Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Trip report- Great Barrier Reef off the Whitsunday Island

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dechucka - 09 Jul 2007 00:49 GMT
Left earliest on the Thursday morning 28/5 for the airport and our flight up
to Hamilton Island which is about 900km north of Brisbane in Queensland.
Flights were,Ok even with SWMBO and the 4 screamers. Got our luggage and got
a lift to the marina to meet up with the rest of the fellows and my first
look at me mates  52 foot Riviera (?) that would be out diving platform for
this trip. Drop SWMBO and the kids at Daydream Island to meet up with
extended family and than headed out to the reef.

What can I say about the diving it was fantastic. We dived at a mixture of
known dive sites but also at many sites which we felt just looked good.
There were 8 of us on board and we divided into a diving group and a duty
pair. The duty pair did 1/2 a day which involved the cooking cleaning etc
and also the manning of the main boat and the inflatable while the others
were diving. Mostly the group in the water stuck in a very loose gaggle so
it was easy to make pick ups if necessary.

Some of the younger blokes were doing 6 dives in a day but my max was 4 and
mostly I did 3 :- morning afternoon and a dusk/night dive. The water was
warm 18 degrees or so and the vis was normally fantastic 20m+ although we
had a few dives where is was down to 5 m or so due to the currents running
around the atolls/islands.

The next Thursday we head back to Daydream and I spent 2 nights there with
the family before heading back to Sydney to watch Aus play South Africa in a
tri nations rugby test. Finally home on the Sunday

It was a fantastic trip and being a bit parochial IMHO and with my somewhat
limited OS diving experience the GBR has some of the best diving in the
world.

Highlights

1) going back to Daydream Island on the first Saturday night and watching
Australia beat the All Blacks ( New Zealand ) in rugby on a huge outdoor
screen, cold beer, the moon the stars and the Southern Cross in the
background

2) finishing a dive and not being able to get back to the boat because there
was a whale between us, absolutely magic floating around watching this
creature

3) coming up from a dive and bitching because the vis was 15m not the normal
20m vis, than remembering that where I normally dive 8 to 10m is good

4) just the diving the coral the fish the rays and sharks

Comments

1) the camera was great but I found myself always looking for the great
photo not enjoying the dive so I limited myself to 1 dive a day with it

2) by the end of the trip I was feeling quite jaded with the diving maybe a
week is to long

Oh well I have the memories I am typing this with the temp at 4 degrees C it
is pissing down with rain and I am cold and wet after feeding the horses and
cattle.

Hopefully I will post some photos in the not to distant future
Dan Bracuk - 09 Jul 2007 01:41 GMT
"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:

:What can I say about the diving it was fantastic. We dived at a mixture of
:known dive sites but also at many sites which we felt just looked good.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
:were diving. Mostly the group in the water stuck in a very loose gaggle so
:it was easy to make pick ups if necessary.

Duty group?  Cooking, cleaning?  Not really my style but glad you had
a good time.

Dan Bracuk
Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.
dechucka - 09 Jul 2007 02:11 GMT
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Duty group?  Cooking, cleaning?  Not really my style but glad you had
> a good time.

I did have a great time and the duty was not bad. Cook for the buggers make
sure the boat wasn't too disgusting, tanks were OK and the rest of the time
fishing and keeping an eye on those who were diving. Bit different from a
catered liveaboard but it was a great experience and you do the duty so you
don't pay the money. I must admit the whole thing was not to formal so if
you didn't want to do a duty because you wanted to do a particular dive
someone would do your shift maybe.

Great time
JOF - 09 Jul 2007 02:27 GMT
> Left earliest on the Thursday morning 28/5 for the airport and our flight up
> to Hamilton Island which is about 900km north of Brisbane in Queensland.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> this trip. Drop SWMBO and the kids at Daydream Island to meet up with
> extended family and than headed out to the reef.

Dayum! You got SWMBO down under too? We up here think of distant
places like Down Under as an escape from that.

