 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / July 2007Martin Sheen
I read an article on Martin Sheen recently... He has no qualms calling George W. Bush "a failed student, a failed businessman, and now a failed president." He goes on to say "I saw what happened to the Dixie Chicks (when they spoke out against the Iraq war). If George W. Bush were a true Christian, like he proclaims himself to be, you know what he would have done? He'd have invited them to his next barbecue to play and say 'Hey, I love their music and whether or not I agree with them, I support their right to free speech.' But instead he was a bully. And he enjoyed watching what happened to them ... it gave him a sense of power and righteousness," And... "He's still a bully. What is arrogance but ignorance matured?" What I (Oooooorah) don't understand is why American lefties seem to be intelligent while the far right seem to be completely ignorant nut jobs. > What I (Oooooorah) don't understand is why American lefties seem to > be intelligent while the far right seem to be completely ignorant nut > jobs. Hmmm... Must be all that fuckin' snow up there in Canada f.cking up your brain cells... Frostbitten 'nads, perhaps? http://grumman581.googlepages.com/welcome-rec-scuba > > What I (Oooooorah) don't understand is why American lefties seem to > > be intelligent while the far right seem to be completely ignorant nut [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > http://grumman581.googlepages.com/welcome-rec-scuba You're assuming the poster has nads. On Jul 5, 5:02 pm, oorahsc...@gmail.com wrote: > I read an article on Martin Sheen recently... > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > be intelligent while the far right seem to be completely ignorant nut > jobs. The Dixie Chicks apparently thought that *they* were the only ones allowed free speech and the freedom of expression. Do we not have the right to stop listening to their music, or to say we do not agree with them? I think that we do. And did they not also forget that with freedom comes the obligation to take responsibility for the things that one says and to be ready to deal with the implications of one's words on one's career? * > The Dixie Chicks apparently thought that *they* were the only ones > allowed free speech and the freedom of expression. Do we not have the > right to stop listening to their music, or to say we do not agree with > them? I think that we do. I have never listened to a single song from them, couldnt pick 'em out of a lineup. > And did they not also forget that with freedom comes the obligation to > take responsibility for the things that one says and to be ready to > deal with the implications of one's words on one's career? > > * Why is it all these great, holier-than-thou intellectual lefties have to hide their identities? > I have never listened to a single song from them, couldnt pick 'em out of a > lineup. BS...either that or you're an idiot. > > I have never listened to a single song from them, couldnt pick 'em out of a > > lineup. > > > BS...either that or you're an idiot. Another option is that Scott just prefers good music and musicians? Dennis "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sexually excited me with: >> > I have never listened to a single song from them, couldnt pick 'em >> > out [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Dennis No, Scott prefers women, but I'm trying to break him of that habit. Scott Koplin, posting as Carl Nisarel <hostlbuddha@postmaster.co.uk> admitted: > No, Scott prefers women, but I'm trying to break him of that > habit. Once again Scotty is demonstrating that he's a pussy.  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com On Jul 9, 8:47 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> wrote: > <squbad...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Dennis I don't like their music either but I could pick 'em out of a lineup. So he's either lying or doesn't own a TV and is illiterate. > On Jul 9, 8:47 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > I don't like their music either but I could pick 'em out of a lineup. > So he's either lying or doesn't own a TV and is illiterate. Or prefers watchng other things than entertainment/celebrity news. Clearly he's not illiterate, else it'd be real difficult for him to post to Usenet. You really have to give the alternatives a bit more thought. I doubt I'd be able to pikc 'em out of a lineup either. Same with a lot of musicians - even ones I like. I don't look at their pictures, just the music. Dennis On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:27:49 -0600, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote: > Clearly he's not illiterate, else it'd be real difficult for him to post to > Usenet. Hmmm... If that was the case, we wouldn't have any AOLers nor any WebTV weenies around... Nice try, but you need a better example... <grin> > On Jul 9, 8:47 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I don't like their music either but I could pick 'em out of a lineup. > So he's either lying or doesn't own a TV and is illiterate. I don't own TV, and I'm illiterate. But at least I'm not an anonymous chickenshit coward. And I have no idea what they look like. I had one of their CDs, and I chucked it when they shanked the President to foreigners for a cheap laugh. And, when one of their songs comes on that I recognize, I change the station. Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >> I have never listened to a single song from them, couldnt pick 'em >> out of a lineup. >> > BS...either that or you're an idiot. Don't talk to my luv-muffin that way, I'm going to have his love child! He's -mine-, you're gonna have to stand in line. Ok, you can butt f.ck me while you're waiting in line. I'll pretend you're a little boy. I'm sure that with the size of your dick, it'll be easy to imagine it. > BS...either that or you're an idiot. f.ck you, punk. Why the f.ck would I listen to a bunch of fat, liberal, never-done-nothings trying to climb the ladder on a country line of horseshit? Idiots are people who think these twats are worth listening to, which includes cowards like you. > On Jul 5, 5:02 pm, oorahsc...@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > take responsibility for the things that one says and to be ready to > deal with the implications of one's words on one's career? The problem is they don't understand basic economics. Just because you pay a plumber to fix your toilet doesn't mean you value his opinion on foreign policy. You value his skill with a wrench, not his political insights. The Dixie Chicks are famous and have an audience because they are talented musicians. When they perform, the audience are their employers, and they are getting paid to play their instruments and sing. They are not being paid to be political pundits. If you stop doing your job and spend your employer's time mocking his/her political convictions, you'll probably not be employed very long. Why should they be any different. If they do something that pisses off their employers/audience when they're supposed to be rendering the services purchased (music) then they get the same response the plumber gets if he tries to pontificate on tax policy while your basement floods. On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:43:16 -0700, dweebgs wrote: >> On Jul 5, 5:02 pm, oorahsc...@gmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > instruments and sing. They are not being paid to be political > pundits. Really? Why are they still getting paid? > If you stop doing your job and spend your employer's time > mocking his/her political convictions, you'll probably not be employed [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > response the plumber gets if he tries to pontificate on tax policy > while your basement floods. They abandoned the pinheaded redneck market and are doing quite well. See "Shut Up & Sing" for more detail. Anonymous coward, right? Signaturedillon Broadway Photo sucks. Ask me why. > Anonymous coward, right? > -- > dillon Anonymity really has nothing to do with cowardice. Anonymity really has more to do with armed redneck righty nutjobs. Can you understabd that ? >>Anonymous coward, right? >>-- [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Anonymity really has more to do with armed redneck righty nutjobs. > Can you understabd that ? So yer a coward? Signature“TANSTAAFL” ____________________________________________________________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 ____________________________________________________________________________ >> Anonymous coward, right? >> -- [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Anonymity really has more to do with armed redneck righty nutjobs. > Can you understabd that ? Being anonymous is great. I can post all I want about how I like to suck little boy dicks and none of the straight guys on rec.scuba can find me. I can taunt them for not showing up to meet me even if I'm not on the same continent. And best of all, it allows me to go to the kiddie sites like myspace and such and lure little boys for clandestine meetings without the cops being able to trace me. All the other child molesters know how to find me though. So, we'll meet in the same place next week, right? No girls this time, ok? > Anonymity really has nothing to do with cowardice. > Anonymity really has more to do with armed redneck righty nutjobs. > Can you understabd that ? Nice how he blames his cowardice on people he subjects to his bigotry. "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> sexually excited me with: >> Anonymity really has nothing to do with cowardice. >> Anonymity really has more to do with armed redneck righty nutjobs. >> Can you understabd that ? > > Nice how he blames his cowardice on people he subjects to his bigotry. Oh Scotty, you can subject me to your "big ol' tree" up my butt anything you want! Scott Koplin, posting as Carl Nisarel <hostlbuddha@postmaster.co.uk> admitted: > Oh Scotty, you can subject me to your "big ol' tree" up my > butt anything you want! SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >> Anonymous coward, right? >> -- >> dillon > Anonymity really has nothing to do with cowardice. > Anonymity really has more to do with armed redneck righty nutjobs. > Can you understabd that ? Right, just another f.cking coward. Want proof? Greg Mossman, alive and well, with all his limbs still attached. He's had dinner with more "rednecks" than anyone else here not being one. Another difference, he'll probably be released from my killfile someday......you never will. > Right, just another f.cking coward. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Another difference, he'll probably be released from my killfile > someday......you never will. Funny how "they" all fall back on the same old saw. If they had a shred of true belief in what they were posting, they would feel no need to hide. > Anonymity really has nothing to do with cowardice. > Anonymity really has more to do with armed redneck righty nutjobs. > Can you understabd that ? OK, not cowardice, irrational fear. Not quite the same, but close. > squbad...@gmail.com wrote > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > OK, not cowardice, irrational fear. Not quite the same, but close. Not necessarily. For instance, when I went to New Orleans, I was stalked by a demented redneck with a gun. >>squbad...@gmail.com wrote >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Not necessarily. For instance, when I went to New Orleans, I was > stalked by a demented redneck with a gun. how could you tell he ws demented? > >>squbad...@gmail.com wrote > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > how could you tell he ws demented? He had that demented look in his eyes. > > >>squbad...@gmail.com wrote > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > He had that demented look in his eyes. Did you mean "fermented"? JF >>>>squbad...@gmail.com wrote >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > He had that demented look in his eyes. oh, that is usually a good indicator > >>squbad...@gmail.com wrote > >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > how could you tell he ws demented? I think he's talking about Grumman. If you can't tell he's demented, well, I'll just leave it at that. >>>>squbad...@gmail.com wrote >>>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > If you can't tell he's demented, well, I'll just leave it at that. gru never looked demented to me - but then he did have mirrored shades on > gru never looked demented to me - but then he did have mirrored shades on Pilot glasses make anyone look like a cop or demented.... > gru never looked demented to me - but then he did have mirrored shades on Best I remember, I had photochromic prescription lenses in my glasses at the time and they were not mirrored... >>gru never looked demented to me - but then he did have mirrored shades on > > Best I remember, I had photochromic prescription lenses in my glasses > at the time and they were not mirrored... my mistake I was looking at your gun, actually !:-) > >OK, not cowardice, irrational fear. Not quite the same, but close. > Not necessarily. For instance, when I went to New Orleans, I was >> stalked by a demented redneck with a gun. Not likely. You're still alive. > Not necessarily. For instance, when I went to New Orleans, I was > stalked by a demented redneck with a gun. I take offense at that... I was not stalking you, I was stalking Janna... I had an eel that I thought she might want to pet... <dirty-old-man-grin> On Jul 10, 12:43 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM- gmail.com> wrote: > > Not necessarily. For instance, when I went to New Orleans, I was > > stalked by a demented redneck with a gun. > > I take offense at that... I was not stalking you, I was stalking > Janna... I had an eel that I thought she might want to pet... > <dirty-old-man-grin> You could have at least been a gentleman about it and offered her some beads. > You could have at least been a gentleman about it and offered her some > beads. She pets eels for beeds? Even in New Orleans, that's a new one... > > You could have at least been a gentleman about it and offered her some > > beads. > > She pets eels for beeds? Even in New Orleans, that's a new one... He didn't say she would have accepted, just that offering was the least you could do. > She pets eels for beeds? Even in New Orleans, that's a new one... Wish I'd known that when I was there. I'd have bought some beads for her if that gal in gauze would have petted my eel. Lee > Wish I'd known that when I was there. I'd have bought some beads for her if > that gal in gauze would have petted my eel. I suspect that she would hold out for the expensive beads... Those white ones that come from oysters... > > Wish I'd known that when I was there. I'd have bought some beads for her if > > that gal in gauze would have petted my eel. > > I suspect that she would hold out for the expensive beads... Those > white ones that come from oysters... I suspect that you need to work on your game. >>> Wish I'd known that when I was there. I'd have bought some beads for her >>> if >>> that gal in gauze would have petted my eel. >> I suspect that she would hold out for the expensive beads... Those >> white ones that come