 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / October 2007Diving in Sharm El Sheik /Clifftop Hotel
Hi, has anybody been in this hotel? Recommended? Are there good anglophone diving operators, where divers are not lead throught the reefs like cattle, by ten, stacked in groups of 2x5? Which ones to avoid? What about OONAS divers, Red Sea diving college? TIA, Matthias > Hi, > has anybody been in this hotel? Recommended? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > What about OONAS divers, Red Sea diving college? Ping me offline, my boss just got back from Sharm. > > Hi, > > has anybody been in this hotel? Recommended? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Ping me offline, my boss just got back from Sharm. Why offline? Are actual scuba discussions off-limits here? > > Ping me offline, my boss just got back from Sharm. > > Why offline? Are actual scuba discussions off-limits here? I know you don't understand this or care, but when it comes to putting out specific information on a public forum concerning where military and off duty military servicemen are diving and training, yes. I also know you don't understand this or care, but there are "people" and "groups" there in the middle east that are bent on killing Americans, just any Americans, and especially those who might be serving their nation in the war against Islamic Fascism (which, in spite of your best efforts, we are winning). You know, the same Americans fighting, killing and sacrificing for your freedom and safety? The same freedom you shamelessly abuse from your podium of partisan bigotry and angst to undermine their efforts, endanger them and offer aid, comfort and support to their enemies? So, if you want to know where to stay away from, ping me offline. On Oct 23, 6:56 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Ping me offline, my boss just got back from Sharm. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > out specific information on a public forum concerning where military > and off duty military servicemen are diving and training, yes. Sure, I understand. You can only give out this top secret information via e-mail to foreigners from a country we were at war with a mere 62 years ago. Does bullshit still smell in Washington? I remember when I used to have to drive out to our satellite office in Duvall - if I took a certain side road to avoid traffic on the main arterial, I'd pass by a place that sold fermented cow manure. Your post reminds me of this. Do you think Matthias will glean any useful information on diving in Sharm if your boss was only diving in restricted top secret areas? > I also know you don't understand this or care, but there are "people" > and "groups" there in the middle east that are bent on killing > Americans, just any Americans, and especially those who might be > serving their nation in the war against Islamic Fascism (which, in > spite of your best efforts, we are winning). Of course. And we all know you, with your years of dedicated service, are on the front lines directing our efforts against terrorism by withholding potentially useful information about dive sites from the general public. You are my hero. > You know, the same Americans fighting, killing and sacrificing for > your freedom and safety? In Sharm? > The same freedom you shamelessly abuse from your podium of partisan > bigotry and angst to undermine their efforts, endanger them and offer > aid, comfort and support to their enemies? In Sharm? > So, if you want to know where to stay away from, ping me offline. I have no desire to head to the middle east even though my last name isn't a Jewish one and I could probably pass without being unduly molested. It's all a big fly-infested shithole and I've heard the diving isn't worth it. I would like to dive in Malaysia, but I'm boycotting them as well. Still, proper usenet protocol dictates that you post this stuff here so that everyone reading rec.scuba can know where to stay away from. <chop the usual spineless, lying, bigot, a.shole projection and assumption> > Still, proper usenet protocol dictates that you post this stuff here > so that everyone reading rec.scuba can know where to stay away from. When you figure out what proper Usenet protocol is and how to apply it to yourself, you can dictate. Thanbks for showing your a.s again, though. On Oct 23, 11:00 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > <chop the usual spineless, lying, bigot, a.shole projection and > assumption> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Thanbks for showing your a.s again, though. So how's the diving in Sharm nowadays? > So how's the diving in Sharm nowadays? Great from what I was told, unless you dont like surfacing under topless women... pugetsounddiver@gmail.com wrote in news:1193173003.212282.207850 @e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >> So how's the diving in Sharm nowadays? > > Great from what I was told, unless you dont like surfacing under > topless women... You should go diving on Lanzarote, at Mala...it's a nudist colony...quite an experience when you come up from 10m to the concrete platform they use to go in the water... > On Oct 23, 11:00 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > So how's the diving in Sharm nowadays? Great Janusz You do by far not realize how right Scott is in this issue. Not only with respect to visitors to Sharm he referred