> What can I say about the diving it was fantastic. We dived at a mixture of
> known dive sites but also at many sites which we felt just looked good.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> had a few dives where is was down to 5 m or so due to the currents running
> around the atolls/islands.

18 is warm???? Up here that's shriveldick temps.

> The next Thursday we head back to Daydream and I spent 2 nights there with
> the family before heading back to Sydney to watch Aus play South Africa in a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> screen, cold beer, the moon the stars and the Southern Cross in the
> background

Trade rugby for hockey (the ice kind) and you've got it right. We
can't actually see the Southern Cross, but after a few wobblypops it
starts to come into focus.

> 2) finishing a dive and not being able to get back to the boat because there
> was a whale between us, absolutely magic floating around watching this
> creature

That's very good.

> 3) coming up from a dive and bitching because the vis was 15m not the normal
> 20m vis, than remembering that where I normally dive 8 to 10m is good

Holidays spoil a man.

> 4) just the diving the coral the fish the rays and sharks
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> 2) by the end of the trip I was feeling quite jaded with the diving maybe a
> week is to long

Give yer head a shake. If it gets old take the camera down again.

> Oh well I have the memories I am typing this with the temp at 4 degrees C it
> is pissing down with rain and I am cold and wet after feeding the horses and
> cattle.

Hey. Aren't you the same guy said 18 degrees was warm diving? 4
degrees isn't much different from 18.

> Hopefully I will post some photos in the not to distant future

You'd better. We want pics of Wobblygongs or whatever those little
crotchbiter sharks are called.

JF
Greg Mossman - 09 Jul 2007 03:23 GMT
> 18 is warm???? Up here that's shriveldick temps.

And down here it's frozen solid.
dechucka - 09 Jul 2007 04:42 GMT
>> 18 is warm???? Up here that's shriveldick temps.
>
> And down here it's frozen solid.

talking Celsius not F
Greg Mossman - 09 Jul 2007 20:41 GMT
> >> 18 is warm???? Up here that's shriveldick temps.
>
> > And down here it's frozen solid.
>
> talking Celsius not F

Why would you do that?  Only a 7 degree difference between a warm and
a cold water dive doesn't make sense.  Celsius is way too limiting for
complaining about water temperature.  We Americans have many
gradations of cold to warm.  How can you really experience life
without being able to tell the fine distinction between, say, 78 and
80 degrees?  Might as well leave out the numbers altogether and just
say cold or warm.
dechucka - 09 Jul 2007 22:56 GMT
>> >> 18 is warm???? Up here that's shriveldick temps.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> 80 degrees?  Might as well leave out the numbers altogether and just
> say cold or warm.

we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
Greg Mossman - 10 Jul 2007 01:07 GMT
> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate

Same with bar.

It's a lot easier to tell your buddy you have 1,500 psi left rather
than saying you have 103.421172 bar, but whatever floats your boat.
dechucka - 10 Jul 2007 01:44 GMT
>> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>
> Same with bar.
>
> It's a lot easier to tell your buddy you have 1,500 psi left rather
> than saying you have 103.421172 bar, but whatever floats your boat.

well you use what you have. IMHO metric is a lot more logical compared to
the imperial system. Saying that I still think of peoples height in feet and
inches to a certain extent and still use psi when diving and filling up the
car tyres.
Carl Nisarel - 10 Jul 2007 01:49 GMT
"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> sexuallly excited me with:

>>> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> feet and inches to a certain extent and still use psi when diving and
> filling up the car tyres.

I use metric when I'm filling up my blow up little boy love dolls.  There's
something really sexy about the saying "bars".  It just gets you all horny,
eh?

