Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Diving Past 50?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paulf Foley - 03 Feb 2008 20:47 GMT
www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s080202.html

Actor Donald Sutherland "nearly died" of a burst blood vessel in his
lung.  He had been diving on location for the movie Fools Gold.  His
doctor apparently told him that he shouldn't be diving past age 50.  
When he told the dive master for the movie what had happened, the dive
master confessed that he had been advised that he shouldn't be diving
past age 50 either.

What's up with this?
chilly - 03 Feb 2008 21:44 GMT
> www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s080202.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> What's up with this?

snort.

What a load of hooey.

Maybe Donald Sutherland's health was such that his doctor recommended he not
continue to dive.  Maybe the DM had been bent any number of times and he'd
been advised that he should quit being a DM after the age of 50.

You'll be hearing a lot of response on this thread, I'm sure due to the
demographics here.
Grumman-581 - 03 Feb 2008 21:55 GMT
> What's up with this?

Hey, life is a terminal disease... Good health is just the slowest
possible way of dying...

Feel free to tell the doctor that I said that he's an idiot... While
you're at it, tell him I said to f.ck off also...

Signature

See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

Terry - 05 Feb 2008 10:26 GMT
Did you miss your nap ?  You seem grumpy.
self - 03 Feb 2008 22:20 GMT
Why are there so few older divers?

I am 64 and notice that I am often the oldest diver on the boat.

I know that diving has been popular for many years and that there must
be many people now over 60 that used to dive regularly.

Can the lower participatiom rate be due to health issues, or a "been
there done that" feeling"?

I am frankly puzzled.

Thanks

Pat

> www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s080202.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> What's up with this?

Signature

Pat

El Stroko Guapo - 03 Feb 2008 22:33 GMT
> Why are there so few older divers?
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Pat

Or you young puppies drive them off?

esg

older than dirt but still very very handsome
JOF - 03 Feb 2008 23:08 GMT
> > Why are there so few older divers?
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

It's the smell of testosterone.

JF
chilly - 03 Feb 2008 22:57 GMT
> Why are there so few older divers?
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Pat

Maybe it is because people like dechucka and grumann are insisting that the
older divers go up the ladder wearing all their gear.
dechucka - 04 Feb 2008 00:03 GMT
>> Why are there so few older divers?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> the
> older divers go up the ladder wearing all their gear.

I think that if you can't get up the ladder in recreational diving rig you
are probably unfit for diving. There are circumstances where this is not
true my one legged mate ( who actually can but it is easier for him not to )
and in Dans example of people with bad backs, he reminded me of the ex
girlfriend of a bloke I dive with who once again COULD get up the ladder but
found it easier to get her gear off  ( so to speak ) in the water. Both
these people used to make sure that were in the last few to get back on the
boat so they didn't inconvenience to many people
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 04 Feb 2008 14:36 GMT
> I think that if you can't get up the ladder in recreational diving rig you
> are probably unfit for diving. There are circumstances where this is not
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> water. Both these people used to make sure that were in the last few to
> get back on the boat so they didn't inconvenience to many people

   That's ridiculous.

   A lot of people may not weigh hardly twice what their gear does.

   Ladders themselves present a problem to some.

           Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
       http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762
Grumman-581 - 04 Feb 2008 14:41 GMT
> That's ridiculous.
>
> A lot of people may not weigh hardly twice what their gear does.
>
> Ladders themselves present a problem to some.

That was why davits were invented, right? <grin>

Signature

See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

JOF - 04 Feb 2008 15:39 GMT
On Feb 4, 9:36 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:

> > I think that if you can't get up the ladder in recreational diving rig you
> > are probably unfit for diving. There are circumstances where this is not
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>     Ladders themselves present a problem to some.

I was told by a divemaster in Mexico that his company's policy is now
for all divers to remove their weights and bcd in the water. Given the
windy rough conditions there at this time of year it's probably not a
bad policy. I can remember many times floating behind the dive boat
watching the platform crash down from 10 or more feet over my head and
wondering how some of the people with us managed to catch a ride on it
encumbered with tank and bcd. Some little bitty people just aren't
that strong, or that coordinated, or that confident in the ocean
environment to handle that chore easily. Posters right here in the
group have said they prefer to doff and don in the water, and yet
they're competent divers and in apparently good physical condition.
Weightlifting doesn't have to be a part of diving fun.

I can't honestly say I'd do so well with the double 80's myself under
those conditions, but then I'm one of those old farts who shouldn't be
diving. 8)

JF
Grumman-581 - 04 Feb 2008 16:17 GMT
> I was told by a divemaster in Mexico that his company's policy is now
> for all divers to remove their weights and bcd in the water. Given the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> divers and in apparently good physical condition. Weightlifting doesn't
> have to be a part of diving fun.

If there's a ladder, you grab ahold of it right before it reaches the
deepest that it will go and hold on for a wild ride... Keep your
regulator in your mouth and just take it one step at a time... It's
probably easier to go one step up the ladder on the downward motion, but
you have to balance that with the fact that getting dunked in the water
again is more likely to make you lose your grip than when you're in the
air... Depending upon what the seas are doing, this can definitely be an E
ticket ride...

If you've got a platform without a ladder and it's crashing down from 10
ft above the surface, that could make for an interesting experience... I
would hazard to guess that you would need to wait for it to crash down and
while it is submerged, swim above it while grabbing hold of something for
dear life... Kind of like a fast beaching of a whale? <grin>  If the seas
are that rough and there is only a platform without a ladder, I would hate
having to give up my air supply since there's probably a good chance that
you're going to end up back in the water before you're completely aboard...

> I can't honestly say I'd do so well with the double 80's myself under
> those conditions, but then I'm one of those old farts who shouldn't be
> diving. 8)

I dive doubles when I'm in Cozumel... I always get a laugh when those
small Mexican guys on the boat crew think they are going to take my tanks
and backplate from me when I'm coming up the ladder... Hell, it probably
weighs more than they do... I just tell 'em to stand back and I'll climb
the ladder... Sometimes though, I have to wonder whether those wimpy
ladders will support the combined weight of me and my gear... So far, so
good, so I guess they're sturdier than they look...

Signature

See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

JOF - 05 Feb 2008 02:07 GMT
On Feb 4, 11:17 am, Grumman-581 <grumman581-usenet-2...@spambob.net>
wrote:
> > I was told by a divemaster in Mexico that his company's policy is now
> > for all divers to remove their weights and bcd in the water. Given the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> air... Depending upon what the seas are doing, this can definitely be an E
> ticket ride...

