*****I see you and your new buddy Kramer have been involved in
internet bets before.
Seems hh that you poked your snout in to some of Kramers wild betting
and you got burnt. It's hilarious to read the whole thread but heres a
teaser.
Uh...HH? What are you raving about? None of the above had ANYTHING
to
do with the bet, so what are you going on about. This is NOT your
soapbox, HH. We really don't need to listen to your rantings just to
satisfy your own personal agenda.
Next, as a lawyer you make a great car mechanic.. Lawyers go to
university for 7 years to learn their skills. Did you even finish
school? All your questions do is obfuscate the original bet, of which
there was NO question of meaning or intent.
What I was proposing was two bets about diving to Jason O'Rourke. Why
are YOU so busy spending YOUR time insinuating yourself into this
issue.
Could it be that PERSONAL AGENDA that I keep mentioning?
> > Time to take responsibility for your own words.
> Take responsibility for your bet proposals.
> You lost the California diveboat one because you were imprecise.
You are an even bigger fool that I had thought! If Jason never
accepted
the bet, how could ANYONE win or lose? You make yourself look like a
fool because you ARE imprecise. Hell, not even imprecise... flat out
incorrect!!! ROTFL!!
> running your mouth (again) and doing the same thing here (again),
Again? HH, would YOU care to make a bet and PROVE your words? PROVE
where I accepted ANY bet in r.s other than ADRIAN'S and I'll donate
$500
to DAN. FAIL TO PROVE that I accepted any bets and YOU donate $500 to
DAN. Now... put your money where YOUR mouth is...
> you'll use your own sloppiness as your excuse to welch out (again).
$500 to DAN.... and remember, there is no welching unless there has
been
a bet offered AND accepted. (We would want to be 'imprecise,' would
we?)
Personally, I never accepted ANY other bets than with Adrian. Prove
otherwise and DAN gets more of my money. FAIL to prove it and DAN
gets
YOUR money. I offered several bets to many r.c buffoons (such as
yourself) and none had the nerve to accept them, How about it, son.
Have
YOU the balls to ACCEPT this bet? Or are you just going to play word
games?
Steve Kramer
Chiang Mai, Thailand
******You tried your old trick............
As a proposed contract, this is unacceptably sloppy, so I reject it
out
of hand. Write up your proposed terms, include impartial third party
arbiters and holders, and email it to me offline and I'll consider
your
offer. One thing that I would like to see added to the terms is that
you agree to personally escort the delivery of the payment to me.
This
shouldn't be a burden to a guy who brags about how easy it is to get
free airline tickets. The ball's in your court.
-hh
*******Kramer whacked back an ace........
"H. Huntzinger" wrote:
I was wrong... I really thought that it was impossible for you to get
any more foolish that you already displayed. But you proved me wrong.
You HAVE far surpassed anything I could have possibly imagined as
ridiculous. You have added and entirely new dimension to the
definition
of the word!!
> As written, the bet allowed broad interpretation. You could have
> narrowed its possible scope before the fact, but you didn't.
> After the fact, its too late. Pay up.
The offer was never accepted, fool. Therefore there never WAS a bet.
I
kept asking him to accept, again and again. But he refused. There was
an
offer, but never an acceptance. Even with your low level of thinking
ability, you have to realize that there needs to be both an offer AND
an
acceptance to there to be a finalized bet. But then, I continue to
overestimate you level of thinking, don't I...
This offer had nothing to do with you in the first place. I was
between
Jason and me. Then you decided it would be the perfect place for you
to
publicly humiliate yourself by throwing in your own agenda towards
me.
You did so brilliantly and made the perfect fool of yourself in the
process. Well, you sit around and play word games and practice your
ignorance by yourself. I'm going diving. :o)
Steve Kramer
Chiang Mai, Thailand
******Then squashed you like a bug................
"H. Huntzinger" wrote:
... more useless garbage.
You and Jason can continue to play with your words all you want.
Everyone reading this thread knows what fools you made of yourselves
with it. But as this is a diving newsgroup, I'm going diving. You can
sit around on dry land and act the fool, which you do most of the
year.
Personally, I prefer to dive most of the year.
Oh... by the way, please stop sending me e-mail!! I really don't want
to
read your garbage twice!
Bye....
Steve Kramer
Chiang Mai, Thailand
*******And on and on the pair of you went.......
Steve Kramer <st...@seatraveler.com> wrote:
> > As written, the bet allowed broad interpretation. You could have
> > narrowed its possible scope before the fact, but you didn't.
> > After the fact, its too late. Pay up.
> The offer was never accepted, fool. Therefore there never WAS a bet.
Your offer was accepted by the respose, which happened to be the
proof
that your claim was wrong, and your proposed bet forefeit. An
honorable
man would have accepted that, and paid up.
Instead, you're whining and weaselng about the lack of notarized
paperwork or some other formality nonsense. When you write a sloppy
proposal, you have to accept sloppy results. Its called taking
reponsibility for your actions.
Similarly, to stop getting my posts cc'ed to your inbox, all you have
to
do is to stop responding to them in this thread with your rediculous
claims, malicious lies, bullying and Ad Homenium attacks. That's the
contract; if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
> This offer had nothing to do with you in the first place. I was between
> Jason and me.
And just who was the bozo that published the bet again and again in a
public forum for all to see and comment on? You were.
Once again, your lame excuses for your actions doesn't fly.
-hh
Takin & Kanoknuan - 06 Nov 2007 11:46 GMT
"LarbGai" <larbgai@lycos.com> wrote in message
> *****I see you and your new buddy Kramer have been involved in
> internet bets before.
[quoted text clipped - 164 lines]
>
> -hh
**LOL What a couple of tossers!!!