Oh Chucky, quit playing so hard to get!  I'll let you be on top!
Carl Nisarel - 14 Jul 2007 17:55 GMT
Scott Koplin, posting as Carl Nisarel
<hostlbuddha@postmaster.co.uk> admitted:

> I use metric when I'm filling up my blow up little boy love
> dolls.  There's something really sexy about the saying "bars".
>  It just gets you all horny, eh?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

dechucka - 10 Jul 2007 04:55 GMT
>>> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> and inches to a certain extent and still use psi when diving and filling
> up the car tyres.

that's crap I use bars when diving ( brain explosion on my part). The signal
for 103.421172 bar is 10 fingers held up or 5 fingers held up twice. So what
is your signal for 725.188 690 036 pound/square inch which is a figure I am
always interested in when diving
Chris Guynn - 10 Jul 2007 14:20 GMT
> >>> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> is your signal for 725.188 690 036 pound/square inch which is a figure I am
> always interested in when diving

Usually, when my buddy wants to know how much gas I've got, I just show them
my gauge.

I don't really have to worry about "signals" that way.
Scott - 10 Jul 2007 16:50 GMT
> Usually, when my buddy wants to know how much gas I've got, I just show them
> my gauge.

> I don't really have to worry about "signals" that way.

Thing is, when you do that you are removing part of the reason I signal
someone to tell me how much gas they have, and that is to assess your level
of comfort, awareness and narcosis. Really, I don't even have to ask, I can
just look at your gauge.
Chris Guynn - 10 Jul 2007 17:42 GMT
> > Usually, when my buddy wants to know how much gas I've got, I just show
> them
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> of comfort, awareness and narcosis. Really, I don't even have to ask, I can
> just look at your gauge.

So far I haven't been in a position that it would matter anyway.

My deepest dive to date is less than 60 feet.

Just do something funny underwater and I'll flash you a "turkey-diver"
signal.  That'll pretty much tell you everything you need to know about my
narc and comfort level... particularly if I'm smiling when I do it.
Scott - 10 Jul 2007 17:54 GMT
> So far I haven't been in a position that it would matter anyway.

You might be suprised...

> My deepest dive to date is less than 60 feet.

> Just do something funny underwater and I'll flash you a "turkey-diver"
> signal.  That'll pretty much tell you everything you need to know about my
> narc and comfort level... particularly if I'm smiling when I do it.

OK, thats a new one.
Chris Guynn - 10 Jul 2007 22:19 GMT
> > So far I haven't been in a position that it would matter anyway.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> OK, thats a new one.

If we ever get to dive together, I'll show you.
Grumman-581 - 10 Jul 2007 20:31 GMT
> So far I haven't been in a position that it would matter anyway.
>
> My deepest dive to date is less than 60 feet.

Awh, 'ell... I've had deco stops deeper than that...

You're going to have to take a shovel with you on some of those West
Texas dives so that you can get a bit deeper... <grin>
Chris Guynn - 10 Jul 2007 22:21 GMT
> > So far I haven't been in a position that it would matter anyway.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You're going to have to take a shovel with you on some of those West
> Texas dives so that you can get a bit deeper... <grin>

hehe...

The deepest I've been out here in the wonders of the Texas desert is 25 ffw.

Or less.

I hit around 50 ish in Negril.
Grumman-581 - 10 Jul 2007 23:21 GMT
> The deepest I've been out here in the wonders of the Texas desert is 25 ffw.
>
> Or less.

OK, I stand corrected... You will need to take a back hoe along with
you...
Grumman-581 - 10 Jul 2007 20:37 GMT
> Thing is, when you do that you are removing part of the reason I signal
> someone to tell me how much gas they have, and that is to assess your level
> of comfort, awareness and narcosis. Really, I don't even have to ask, I can
> just look at your gauge.

And with respect to the eyesight of some of us, we can read the other
person's gauge easier than we can read our own... <grin>
Dan Bracuk - 10 Jul 2007 23:09 GMT
"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:

:Thing is, when you do that you are removing part of the reason I signal
:someone to tell me how much gas they have, and that is to assess your level
:of comfort, awareness and narcosis. Really, I don't even have to ask, I can
:just look at your gauge.