I know. That's what I meant. It's always windy this time of the year
around Cancun. Windy means big waves, at least big when yer looking up
from the surface of the water and the boat's platform is looking above
you. So far they've all had ladders but I've seen folks who weren't
all that comfortable in the first place get a tad nervous when faced
with the jumping platform. The only time I've had trouble with the
ladder was in Ft.Lauderdale (I'm pretty sure Dave, Barb, Lee and Mike
were there that day). We were diving off a flat cattle boat with the
ladder up the side. Just as I was about to grab it the hinged ladder
swung out from the boat and corked me in the skull. I was a little
messed up for a second but then everything was okay, except my head
sure hurt.

> I dive doubles when I'm in Cozumel... I always get a laugh when those
> small Mexican guys on the boat crew think they are going to take my tanks
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ladders will support the combined weight of me and my gear... So far, so
> good, so I guess they're sturdier than they look...

It's amazing what those little Mexican fellers can do with a person
bigger than them. There was a young girl in our group on one dive and
she was afraid to grab the ladder. One of the crew coaxed her in close
enough and finally just reached out and did a one handed snatch of her
bc, with her in it, and lifted the whole squirming mass into the boat
as the platform went skyward. It was impressive.

JF
Adam Helberg - 04 Feb 2008 23:26 GMT
On Feb 4, 9:36 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:
> "dechucka" <dechu...@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Ladders themselves present a problem to some.

I was told by a divemaster in Mexico that his company's policy is now
for all divers to remove their weights and bcd in the water. Given the
windy rough conditions there at this time of year it's probably not a
bad policy. I can remember many times floating behind the dive boat
watching the platform crash down from 10 or more feet over my head and
wondering how some of the people with us managed to catch a ride on it
encumbered with tank and bcd. Some little bitty people just aren't
that strong, or that coordinated, or that confident in the ocean
environment to handle that chore easily. Posters right here in the
group have said they prefer to doff and don in the water, and yet
they're competent divers and in apparently good physical condition.
Weightlifting doesn't have to be a part of diving fun.

I can't honestly say I'd do so well with the double 80's myself under
those conditions, but then I'm one of those old farts who shouldn't be
diving. 8)

JF

In rough seas I'd rather have my Scuba with me and regulator in mouth. I think taking
the Scuba off can cause more harm than good.

Adam
Dan Bracuk - 05 Feb 2008 00:10 GMT
"Adam Helberg" <sendspamhere@yahee.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:

:In rough seas I'd rather have my Scuba with me and regulator in mouth. I think taking
:the Scuba off can cause more harm than good.

Not if you can swim.

Dan Bracuk
Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.
Adam Helberg - 05 Feb 2008 04:24 GMT
> "Adam Helberg" <sendspamhere@yahee.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Not if you can swim.

I can swim but to get out in heavy seas I partially deflate my BC, extend my arm and
reach the ladder. I control my distance from the ladder and climb on the ladder with
my reg in mouth. I just climb out with all my gear, possibly removing my fins but
that's it, on the way up.

I think trying to remove gear on the way up just complicates things and increases
risk.

Adam
Lee Bell - 05 Feb 2008 04:45 GMT
>> :In rough seas I'd rather have my Scuba with me and regulator in mouth. I
>> think taking the Scuba off can cause more harm than good.

>> Not if you can swim.

I'm with Dan on this one. In rough seas, trying to get aboard a pitching
vessel, I'd much rather not have all my scuba equipment to deal with as
well. With fins, mask and snorkel (somebody can toss me my snorkel), I am
sure I can find my way onto even a violenting pitching dive platform. With
tanks, plate and regulators, I'm less sure.

> I think trying to remove gear on the way up just complicates things and
> increases risk.

Maybe yes, maybe no. My previous boat did not have a ladder. You had to
climb up via the outdrive. That was hard enough without gear. To handle it,
we left clip off lines hanging far enough below the boat that attached
equipment would not hit the boat no matter how rough the seas got. If it
worked for us, it would probably work for others.

Lee
mag3 - 05 Feb 2008 10:55 GMT
>> I think trying to remove gear on the way up just complicates things and
>> increases risk.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>equipment would not hit the boat no matter how rough the seas got. If it
>worked for us, it would probably work for others.

Also, the type of ladder (if one is available) makes a differene, at least to me.
It it's the "open-ended" type (ie. one long shaft down the middle and open-ended
rungs) it's easier to come up IMHO with everything on if one is careful not to slip off.
I do this in NJ on our primary boat with a full RAS setup (ST 120 & 30cf Pony etc)..
One simply takes it one rung at a time and hang on for dear life.

Other boats which don't have "fin friendly" ladders (all the boats I've encountered
in the FFK's), require you to remove your fins first and hand them up before boarding,
but that is all I've been asked to remove and all I would remove. I think it much faster
for me to try and get up on the boat than to waste time d'offing my gear in the water
fighting the seas/current, getting tangled in the trail line, and potentally losing a piece
of gear....

____________________________________________
Regards,

Arnold
Lee Bell - 05 Feb 2008 12:30 GMT
> Other boats which don't have "fin friendly" ladders (all the boats I've
> encountered
> in the FFK's), require you to remove your fins first and hand them up
> before boarding,
> but that is all I've been asked to remove and all I would remove.

If you have pocket/strap fins, just say no. The one thing I don't want to
hand off if I can avoid it, is my fins. If, for one reason or another, I
wind up back in the water, my fins can make the difference between drifting
away and getting back to the boat for another try. If your fins have straps,
run your arm through them and keep them with you. If you use full foot fins,
as I do, you don't always have a choice. In really rough conditions, you
need both hands for the ladder.

Lee
mag3 - 05 Feb 2008 12:50 GMT
>If you have pocket/strap fins, just say no. The one thing I don't want to
>hand off if I can avoid it, is my fins. If, for one reason or another, I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>as I do, you don't always have a choice. In really rough conditions, you
>need both hands for the ladder.

I should rephrase.... They *suggest* you had up your fins and expect you to,
standing by to retreive them as you prepare to mount the ladder. I do have
strapped fins and should learn to put them on my  arm for the reason you state.
It just seemed more convenient to give them to the DM on board and then climb
up the ladder.  I'm ususally hanging onto the trail line at  the same time I'm taking
the fins off  though, so I'll be figuring out a better solution for managing that as well.