to, but also concerning the one I asked for. It reminds me of times when I was not allowed to drive to the GDR to Berlin. > On Oct 23, 6:56 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > via e-mail to foreigners from a country we were at war with a mere 62 > years ago. Imagine there are servicemen who work for both parties now. > Do you think Matthias will glean any useful information on diving in > Sharm if your boss was only diving in restricted top secret areas? This is not about diving. Last time I was in Sharm, the dive-shop I bought fins in, was blasted 2 days after. I would not want to give any information whatsoever to these maniacs regarding who is who, and where, and when. >>I also know you don't understand this or care, but there are "people" >>and "groups" there in the middle east that are bent on killing [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > In Sharm? In fact, yes. http://www.iaw.on.ca/~awoolley/mfo.html >>The same freedom you shamelessly abuse from your podium of partisan >>bigotry and angst to undermine their efforts, endanger them and offer >>aid, comfort and support to their enemies? > > In Sharm? In fact, yes. The egypt based ragheadiots from the Quena region have since long begun targeting places of touristic interest, as these are a major source of national income to the country they want to destabilize. Luxor Hatshepsut temple massacre, Taba bombing, Sharm bombing, to name a few. > I have no desire to head to the middle east even though my last name > isn't a Jewish one and I could probably pass without being unduly > molested. It's all a big fly-infested shithole and I've heard the > diving isn't worth it. I would like to dive in Malaysia, but I'm > boycotting them as well. Not flies. Cockroaches. Matthias > You do by far not realize how right Scott is in this issue. > Not only with respect to visitors to Sharm he referred to, > but also concerning the one I asked for. He never will realize it, he cant. To do so would require that he realize what an hypocrite and careless a.shole he is. > It reminds me of times when I was not allowed to drive to > the GDR to Berlin. > This is not about diving. > Last time I was in Sharm, the dive-shop I bought fins in, > was blasted 2 days after. > I would not want to give any information whatsoever to these > maniacs regarding who is who, and where, and when. Truth is the Kryptonite Mossman and the other far left moonbats fear. When they carelessly expose the same good people who provide and protect their freedom to danger, they can always just blame it on Bush. > In fact, yes.http://www.iaw.on.ca/~awoolley/mfo.html > In fact, yes. The egypt based ragheadiots from the Quena > region have since long begun targeting places of touristic > interest, as these are a major source of national income to > the country they want to destabilize. Luxor Hatshepsut > temple massacre, Taba bombing, Sharm bombing, to name a few. > Not flies. Cockroaches. Big ones, with bombs. >> You do by far not realize how right Scott is in this issue. >> Not only with respect to visitors to Sharm he referred to, [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >protect their freedom to danger, they can always just blame it on >Bush. Isn't he the maniac who got the US military in all this mess of a futil conflict which has politicians running with their head in their as..ses. Please when recommending places to scuba dive also include the LAT and LONG coordinates. >> In fact, yes.http://www.iaw.on.ca/~awoolley/mfo.html > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Big ones, with bombs. Matthias Voss <spammat.voss@gmx.de> wrote in news:fflm67$cm1$00$1@news.t- online.com: > You do by far not realize how right Scott is in this issue. > Not only with respect to visitors to Sharm he referred to, > but also concerning the one I asked for. > > It reminds me of times when I was not allowed to drive to > the GDR to Berlin. <snip> Don't exagerate Matthias, if they really want target them they only have to follow one of the UNTSO MP patrols... > You do by far not realize how right Scott is in this issue. Matthias, your tongue is so far wedged up Scott a.s that it must taste bad even for someone weaned on German "food". You were the one who started this thread, remember? Have a nice day. >>You do by far not realize how right Scott is in this issue. > > Matthias, your tongue is so far wedged up Scott a.s that it must taste > bad even for someone weaned on German "food". > > You were the one who started this thread, remember? You were the one who misinterpreted the relation between input and output. Don't get too burnt. Matthias > You do by far not realize how right Scott is in this issue. > Not only with respect to visitors to Sharm he referred to, > but also concerning the one I asked for. > > It reminds me of times when I was not allowed to drive to > the GDR to Berlin. Why it was so nice and friendly country? BTW when Berlin was in GDR I could go there without passport. > > On Oct 23, 6:56 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Imagine there are servicemen who work for both parties now. OMG - you know something about treason? As a good German citizen you should report it immediately! > > Do you think Matthias will glean any useful information on diving in > > Sharm if your boss was only diving in restricted top secret areas? > > This is not about diving. > Last time I was in Sharm, the dive-shop I bought fins in, > was blasted 2 days after. Quite a long fuse. > I would not want to give any information whatsoever to these > maniacs regarding who is who, and where, and when. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > In fact, yes.http://www.iaw.on.ca/~awoolley/mfo.html Matthias, it is one of those boring UN-type missions (although it is not UN). Definitely they don't fight, kill etc. Probably you haven't heard about it, but the mission receives some funds from your government. web page is http://www.mfo.org > >>The same freedom you shamelessly abuse from your podium of partisan > >>bigotry and angst to undermine their efforts, endanger them and offer [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > the country they want to destabilize. Luxor Hatshepsut > temple massacre, Taba bombing, Sharm bombing, to name a few. > > I have no desire to head to the middle east even though my last name > > isn't a Jewish one and I could probably pass without being unduly [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Not flies. Cockroaches. the big ones Janusz >>You do by far not realize how right Scott is in this issue. >>Not only with respect to visitors to Sharm he referred to, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Why it was so nice and friendly country? BTW when Berlin was in GDR I > could go there without passport. Interesting. I could not _because_ I was State Police. You could because you _were_. Btw, do they build roundabouts in Poland now? Matthias >>>On Oct 23, 6:56 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 74 lines] > > Janusz  SignatureVK exquis. mod. Gesch.haus in ruh. Wohnl.3 WE, ehem. Praxis, ca. 350/1000 qm WF/Grdst. 19km nördl. Braunschweig , hochw. einger; Nah VW, Hafen; frei, 0160-4433698 o. 0911-7809081. Gut für Arzt/RA/Ing.büro, oder ruhiges Wohnen, Bilder vorh. > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Interesting. I could not _because_ I was State Police. Are you sure? Couple months ago you said you were Bundesgrenschutz (Federal Border Guard) now State Police (Landespolizei). Maybe you were with RAF? > You could because you _were_. ???????????? > Btw, do they build roundabouts in Poland now? Yes, a lot and I hate them. Many small intersections are rebuilt into roundabouts, what terribly slows traffic. Janusz >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > (Federal Border Guard) now State Police (Landespolizei). Maybe you > were with RAF? He meant State Police as in federal police, and the GSG groups are federal (Bundespolizei). Matthias talked about this already years ago. On 24 Pa , 17:57, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@advalvasstopspam.be> wrote: > "janus...@hotmail.com" <janus...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:1193239357.725859.260010@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > He meant State Police as in federal police, and the GSG groups are federal > (Bundespolizei). Maybe, maybe. BTW Bundespolizei was established in 2005 and he served much earlier. Janusz > Matthias talked about this already years ago. > >> Interesting. I could not _because_ I was State Police. >> > Are you sure? Couple months ago you said you were Bundesgrenschutz [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Janusz But a federal police they were On 24 Pa , 22:27, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@advalvasstopspam.be> wrote: > > >> Interesting. I could not _because_ I was State Police. > >> > Are you sure? Couple months ago you said you were Bundesgrenschutz [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > But a federal police they were Yes, Bundesgrenzschutz was federal police. I don't have any doubt about it. Thank you for the hint that Matthias told about his service years ago. I found his original post "3 comrades of mine later joined the GSG 9 ( the real anti-terror squad) and took part in the Mogadiscio hostage freeing. " - 25 SEP 2001 "Four comrads of my former company took part in the Landshut hostage freeing in Mogadiscio. " - today It seems that the number is increasing :-)))))))) Janusz > On 24 Pa , 22:27, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@advalvasstopspam.be> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > It seems that the number is increasing :-)))))))) As I get older, my memory of past events gets better. Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > > On 24 Pa , 22:27, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@advalvasstopspam.be> [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > As I get older, my memory of past events gets better. > Matthias It's normal, but you have to be careful as short time memory is getting worse. Janusz >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > It's normal, but you have to be careful as short time memory is > getting worse. That true. Hyperbaric oxygen and nitrogen helps a lot. Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > Matthias Don'y you think that nitrogen therapy although probably successful is a little bit too permanent and irreversible? Janusz >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > Don'y you think that nitrogen therapy although probably successful is > a little bit too permanent and irreversible? It far better than to suffer from hyponitrosis. Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > It far better than to suffer from hyponitrosis. ??????????????????????? Do you mean hyponitremia? Janusz >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > ??????????????????????? > Do you mean hyponitremia? No. Hyponitrosis is the state you may get to while reching dangerous levels of hypernitroxity. Matthias > > On 24 Pa , 22:27, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@advalvasstopspam.be> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > As I get older, my memory of past events gets better. > Matthias Or is it more that one should never spoil a good story by sticking too close to the truth? > Or is it more that one should never spoil a good story by sticking too close > to the truth? I think that the phrase is: "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story"... Signature"Don't tailgate or I'll flick a booger on your monitor." > > Or is it more that one should never spoil a good story by sticking too close > > to the truth? > > I think that the phrase is: "Never let the truth get in the way of a > good story"... The way we say it is "s/he never spoils a good story by sticking too close to the truth" and so that's why I phrased it the way I did. > > > Or is it more that one should never spoil a good story by sticking too > close [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > The way we say it is "s/he never spoils a good story by sticking too close > to the truth" and so that's why I phrased it the way I did. I see. It's just like when Americans say "Don't let the door hit you in the a.s on the way out" while Canadians say "Don't let your a.s hit the door on the way oot, eh?" > I see. It's just like when Americans say "Don't let the door hit you > in the a.s on the way out" while Canadians say "Don't let your a.s hit > the door on the way oot, eh?" Must be that passive-aggressive thing they have going, eh? > The way we say it is "s/he never spoils a good story by sticking too close > to the truth" and so that's why I phrased it the way I did. Hmmm... Must be the Canadian translation... > > The way we say it is "s/he never spoils a good story by sticking too close > > to the truth" and so that's why I phrased it the way I did. > > Hmmm... Must be the Canadian translation... Since I said it first and you attempted to rephrase it, I'd say yours was the American translation. It's nice that you were there for your brethren that weren't able to understand it in Canadian . . eh. > Since I said it first and you attempted to rephrase it, I'd say yours was > the American translation. Well, that would depend upon where the phrase originated... I'm pretty certain it didn't originate in Canada since it didn't originally come with an "eh?" at the end... Signature"Dyslexia: Fict or Faction?" > > Since I said it first and you attempted to rephrase it, I'd say yours was > > the American translation. > > Well, that would depend upon where the phrase originated... I'm pretty > certain it didn't originate in Canada since it didn't originally come > with an "eh?" at the end... What can I say? First time I ever heard it, I was in Canada and it was spoken to me by a Canadian. > What can I say? First time I ever heard it, I was in Canada and it was > spoken to me by a Canadian. I did a google search on it, hoping to find the origin of it... The best I could come up with was one site who claimed that it originated from a liberal Texas folklorist from around 1940 or so... Of course, one could argue that a 1940s Texas liberal is probably more conservative than many so called conservatives these days... >>>On 24 Pa , 22:27, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@advalvasstopspam.be> >>>wrote: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > Or is it more that one should never spoil a good story by sticking too close > to the truth? I never said it was a good story. Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. Matthias > > Or is it more that one should never spoil a good story by sticking too close > > to the truth? > > I never said it was a good story. > Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. Well, a story. >>>Or is it more that one should never spoil a good story by sticking too > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Well, a story. No. > On 24 Pa , 17:57, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@advalvasstopspam.be> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Maybe, maybe. BTW Bundespolizei was established in 2005 and he served > much earlier. Still we were a Federal Police and always have been. The only other Federal Police was the Bahnpolizei. Hint: It's in the command structure. And the law. Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > > On 24 Pa , 17:57, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@advalvasstopspam.be> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > only other Federal Police was the Bahnpolizei. > Hint: It's in the command structure. And the law. I know. I was only curious about your statement about State Police and you clarified it. Janusz >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > (Federal Border Guard) now State Police (Landespolizei). Maybe you > were with RAF? BGS is State Police, if you translate State with Staat. In fact Federal Police would have been correct. As for RAF, you were quite close. Four comrads of my former company took part in the Landshut hostage freeing in Mogadiscio. >>You could because you _were_. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Yes, a lot and I hate them. Many small intersections are rebuilt into > roundabouts, what terribly slows traffic. Why don't you just unlock the steering locks of your cars? ;-) Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > BGS is State Police, if you translate State with Staat. In > fact Federal Police would have been correct. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_police > As for RAF, you were quite close. Four comrads of my former > company took part in the Landshut hostage freeing in Mogadiscio. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Why don't you just unlock the steering locks of your cars? ;-) Do you still use this crap? For average thief It takes 5 seconds to open it (without original key) Janusz >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > Do you still use this crap? For average thief It takes 5 seconds to > open it (without original key) The expert speaks. That's even shorter than exchanging the number plates, isn't it. Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > The expert speaks. ????? > That's even shorter than exchanging the number plates, isn't it. Don't know. No experience. Janusz >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > Don't know. No experience. Just in case. We have a good lawyer here. If you promise to pick his strawberries... Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > We have a good lawyer here. > If you promise to pick his strawberries... You know I'm allergic to strawberries, especially German ones. Janusz >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > > Janusz You get pimples? Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > > You get pimples? No. Only strange itching in the right hand. Janusz >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > > No. Only strange itching in the right hand. Ah. This will be cured by age as well. You're catholic? Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > > Ah. This will be cured by age as well. Maybe you are right. When I was younger the itching was concentrated in index finger, now in the middle. > You're catholic? No. What about you? Janusz > Matthias On 23 Pa , 15:56, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Ping me offline, my boss just got back from Sharm. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > out specific information on a public forum concerning where military > and off duty military servicemen are diving and training, yes. Scotty your idiocy is amazing. Even the most dumb Arab knows, where in Sinai are American servicemen. > I also know you don't understand this or care, but there are "people" > and "groups" there in the middle east that are bent on killing > Americans, just any Americans, and especially those who might be > serving their nation in the war against Islamic Fascism (which, in > spite of your best efforts, we are winning). "we are winning" ? Does it mean that you are one of "Islamic Fascists", now? FYI Sharm is one of the most safe places in the Middle East. > You know, the same Americans fighting, killing and sacrificing for > your freedom and safety? and you do nothing. What a shame. > The same freedom you shamelessly abuse from your podium of partisan > bigotry and angst to undermine their efforts, endanger them and offer > aid, comfort and support to their enemies? paranoia? > So, if you want to know where to stay away from, ping me offline. and you'll reveal all secrets you know Janusz > FYI Sharm is one of the most safe places in the Middle East. You're on a slippery slope. Last time I was just two days from being killed in a place which was blown up in downtown Sharm. 3 days after the bombings we had to land in Sharm Harbour at night with our rib to deliver an injured person to the hospital. 'twas _very_ interesting. Matthias > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > > FYI Sharm is one of the most safe places in the Middle East. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > hospital. 'twas _very_ interesting. > Matthias I've been to New York City. Thousands of people were killed in a terrorist attack there and there have always been reports of rampant muggings. I survived. >>janus...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > terrorist attack there and there have always been reports of rampant > muggings. I survived. Do you tell the muggers you're a lawyer? Matthias > I've been to New York City. Thousands of people were killed in a > terrorist attack there and there have always been reports of rampant > muggings. I survived. Too bad they missed you. The world would be a better place without self serving, lying, backstabbing parasites like you in it. Have a great day. On 24 Pa , 13:49, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > > I've been to New York City. Thousands of people were killed in a > > terrorist attack there and there have always been reports of rampant [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Have a great day. Scotty, you should be ashamed. Telling publicly that one of your fellow citizens should be a victim of a terrorist attack in reality shows your support for terrorism - shame on you! Janusz On Oct 24, 6:18 am, "janus...@hotmail.com" <janus...