Why are you not able to base that opinion on the fact that your buddy
showed you his guage?

Dan Bracuk
Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.
Scott - 11 Jul 2007 00:53 GMT
> Why are you not able to base that opinion on the fact that your buddy
> showed you his guage?

Doesnt require much more thought than what an amoeba could come up with.
Dan Bracuk - 11 Jul 2007 01:12 GMT
"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:

:Doesnt require much more thought than what an amoeba could come up with.

So it tells you that he is not overthinking simple questions.

Dan Bracuk
Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.
Scott - 11 Jul 2007 01:40 GMT
> "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
>
> :Doesnt require much more thought than what an amoeba could come up with.
>
> So it tells you that he is not overthinking simple questions.

Whatever.

Don't worry, I'll never ask or expect you to communicate your remaining gas
supply to me.
Grumman-581 - 11 Jul 2007 03:44 GMT
> Don't worry, I'll never ask or expect you to communicate your remaining gas
> supply to me.

Awh, 'ell, remaining gas supply is a boolean value... You either have
it, or you don't...
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 00:25 GMT
>> >>> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> them
> my gauge.

I find signals easier. Get your buddies attention a quick tap on your gauge
and you can signal using 1 finger to represent 10 bar or point at him to ask
his air situation. Makes for easier dive planning IMO
Chris Guynn - 11 Jul 2007 14:29 GMT
> >> >>> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
> >> >>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> and you can signal using 1 finger to represent 10 bar or point at him to ask
> his air situation. Makes for easier dive planning IMO

My gauge isn't accurate enough to represent 1 psi and I don't think my
regulator would be breathing at that point.  I'd guess the regulator would
more or less stop around 75 psi or so.
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 22:36 GMT
>> >> >>> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>> >> >>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> regulator would be breathing at that point.  I'd guess the regulator would
> more or less stop around 75 psi or so.

my gauge's markings is not accurate enough to represent 1 bar. However that
is totally irrelevent, I want to know if I have got a good fill or not, when
I have used 1/2 my air and when my buddy has and when I am down to 50 bar
and the he/she or it I am diving with is at the same level. If I have got a
219 instead of a 220 fill or if I/my buddy is at 50 vs 49 or 51 doesn't
matter to me. A quick hand signal saying I have app whatever bar left is all
that I want to know and my buddy needs to know
Grumman-581 - 11 Jul 2007 01:08 GMT
> that's crap I use bars when diving ( brain explosion on my part). The signal
> for 103.421172 bar is 10 fingers held up or 5 fingers held up twice. So what
> is your signal for 725.188 690 036 pound/square inch which is a figure I am
> always interested in when diving

It all boils down to a particular number of significant digits that
you are willing to live with... For psi, I suspect most people are
willing to go with 2 significant digits or basically how many hundreds
of psi you have left since that is what our gauges are marked in...
Thus, we're probably willing to just quote tank pressures from 0 to
30... With bars / ATMs, you're probably willing to quote in values
from 0 to 20... The metric SPGs that I've seen were marked in 10 bar
increments... It's not unreasonable to assume that one might skip the
last digit since it is always zero... Thus, 140 bar would be signed as
14 instead of 140... We would probably sign the same pressure as 20 or
21 since it is equivalent to 2058 psi...
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 01:10 GMT
>> that's crap I use bars when diving ( brain explosion on my part). The
>> signal
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> 14 instead of 140... We would probably sign the same pressure as 20 or
> 21 since it is equivalent to 2058 psi...

sounds fair
Dennis (Icarus) - 10 Jul 2007 04:24 GMT
> > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>
> Same with bar.
>
> It's a lot easier to tell your buddy you have 1,500 psi left rather
> than saying you have 103.421172 bar, but whatever floats your boat.

So whats the hand signal for a decimal point?