____________________________________________
Regards,

Arnold
Lee Bell - 05 Feb 2008 15:22 GMT
> I should rephrase.... They *suggest* you had up your fins and expect you
> to,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> climb
> up the ladder.

It is more convenient, until you need fins you no longer have with  you.

> I'm ususally hanging onto the trail line at  the same time I'm taking
> the fins off  though, so I'll be figuring out a better solution for
> managing that as well.

Normally, except in the roughest of seas, I have at least one hand on the
dive ladder before I take my fins off. Once I have both hands and feet on
the ladder, I normally hand the fins to someone aboard, making very sure I
don't make a mistake that lands me back in the water.

Since this topic has come up, I'll add something worth considering. Most
dive ladders are hinged at the top. In rough seas, those ladders pivot on
those hinges, banging against some form of stop with considerable force.
Make a point of avoiding having any part of your body near those stops.
Quite a few people have been cut by moving hinges. A few have permanently
lost use of some body part.

Lee
mag3 - 05 Feb 2008 15:30 GMT
>> I'm ususally hanging onto the trail line at  the same time I'm taking
>> the fins off  though, so I'll be figuring out a better solution for
>> managing that as well.
>
>Normally, except in the roughest of seas, I have at least one hand on the
>dive ladder before I take my fins off.

That, we actually *were* warned by the DM not to do for that reason. They
specifically wanted you "on the trail line" rather than on the ladder and subject
to its, and the current's whims....

>Since this topic has come up, I'll add something worth considering. Most
>dive ladders are hinged at the top. In rough seas, those ladders pivot on
>those hinges, banging against some form of stop with considerable force.
>Make a point of avoiding having any part of your body near those stops.
>Quite a few people have been cut by moving hinges. A few have permanently
>lost use of some body part.

Absolutely...
____________________________________________
Regards,

Arnold
Lee Bell - 05 Feb 2008 16:36 GMT
> That, we actually *were* warned by the DM not to do for that reason. They
> specifically wanted you "on the trail line" rather than on the ladder and
> subject
> to its, and the current's whims....

I know what they want. I also know how I'm safest.

Lee
nitespark - 05 Feb 2008 17:11 GMT
>>I should rephrase.... They *suggest* you had up your fins and expect you
>>to,
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Lee

The boats I have on out of Morehead City NC, are equipped with the
"tree" type ladders.  These are considered "fins on" type ladders and
the crew recommends you exit the water with fins on.  There is a small
platform on the stern and a handrail.  Once on the boat, a crew member
removes your fins for you and throws them up on the passenger a few feet
away.

Morehead City has been known for some not so diver friendly sea conditions.

Andy
chilly - 06 Feb 2008 05:59 GMT
> > Normally, except in the roughest of seas, I have at least one hand on the
> > dive ladder before I take my fins off. Once I have both hands and feet on
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Andy

The Pro48 I've been diving off of for a few years, when out at the Atolls,
Belize, has a policy during rough seas.  That is to remove your fins before
grabbing the ladder, so as not to rip your arms off as the boat rears up and
slams back down . . ladders akimbo.  It is an interesting experience for me
to be very near the ladder without getting bonked, very quickly remove my
fins and then grab/step onto the ladder with gear on.  DM then grabs the
diver, in this case me, and assists by helping to balance and relieve some
of the drag of the gear.  I just really dislike this on the bad seas days.
However, one can't always tell at 6 am departure, how it's going to be by 2
pm, or even 11 am.

The trip out is about 2 hours.  The dive op calls the dives before
departure, if they know it will likely be too rough for safety.
nitespark - 06 Feb 2008 12:07 GMT
>>The boats I have on out of Morehead City NC, are equipped with the
>>"tree" type ladders.  These are considered "fins on" type ladders and
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> However, one can't always tell at 6 am departure, how it's going to be by 2
> pm, or even 11 am.

I guess it works for them, but I have seen too many divers in rough seas
get tossed back in the ocean while trying to get up the ladder.  Its
even worse if you are trying to hand a camera system up to the mate.
Last year at Morehead City, sea conditions were "challenging".  The
Captain told us when we ascended, approach the boat from the side.  When
I approached, a wave pushed me around the side of the dive platform
towards the ladder.  The ladder went up, hit me in the side of the head,
knocked my mask off, and came down on my shoulder.  I recovered my mask
and successfully got on the boat after the second try.  Its is REALLY an
interesting ride when you are on the ladder and the boat his a swell and
the stern and the ladder carrying the diver in full gear come up our of
the water.

> The trip out is about 2 hours.  The dive op calls the dives before
> departure, if they know it will likely be too rough for safety.

Sounds like Morehead trips.  2 to 2.5 hour boat ride to many of the dive
sites.
dechucka - 05 Feb 2008 21:41 GMT
>> Other boats which don't have "fin friendly" ladders (all the boats I've
>> encountered
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> full foot fins, as I do, you don't always have a choice. In really rough
> conditions, you need both hands for the ladder

What's wrong with floating around for awhile? Inflate your safety sausage
thingy and the boat will pick you up. That is what happens in Aus except for
Americans Climbing a ladder with fins on seems rather stupid to me
mag3 - 05 Feb 2008 21:59 GMT
>What's wrong with floating around for awhile? Inflate your safety sausage
>thingy and the boat will pick you up. That is what happens in Aus except for
>Americans Climbing a ladder with fins on seems rather stupid to me

It's been my experience that the boat won't do that in the USA. You have to
go to it, not it to you.  Only in an emergency. Otherwise, the expectation is that
all divers will return to where the boat is anchored.

There are only two places I've ever been where that has occured -

    1)    Bora Bora
    2)    Palau

and in both cases, these were "guided" drift dives.

____________________________________________
Regards,

Arnold
Lee Bell - 05 Feb 2008 22:34 GMT
>>What's wrong with floating around for awhile? Inflate your safety sausage
>>thingy and the boat will pick you up. That is what happens in Aus except
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> and in both cases, these were "guided" drift dives.

You've been to other places it happens, you just didn't happen to experience
it. Generally speaking, the boats comes to you on all drift dives. In Palm
Beach County, the boat generally comes to the divers even on wreck dives.

Lee
mag3 - 05 Feb 2008 23:21 GMT
>> There are only two places I've ever been where that has occured -
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>it. Generally speaking, the boats comes to you on all drift dives. In Palm
>Beach County, the boat generally comes to the divers even on wreck dives.

