't change the fact that it was over the violations of the > term of surrender from the first Iraqi Conflict No, my poor naive, uneducated friend - it was about OIL. Janusz > No, my poor naive, uneducated friend - it was about OIL. Agreed... That's why gas is so cheap these days... SignatureSee NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email. On Mar 28, 3:26 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman581-usenet-2...@spambob.net> wrote: > > No, my poor naive, uneducated friend - it was about OIL. > > Agreed... That's why gas is so cheap these days... We were supposed to win the war first. Instead, under the new calculations according to your candidate, gas prices are now expected to decrease in approximately 100 years. On 28 Mar, 23:26, Grumman-581 <grumman581-usenet-2...@spambob.net> wrote: > > No, my poor naive, uneducated friend - it was about OIL. > > Agreed... That's why gas is so cheap these days... gas or US dollar? Janusz >> typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here >> Bosnia trip is not petty. But then most here don't care what you think > > A lot more petty than the lies about WMDs in Iraq that have costs > thousands of lives. A lot more petty than "Mission Accomplished" and > "Major combat is over." You mean GWB is running again? So I can vote for him a third time? Or maybe you were just whining over old news. >But then most here know that you don't think. Compared to -your- response? That's rich. Signature-- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com On 29 Mar, 03:15, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > >> typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here > >> Bosnia trip is not petty. But then most here don't care what you think [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > So I can vote for him a third time? Douggy, had you attended some schools you would have known that US constitution except second amendment has also several other articles and amendments like twenty-second, which prohibits anyone to be elected to the office of the President more than twice. So give up your futile hope. > Or maybe you were just whining over old news. As you didn't participate in the discussion it was about lies and liars - something what is your area of expertise. > >But then most here know that you don't think. > > Compared to -your- response? > > That's rich. Douggy, don't make bigger idiot of yourself than you really are. Janusz > http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VLH37G2&show_article=1
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.