Dennis
dechucka - 10 Jul 2007 04:46 GMT
>> > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> So whats the hand signal for a decimal point?

I don't normally ( actually never ) signal the temp to my buddy
Greg Mossman - 10 Jul 2007 06:34 GMT
> I don't normally ( actually never ) signal the temp to my buddy

Even if your buddy is blind and can't read his own temperature gauge?
dechucka - 10 Jul 2007 08:21 GMT
>> I don't normally ( actually never ) signal the temp to my buddy
>
> Even if your buddy is blind and can't read his own temperature gauge?

all our gauges in Australia have a scale in Braille as well
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 10 Jul 2007 11:50 GMT
>>> I don't normally ( actually never ) signal the temp to my buddy
>>
>> Even if your buddy is blind and can't read his own temperature gauge?
>
> all our gauges in Australia have a scale in Braille as well

 -That- was good.

Signature

 "I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked
a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that
     I'm  theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF

                Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com

Grumman-581 - 11 Jul 2007 01:12 GMT
> all our gauges in Australia have a scale in Braille as well

All that would take is removing the faceplate off the SPG so you can
feel where the hands are pointed...
Dennis (Icarus) - 10 Jul 2007 12:44 GMT
> >> > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I don't normally ( actually never ) signal the temp to my buddy

I thought 103.421172 bar is tank pressure.

Dennis
dechucka - 10 Jul 2007 12:54 GMT
>> >> > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I thought 103.421172 bar is tank pressure.

I thought it was some strange imperial temp measure :-)
George Cathcart - 10 Jul 2007 12:58 GMT
On Jul 10, 8:40 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
wrote:

> > >> > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Dennis

If it's temperature, that's one sick puppy in C or in F.

I always thought the metric system was just for people who have a hard
time dividing by 12.

gc
dechucka - 10 Jul 2007 13:05 GMT
> On Jul 10, 8:40 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I always thought the metric system was just for people who have a hard
> time dividing by 12.

than you thought wrong
George Cathcart - 10 Jul 2007 14:17 GMT
> > On Jul 10, 8:40 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> than you thought wrong

I know. Eventually we'll all be doing metric. If it wasn't for certain
sports events that have a long tradition of imperial measures, we'd
probably have made the conversion by now. I used to run the mile in
high school, and I lament that hardly anyone runs the mile any more,
nor even 1600 meters. The four-minute mile was a great standard, now
nearly meaningless.

The only one I really have trouble with, though, is figuring out
gasoline prices overseas. First, you have to convert from liters to
gallons, then do the currency conversion. By the time I realize,
again, that the US has the cheapest gas in the world except for
Ecuador, I have a headache and have to lie down.

gc
Matthias Voss - 10 Jul 2007 14:25 GMT
> The only one I really have trouble with, though, is figuring out
> gasoline prices overseas. First, you have to convert from liters to
> gallons, then do the currency conversion. By the time I realize,
> again, that the US has the cheapest gas in the world except for
> Ecuador, I have a headache and have to lie down.

The gasoline is ought to be put in the tank!
Btw, gasoline prices in Russia were about 20 Rubl/liter that
is 0.60 Euro. How does that compare?

Matthias
George Cathcart - 10 Jul 2007 18:01 GMT
> > The only one I really have trouble with, though, is figuring out
> > gasoline prices overseas. First, you have to convert from liters to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Matthias

That would be about $3.10 a gallon, which is a tad higher than I can
get in my area (Maryland) right now (I've seen it as low as $2.89 in
some places).

gc
dechucka - 10 Jul 2007 23:12 GMT
>> > On Jul 10, 8:40 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
>> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> again, that the US has the cheapest gas in the world except for
> Ecuador, I have a headache and have to lie down.