I haven't experienced it yet anywhere in the USA, that's for sure.  And the only
other places I've ever dove were the above two.

____________________________________________
Regards,

Arnold
Al Wells - 06 Feb 2008 00:16 GMT
> >You've been to other places it happens, you just didn't happen to experience
> >it. Generally speaking, the boats comes to you on all drift dives. In Palm
> >Beach County, the boat generally comes to the divers even on wreck dives.
>
> I haven't experienced it yet anywhere in the USA, that's for sure.  And the only
> other places I've ever dove were the above two.

Besides Palm Beach county, we do it anywhere we control the boat. I've
done it in the Keys, in SC, GA and NC. Everyone has to be on the same
page.
El Stroko Guapo - 06 Feb 2008 00:45 GMT
>>>You've been to other places it happens, you just didn't happen to experience
>>>it. Generally speaking, the boats comes to you on all drift dives. In Palm
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> done it in the Keys, in SC, GA and NC. Everyone has to be on the same
> page.

All being on the same page is the key. If (1) everyone pays attention to
the local procedures and (2) plans and executes their dive in accordance
with such, there's no problem and there's no quibbling about the issues
in the previous 50 posts.

esg
Dan Bracuk - 05 Feb 2008 22:43 GMT
mag3 <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:

:There are only two places I've ever been where that has occured -
:
:    1)    Bora Bora
:    2)    Palau
:
:and in both cases, these were "guided" drift dives.

3.  Cozumel
4. Palau
5. Galapagos
6. Cocos Islands

Dan Bracuk
Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.
dechucka - 05 Feb 2008 22:43 GMT
>>What's wrong with floating around for awhile? Inflate your safety sausage
>>thingy and the boat will pick you up. That is what happens in Aus except
>>for
>>Americans Climbing a ladder with fins on seems rather stupid to me
>
> It's been my experience that the boat won't do that in the USA.

rescue you?

You have to
> go to it, not it to you.  Only in an emergency. Otherwise, the expectation
> is that
> all divers will return to where the boat is anchored.

if you fall off the ladder because you are to fat see my previous post

> There are only two places I've ever been where that has occured -
>
> 1) Bora Bora
> 2) Palau
>
> and in both cases, these were "guided" drift dives.

will never dive in the US again if boats don't pick up people in danger of
dying
mag3 - 05 Feb 2008 23:18 GMT
>will never dive in the US again if boats don't pick up people in danger of
>dying

No, they'll do that, of course they will. But it has to be a serious if not "life or death"
emergency for the boat to weigh anchor.  The boat is responsible for everyone, and
since the rule (expectation) is for others to find their way back to the boat, the boat
will try to wait for the others to come back before it weighs anchor.  When diving with
Ocean Divers recently, this is how the boat Captain explained things. He said they won't
weigh anchor unless it's a real emergency.

That is of course, for boats not doing a drift dive as has been explained in other posts
here. Then I guess it comes to you.  I don't deny that there are boats that do drift dives
in the USA, but I haven't experienced one yet.

____________________________________________
Regards,

Arnold
Lee Bell - 06 Feb 2008 01:39 GMT
dechucka wrote:

>>will never dive in the US again if boats don't pick up people in danger of
>>dying

Promise?
dechucka - 06 Feb 2008 01:54 GMT
> dechucka wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Promise?

yep
chilly - 06 Feb 2008 05:47 GMT
> > all divers will return to where the boat is anchored.
>
> if you fall off the ladder because you are to fat see my previous post

What if you fall off the ladder because you are too thin?

> > There are only two places I've ever been where that has occured -
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> will never dive in the US again if boats don't pick up people in danger of
> dying

What will you do if the boat is already picking people up in pounding seas
and is at a critical juncture with those . .how then will the boat make it
to the distressed diver in time?

I've recently seen something of that nature occur.
Lee Bell - 06 Feb 2008 11:09 GMT
> What will you do if the boat is already picking people up in pounding seas
> and is at a critical juncture with those . .how then will the boat make it
> to the distressed diver in time? I've recently seen something of that
> nature
> occur.

It may not. Life is full of risks and, like it or not, you can't delegate
all of them to someone else. Some you have to deal with yourself, or pay the
consequences.

Does this sound like something you've read in another thread?

Lee
Joe English - 06 Feb 2008 14:24 GMT
>>>all divers will return to where the boat is anchored.
>>
>>if you fall off the ladder because you are to fat see my previous post
>
> What if you fall off the ladder because you are too thin?

Love to have that problem :-)

>>>There are only two places I've ever been where that has occured -
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> I've recently seen something of that nature occur.
Don Gingrich - 06 Feb 2008 09:36 GMT
>>What's wrong with floating around for awhile? Inflate your safety
>>sausage thingy and the boat will pick you up. That is what happens
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> expectation is that all divers will return to where the boat is
> anchored.

Yeah, I've read a few books about deep wreck diving in the
US Northeast. They all seem to attach the boats to the wrecks.
Local practise is to drop a "shot-line" (weighted with a big buoy
attached to a line) The boat remains free and moves to meet the
divers, if necessary. So most, if not all, of the deco that I've
done is "free-floating" hanging from an SMB.

But then again, we do a lot of dives at or near the mouth of
Port Phillip Bay -- think big tidal currents. Or in Bass Strait
again, not a "nice" bit of water as far as currents and such are
concerned.

-Don

-----  Different topic ----

By the way, if any of you are feeling like sending a quick e-mail
to our local elected idiots, they are about to risk completely
destroying some of the best temperate diving in Australia. The
problem is that the ship channel into Melbourne is only 12 metres
in spots. The new container ships want more depth. So they're
planning on blasting the hard cap rock over soft sandstone at the
mouth of the bay. They say it's only going to erode a couple more
metres, but... And the sponge gardens in this area may not be happy
with a lot more water passing. The fish that live there may not
be impressed, either.

Their first trick is even more impressive. The Yarra River has
acted as an industrial drain for over 100 years back when people
didn't give a stuff about the environment. The silt at the bottom
contains an impressive list of nasties. They're going to dredge
this muck and dump it in a spoil ground in the middle of the bay
and it's not going to put toxic chemicals into the water and
it will be permanently contained in it's new home. (Spot the
sarcasm...)

