Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New study says 151,000 Iraqi dead

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RecScubaPoster - 10 Jan 2008 04:50 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm
Joe English - 10 Jan 2008 12:53 GMT
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm

i thought you were going to post some bad news
dazed and confuzzed - 10 Jan 2008 12:55 GMT
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm

Yeah, like the lancet study......

<snicker>

Signature

“TANSTAAFL”
____________________________________________________________________________

America: Ironically, the safest place to be anti-American.
____________________________________________________________________________
 "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3

Grumman-581 - 10 Jan 2008 13:01 GMT
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm

Although that's a good start, from a financial efficiency standpoint, it
sucks... A quick Google search brings up a price tag so for of around $455
billion... That works out to a bit of $3 *million* per camel f.cker
killed... Hey, I'm all for killing camel f.ckers, but this is a really
inefficient way to go about doing it... Nukes are a whole lot cheaper...

Signature

See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

Carl Nisarel - 10 Jan 2008 12:25 GMT
Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, -

>  Hey, I'm all for killing camel f.ckers,

Your next trip to Canada is going to be a really interesting trip
through the Border Agency interview.

Perhaps they'll make sure that the agent that interviews you will
be a Muslim from an Arabic country.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Matthias Voss - 10 Jan 2008 13:54 GMT
> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, -
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Perhaps they'll make sure that the agent that interviews you will
> be a Muslim from an Arabic country.

So to be better able to discuss the pro and cons of camel
f.cking.

Matthias
Rod - 10 Jan 2008 13:59 GMT
>> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, -
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Matthias

So  what is the break down on those killed by insurgents or
conflecting religous groups verses killed by Americans ?
Lee Bell - 10 Jan 2008 16:14 GMT
>>> Your next trip to Canada is going to be a really interesting trip
>>> through the Border Agency interview.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> So  what is the break down on those killed by insurgents or
> conflecting religous groups verses killed by Americans ?

Hopefully we're way ahead. That's how we planned it.

Like Patton said, the goal of war is not to die for your country. The goal
is to get the other guy to die for his.

Lee
Dennis (Icarus) - 10 Jan 2008 17:37 GMT
> >> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, -
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> So  what is the break down on those killed by insurgents or
> conflecting religous groups verses killed by Americans ?

Or estimates as to how many wou;dve been kilkled duringt he same period by
Saddam's regime, had it remained?
No...can't be...he was a peaceful chap, not doing or ordering harm to
anyone.

Dennis
Lee Bell - 10 Jan 2008 16:13 GMT
>> Your next trip to Canada is going to be a really interesting trip through
>> the Border Agency interview.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> So to be better able to discuss the pro and cons of camel f.cking.

Hell, all Grumman has to do is call ahead and tell them he has a pistol. The
last time somebody did that, they all ran away and John wonders why the
criminals in his country find it so easy to obtain weapons.
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 10 Jan 2008 22:32 GMT
>> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, -
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> So to be better able to discuss the pro and cons of camel f.cking.

 It's all a terrified, impotent basement dwelling troll like nisrael can do
from behind his mommy's skirts.

 carl has made numerous threats of harm here, but has been too terrified to
either meet anyone face to face, or even let anyone know what -province-
he's in.

Signature

Does anybody here really think that taking away the guns will stop
killing? Or knives, or icepicks, or chains, or ropes, or baseball
bats, or poisons, or cars & trucks. People are gonna kill people,
and they'll always think of a new weapon if you take away the old ones.
And just because I carry a potential weapon doesn't mean I intend to
commit murder, or that I may be tempted to commit murder.
I often carry a big ugly knife. Lots of my friends do too.
I have never heard of anyone being tempted to use the knife on
anyone just because they have it with them. You gotta be in the
mood to do the killing and you use what's at hand. -Jeff Cooper

           Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
       http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762

Carl Nisarel - 11 Jan 2008 16:47 GMT
Douglas W. "Fatboy" Frederick of RobinsonEnterprisesLTD whined:

>   carl has made numerous threats of harm here,

Fatboy writes another claim that he'll never support.

I've never made any "threats of harm" top anyone here, Fatboy.

You'll never produce any quotes from my posts to demonstrate
otherwise.

You're simply lying.

> but has been too terrified to either meet
> anyone face to face,

<snicker>

I offered to meet Scotty the pussy at the Peace Arch. He ran,
ran, ran, ran, ran

You're too terrified of clearly identifying your truck so that I
can find you, if you happen to be driving by.

You're just pissed because of the special attention you get from
Canadian Border Agents because of your foolish assertion that
you keep a handgun hidden in your truck.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Lee Bell - 11 Jan 2008 17:40 GMT
> It's all a terrified, impotent basement dwelling troll like nisrael can do
> from behind his mommy's skirts. carl has made numerous threats of harm
> here, but has been
> too terrified to either meet anyone face to face, or even let anyone know
> what -province- he's in.

He's mysteriously disappeared from my inbox . . . again. I don't know how
that could have happened.
Carl Nisarel - 11 Jan 2008 16:53 GMT
To a group I went by chance, two thousand posters I saw in a
glance, cried out Lee Bell, awakened from a trance, whither...

> He's mysteriously disappeared from my inbox . . . again. I
> don't know how that could have happened.

Lee has scurried away from his claims.

Pull your head out of your a.s, Lee.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Scott - 12 Jan 2008 01:54 GMT
> > It's all a terrified, impotent basement dwelling troll like nisrael can do
> > from behind his mommy's skirts. carl has made numerous threats of harm
> > here, but has been
> > too terrified to either meet anyone face to face, or even let anyone know
> > what -province- he's in.

> He's mysteriously disappeared from my inbox . . . again. I don't know how
> that could have happened.

No worries, he'll shift nyms and be back again.
Carl Nisarel - 12 Jan 2008 04:57 GMT
rec.scuba's resident pussy Scott Koplin whimpered:

> No worries, he'll shift nyms and be back again.

<snicker>

I can leave for months and Scotty will be here accusing any new
posters of being me.

I don't nymshift, pussy.

Now, go run and cower.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

hierophantfish@hotmail.com - 13 Jan 2008 05:29 GMT
> rec.scuba's resident pussy Scott Koplin whimpered:

> I can leave for months and Scotty will be here accusing any new
> posters of being me.

Scott and a few others accused me of being you and of being some other
people.  They don't like when someone new decides to post here and
doesn't agree with them.  And they sure don't like you.  Bravo !   :-)
Carl Nisarel - 11 Jan 2008 00:10 GMT
To a group I went by chance, two thousand posters I saw in a
glance, cried out Matthias Voss, awakened from a trance,
whither...

>> Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581, -
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> So to be better able to discuss the pro and cons of camel
> f.cking.

In Mikey's case, it's the camel who is going to be humping and
Mikey who is going to be strapped to a board for servicing.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Lee Bell - 10 Jan 2008 13:16 GMT
> A quick Google search brings up a price tag so for of around $455
> billion... That works out to a bit of $3 *million* per camel f.cker
> killed... Hey, I'm all for killing camel f.ckers, but this is a really
> inefficient way to go about doing it... Nukes are a whole lot cheaper...

Yeah, but the screw up the oil wells. Perhaps if we thought of them as
prairie dogs, we could recover some of our money by charging shooters.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.