Fair enough, you'd hate the petrol prices over here
Greg Mossman - 11 Jul 2007 01:12 GMT
> >> "George Cathcart" <george.cathc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
> Fair enough, you'd hate the petrol prices over here-

Not me.  My car runs on gas.
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 01:31 GMT
>> >> "George Cathcart" <george.cathc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> Not me.  My car runs on gas.

even the gas prices over here are expensive.
Dennis (Icarus) - 11 Jul 2007 00:26 GMT
> On Jul 10, 8:40 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> gc

I've wondered if they have metric degrees for circles, totalling to 100, or
if they keep the same 360 used in Imperial geometry.
;-)

Dennis
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 00:31 GMT
>> On Jul 10, 8:40 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> if they keep the same 360 used in Imperial geometry.
> ;-)

I don't think that degrees is either an imperial or Si units.

IMHO using the imperial system just makes a rod or a rood for your own back
:-)
Dennis (Icarus) - 11 Jul 2007 03:21 GMT
<snip>

> > I've wondered if they have metric degrees for circles, totalling to 100,
> > or
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> IMHO using the imperial system just makes a rod or a rood for your own back
> :-)

Good thing I have the stones to deal with it.

Dennis
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 03:24 GMT
> <snip>
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Good thing I have the stones to deal with it.

I must admit that imperil units are on topic for a diving ng because of the
perchs, rods ( fishing), poles ( fishing ) and chains ( anchor ) involved
Grumman-581 - 11 Jul 2007 00:46 GMT
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:29:42 -0600, "Dennis \(Icarus\)"
<nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:

> I've wondered if they have metric degrees for circles, totalling to 100, or
> if they keep the same 360 used in Imperial geometry.
> ;-)

The closest they come is when you do measurements in 'grads'... 100
grads = 90 degrees... Blame it on the fuckin' French...

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Decimal_time.html
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 01:01 GMT
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:29:42 -0600, "Dennis \(Icarus\)"
> <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Decimal_time.html

radians are the angle measurements in SI units
Grumman-581 - 11 Jul 2007 01:12 GMT
> radians are the angle measurements in SI units

So the metric GPSs give position in radians? <snicker>

Read the article that I posted... They tried to get away from degrees
and found out how much it screwed up everything...
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 01:29 GMT
>> radians are the angle measurements in SI units
>
> So the metric GPSs give position in radians? <snicker>
>
> Read the article that I posted... They tried to get away from degrees
> and found out how much it screwed up everything...

I did, very interesting article notice the same "problems" occurred with
time as well. However it seems  the French proposal fell down not because it
was not a better or more logical system but because the whole world was
unified in the old system.

The other aspects of the metric system were however a more unifying system
which when added to the fact that it is a more logical and rational system
able to be derived from 7 base units.

Oh well each to there own, the differences make the world an interesting
place
Greg Mossman - 11 Jul 2007 01:14 GMT
On Jul 10, 5:29 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
wrote:

> > On Jul 10, 8:40 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> if they keep the same 360 used in Imperial geometry.
> ;-)

And why not metric time?
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 01:32 GMT
> On Jul 10, 5:29 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> And why not metric time?
See grummans post
Dennis (Icarus) - 11 Jul 2007 03:21 GMT
> On Jul 10, 5:29 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> And why not metric time?

They tried that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_time

A more recent proposal
http://zapatopi.net/metrictime/

Signature

Dennis

"For instance, on planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more
intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much - the wheel, New
York, wars and so on, while all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in
the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always
believed that they were more intelligent than man, for precisely the same
reasons."
--Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, chapter 23.

Matthias Voss - 11 Jul 2007 11:28 GMT
>>I always thought the metric system was just for people who have a hard
>>time dividing by 12.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I've wondered if they have metric degrees for circles, totalling to 100, or
> if they keep the same 360 used in Imperial geometry.

Sometimes we use 400 g for a full circle.
That makes it really spin.

Matthias
Scott - 10 Jul 2007 05:57 GMT
> > > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> So whats the hand signal for a decimal point?

Middle finger.
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 10 Jul 2007 11:50 GMT
>> > > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Middle finger.