from oysters... > I suspect that you need to work on your game. We're very married men. We have no game. I suspect she didn't have a game either, she looked professional, very high quality professional, out of my price range even if I were in the market professional. Damn, she was hot. Lee > We're very married men. We have no game. We can window shop, we just can't buy the merchandise... > I suspect she didn't have a game either, she looked professional, very high > quality professional, out of my price range even if I were in the market > professional. > > Damn, she was hot. Hmmm... That must have been why she was wearing gauze... Yeah, that's it... >> We're very married men. We have no game. > We can window shop, we just can't buy the merchandise... Or rent it. > >> We're very married men. We have no game. > > > We can window shop, we just can't buy the merchandise... > > Or rent it. S'okay to check the menu, long as you eat at home. > > >> We're very married men. We have no game. > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > S'okay to check the menu, long as you eat at home. It doesn't matter where you get your appetite as long as you come home for dinner. > It doesn't matter where you get your appetite as long as you come home for > dinner. I get my appetite at home, as I understand you do. Out in the wilds, I just run comparisons. Most of them are too damned skinny; most couldnt handle a proper "event" on the kitchen floor without needing medical help after. >> It doesn't matter where you get your appetite as long as you come home >> for [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > on > the kitchen floor without needing medical help after. ***** Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > > "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message > > I get my appetite at home, as I understand you do. > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > on > > the kitchen floor without needing medical help after. > ***** And, as an added bonus, I showed it to her and got smicked on the back of the head. Gawd I love that girl. > I get my appetite at home, as I understand you do. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > on > the kitchen floor without needing medical help after. Says one of the few guys I know that robbed the cradle by even more than I did. > > I get my appetite at home, as I understand you do. > > Out in the wilds, I just run comparisons. > > Most of them are too damned skinny; most couldnt handle a proper "event" > > on the kitchen floor without needing medical help after. > > Says one of the few guys I know that robbed the cradle by even more than I > did. Hey. I was in basic when she was born. It only took another 21 years for me to find her. That is called perseverance. Thankfully she was a gymnast. >> > Most of them are too damned skinny; most couldnt handle a proper >> > "event" [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Thankfully she was a gymnast. Hey, I wasn't complaining, I was complementing. Jayna's 13 years my junior. Lee > > It doesn't matter where you get your appetite as long as you come home for > > dinner. > > I get my appetite at home, as I understand you do. Mostly I do. > Out in the wilds, I just run comparisons. I drool occasionally, but no more than I drool at home so it's all good. > Most of them are too damned skinny; I feel the same way. The magazines, movies, and tv shows are really killing the looks of the American woman. I'm not saying I prefer a large lady, but I sure don't prefer a petite one either. > most couldnt handle a proper "event" on > the kitchen floor without needing medical help after. I'm not sure I could do any better. Give me a table or countertop any day though. > >>> Wish I'd known that when I was there. I'd have bought some beads for her > >>> if [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Lee I'm married and I've got game, I just choose not to play it. I wasn't saying that he (or you) should have tried harder, only that his game must not be (have been?) all that great if he would have had to resort to the oyster beads. :-) > I wasn't saying that he (or you) should have tried harder, only that his > game must not be (have been?) all that great if he would have had to > resort > to the oyster beads. :-) Jewelry is often the shortest distance between two points. > > I wasn't saying that he (or you) should have tried harder, only that his > > game must not be (have been?) all that great if he would have had to > > resort > > to the oyster beads. :-) > > Jewelry is often the shortest distance between two points. <sigh> Men still have so much to learn about women. > > > I wasn't saying that he (or you) should have tried harder, only that his > > > game must not be (have been?) all that great if he would have had to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Men still have so much to learn about women. How come it's always up to us guys to learn and make accommodations? Why shouldn't the ladies give a little too? We need to let them know we still wear the pants in the family, at least whenever the laundry gets done. Wendy