>>I'll call 911 after I've called ACP .45.
>
> An argument could me made for:
>
> "I don't call 911, I call M1911"
Joe English wote
>> "I don't call 911, I call M1911"
> I hope I never have to make that decision
> And if I do I make the right one
Let me help you. Depending on the urgency of the situation, you do both.
You dial 911 AND you lock and load in preparation of someone illegally
entering your premises.
Lee
Joe English - 22 Mar 2008 07:10 GMT
> Joe English wote
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Lee
thanks - I got those parts it is the actual shooting someone - and
hopefully it is the right thing to do.
I don't think anyone here relishes the thought of having to shoot
someone. I know many policemen (well not really many - a couple) who
have had to shoot someone - two were kills who left the job because of
it. One worked with young kids - really tried to help them instead of
busting their balls. He confronted a burglar one night, the kid level
something at him that he thought was a gun. The kid was 15 years old
and had a piece of rebar in his hand. The second shot a guy in the back
of his head while he was running from the cop after committing two armed
robberies, and a car jacking in the previous 45 - 60 minutes. The cop
was white the perp was black. The black leaders and the local paper
rode his a.s pretty good - wanted to know why he didn't shoot to wound.
We all know the answer to that. Unfortunately he was running towards
a junior high full of kids. The perp had already shot one person a few
minutes earlier. Wonder what would have happened had he entered the
gun-free school
Dennis (Icarus) - 22 Mar 2008 18:58 GMT
<snip>
> thanks - I got those parts it is the actual shooting someone - and
> hopefully it is the right thing to do.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> minutes earlier. Wonder what would have happened had he entered the
> gun-free school
Surely the gun-free security barriers would have prevented that?
;-)
Dennis
Joe English - 22 Mar 2008 19:39 GMT
> <snip>
>> thanks - I got those parts it is the actual shooting someone - and
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Dennis
You would think - the cops gun did!
Grumman-581 - 22 Mar 2008 10:16 GMT
> Let me help you. Depending on the urgency of the situation, you do both.
> You dial 911 AND you lock and load in preparation of someone illegally
> entering your premises.
I would argue that you have the order of those two operation backwards...
Lock and load first and then *if* you have time, call 911... Maybe you
call them afterwards... Maybe you just call BFI...

Signature
See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.
Lee Bell - 22 Mar 2008 10:52 GMT
>> Let me help you. Depending on the urgency of the situation, you do both.
>> You dial 911 AND you lock and load in preparation of someone illegally
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Lock and load first and then *if* you have time, call 911... Maybe you
> call them afterwards... Maybe you just call BFI...
I did include a qualifier "Depending on the urgency of the situation."
There are merits to my order and to yours. The investigation will surely
note the sequence of events and the sooner the 911 call is made, the more
likely things are to go smoothly. The actual sequence of events in my home
is likely to be telling my wife to dial 911 while I reach for a weapon.
My defensive weapons are where they are supposed to be, loaded and ready for
use at all times. About the only time they are unloaded is when they are
cleaned. About the only time they are not where they live is when they're at
the range and, on rare occasions, when they are in the safe because there
are children in my home that I can't, for one reason or another, ensure
don't have access to them.
Lee