If you think this is a generally bad idea, you may want to drop an
e-mail to:

Our Premier -- John Brumby

john.brumby@parliament.vic.gov.au

The Minister for Water and Environment(though he hasn't said a lot
about the project)
michael.crutchfield@parliament.vic.gov.au

Minister for Tourism (Also silent)

timothy.holding@parliament.vic.gov.au

Transport Minister (we need bigger ships...)

lynne.kosky@parliament.vic.gov.au

The Federal Environment Minister, Peter "Sell-Out" Garrett
Peter.Garrett.MP@aph.gov.au

Thanks for any messages to these turkeys.

-Don

> There are only two places I've ever been where that has occured -
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Arnold
nitespark - 05 Feb 2008 21:59 GMT
>>>Other boats which don't have "fin friendly" ladders (all the boats I've
>>>encountered
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> thingy and the boat will pick you up. That is what happens in Aus except for
> Americans Climbing a ladder with fins on seems rather stupid to me

I don't know about the conditions where you dive, but I have been in
some ripping currents and "floating around for awhile" is NOT a good
idea.  Some of the places I have been, the Captain told us in the dive
briefing, "hit the down line...the surface is NOT your friend".  When
you are in 5-9 ft seas in a current, floating around and inflating your
safety sausage is not much of an option.  If you miss the current line
and caught in a current, the dive boat will NOT weigh anchor, with other
divers in the water to pick you up.
dechucka - 05 Feb 2008 22:51 GMT
>>>>Other boats which don't have "fin friendly" ladders (all the boats I've
>>>>encountered
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I don't know about the conditions where you dive, but I have been in some
> ripping currents and "floating around for awhile" is NOT a good idea.

true but better than floating 1m under ther water

Some of the places I have been, the Captain told us in the dive
> briefing, "hit the down line...the surface is NOT your friend".  When you
> are in 5-9 ft seas in a current, floating around and inflating your safety
> sausage is not much of an option.  If you miss the current line and caught
> in a current, the dive boat will NOT weigh anchor, with other divers in
> the water to pick you up.

1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted

and

2 a person in danger is the priority, the craft would weigh anchor and
collect a person in danger in my experience in Australia. Floating around
the ocean with BCD inflated, weights maybe dumped and in vision of someone
on the boat is not an emergency. Float around and some will get you
nitespark - 05 Feb 2008 23:23 GMT
>  Some of the places I have been, the Captain told us in the dive
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted

Apparently you haven't dove on sites where conditions change from the
start of the dive to the end of the dive.

> and
>
> 2 a person in danger is the priority, the craft would weigh anchor and
> collect a person in danger in my experience in Australia. Floating around
> the ocean with BCD inflated, weights maybe dumped and in vision of someone
> on the boat is not an emergency. Float around and some will get you

So if the dive boat has 15 divers in the water, 14 of them reach the
wreck.  One loses the down line and is swept away by the current.  You
feel the Captain should place the other 14 divers in danger to go after
1?  That would require the other 14 divers to make a free ascent, in
current.  The Captains I have dove with told us ahead of time of the
conditions and have told us if we lose the down line, he will NOT weigh
anchor, leaving the other divers on the site to go after one.  They will
try to keep the adrift diver in sight as long as possible but it is VERY
easy to lose a diver in the ocean swells.  I ALWAYS carry a safety
sausage with me when I dive.  I have used it once.
dechucka - 06 Feb 2008 01:17 GMT
>>  Some of the places I have been, the Captain told us in the dive
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Apparently you haven't dove on sites where conditions change from the
> start of the dive to the end of the dive.

In Australia we have weather forecasts

>> and
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> wreck.  One loses the down line and is swept away by the current.  You
> feel the Captain should place the other 14 divers in danger to go after 1?

What danger?

That would require the other 14 divers to make a free ascent, in
> current.  The Captains I have dove with told us ahead of time of the
> conditions and have told us if we lose the down line, he will NOT weigh
> anchor, leaving the other divers on the site to go after one.  They will
> try to keep the adrift diver in sight as long as possible but it is VERY
> easy to lose a diver in the ocean swells.  I ALWAYS carry a safety sausage
> with me when I dive.  I have used it once.

my point exactly
Grumman-581 - 06 Feb 2008 01:27 GMT
> In Australia we have weather forecasts

In the Navy, we called those individuals who made those predictions,
"weather guessers"... The civilians call them "forecasters"... I think we
were right and the civilians were just a tad bit too optimistic...

Signature

See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

dechucka - 06 Feb 2008 01:29 GMT
>> In Australia we have weather forecasts
>
> In the Navy, we called those individuals who made those predictions,
> "weather guessers"... The civilians call them "forecasters"... I think we
> were right and the civilians were just a tad bit too optimistic...

cruel but fair
nitespark - 06 Feb 2008 11:54 GMT
>>> Some of the places I have been, the Captain told us in the dive
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> In Australia we have weather forecasts

WOW!!!  I am impressed that the Ozzy meteorological prognosticators can
accurately predict changes in ocean currents at all the dive locations
within a 30-45 minutes window.  If I ever make to that part of the world
to dive, I will feel all warm and fuzzy.

However, should you dive in the US, you are that mercy of our antiquated
and inadequate marine climate forcasters which don't offer the luxury of
telling us when and where and how much the current will change when we
are diving.

I especially urge you DO NOT dive the Spiegle Grove (Key Largo, Fla).

>>>and
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> What danger?

Geez...Suppose a diver needs to make an ascent and can't find the down
line?  Suppose it is towards the end of the dive and ALL of the divers
needs to ascend and can't find the down line?  Then, not only do you
have *1* diver that is adrift, you have 14 more that are adrift,
underwater, maybe doing mandatory deco stops, and defintely doing safety
stops.  You don't consider THAT a danger?  You don't consider a diver in
close proximity to moving prop(s) a danger?

>  That would require the other 14 divers to make a free ascent, in
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> my point exactly

We agree about the safety sausage, but that isn't an all encompassing
lifesaving device.  It merely makes you more visible in the water and
increases your chances of being seen if you do become adrift for
whatever reason.  Some dive operations REQUIRE every diver to carry a
sausage and even provide them if a diver does not have one.
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 06 Feb 2008 13:11 GMT
>>>> Some of the places I have been, the Captain told us in the dive
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> I especially urge you DO NOT dive the Spiegle Grove (Key Largo, Fla).

 :-)

Too true.