insists that I'm the king around our house, and will always be as long as I continue to do all the cooking, take care of the pool, cut the grass, buy the groceries, pay the mortgage and credit card bills, defend the castle from marauders, and dispose of my own empties. More men need to learn to assert themselves. JF > > > > I wasn't saying that he (or you) should have tried harder, only that his > > > > game must not be (have been?) all that great if he would have had to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > How come it's always up to us guys to learn and make accommodations? Well, here's the way I see it. Women know this about men: we like boobs and beer. There's really not much more to know. Men know this about women: So, do you see a disparity there? > Why shouldn't the ladies give a little too? We need to let them know > we still wear the pants in the family, at least whenever the laundry [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > credit card bills, defend the castle from marauders, and dispose of my > own empties. I think you just answered your own question. If you were in charge, would you be interested in "compromising" your power away? > More men need to learn to assert themselves. <sigh> Men still have so much to learn about women. > Men still have so much to learn about women. Mebbe if they took on some of the responsibilities around the house we'd have more time to learn. I'd be quite happy to learn while someone else cut the grass, or cleaned the pool. I try to learn while I'm standing alone in a creek fishing but the fish keep distracting me. I try to learn while I'm having a beer with friends but ... well, you know. I try to learn from movies and tv but Hollywood is biased against us as well. Us guys need more free time to think, that's all there is to it. JF > > Men still have so much to learn about women. > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > JF You want time to learn? Take your wife out for dinner. You'd be amazed what you can learn if you pay attention. > You want time to learn? > > Take your wife out for dinner. > > You'd be amazed what you can learn if you pay attention. And shut the f.ck up. > > You want time to learn? > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > And shut the f.ck up. That is oftentimes very condusive to paying attention. Occasionally, she might need you to speak up to get her started though. If there's no conversation during dinner, you can be pretty sure it's one of those times. I find that I learn much more from my wife about her current state if I talk to her and not at her. > > > You want time to learn? > > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > I find that I learn much more from my wife about her current state if I talk > to her and not at her. Yeah, but it's all in the posture and the peach... > I find that I learn much more from my wife about her current state if I talk > to her and not at her. Total bullshit, Chris... Men might *think* that they are communicating with women, but they're just deluding themselves... Our thought processes are just too fuckin' different for there to be communication between our two species... Yeah, that's right, I said *species*... We're two different species that somehow have managed to evolve such that we can interbreed... You might as well ask the elephant his opinion of the kangaroo... OK, that's probably a mistake -- elephants and kangaroos probably have more in common than men and women... On Jul 13, 10:14 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM- gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:28:53 GMT, "Chris Guynn" > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > opinion of the kangaroo... OK, that's probably a mistake -- elephants > and kangaroos probably have more in common than men and women... You are one brave dude. Obviously Grace doesn't read this newsgroup. 8) JF > You are one brave dude. Obviously Grace doesn't read this newsgroup. No, she doesn't read the newsgroup, but I'm not saying anything that I haven't said to her before... Of course, she doesn't understand any of it since we're two different species that cannot communicate anyway... > > > Men still have so much to learn about women. > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > You'd be amazed what you can learn if you pay attention. But that would mean listening for an entire meal? Isn't that why we drink at dinner? JF > But that would mean listening for an entire meal? Isn't that why we > drink at dinner? No, that's why we burp after every drink... >>>>I wasn't saying that he (or you) should have tried harder, only that his >>>>game must not be (have been?) all that great if he would have had to [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > JF SO she has you trained.....? Signature“TANSTAAFL” ____________________________________________________________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 ____________________________________________________________________________ > SO she has you trained.....? You misspelled emasculated. > > SO she has you trained.....? > > You misspelled