Pick One, Futile John!

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 21 Feb 2008 23:57 GMT

Yoouuuuuu Cannn Dooooo Iiitttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!

> > Absolutely. Go back and check on who invented the cites, oh Inventive
> > One.
>
> > Here's the clip of you chanting mindless confiscation over and over.
>
> > Pick one, and I'll get the URL for your post.
>
> > Pick one, and I'll get the URL for your post.
>
> > Pick one, and I'll get the URL for your post.
>
> > Pick one, and I'll get the URL for your post.

> > Then you can prove, for the first time ever, that I invented it.
>
> > And that you're not a spineless, lying a.shole.
> > ==============================================
>
> > > So which ones will you ban and confiscate?
>
> > I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch
> > there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're
> > in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my
> > concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of
> > firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often
> > called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers
> > another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. To
> > simply push to limit the existance of automatic weapons wouldn't really
> > be fair, would it? - JOF
>
> > > Which one, as -you- say, does the "spraying", or has the (-your-
> > > words)
> > > " too high cyclic rate if fire"?
>
> > Dunno. I'd have to do some research. Based on what I know (or think I
> > know), your Colt 1911 wouldn't likely be considered a sprayer, even in
> > the hands of an expert like you.
>
> > > Be specific, and stop snipping all the context.
>
> > My apologies to Scott. He hates it when we leave in all the stuff from
> > the earlier posts.
>
> > > >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean.
> > > > Did I say I would confiscate them?
> > > Yes, several times.
>
> > Delusion.
>
> > ======================
>
> > > Spin it how you want. You have -several times made references to gun
> > > confiscation. No matter if 85% of the population approves, as you seem
> > > to
> > > think this makes some sort of difference.
>
> > I'm not calling you a liar on that but I'd like to see the context (I
> > know we've been overusing that word). I'm not a proponent of wholesale
> > confiscation of guns. Well, except perhaps for some of the weapons I
> > think
> > are pretty ridiculously powerful. -JOF
>
> > =======================
>
> > > Legislating against ownership is confiscation, crystal clear.
> > > You've espoused several situations where it would be "understandable"
> > > to
> > > "mediate" possession of certain weapons that you SIMPLY DON'T LIKE,
> > > without any justification other than your total ignorance.
> > > The .50 caliber sniper rifle is a perfect example.
> > > They cost a fortune, the public doesn't have them to speak of, they
>
> > have -absolutely- NO criminal record, but you FEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL people
> > shouldn't have them, just "because".
>
> > > You have NO OTHER JUSTIFICATION
>
> > .
> > They're an example of overkill, but perhaps a bad one. Some of the very
> > high cycle rate automatic weapons are probably better examples of
> > weapons
> > that the general public has no need of. -JOF
>
> > =========================
> > >Are you for the confiscation of some guns,
>
> > > Yes or no?
>
> > And this, of all things, is a for us/against us point, and
> > defines your gun control position on the group.
> > Only because of the definition you choose to use. Again, for me it's
> > rey. -JOF
>
> > ===========================
>
> > > This "middle" or "gray area" you espouse is a bullshit way of you
> > > avoiding
> > > having to say what you mean.
> > > Are you for the confiscation of some guns,
> > > Yes or no?
>
> > By your definition I am. By my own I'm not. I'm in favour of controls.
>
> > ===========================
>
> > "I suppose there would be some amount of confiscation
> > involved in my idea of appropriate weapon ownership" -JOF
>
> > ===============================
>
> > > It's also why you're fleeing in fright from three simple questions.
>
> > Yeah. I'm shaking in my boots. 8)
>
> > Not at the speed you're running.
>
> > > > Now, please state 1) where you stand on arbitrary confiscation of
> > > > firearms.
>
> > > > State, specifically, 2) whether individual citizens should be able
> > > > to
> > > > own M2 (skeery Barrett) rifles.
>
> > > > State, specifically, 3) whether individual citizens should be able
> > > > to
> > > > own fully automatic weapons.
>
> > > Answering these truthfully, as you have previously, would make you out
> > > a
> > > liar right here and now.
>
> > You don't need any help.
>
> > There's a particular truth.
>
> > > That's why you've scurried from them 4 days running.
>
> > > And I mean running.
>
> > > You're a low-life lying piece of sh.t.
>
> > Oh you sugar-tongued devil, you.
>
> > Funny, or sad?
>
> If you had a better sense of humour there might be a future for you
> writing fantasy fiction.
>
> JF-"Is that just another way of saying I don't know what to say except
> "Duh"
> and that definitely isn't going to go down well with the metoos so I'll
> knock their sox off with my own version of sophisticated humour?"
>
> So I take it you're scurrying here too?

Hell no. Popeye's Fables make great reading.

Signature

--

A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment
different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies,
fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper

Popeye/www.finalprotectivefire.com