Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

EU Heightened Security

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 12 Jun 2007 20:10 GMT
> EU Heightened Security
>
> The English are feeling the pinch in relation to
> recent terrorist threats and have raised their
> security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved."  Soon,
> though, security levels may be raised yet again to
> "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross." Londoners have not
> been "A Bit Cross" since the blitz in 1940 when tea
> supplies all but ran out. Terrorists have been
> re-categorized from "Tiresome" to a "Bloody Nuisance."
> The last time the British issued a "Bloody Nuisance"
> warning level was during the great fire of 1666.
>
> Also, the French government announced yesterday that
> it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to
> "Hide." The only two higher levels in France are
> "Surrender" and "Collaborate." The rise was
> precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France 's
> white flag factory, effectively paralyzing the
> country's military capability.
>
> It's not only the English and French that are on a
> heightened level of alert. Italy has increased the
> alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to
> "Elaborate Military Posturing." Two more levels
> remain: "Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change
> Sides."
>
> The Germans also increased their alert state from
> "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Dress in Uniform and Sing
> Marching Songs." They also have two higher levels:
> "Invade a Neighbor" and "Lose."
>
> Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as
> usual, and the only threat they are worried about is
> NATO pulling out of Brussels .
>
> The Spanish are all excited to see their new
> submarines ready to deploy. These beautifully designed
> subs have glass bottoms so the new Spanish navy can
> get a really good look at the old Spanish navy.
>
> "I do not think that the wireless waves that I have discovered will
> have any practical application."  --- Heinrich Hertz

Signature

--

>  John says I'm a blusterer, a noisy gasbag.

Bingo.

>  How'd you like to report on that to him
> personally? I get up your way all the time now.

I'll have to call some friends in customs.  You've bragged
many times about having a record, right? -Yesman Mike

"Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when
he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness
and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~

 Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com
Scott - 12 Jun 2007 23:12 GMT
> > EU Heightened Security

http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_159222541.html
Rod - 13 Jun 2007 00:29 GMT
>> > EU Heightened Security
>
>http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_159222541.html

The trouble with this plot is that it can be negatted by using our
selves againt us. Put a picture of Hillary in the C-Rats and they will
go back to fighting
Scott - 13 Jun 2007 00:36 GMT
> >> > EU Heightened Security
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> selves againt us. Put a picture of Hillary in the C-Rats and they will
> go back to fighting

Yeah, even a dyke couldn't eat that...
Bryan Heit - 13 Jun 2007 18:41 GMT
>>> EU Heightened Security
>
> http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_159222541.html

Damn, had a hell of a time getting through that one with a "straight"
face.  Best part:

"create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into
homosexuals and make *them more interested in sex than fighting*"

So I've never been to war, so maybe a missing something here, but isn't
being "more interested in sex then fighting" essentially what men
already are?  Wouldn't that bomb just end up making super (gay) men?

Ahh, gotta love military research, totally impractical but usually good
for a laugh.

Bryan
-hh - 14 Jun 2007 11:24 GMT
> Ahh, gotta love military research, totally impractical but
> usually good for a laugh.

The shortcoming of this 'blue sky' proposal was that it was submited
in utter ignorance of existing Legal/Treaty restrictions, specifically
the Chemical Weapon Convention (CWC) Treaty.

The only reason why this 17 year old proposal is "newsworthy" is
because of the persistance of a bunch of tinfoil hatters that has
probably cost the government $10M to obey the law requiring that their
shotgunned FOIA requests over the years all be faithfully investigated
and answered.  Since that is your tax money being spent that
alternatively would have gone to support the troops, hope you think
this joke was worth it.

-hh
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 14 Jun 2007 20:15 GMT
> > Ahh, gotta love military research, totally impractical but
> > usually good for a laugh.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> -hh

"Don't ask - don't tell" is from the same period, isn't it? Just
curious why?
Probably you remember that effects of some types of weapons were
tested on American soldiers.

Janusz
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.