 Or -anywhere- on the North Carolina coast...

>>>>and
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> reason.  Some dive operations REQUIRE every diver to carry a sausage and
> even provide them if a diver does not have one.

Signature

"To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and
law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct,
but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will
permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will
allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the
law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals.
Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to
the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
~Jeff Snyder~

Lee Bell - 06 Feb 2008 15:11 GMT
Douglas W. Popeye Frederick wrote

>> I especially urge you DO NOT dive the Spiegle Grove (Key Largo, Fla).
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>  Or -anywhere- on the North Carolina coast...

Or pretty much anywhere in Florida that is close enough to the Gulf Stream
to be affected by eddies. Perhaps the most interesting currents are those
that not only change during the dive, but are different at different depths.
It's not all that unusual to have a strong current on the surface, but none
at the bottom, or a mild one on the surface, and a ripping one traveling in
the opposite direction near the bottom.

Lee
chilly - 06 Feb 2008 15:18 GMT
> Douglas W. Popeye Frederick wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> at the bottom, or a mild one on the surface, and a ripping one traveling in
> the opposite direction near the bottom.

Very common in Sipadan too.  We had to plan the dives to be going in
different directions at different depths.

Sometimes the turn was easily made, sometimes there was a bit of a struggle.
Lee Bell - 06 Feb 2008 01:47 GMT
> So if the dive boat has 15 divers in the water, 14 of them reach the
> wreck.  One loses the down line and is swept away by the current.  You
> feel the Captain should place the other 14 divers in danger to go after 1?

If he's really in danger, sure.

Actually, most of the boats I dive from these days, are not moored. Divers
go down a buoy line, either one permanently placed on the wreck or one
attached to it for that dive. If a diver surfaces, even when it's not an
emergency, the boat simply picks that diver, or buddy team up and returns to
area near the buoy. It works well without putting anyone in danger.

> That would require the other 14 divers to make a free ascent, in current.

They they'd get picked up too.

> The Captains I have dove with told us ahead of time of the conditions and
> have told us if we lose the down line, he will NOT weigh anchor, leaving
> the other divers on the site to go after one.  They will try to keep the
> adrift diver in sight as long as possible but it is VERY easy to lose a
> diver in the ocean swells.  I ALWAYS carry a safety sausage with me when I
> dive.  I have used it once.

I almost always carry an enormous one. In the Dry Tortugas, I use it on
every dive. It's an E ticket ride when you realize that the saves around you
are taller than your 6 foot safety sausage and the dive boat is near the
horizon, focused on picking up other divers. It gets even more exciting when
you're being circled by sharks that want the fish handing on your stringer.

Lee
chilly - 06 Feb 2008 05:51 GMT
> >  Some of the places I have been, the Captain told us in the dive
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Apparently you haven't dove on sites where conditions change from the
> start of the dive to the end of the dive.

Hmm, I should have read ahead.
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 05 Feb 2008 23:29 GMT
> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted

 What a pussy.

 Most of us dive in much worse conditions than that.

 On the 2000 Thanksgiving dive, we were in 8-10 foot seas or better, with
lightning striking close enough to light the bottom day-bright at 90fsw.

> and
>
> 2 a person in danger is the priority, the craft would weigh anchor and
> collect a person in danger in my experience in Australia. Floating around
> the ocean with BCD inflated, weights maybe dumped and in vision of someone
> on the boat is not an emergency. Float around and some will get you

 Just because someone misses the line, doesn't mean they're in danger.

 Leaving ten other divers, some of whom are decoing under the props, to
chase one guy, is hardly productive.

 No wonder you're scared shitless of everything.

           Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
       http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762
Dan Bracuk - 06 Feb 2008 00:51 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
pounded away at his keyboard resulting in:

:  What a pussy.
:
:  Most of us dive in much worse conditions than that.

But not all of us.  I wouldn't dive in conditions like that either.

Dan Bracuk
Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.
Scott - 06 Feb 2008 01:23 GMT
> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
> pounded away at his keyboard resulting in:

> :  What a pussy.

> :  Most of us dive in much worse conditions than that.

> But not all of us.  I wouldn't dive in conditions like that either.

Cool.

That is the beauty of being free to chose, eh?

We had a blast.
Dan Bracuk - 06 Feb 2008 03:30 GMT
"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:

:That is the beauty of being free to chose, eh?

It is indeed.

Dan Bracuk
Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.
Curtis - 06 Feb 2008 02:24 GMT
> :  What a pussy.
> :
> :  Most of us dive in much worse conditions than that.
>
> But not all of us.  I wouldn't dive in conditions like that either.

   I would, but at a different location.

   When the seas get that rough, no waves in caves.......
dechucka - 06 Feb 2008 01:20 GMT
>> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted
>
>  What a pussy.
>
>  Most of us dive in much worse conditions than that.

why?

>  On the 2000 Thanksgiving dive, we were in 8-10 foot seas or better, with
> lightning striking close enough to light the bottom day-bright at 90fsw.

what a big butch person you must be, bet you drive a big truck as well

>> and
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>  Leaving ten other divers, some of whom are decoing under the props, to
> chase one guy, is hardly productive.

if the person is danger it is well worth it

>  No wonder you're scared shitless of everything.

only your attitude
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 06 Feb 2008 02:25 GMT
>>> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> why?

 Why not?

 We're there to dive.

 The faint of heart (that would be you) can stay on the dock.

>>  On the 2000 Thanksgiving dive, we were in 8-10 foot seas or better, with
>> lightning striking close enough to light the bottom day-bright at 90fsw.
>
> what a big butch person you must be, bet you drive a big truck as well

 I am, and I do, actually.

 Chosen as a lead driver out of 1,100 in our company, in less than six
months.

 With less than two years experience, over guys that have 30+.

 Called on for information and assistance by all 5 divisions of our
company, and our recruiters, and occasionally by senior ops managers.

 And get this- it's usually for information on Canada.

 But then I'm good at anything I enjoy doing.

>>> and
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> if the person is danger it is well worth it

 Leaving the other ten in danger?

 Must be Australian math.

>>  No wonder you're scared shitless of everything.
>
> only your attitude

 Au contraire.

 Your posting history indicates a lengthy otherwise.