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 24 Pa , 13:49, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > fellow citizens should be a victim of a terrorist attack in reality > shows your support for terrorism - shame on you! What do you expect from a guy who only "served his country" so he could brag about serving his country? > On Oct 24, 6:18 am, "janus...@hotmail.com" <janus...@hotmail.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > What do you expect from a guy who only "served his country" so he > could brag about serving his country? You deserve the best, asswipe. Dish it out but you cant take it. > janus...@hotmail.com wrote: > > FYI Sharm is one of the most safe places in the Middle East. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > hospital. 'twas _very_ interesting. > Matthias Since the attack there is increased presence of Egyptian police and secret services in Sharm area and additional restrictions for the locals to enter the area. All the time you have at least one police officer in the "spitting" distance. Unfortunately security measures were not so tight in Dahab. That's why I said That Sharm is one of the safest places in the Middle East. Janusz pugetsounddiver@gmail.com pounded away at his keyboard resulting in: :> > Ping me offline, my boss just got back from Sharm. :> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] :out specific information on a public forum concerning where military :and off duty military servicemen are diving and training, yes. I know you don't understand this or care, but when it comes to being discrete, it is more effective to privately send an email than to publicly invite one. Dan Bracuk Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do. > pugetsounddi...@gmail.com pounded away at his keyboard resulting in: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- I only got and answered one. Plus, if I had done it your way I would have denied Greg the chance to show his a.s again. On Oct 27, 11:15 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > > I know you don't understand this or care, but when it comes to being > > discrete, it is more effective to privately send an email than to > > publicly invite one. > I only got and answered one. > > Plus, if I had done it your way I would have denied Greg the chance to > show his a.s again. I thought you said you ignore me. From this post you make it clear that I rule your life. And that's an order, son! > On Oct 27, 11:15 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I thought you said you ignore me. From this post you make it clear > that I rule your life. And that's an order, son! I do when I am home and my killfile works, other than that, I like watching you squirm. On Oct 27, 1:01 pm, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Oct 27, 11:15 am, pugetsounddi...@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I do when I am home and my killfile works, other than that, I like > watching you squirm. Broken killfile again? I sure hate when that happens. Maybe you need a competent machinist to fix it. Besides, I though you like watching my a.s, not watching my squirm. > I know you don't understand this or care, but when it comes to being > discrete, it is more effective to privately send an email than to > publicly invite one. Which works great if someone uses a valid email address or one that they routinely check as their USENET email address... That is not always the case though, so sometimes you need to send them a message on the one medium that you know that they do read (i.e. the newsgroup)... I don't think that Greg uses his main email account for newsgroup communications, but he does check it periodically... Grumman-581 <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard resulting in: :Which works great if someone uses a valid email address or one that :they routinely check as their USENET email address... That is not :always the case though, so sometimes you need to send them a message :on the one medium that you know that they do read (i.e. the :newsgroup)... I don't think that Greg uses his main email account for :newsgroup communications, but he does check it periodically... Greg didn't ask the original question, Matthias Voss did. Dan Bracuk Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do. > Grumman-581 <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> pounded away at > his keyboard resulting in: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Greg didn't ask the original question, Matthias Voss did. And Matthias got the info he needed. What was it you were bitching about? > Hi, > has anybody been in this hotel? Recommended? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > TIA, > Matthias Matthias. http://www.diveafrica.com/ Used these guys both times I have been to Sharm. 4 to a guide. Baz > Hi, > has anybody been in this hotel? Recommended? Never heard about the hotel and they don't even have web page. More info is only on one of Russian web pages and it seems that the hotel is one of the oldest in Sharm (from 1995) and they don't accept credit cards. If I were you I would keep keep out of them. > Are there good anglophone diving operators, where divers are > not lead throught the reefs like cattle, by ten, stacked in > groups of 2x5? > > Which ones to avoid? Most "local". > What about OONAS divers, Red Sea diving college? Emperor divers? Janusz > TIA, > Matthias P.S. TIA??? IIRC Sinai Penisula is in Asia
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.