emasculated. He was talking to me, not you. JF On Jul 13, 6:00 pm, dazed and confuzzed <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote: > >>"Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > SO she has you trained.....? Absolutely. JF >>>>I wasn't saying that he (or you) should have tried harder, only that his >>>>game must not be (have been?) all that great if he would have had to [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > JF Kinda of like gun control - wht do the pro gunners have to give in all the time ? > > "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > JF You and Mike have this totally correct. Very good. He knows that he wears the pants here, unquestionably. He is also very much aware that I select the pants. * > You and Mike have this totally correct. Very good. He knows that he > wears the pants here, unquestionably. He is also very much aware that > I select the pants. I am the boss in my family and I have my wife's permission to say so. Actually, I make very few decisions, but do retain veto power. I'll get to keep it as long as I don't use it too often, or injudiciously. Lee > > > "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > wears the pants here, unquestionably. He is also very much aware that > I select the pants. Mike has always impressed me as a wise man who knows his place. You say cook. He says how much? Say hello to him btw. I've missed our feeding frenzies at Gilboa. JF > <sigh> > > Men still have so much to learn about women. If it flies, floats, or f.cks, it's cheaper to rent than to buy... That about covers it, doesn't it? > > <sigh> > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > That about covers it, doesn't it? Well, considering that the model I've got earns more than she spends, I'd have to disagree. > > > <sigh> > > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Well, considering that the model I've got earns more than she spends, I'd > have to disagree. ***** >> Men still have so much to learn about women. > > If it flies, floats, or f.cks, it's cheaper to rent than to buy... > > That about covers it, doesn't it? You left out eats. If it eats, it's cheaper to rent too. >> I wasn't saying that he (or you) should have tried harder, only that his >> game must not be (have been?) all that great if he would have had to >> resort >> to the oyster beads. :-) > >Jewelry is often the shortest distance between two points. Jewelry, especially the kind with large, sparkly stones, is a great expediter. Rick > Jewelry, especially the kind with large, sparkly stones, is a great > expediter. Ah yes, but there are far more economically reasonable paths to the peon. > Ah yes, but there are far more economically reasonable paths to the peon. And if you lower your standards enough, even someone like Billy-Boy can get laid... On Jul 13, 2:56 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM- gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:49:47 -0700, "Scott" > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > And if you lower your standards enough, even someone like Billy-Boy > can get laid... Scott sounds like he has that covered. JF > On Jul 13, 2:56 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM- > gmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Scott sounds like he has that covered. You probably didn't mean it that way, but that came out pretty shitty. Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > > On Jul 13, 2:56 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM- > > gmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > You probably didn't mean it that way, but that came out pretty shitty. Pappy used to say "If we had some ham we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs." No sweat at all. We know the truth and the difference. If he had enough hair on his a.s to make a direct insult, well, he doesn't. > > > On Jul 13, 2:56 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM- > > > gmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > If he had enough hair on his a.s to make a direct insult, well, he doesn't.- You don't know the difference between hair and discretion. JF On Jul 13, 7:18 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > > On Jul 13, 2:56 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM- > > gmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > You probably didn't mean it that way, but that came out pretty shitty. Well, heaven forbid anyone should say anything nasty in rec.scuba. Did I miss something or wasn't Scott the one who was bragging about all the kitchen floor action here? JF > On Jul 13, 7:18 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > I miss something or wasn't Scott the one who was bragging about all > the kitchen floor action here? So you're clearly stating that Scott's girlfriend is an example of "lowered standards"? Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com On Jul 13, 10:49 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > > On Jul 13, 7:18 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > So you're clearly stating that Scott's girlfriend is an example of > "lowered standards"? Weren't we talking about whoever he had the kitchen floor action with? He's the one who was bragging about that. Ask him. Do you think that's an example of lowered standards? I could only assume he wouldn't talk that way about anyone he still loved and respected. JF > On Jul 13, 10:49 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > Weren't we talking about whoever he had the kitchen floor action with? No, not at all. > He's the one who was bragging about that. Ask him. Do you think that's > an example of lowered standards? I could only assume he wouldn't talk > that way about anyone he still loved and respected. Welll, lets take a look at what Scott said: <Scott> 7/11/2007 "I get my appetite at home, as I understand you do." "Out in the wilds, I just run comparisons." "Most of them are too damned skinny; most couldnt handle a proper "event" on the kitchen floor without needing medical help after." </Scott> Now, the way I read it, looks like its was more an assessment - not necessarily a reflection of whatever does or does not occur in their home. After all, he then wrote the following: <Scott> 7/12/2007 And, as an added bonus, I showed it to her and got smicked on the back of the head. Gawd I love that girl. </Scott> So, clearly, from what I can tell, he does love (and respect, as shown in other posts) the young lady with whom he lives. Dennis On Jul 14, 9:50 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> wrote: > > On Jul 13, 10:49 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > the kitchen floor without needing medical help after." > </Scott> Exactly. He wasn't referring to the light of his life, ergo nor was I. Try to explain that to yer buddy Freddy Chainsawhands. > Now, the way I read it, looks like its was more an assessment - not > necessarily a reflection of whatever does or does not occur in their home. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > So, clearly, from what I can tell, he does love (and respect, as shown in > other posts) the young lady with whom he lives. Gadzooks! Is it possible we agree? 8) JF > On Jul 14, 9:50 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> >> Welll, lets take a look at what Scott said: >> <Scott> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Exactly. He wasn't referring to the light of his life, -Totally- > ergo nor was I. -Lost- As usual. > Try to explain that to yer buddy Freddy Chainsawhands. > -Lost- > > As usual. One has to wonder why this old sot thinks anyone needs to explain anything to either one of us. > "JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message > > He's the one who was bragging about that. Ask him. Do you think that's > > an example of lowered standards? I could only assume he wouldn't talk > > that way about anyone he still loved and respected. Why dont you ask her yourself, you spineless f.cking piece of sh.t? Cause you are a punk, and your best act is the cheapest of shots from the cheapest of seats. Send an e-mail and I'll be sure that she gets it and replies. She'll intellectually pound you like the cheap meat you are. Bitch. rec.scuba's resident pussy "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> whined: > Why dont you ask her yourself, you spineless f.cking piece of > sh.t? Posting under other people's names and emails, like you do, is the very definition of spineless f.cking piece of sh.t. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > On Jul 13, 10:49 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > He's the one who was bragging about that. Ask him. Do you think that's > an example of lowered standards? Ever notice when you're tapdancing around a question, you just ask it back? I didn't make the "lowered standards" comment about Scott's woman, and I don't have to explain it. I just shined the light, as usual, to watch the roach scurry. >I could only assume he wouldn't talk > that way about anyone he still loved and respected. Must be a $200 slacks thing. I'd say you're just jealous, because you're -way- past the point where you can get it on the kitchen floor. > JF Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >> Well, heaven forbid anyone should say anything nasty in rec.scuba. Did >> I miss something or wasn't Scott the one who was bragging about all >> the kitchen floor action here? > > So you're clearly stating that Scott's girlfriend is an example of > "lowered standards"? Are either of you saying that a little imprompu action on the kitchen floor is a lower standard? Lee "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net> pounded away at his keyboard resulting in: :Are either of you saying that a little imprompu action on the kitchen floor :is a lower standard? It certainly is altitude-wise. Dan Bracuk Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do. > Are either of you saying that a little imprompu action on the kitchen floor > is a lower standard? Compared to on the cabinets, yeah... Of course, basements would be an even lower standard... Texas girls don't do basements... >> Are either of you saying that a little imprompu action on the kitchen >> floor [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Texas girls don't do basements... Florida guys don't have basements. > Florida guys don't have basements. I've actually heard of a house in Houston that had a basement... Hopefully, they had a serious sump pump to go along with it to keep it from becoming an indoor swimming pool... >> Florida guys don't have basements. > > I've actually heard of a house in Houston that had a basement... > Hopefully, they had a serious sump pump to go along with it to keep it > from becoming an indoor swimming pool... There are a few houses that are built on ridges that have honest to goodness basements. There are a few more that are built at the same level as other homes and have dirt piled up around the first floor to make it basement like. They're all owned by Yankees. For the rest of us, a basement would be referred to as an indoor swimming pool. Lee > There are a few houses that are built on ridges that have honest to > goodness basements. There are a few more that are built at the same level as > other homes and have dirt piled up around the first floor to make it > basement like. They're all owned by Yankees. Yeah, leave it to the Yankees to bring basements down here where they're not needed... The closest think we have is probably the storm cellars up in the rural farms of northern Texas... We don't get tornados as serious as they do up there, so we don't tend to see storm cellars down here... > >> Are either of you saying that a little imprompu action on the kitchen > >> floor [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Florida guys don't have basements. Or Texas girls? JF "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net> whined: > Are either of you saying that a little imprompu action on the > kitchen floor is a lower standard? Scotty and Douggy are dreaming about doing it with Scotty's niece (again). SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>> Well, heaven forbid anyone should say anything nasty in rec.scuba. Did >>> I miss something or wasn't Scott the one who was bragging about all [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Are either of you saying that a little imprompu action on the kitchen > floor is a lower standard? Futile John Francis is. We're not. Signature"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com Douglas W. Popeye Frederick >> Are either of you saying that a little imprompu action on the kitchen >> floor is a lower standard? > Futile John Francis is. Who? > We're not. I would think not. Jayna and I might manage a little kitchen floor action, but it's questionable whether either of us would be able to get back up again. Might be worth it. I'll let you know . . . if I can crawl back to the computer. Lee On Jul 14, 1:55 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > >>> Well, heaven forbid anyone should say anything nasty in rec.scuba. Did > >>> I miss something or wasn't Scott the one who was bragging about all [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Futile John Francis is. Did I? > We're not. Aren't you? JF > >>> Well, heaven forbid anyone should say anything nasty in rec.scuba. Did > >>> I miss something or wasn't Scott the one who was bragging about all [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > We're not. Not pointed at Lee or Doug; If you and your lady don't have enough passion between you to f.cking nail it wherever it is you are standing (within legal and moral reason) when that lightening bolt strikes, then one would reasonably surmise you have no knowledge of passion or even of love, true freedom or fun. > So you're clearly stating that Scott's girlfriend is an example of > "lowered standards"? The desperation is palpable. "Douglas W. \"Fatboy\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> : > So you're clearly stating that Scott's girlfriend is an > example of "lowered standards"? Any woman stupid or desparate enough to date Scotty the Pussy cleary is an example of lowered standards. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > > And if you lower your standards enough, even someone like Billy-Boy > > can get laid... > > Scott sounds like he has that covered. Nawh, Scott's standards (these days) are considerably higher than Billy-Boy's ever were... On the other hand, back when he was in the Corp, I suspect that his standards probably were quite a bit lower, but even the most drunken sailor or marine has standards higher than Billy-Boy... And I say that even though our mottos were: "Eight to Eighty, Blind, Deaf, Dumb, or Crazy" and "Female, walks on two legs, doesn't drag her knuckles (too often)" We had to add the "too often" clause to be able to allow for the female marines... > Nawh, Scott's standards (these days) are considerably higher than > Billy-Boy's ever were... On the other hand, back when he was in the [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > We had to add the "too often" clause to be able to allow for the > female marines... "Five, fifteen or fifty, blind, crippled or crazy, no muff too tough." |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message