Signature

Does anybody here really think that taking away the guns will stop
killing? Or knives, or icepicks, or chains, or ropes, or baseball
bats, or poisons, or cars & trucks. People are gonna kill people,
and they'll always think of a new weapon if you take away the old ones.
And just because I carry a potential weapon doesn't mean I intend to
commit murder, or that I may be tempted to commit murder.
I often carry a big ugly knife. Lots of my friends do too.
I have never heard of anyone being tempted to use the knife on
anyone just because they have it with them. You gotta be in the
mood to do the killing and you use what's at hand. -Jeff Cooper

           Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
       http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762

dechucka - 06 Feb 2008 02:47 GMT
>>>> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>  I am, and I do, actually.

WOW        I'm sure Sott is impressed

>  Chosen as a lead driver out of 1,100 in our company, in less than six
> months.

WOW big company mine used to be 4 platoons plus us non workers in company HQ

>  With less than two years experience, over guys that have 30+.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>  But then I'm good at anything I enjoy doing.

WOW you are so good no wonder you are the self appointed leader of rec.scuba

>>>> and
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>  Leaving the other ten in danger?

we have back up. IF people have a deco obligation  the anchor line is not
the only place to do it

>  Must be Australian math.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>  Your posting history indicates a lengthy otherwise.

a lengthy otherwise what?
chilly - 06 Feb 2008 06:20 GMT
> >> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> why?

Because sometimes that's how it works out.

> >  On the 2000 Thanksgiving dive, we were in 8-10 foot seas or better, with
> > lightning striking close enough to light the bottom day-bright at 90fsw.
>
> what a big butch person you must be, bet you drive a big truck as well

Well, thanks . .I guess  . . . and I drive a Honda Accord actually.

> >> 2 a person in danger is the priority, the craft would weigh anchor and
> >> collect a person in danger in my experience in Australia. Floating around
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> if the person is danger it is well worth it

Not if it puts other divers into danger

> >  No wonder you're scared shitless of everything.
>
> only your attitude
Lee Bell - 06 Feb 2008 11:12 GMT
> Leaving ten other divers, some of whom are decoing under the props . . .

Decoing under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 06 Feb 2008 13:08 GMT
>> Leaving ten other divers, some of whom are decoing under the props . . .
>
> Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.

 A lot of boats rig a deco line from bow to stern.

Signature

"To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and
law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct,
but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will
permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will
allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the
law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals.
Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to
the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
~Jeff Snyder~

Matthias Voss - 06 Feb 2008 13:49 GMT
>>> Leaving ten other divers, some of whom are decoing under the props . . .
>>
>> Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.
>
>  A lot of boats rig a deco line from bow to stern.

That is for keel-hawling!
Matthias
Grumman-581 - 06 Feb 2008 15:14 GMT
> That is for keel-hawling!

Actually keelhauling was from one side of the ship to the other...

Signature

See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

JOF - 06 Feb 2008 15:22 GMT
On Feb 6, 10:14 am, Grumman-581 <grumman581-usenet-2...@spambob.net>
wrote:
> > That is for keel-hawling!
>
> Actually keelhauling was from one side of the ship to the other...

Smaller boat version.

JF
Matthias Voss - 06 Feb 2008 21:49 GMT
>>That is for keel-hawling!
>
> Actually keelhauling was from one side of the ship to the other...

Only if you were nice ..
<eg>

Matthias
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 06 Feb 2008 17:23 GMT
>>>> Leaving ten other divers, some of whom are decoing under the props . .
>>>> .
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> That is for keel-hawling!

 :-)

Signature

"To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and
law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct,
but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will
permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will
allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the
law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals.
Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to
the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
~Jeff Snyder~

Lee Bell - 06 Feb 2008 15:15 GMT
>> Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.

>  A lot of boats rig a deco line from bow to stern.

I've never seen one. I don't understand how that would work since the
shallowest deco stop is 10 feet and most boats do not draw that much. I
don't think I'd like doing my deco anywhere close to the props. The last
person I know that did, is no longer with us. The boat, but not the captain,
I used for my Dry Tortugas trips killed him.

Lee
nitespark - 06 Feb 2008 16:31 GMT
>>>Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Lee

http://olympusdiving.com/index.cfm?section=806

Scroll down the page.  This is a typical rigging for the boats out of
Morehead City.
Lee Bell - 06 Feb 2008 16:53 GMT
>>>>Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.

>>> A lot of boats rig a deco line from bow to stern.

>> I've never seen one. I don't understand how that would work since the
>> shallowest deco stop is 10 feet and most boats do not draw that much. I
>> don't think I'd like doing my deco anywhere close to the props. The last
>> person I know that did, is no longer with us. The boat, but not the
>> captain, I used for my Dry Tortugas trips killed him.

> http://olympusdiving.com/index.cfm?section=806

> Scroll down the page.  This is a typical rigging for the boats out of
> Morehead City.

That's not from bow to stern or under the props. I've used boats with hang
bars for deco as well, including some under the props, but they're well
under the props and, most importantly, if in use when the boat begins to
move, force the diver away from the props rather than into them.  I've still
not seen one that runs a deco line from bow to stern under the props.

Lee
nitespark - 06 Feb 2008 17:20 GMT
>>>>>Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> move, force the diver away from the props rather than into them.  I've still
> not seen one that runs a deco line from bow to stern under the props.

I know.  It was the closest thing I could think of to what was
mentioned.  On the boats I have been on, it is a PVC pipe that is
between the two weights and is parallel to the surface.  It is a good
rig, but when the boat rolls with a wave, it can be a bit difficult to
hang onto the pvc pipe.
Lee Bell - 06 Feb 2008 20:49 GMT
> I know.  It was the closest thing I could think of to what was mentioned.
> On the boats I have been on, it is a PVC pipe that is between the two
> weights and is parallel to the surface.  It is a good rig, but when the
> boat rolls with a wave, it can be a bit difficult to hang onto the pvc
> pipe.

Actually, it's closer than I thought at first. I saw the bottom picture
before I saw the top diagram.

Lee
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 06 Feb 2008 17:35 GMT
>>>>>Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> That's not from bow to stern or under the props.

 It sure is for landlubbers. :-)

 And going from the hang line to the ladder brings you right past the
props.

>I've used boats with hang bars for deco as well, including some under the
>props, but they're well under the props and, most importantly, if in use
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Lee

Signature

"To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and
law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct,
but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will
permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will
allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the
law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals.
Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to
the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
~Jeff Snyder~

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 06 Feb 2008 17:32 GMT
>>> Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> person I know that did, is no longer with us. The boat, but not the
> captain, I used for my Dry Tortugas trips killed him.