 That was great.

Signature

 "I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked
a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that
     I'm  theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF

                Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com

Dennis (Icarus) - 10 Jul 2007 12:44 GMT
> > > > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Middle finger.

My dive bud in Cayman hadnt taken the advanced diver class, but wanted to
see the effecs of narcosis by trying toi do some math problems. So I agreed
to give him a couple. He was an engineer as well, so first wass pretty easy
addition, then a straight forward algebra, then taking the first derivative.
He got all three right - even got theoretical. All he wrote fo the last one
was F.U., which I took tommean that there's a function f(u) = f'(x)..... ;-)

Dennis
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 10 Jul 2007 11:49 GMT
>> > we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> So whats the hand signal for a decimal point?

 That was good.

Signature

 "I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked
a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that
     I'm  theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF

                Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com

Grumman-581 - 11 Jul 2007 08:45 GMT
> It's a lot easier to tell your buddy you have 1,500 psi left rather
> than saying you have 103.421172 bar, but whatever floats your boat.

With an imperial based SPG, it is graduated in 100 psi units and
you'll probably sign to your buddy "15" since it's not unreasonable to
assume that the hundreds will be implicitly understood... With the
metric SPG, it is graduated in 10 bar units and you'll probably sign
to your buddy "10" for 100 bar since the last zero will be implicitly
understood... Depending upon your personal conservative factor, you
might always truncate downward or you might actually round upwards or
downwards as appropriate...
Grumman-581 - 11 Jul 2007 11:25 GMT
> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate

I thought ya'll used commas over there...
dechucka - 11 Jul 2007 22:38 GMT
>> we also have decimal points if you want to get more accurate
>
> I thought ya'll used commas over there...

stop thinking and you may get it right ;-)
Dillon Pyron - 09 Jul 2007 04:35 GMT
>> Left earliest on the Thursday morning 28/5 for the airport and our flight up
>> to Hamilton Island which is about 900km north of Brisbane in Queensland.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>18 is warm???? Up here that's shriveldick temps.

John, I thought you Cannucks had all gone over to the metric dark
side.  That's like the Brits, who can't even legally sell a good pint
to a man anymore.  Not that they don't do it on a regular basis.
Signature

dillon

Broadway Photo sucks.  Ask me why.

JOF - 09 Jul 2007 14:24 GMT
> >> Left earliest on the Thursday morning 28/5 for the airport and our flight up
> >> to Hamilton Island which is about 900km north of Brisbane in Queensland.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> side.  That's like the Brits, who can't even legally sell a good pint
> to a man anymore.  Not that they don't do it on a regular basis.

I was talking about Celsius. 64F isn't my idea of warm. We got stuck
with litres for gas, kilometers for the highway, kilo's for meat
(although they cop out and put #'s in small print), and Celsius for
temps. The rest the gov't caved on before getting it all in place. Of
course they waited until industry & commerce had wasted a bunch of
money setting up for the transition. Us old farts still think in the
old measure, but not our kids. To me Matt's 6'5, to him he's just
under 2 meters. If I say it's 90 out he looks at me like I'm nuts "The
world isn't about to explode yet, dad." When I reminisce about the
good old car and bike days, how we actually went speeds like 125
occasionally, the kids just shrug, big deal.
Some of the workarounds make things like driving in the US
problematic. My wife's car can be switched from Imperial to metric so
even the analog looking speedo shows either miles or kilos. We had
crossed back into Canada a couple of weeks ago and I was driving. At
one point I was pretty much alone on the highway, glanced at the
speedo and saw I was only doing 60. I figured my speed sense had
dulled after 5 hours on the US highways so I speeded up a bit. Well
before I hit the local speed limit of 100 I realized I was going way
too fast. We switched the computer back to metric then.

