Scuba Forum / General / January 2008
New study says 151,000 Iraqi dead
|
|
Thread rating:  |
RecScubaPoster - 10 Jan 2008 04:50 GMT http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm
Joe English - 10 Jan 2008 12:53 GMT > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm i thought you were going to post some bad news
dazed and confuzzed - 10 Jan 2008 12:55 GMT > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm Yeah, like the lancet study......
<snicker>
 Signature “TANSTAAFL” ____________________________________________________________________________
America: Ironically, the safest place to be anti-American. ____________________________________________________________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3
Grumman-581 - 10 Jan 2008 13:01 GMT > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm Although that's a good start, from a financial efficiency standpoint, it sucks... A quick Google search brings up a price tag so for of around $455 billion... That works out to a bit of $3 *million* per camel f.cker killed... Hey, I'm all for killing camel f.ckers, but this is a really inefficient way to go about doing it... Nukes are a whole lot cheaper...
 Signature See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.
Carl Nisarel - 10 Jan 2008 12:25 GMT Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, -
> Hey, I'm all for killing camel f.ckers, Your next trip to Canada is going to be a really interesting trip through the Border Agency interview.
Perhaps they'll make sure that the agent that interviews you will be a Muslim from an Arabic country.
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Matthias Voss - 10 Jan 2008 13:54 GMT > Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, - > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Perhaps they'll make sure that the agent that interviews you will > be a Muslim from an Arabic country. So to be better able to discuss the pro and cons of camel f.cking.
Matthias
Rod - 10 Jan 2008 13:59 GMT >> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, - >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Matthias So what is the break down on those killed by insurgents or conflecting religous groups verses killed by Americans ?
Lee Bell - 10 Jan 2008 16:14 GMT >>> Your next trip to Canada is going to be a really interesting trip >>> through the Border Agency interview. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > So what is the break down on those killed by insurgents or > conflecting religous groups verses killed by Americans ? Hopefully we're way ahead. That's how we planned it.
Like Patton said, the goal of war is not to die for your country. The goal is to get the other guy to die for his.
Lee
Dennis (Icarus) - 10 Jan 2008 17:37 GMT > >> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, - > >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > So what is the break down on those killed by insurgents or > conflecting religous groups verses killed by Americans ? Or estimates as to how many wou;dve been kilkled duringt he same period by Saddam's regime, had it remained? No...can't be...he was a peaceful chap, not doing or ordering harm to anyone.
Dennis
Lee Bell - 10 Jan 2008 16:13 GMT >> Your next trip to Canada is going to be a really interesting trip through >> the Border Agency interview. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > So to be better able to discuss the pro and cons of camel f.cking. Hell, all Grumman has to do is call ahead and tell them he has a pistol. The last time somebody did that, they all ran away and John wonders why the criminals in his country find it so easy to obtain weapons.
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 10 Jan 2008 22:32 GMT >> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, - >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > So to be better able to discuss the pro and cons of camel f.cking. It's all a terrified, impotent basement dwelling troll like nisrael can do from behind his mommy's skirts.
carl has made numerous threats of harm here, but has been too terrified to either meet anyone face to face, or even let anyone know what -province- he's in.
 Signature Does anybody here really think that taking away the guns will stop killing? Or knives, or icepicks, or chains, or ropes, or baseball bats, or poisons, or cars & trucks. People are gonna kill people, and they'll always think of a new weapon if you take away the old ones. And just because I carry a potential weapon doesn't mean I intend to commit murder, or that I may be tempted to commit murder. I often carry a big ugly knife. Lots of my friends do too. I have never heard of anyone being tempted to use the knife on anyone just because they have it with them. You gotta be in the mood to do the killing and you use what's at hand. -Jeff Cooper
Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762
Carl Nisarel - 11 Jan 2008 16:47 GMT Douglas W. "Fatboy" Frederick of RobinsonEnterprisesLTD whined:
> carl has made numerous threats of harm here, Fatboy writes another claim that he'll never support.
I've never made any "threats of harm" top anyone here, Fatboy.
You'll never produce any quotes from my posts to demonstrate otherwise.
You're simply lying.
> but has been too terrified to either meet > anyone face to face, <snicker>
I offered to meet Scotty the pussy at the Peace Arch. He ran, ran, ran, ran, ran
You're too terrified of clearly identifying your truck so that I can find you, if you happen to be driving by.
You're just pissed because of the special attention you get from Canadian Border Agents because of your foolish assertion that you keep a handgun hidden in your truck.
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Lee Bell - 11 Jan 2008 17:40 GMT > It's all a terrified, impotent basement dwelling troll like nisrael can do > from behind his mommy's skirts. carl has made numerous threats of harm > here, but has been > too terrified to either meet anyone face to face, or even let anyone know > what -province- he's in. He's mysteriously disappeared from my inbox . . . again. I don't know how that could have happened.
Carl Nisarel - 11 Jan 2008 16:53 GMT To a group I went by chance, two thousand posters I saw in a glance, cried out Lee Bell, awakened from a trance, whither...
> He's mysteriously disappeared from my inbox . . . again. I > don't know how that could have happened. Lee has scurried away from his claims.
Pull your head out of your a.s, Lee.
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Scott - 12 Jan 2008 01:54 GMT > > It's all a terrified, impotent basement dwelling troll like nisrael can do > > from behind his mommy's skirts. carl has made numerous threats of harm > > here, but has been > > too terrified to either meet anyone face to face, or even let anyone know > > what -province- he's in.
> He's mysteriously disappeared from my inbox . . . again. I don't know how > that could have happened. No worries, he'll shift nyms and be back again.
Carl Nisarel - 12 Jan 2008 04:57 GMT rec.scuba's resident pussy Scott Koplin whimpered:
> No worries, he'll shift nyms and be back again. <snicker>
I can leave for months and Scotty will be here accusing any new posters of being me.
I don't nymshift, pussy.
Now, go run and cower.
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
hierophantfish@hotmail.com - 13 Jan 2008 05:29 GMT > rec.scuba's resident pussy Scott Koplin whimpered:
> I can leave for months and Scotty will be here accusing any new > posters of being me. Scott and a few others accused me of being you and of being some other people. They don't like when someone new decides to post here and doesn't agree with them. And they sure don't like you. Bravo ! :-)
Carl Nisarel - 11 Jan 2008 00:10 GMT To a group I went by chance, two thousand posters I saw in a glance, cried out Matthias Voss, awakened from a trance, whither...
>> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, - >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > So to be better able to discuss the pro and cons of camel > f.cking. In Mikey's case, it's the camel who is going to be humping and Mikey who is going to be strapped to a board for servicing.
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Lee Bell - 10 Jan 2008 13:16 GMT > A quick Google search brings up a price tag so for of around $455 > billion... That works out to a bit of $3 *million* per camel f.cker > killed... Hey, I'm all for killing camel f.ckers, but this is a really > inefficient way to go about doing it... Nukes are a whole lot cheaper... Yeah, but the screw up the oil wells. Perhaps if we thought of them as prairie dogs, we could recover some of our money by charging shooters.
|
|
|