 They run a line under the keel from the down/anchor line to a weighted
(vertical) stern line- the diver comes up the down line, and has a 5 meter
line the length of the boat down to the stern to hang on.

 It's common in N.C. and the Panhandle.

 Someone in North Carolina (Hatteras Divers?) even hangs regulators on it,
with hoses up to the boat, in case you need to borrow a tad.

Signature

"To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and
law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct,
but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will
permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will
allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the
law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals.
Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to
the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
~Jeff Snyder~

nitespark - 06 Feb 2008 18:26 GMT
>>>> Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>  Someone in North Carolina (Hatteras Divers?) even hangs regulators on
> it, with hoses up to the boat, in case you need to borrow a tad.

I havn't dove with Hatteras Divers but the Olympus link I sent in an
earlier response to Lee's message shows something somewhat similar.
Although this rig does not run a line from stern to bow, it does drop a
safety stop bar over the side of the boat.  I know the boats at
Discovery Diving drop a regulator off the stern of the boat for divers
that may be low or OOA.  Olympus Diving does the same thing.
mag3 - 06 Feb 2008 21:35 GMT
>>  They run a line under the keel from the down/anchor line to a weighted
>> (vertical) stern line- the diver comes up the down line, and has a 5
>> meter line the length of the boat down to the stern to hang on.
>>
>>  It's common in N.C. and the Panhandle.

Believe it or not, my primary boat up here in NJ has one - the exact rig depeicted
here.  Now I know how it got it's name....

____________________________________________
Regards,

Arnold
JRE - 06 Feb 2008 23:20 GMT
>>> Decoding under props is a good way to get a Darwin award nomination.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Lee

There are a couple of ways.  A Carolina rig is based on weights fore and
aft and secured to the side of the boat.  Some boats rig a fairly heavy
SS deco bar at 10' instead.  If it's rough, I find the Carolina rig
nicer because it stresses my shoulders a lot less.  If it's not, the bar
is nicer because when shared with other divers not all of them need good
buoyancy control to stay at the right depth.

Signature

John Eells

JRE - 06 Feb 2008 00:55 GMT
<snip>

> 2 a person in danger is the priority, the craft would weigh anchor and
> collect a person in danger in my experience in Australia. Floating around
> the ocean with BCD inflated, weights maybe dumped and in vision of someone
> on the boat is not an emergency. Float around and some will get you

I don't agree.  The greatest good of the greatest number is the
priority, and leaving divers in the water behind to retrieve someone who
is downcurrent is not an accepted practice anywhere I've dived.  The
potential hazards to divers who happen to be on their way up the line,
perhaps with deco obligations, or under the stern when the boat begins
to move are also a consideration.

If you wind up unable to reach the boat, you should expect to float
around a while until you can be retrieved without causing other divers
to be endangered.

Signature

John Eells

dechucka - 06 Feb 2008 01:24 GMT
> <snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> perhaps with deco obligations, or under the stern when the boat begins to
> move are also a consideration.

you dive on boats that have no emergency recall plans? Even when I dive off
a private boat, which is the norm, we have an emergency recall plan for
situations where a diver may be down current and in trouble. Hint as a diver
I have always been taught to keep away from the 220 hp diver mashers

> If you wind up unable to reach the boat, you should expect to float around
> a while until you can be retrieved without causing other divers to be
> endangered.

Totally agree
chilly - 06 Feb 2008 05:51 GMT
> >> What's wrong with floating around for awhile? Inflate your safety sausage
> >> thingy and the boat will pick you up. That is what happens in Aus except
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted

Haven't you ever entered under one set of surface conditions only to find
another upon ascent?

Are you sure you've done a lot of diving?

> and
>
> 2 a person in danger is the priority, the craft would weigh anchor and
> collect a person in danger in my experience in Australia. Floating around
> the ocean with BCD inflated, weights maybe dumped and in vision of someone
> on the boat is not an emergency. Float around and some will get you

At least, you hope that is what will happen.

Who is the person in danger?  If the boat is collecting people and they are
half in and half out, shall the boat put those people in danger to attempt
to rescue one?

Yes, I have floated for a long time waiting.  And in some of the rougher sea
conditions, I have felt some mild concern from time to time. So far so good
though.

I much preferred this floating around waiting business with my old BCD.  My
new one with the back inflate, makes the waiting in rough conditions that
much less pleasant.  I'll probably get used to it.
Joe English - 06 Feb 2008 14:29 GMT
>>>>What's wrong with floating around for awhile? Inflate your safety
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> Haven't you ever entered under one set of surface conditions only to find
> another upon ascent?

I certainly have - both ways.  Entered water in less than ideal
conditions only to surface in glass calm water.  Also surfaced in 8-10
ft seas with the boat a mere 100 yards away.  My dive partner was out of
air, I wasn't.  The boat couldn't see us - it was one tortuous (sp) trip
to the boat.  Both happened in Key Largo 0ne on the Benwood - don't
remember teh other sits

> Are you sure you've done a lot of diving?
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> new one with the back inflate, makes the waiting in rough conditions that
> much less pleasant.  I'll probably get used to it.
dechucka - 06 Feb 2008 21:40 GMT
>> >> What's wrong with floating around for awhile? Inflate your safety
> sausage
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Haven't you ever entered under one set of surface conditions only to find
> another upon ascent?

yep but never from calm to 4 foot waves

> Are you sure you've done a lot of diving?

yep

>> and
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> new one with the back inflate, makes the waiting in rough conditions that
> much less pleasant.  I'll probably get used to it.
chilly - 07 Feb 2008 04:16 GMT
> >> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted
> >
> > Haven't you ever entered under one set of surface conditions only to find
> > another upon ascent?
>
> yep but never from calm to 4 foot waves

Then you haven't lived.  :^)  I once went diving in relatively calm
conditions and got recalled to the boat because hurricane seas had shown up.
That was interesting.

> > Are you sure you've done a lot of diving?
>
> yep

Hmm . . .
dechucka - 07 Feb 2008 19:34 GMT
>> >> 1 I wouldn't dive in the conditions you have posted
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> up.
> That was interesting.

I'm sure it would have been

>> > Are you sure you've done a lot of diving?
>>
>> yep
>
> Hmm . . .
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 05 Feb 2008 23:09 GMT
>>> Other boats which don't have "fin friendly" ladders (all the boats I'