 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / July 2007Futile John Francis- Lying Piece Of sh.t.
This lie (two, actually), Futile. Got any proof yet? Or is your "memory" still "serving" you like that other lie I documented? >>> >>>>> Only when it's snippage that has quotes like "I don't agree." >>> >>>>> somehow >>> >>>>> becoming "I agree." That's a more extreme example than we usually >>> >>>>> get >>> >>>>> here. There's nothing wrong with losing extraneous stuff, but >>> >>>>> quoting >>> >>>>> a paragraph, sentence, or words out of context when the context >>> >>>>> defines the quote invalidates the cite. I'll give you a more >>> >>>>> appropriate example. >>> >>>>> I might post something like "I hate guns being in >>> >>>>> the hands of irresponsible individuals. I think there should be >>> >>>>> some >>> >>>>> reasonable solution to control them and I support their >>> >>>>> confiscation >>> >>>>> from owners who prove themselves to be irresponsible through their >>> >>>>> actions." In rec.scuba that will likely become "I hate guns ... >>> >>>>> and I >>> >>>>> support their confiscation" and become part of Popeye's epic >>> >>>>> sig. -JOF >>> >>> >>>> Let's see it, big shooter. >>> >>> >>>> I have a good time with my sigs, but, I suspect you're porking the >>> >>>> pie >>> >>>> here. -Popeye  Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com On Jul 14, 2:15 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > This lie (two, actually), Futile. > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > >>> >>>> pie > >>> >>>> here. -Popeye You sure are one persistant little feller. So what is it this time? What heinous crime have I perpetrated on your ricepaper wrapped ego? I know women who can cry at the drop of a hat who are less sensitive than you. 8) JF > On Jul 14, 2:15 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > I know women who can cry at the drop of a hat who are less sensitive > than you. 8) Sure, John, sure. At least I can remember how many times I answer a post. Did you have any examples of these hacked signatures, or just more sliding hyperbole? Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com On Jul 16, 8:03 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2:15 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > Did you have any examples of these hacked signatures, or just more sliding > hyperbole? It would be a good trick to have evidence of a future event, wouldn't it? If you're talking about lifting out of context, the one on this post of yours will do nicely. Have a great day. JF > On Jul 16, 8:03 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > it? If you're talking about lifting out of context, the one on this > post of yours will do nicely. It's sad when you get so old you can't remember what you write from day to day. Maybe if you had responded to it the first time, or the first dozen times, it was posted, you wouldn't have to strain hemoroids to get out the inevitably failing spin attempt. >Have a great day. I always do. ================================== 214. JOF View profile More options Jun 21, 10:34 am Newsgroups: rec.scuba From: JOF <jofran...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:34:04 -0000 Local: Thurs, Jun 21 2007 10:34 am Subject: Re: Another Picture Of My Truck... Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author On Jun 21, 12:31 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> wrote: - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > "JOF" <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1182365204.378089.289430@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > On Jun 20, 3:29 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> > > wrote: > > > "JOF" <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:1182360819.452423.261250@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > > > <snip> > > > > > This "middle ground" that you advocate, requires that someone > quantify > > > > > your "responsible person keeping a reasonable number of reasonable > > > weapons > > > > > for reasonable and legal uses." > > > > And the alternative that you prefer is no controls on any weapons at > > > > all, so any whackjob can have all the weapons he thinks he needs to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > > > have to try so hard to defend your right to have guns. They're what > > > > you're really defending. That's too bad, for you. > > > So you finally agree that Popeye quoted you accurately? > > If you'll agree that it proves he's a hypocrite when he gripes about > > snipping posts. There remains the little problem of rhetorical > > statements. Read this as a rhetorical statement. > Go ahead & restate what you think his gripe is regards to snippage. > > "And the alternative that you prefer is no controls on any weapons at > > all, so any whackjob can have all the weapons he thinks he needs to > > satisfy all his inadequacy issues." > But the you in that statement refers to Popeye, which is inaccurate. > Again, it is the writer's job to be clear. If you (JOF) are not referring > to > Popeye, then you should use a different pronoun. > Perhaps if you'd spent more time on English instead of Latin.....? > > Are you positive it's a lie or might it be that someone misinterpreted > > my meaning? It's easy to do without body language, facial expression, > > etc. That's the point I tried to make earlier but to no avail. > Which is why, as I said, it is the writer's job to be aware of these > things [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > At first I was correcting what I thought was your belief about Popeye's > position on gun control. > > > Finally? > > > You're sure about this? > > > You do agree to having written that? > > Sure. I just saw the proof. I had to go find it for you, along with > > the rest of the stuff he snipped out. But see my comment above. Is > > this another case of paradigm thinking? > Not for me, I remember it. Good thing you'v elearned how to search for > things though. > Congrats! > I do hope that this does represent a paradigm shift for you. > > > And do yo also remember where I have pointed out previously that your > > > assessment of Popeye's position is incorrect? > > > Even provided google references. > > I remember you telling me I was wrong on lots of occasions. Do you > > remember him complaining that snipped posts aren't proper, quite > > recently in fact? Do we have a double standard in play here? 8) > I do recall you've complained about "snipped context". :-) Only when it's snippage that has quotes like "I don't agree." somehow becoming "I agree." That's a more extreme example than we usually get here. There's nothing wrong with losing extraneous stuff, but quoting a paragraph, sentence, or words out of context when the context defines the quote invalidates the cite. I'll give you a more appropriate example. I might post something like "I hate guns being in the hands of irresponsible individuals. I think there should be some reasonable solution to control them and I support their confiscation from owners who prove themselves to be irresponsible through their actions." In rec.scuba that will likely become "I hate guns ... and I support their confiscation" and become part of Popeye's epic sig. JF Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com On Jul 17, 12:06 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > > On Jul 16, 8:03 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 169 lines] > actions." In rec.scuba that will likely become "I hate guns ... and I > support their confiscation" and become part of Popeye's epic sig. Maybe you should lay off the moonshine for a while. You're still having reading comprehension problems, aren't you? Maybe old age sets in at age 50 in your case? JF > On Jul 17, 12:06 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 193 lines] > having reading comprehension problems, aren't you? Maybe old age sets > in at age 50 in your case? So you have no evidence, and never did. Got it. Just another round of Futile John slinging sh.t to see what will stick. Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com On Jul 14, 2:15 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > This lie (two, actually), Futile. > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > >>> >>>> pie > >>> >>>> here. -Popeye I had to read this a couple of times before I figgered out what you were whining about. So, do you think you'll ever use anything like I suggested? JF > On Jul 14, 2:15 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > I had to read this a couple of times before I figgered out what you > were whining about. Your own post? No doubt. Why should it be different from when you read anyone else's? >So, do you think you'll ever use anything like I > suggested? So you have no evidence, and it was a lie? Check. Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com "Too bad he had to watch while his wife was beaten to death." Where's your proof of that, Fatboy? SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.