>>> Apparently not.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> know of made the same mistake. Of the three, two got back in safely. One
> did not. That's not indicative of a good captain either.

Signature
"If you guys would just settle to earth and admit that guns are just
noisy potentially dangerous tools and quit waving them around
like a steel dick then there's be no need for discussions like this." - JOF
Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762
> It seems that if two made it back, then it wasn't such a questionable
> decision to go out that day.
He didn't make it back. That pretty much proves it wasn't a good idea.
Both the other captains aborted their trips, also suggesting that going out
was not a very good idea.
The fact that that they got back in safely suggests that they are better
captains.
> I've gone out and turned back more than once (you never have, even once,
> I guess?), and never had it mentioned that this was poor judgment on the
> part of the Captain.
I have gone out and turned back. Nobody had to tell me it that going out was
a poor judgement on the part of the captain. I knew it. That's why I turned
back. None of the three captains had to be told they had made a bad decision
either. They knew. That's why they turned back. One didn't make it back.
Call it what you
want, but a wrecked boat and customers in the hospital are pretty strong
evidence of his poor judgement. The quality of a captain is not
demonstrated by his performance on nice days. It's demonstrated in the
quality of his decisions on the bad ones. This captain went out when he
should not have, destroyed his boat and injured his passengers in the
process. I'm having a bit of trouble understanding why you consider that to
be good.
> As to why the boat rolled, unless you have information I don't, no one
> has mentioned a particular cause.
It rolled because the captain took it out into conditions that he and the
boat were not able to handle. It was his responsibility to check conditions,
his responsibility to decide whether he, his boat and his customers were
safe going out that day, and his responsibility to handle the boat
responsibly and safely. His responsibility is clear both legally and by
custom. He failed in his responsibilities.
> You opinion refers to some general assumptions.
It is based on experience in the area and as the captain of my own boats.
I've had to make the same decision more than once. I've made a wrong
decision more than once too. I've yet to make a wrong decision that I was
unable to change, allowing my boat and my passengers, to return to port
safely.
> And we're both entitled to our opinions.
True, but you'll have to pardon me for my belief that your statement that he
was a good captain, in a discussion about his going out in conditions any
captain should have known were unsafe, when the sum of all his decisions
resulted in a wrecked boat and injured passengers, is not supported by the
facts.
Lee