JF
Grumman-581 - 13 Jul 2007 05:44 GMT
> I was talking about Celsius. 64F isn't my idea of warm. We got stuck
> with litres for gas, kilometers for the highway, kilo's for meat
> (although they cop out and put #'s in small print), and Celsius for
> temps.

When I was in Toronto, I noticed that the kilograms were in small
print on the signs above the meat / produce at one grocery store that
we went to...

> Some of the workarounds make things like driving in the US
> problematic. My wife's car can be switched from Imperial to metric so
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> before I hit the local speed limit of 100 I realized I was going way
> too fast. We switched the computer back to metric then.

Yeah, I noticed that feature on our rental car when I was up there...
I figure it would be fun to switch it to US units for the next guy
using the car... <evil-grin>
JOF - 13 Jul 2007 13:58 GMT
On Jul 13, 12:44 am, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-
gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was talking about Celsius. 64F isn't my idea of warm. We got stuck
> > with litres for gas, kilometers for the highway, kilo's for meat
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I figure it would be fun to switch it to US units for the next guy
> using the car... <evil-grin>

At least I noticed the speed thing felt all wrong just before I hit
100 mph. Mebbe the new cars are just too smooth and quiet.

JF
Grumman-581 - 13 Jul 2007 17:52 GMT
> At least I noticed the speed thing felt all wrong just before I hit
> 100 mph. Mebbe the new cars are just too smooth and quiet.

They definitely are... Hell, my pickup feels smoother at 100 mph than
the '69 Pontiac I had felt way back in my younger days... The Pontiac
was heavy, but it felt like it was wanting to come off the ground once
you got past 85 or so... Very light steering... Just felt
squirrelly...
ben bradlee - 09 Jul 2007 03:15 GMT
> Oh well I have the memories I am typing this with the temp at 4 degrees C
> it is pissing down with rain and I am cold and wet after feeding the
> horses and cattle.

It's good to be home.

Thanks for the report.  Another place I'd like to visit.
Mike from Ottawa - 09 Jul 2007 04:02 GMT
<snip>
>Some of the younger blokes were doing 6 dives in a day but my max was 4 and
>mostly I did 3 :- morning afternoon and a dusk/night dive. The water was
>warm 18 degrees or so and the vis was normally fantastic 20m+ although we
>had a few dives where is was down to 5 m or so due to the currents running
>around the atolls/islands.

18.  Man, that is so warm.  And you're in the middle of winter.

>The next Thursday we head back to Daydream and I spent 2 nights there with
>the family before heading back to Sydney to watch Aus play South Africa in a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>limited OS diving experience the GBR has some of the best diving in the
>world.

No doubt.

>Highlights
>
>1) going back to Daydream Island on the first Saturday night and watching
>Australia beat the All Blacks ( New Zealand ) in rugby on a huge outdoor
>screen, cold beer, the moon the stars and the Southern Cross in the
>background

Ain't that such a freak event!

>2) finishing a dive and not being able to get back to the boat because there
>was a whale between us, absolutely magic floating around watching this
>creature

What kind of whale?  That would be so cool.

>3) coming up from a dive and bitching because the vis was 15m not the normal
>20m vis, than remembering that where I normally dive 8 to 10m is good

The worst vis I've ever had was about .5m, in the Madawaska River at
Arnprior.  It was a sunny day, but at about 2-3m down it was lights
out.

>4) just the diving the coral the fish the rays and sharks

Hmmmmm

>Comments
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>2) by the end of the trip I was feeling quite jaded with the diving maybe a
>week is to long

A few years ago I went on a diving trip on the St Lawrence River
onboard a converted tug boat.  Following the night dive with some cold
beer, looking up at the stars.  I'm there, even if it wasn't the GBR.

>Oh well I have the memories I am typing this with the temp at 4 degrees C it
>is pissing down with rain and I am cold and wet after feeding the horses and
>cattle.

OK, now you're getting cold.

>Hopefully I will post some photos in the not to distant future

No upchucking shots I hope.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.