 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / June 2007Gotta Love The Brits
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5 "Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~ Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5 why and your point is what? >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5 > > why and your point is what? Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how desperate you are to get back on topic. > So which one will you ban and confiscate? I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. <snip> > >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean. > > Did I say I would confiscate them? > Yes, several times. Delusion. -JOF "Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~ Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5 >> >> why and your point is what? > > Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how > desperate you are to get back on topic. so you can'/won't make a point? Looking forward to more of your random posts. NOT >>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5 >>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > so you can'/won't make a point? Looking forward to more of your random > posts. NOT No need to get your panties knotted. But you sure do keep answering them. Tell me and Futile again, who was it that was reeling in who? > So which one will you ban and confiscate? I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. <snip> > >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean. > > Did I say I would confiscate them? > Yes, several times. Delusion. -JOF "Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~ Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5 >>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > No need to get your panties knotted. I'm not wearing any that should excite you > But you sure do keep answering them. just trying to figure out wtf u r going on about > Tell me and Futile again, who was it that was reeling in who? Oh so your original post was a troll and you had no pov > "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in >>>>> why and your point is what? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > I'm not wearing any that should excite you I'm not a "show me yours" Aussie trucker. >> But you sure do keep answering them. > > just trying to figure out wtf u r going on about You sure you have a funny way of putting a stop to these "prattish" OT posts. Sounds like you were porking a pie. Try dialing 1-800-usenetanon. >> Tell me and Futile again, who was it that was reeling in who? > > Oh so your original post was a troll and you had no pov No, the original post has its own point, not mine. Just because -you- don't get it, doesn't mean there isn't one. In fact, the converse is more likely true. Ask Futile John, he's in that predicament all the time. >> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in >>>>>> why and your point is what? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > I'm not a "show me yours" Aussie trucker. we know that your a "show me yours" Yankee trucker who travels to Canada for some back channelling . >>> But you sure do keep answering them. >> >> just trying to figure out wtf u r going on about > > You sure you have a funny way of putting a stop to these "prattish" OT > posts. why should I? > Sounds like you were porking a pie. so that was you in American Pie was it? > Try dialing 1-800-usenetanon. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > No, the original post has its own point, not mine. which is what? come on explain > Just because -you- don't get it, doesn't mean there isn't one. > > In fact, the converse is more likely true. > > Ask Futile John, he's in that predicament all the time. > "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in >>>>>> Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how >>>>>> desperate you are to get back on topic. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > we know that your a "show me yours" Yankee trucker who travels to Canada > for some back channelling I'm not the one playing porkie pie patty cake with carl nisrael. >>>> But you sure do keep answering them. >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > why should I? Well, you've only stated 5 times that it's the purpose of your inquiries. I certainly didn't think it was, but now you've confirmed it. Looks like you told another FJF whopper. >> Sounds like you were porking a pie. > > so that was you in American Pie was it? You're the pie porker, mate. >> Try dialing 1-800-usenetanon. >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > which is what? come on explain Tell you what. Why don't -you- give us your opinion of the Brits Knighting Salman Rushdie. But is sure does seem like you're dragging out these off-topic posts you said you were trying to end. >> Just because -you- don't get it, doesn't mean there isn't one. >> >> In fact, the converse is more likely true. >> >> Ask Futile John, he's in that predicament all the time. > So which one will you ban and confiscate? I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. <snip> > >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean. > > Did I say I would confiscate them? > Yes, several times. Delusion. -JOF "Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~ Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > Tell you what. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > But is sure does seem like you're dragging out these off-topic posts you > said you were trying to end. It really is amazing; Your ability to bait the dickheads into revealing their dickheadedness. As always, they do all the heavy lifting. snip > Why don't -you- give us your opinion of the Brits Knighting Salman > Rushdie. Why not the bloke is a good author and has contributed to literature. His getting a knighthood is probably just as valid as people like Ian Botham getting one snip > snip >> Why don't -you- give us your opinion of the Brits Knighting Salman [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > getting a knighthood is probably just as valid as people like Ian Botham > getting one Are you posting off topic and porking that pie again? It sure does seem like you talk the talk without walking the walk. >> snip >>> Why don't -you- give us your opinion of the Brits Knighting Salman [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Are you posting off topic and porking that pie again? I am posting on topic for this thread and that is my opinion that you requested. Yes the bloke deserves a knighthood, his list of novels is quite amazing and he has one heaps of awards including the Booker of Bookers. > It sure does seem like you talk the talk without walking the walk. great comment bit more inane than normal but great comment ..... for you >>> snip >>>> Why don't -you- give us your opinion of the Brits Knighting Salman [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > I am posting on topic for this thread I was posting on topic for my truck thread. We post on topic for gun threads. What sort of Futile John Francis tapdance is this? > and that is my opinion that you requested. Yes the bloke deserves a > knighthood, his list of novels is quite amazing and he has one heaps of > awards including the Booker of Bookers. More pie porking off-topic posting. Looks like you were flat out lying before. >> It sure does seem like you talk the talk without walking the walk. > > great comment bit more inane than normal but great comment ..... for you That's funny, you just said the same thing. You're just chalk full of sh.t. Were you going to get on those other 9 posts to your "show me" buddy? > So which one will you ban and confiscate? I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. <snip> > >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean. > > Did I say I would confiscate them? > Yes, several times. Delusion. -JOF "Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~ Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com >>>> snip >>>>> Why don't -you- give us your opinion of the Brits Knighting Salman [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I was posting on topic for my truck thread. you started an off topic thread I was mearly replying to it and this one > We post on topic for gun threads. if you think guns and diving are the same so be it > What sort of Futile John Francis tapdance is this? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > More pie porking off-topic posting. actuaslly as this thread is mark OT what difference does it make > Looks like you were flat out lying before. leap of logic which doesn't quite work >>> It sure does seem like you talk the talk without walking the walk. >> >> great comment bit more inane than normal but great comment ..... for you > > That's funny, you just said the same thing. but when I said it about you it was the truth snip So you started this thread about Rushdie and you only On topic contribution has been to post a link without comment. I will now repeat my OP in this thread "why and your point is what?" when posting that link Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com wrote http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5God bless them, every one.> "This is an occasion for the world's 1.5 billion Muslims to look at theseriousness of this decision," said Mohammed Ijaz ul-Haq,> Pakistan's religious affairs minister. "The West is accusing Muslims ofextremism and terrorism," he told his country's parliament.> "If someone exploded a bomb on his body he would be right to do so, unlessthe British government apologizes and withdraws> the 'sir' title."Bang. Problem resolved.> The parliament in Islamabad - supposedly a key ally in the war on terror -then backed a government-sponsored motion> demanding an apology and the withdrawal of the honor from the The SatanicVerses author.Imagine that. The guy that just supported exploding a bomb on the body of aBritish knight, to his parliament no less, is complaining about hisreligion being accused of extremism and terrorism. Talk about proving thepoint. It would be hard to have done so more quickly, completely anddecisively.Bang again, just in case the first shot only wounded him.Lee > Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com wrote http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5God bless them, every one.> "This is an occasion for the world's 1.5 billion Muslims to look at theseriousness of this decision," said Mohammed Ijaz ul-Haq,> Pakistan's religious affairs minister. "The West is accusing Muslims ofextremism and terrorism," he told his country's parliament.> "If someone exploded a bomb on his body he would be right to do so, unlessthe British government apologizes and withdraws> the 'sir' title."Bang. Problem resolved.> The parliament in Islamabad - supposedly a key ally in the war on terror -then backed a government-sponsored motion> demanding an apology and the withdrawal of the honor from the The SatanicVerses author.Imagine that. The guy that just supported exploding a bomb on the body of aBritish knight, to his parliament no less, is complaining about hisreligion being accused of extremism and terrorism. Talk about proving thepoint. It would be hard to have done so more quickly, completely anddecisively.Bang again, just in case the first shot only wounded him.Lee We are not extremists! Islam is a relgion of peace! Muslims are peaceful! We will kill anyone who says differently! We will slit their throats from ear to ear, and stone their families! We are peaceful and moderate! Dennis, channeling Abdullah. >> Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com wrote >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Dennis, channeling Abdullah. :-) > So which one will you ban and confiscate? I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. <snip> > >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean. > > Did I say I would confiscate them? > Yes, several times. Delusion. -JOF "Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~ Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com > The guy that just supported exploding a bomb on the body of a British knight, to his parliament no less, > is complaining about his religion being accused of extremism and terrorism. Talk about proving thepoint. > It would be hard to have done so more quickly, completely and decisively. > Bang again, just in case the first shot only wounded him. > Lee http://tinyurl.com/yqcpaw http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =462779&in_page_id=1811&ct=5 http://tinyurl.com/2zc96r |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.