Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / December 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lightbulb Changed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nitespark - 21 Dec 2003 01:44 GMT
I changed a lightbulb.

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Kimber - 21 Dec 2003 01:56 GMT
> I changed a lightbulb.

All by yourself?!!?

Kimber
Signature

I'm movin' on
At last I can see life has been patiently waiting for me
And I know there's no guarantees, but I'm not alone

rnf2 - 21 Dec 2003 02:16 GMT
> I changed a lightbulb.

It's light bulb, note the space.

rhys
srspencer@hotmail.com - 21 Dec 2003 02:30 GMT
>> I changed a lightbulb.
>
>It's light bulb, note the space.
>
>rhys

Could it be a lite bulb?
As in low cal.

T
rnf2 - 21 Dec 2003 02:51 GMT
> >> I changed a lightbulb.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> T

dunno, does it fit down a .22 barrel or a .44 barrel? I'd prefer a medium
cal. such as .38

rhys
chilly - 21 Dec 2003 02:37 GMT
> I changed a lightbulb.

That is so exciting!  Was it a night light?
Nitespark - 21 Dec 2003 02:51 GMT
>>I changed a lightbulb.
>
> That is so exciting!  Was it a night light?

Actually one of my infra-red tail lights.

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

chilly - 21 Dec 2003 03:53 GMT
> >>I changed a lightbulb.
> >
> > That is so exciting!  Was it a night light?
>
> Actually one of my infra-red tail lights.

ooooohhhhh, sexxxxxxyyyyy.
George Cathcart - 21 Dec 2003 03:11 GMT
Were you drinking beer at the time?

Did you shoot the old bulb?

No real need to change the bulb unless you only like having sex in the dark.

There: beer, guns and sex in a single post.

Who wants to do Nazis?

g

> I changed a lightbulb.
rnf2 - 21 Dec 2003 03:26 GMT
I already did guns, see the "Cal" post.

rhys

> Were you drinking beer at the time?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> > I changed a lightbulb.
Curtis - 21 Dec 2003 03:24 GMT
> I changed a lightbulb.

   Damn.......I have to tonight.  Problem is, series Christmas lights, 100
on the string, gotta find which one it is......on 3 strings.  Teach me to
use them for more than one year.   ;-)

Curtis
rnf2 - 21 Dec 2003 03:32 GMT
> > I changed a lightbulb.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Curtis

toss the lot in the open fireplace when no-ones looking, when they look
around at the smell of plastic go Ooopsie, and go change the bulb with a
Visa at the nearest Walmart.

rhys
Curtis - 21 Dec 2003 04:05 GMT
> toss the lot in the open fireplace when no-ones looking, when they look
> around at the smell of plastic go Ooopsie, and go change the bulb with a
> Visa at the nearest Walmart.

   But buying replacement bulbs for cash at Wally World and going through
each one earns more "honey-do" points.   ;-)

Curtis
Chris Guynn - 22 Dec 2003 16:19 GMT
> > toss the lot in the open fireplace when no-ones looking, when they look
> > around at the smell of plastic go Ooopsie, and go change the bulb with a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Curtis

Generally, there's only one bulb out.  What I do is replace the first bulb.
If it works great, if not, I take what was the first bulb and use it to
replace the second bulb.  I repeat until I find the proper bulb.  It's
generally about 3/4 of the way from whichever end I start on.
David  M. Burnworth - 23 Dec 2003 03:39 GMT
"Chris Guynn" <chrisguynn@sbcglobal.N.O.S.P.A.M.net> wrote in message >
Generally, there's only one bulb out.  What I do is replace the first bulb.
> If it works great, if not, I take what was the first bulb and use it to
> replace the second bulb.  I repeat until I find the proper bulb.  It's
> generally about 3/4 of the way from whichever end I start on.

What happens if you start in the middle and go one way?  :)

David
Chris Guynn - 23 Dec 2003 15:08 GMT
> "Chris Guynn" <chrisguynn@sbcglobal.N.O.S.P.A.M.net> wrote in message >
> Generally, there's only one bulb out.  What I do is replace the first bulb.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> David

It will be approximately 1/4 of the way the opposite direction
David  M. Burnworth - 23 Dec 2003 20:53 GMT
"Chris Guynn" <chrisguynn@sbcglobal.N.O.S.P.A.M.net> wrote in message > It
will be approximately 1/4 of the way the opposite direction

Is that better or worse?

David
Chris Guynn - 23 Dec 2003 22:02 GMT
> "Chris Guynn" <chrisguynn@sbcglobal.N.O.S.P.A.M.net> wrote in message > It
> will be approximately 1/4 of the way the opposite direction
> >
> Is that better or worse?
>
> David

About the same.  My way, I go through 3/4 of the strand from beginning to
bad bulb.

Your way, I'd go through 1/2 the strand (middle to end) and then 1/4 the
strand (middle to 1/4 other direction or end to 1/4 towards middle) for a
total of 3/4 of the way.
David  M. Burnworth - 24 Dec 2003 02:23 GMT
"Chris Guynn" <chrisguynn@sbcglobal.N.O.S.P.A.M.net> wrote in message >
About the same.  My way, I go through 3/4 of the strand from beginning to
> bad bulb.
>
> Your way, I'd go through 1/2 the strand (middle to end) and then 1/4 the
> strand (middle to 1/4 other direction or end to 1/4 towards middle) for a
> total of 3/4 of the way.

You just can't win...

David
Nitespark - 21 Dec 2003 05:24 GMT
>>I changed a lightbulb.
>
>     Damn.......I have to tonight.  Problem is, series Christmas lights, 100
> on the string, gotta find which one it is......on 3 strings.  Teach me to
> use them for more than one year.   ;-)

You can get one of those little AC testers that you hold up next to a
wire.  If the wire is energized the tip of it will glow.  Plug your
Christmas lights into the wall socket and just follow the line tester up
the string until it doesn't glow anymore and there is your bad bulb.
You can get these testers at most any electrical supply house for about $20.

Andy

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Jammer Six - 21 Dec 2003 06:02 GMT
>     Damn.......I have to tonight.  Problem is, series Christmas lights, 100
> on the string, gotta find which one it is......on 3 strings.  Teach me to
> use them for more than one year.   ;-)

Period key stuck, or are you functionally illustrious?

Signature

"We're going to rush the hijackers."
    -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001

Curtis - 21 Dec 2003 06:19 GMT
> Period key stuck, or are you functionally illustrious?

   Well, (pausing) I'd explain it, (pausing) but I figure ya already have
the answer.

Curtis
Jammer Six - 21 Dec 2003 08:41 GMT
> > Period key stuck, or are you functionally illustrious?
>
>     Well, (pausing) I'd explain it, (pausing) but I figure ya already have
> the answer.

You spelled "you" wrong.

Signature

"We're going to rush the hijackers."
    -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001

Curtis - 21 Dec 2003 15:12 GMT
> You spelled "you" wrong.

   Not here in the South, I dinnit.

   South......place where I can still tee-shirt dive in Dec-Jan.

Curtis
David  M. Burnworth - 21 Dec 2003 20:48 GMT
I thought series Christmas lights went out he door years ago.  How
passee....

David

> > I changed a lightbulb.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Curtis
Jammer Six - 21 Dec 2003 22:16 GMT
> I thought series Christmas lights went out he door years ago.  How
> passee....

There are no series Christmas lights.

There is only "New", "Tangled", and "Doesn't Work".

Signature

"We're going to rush the hijackers."
    -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001

Rudy Benner - 21 Dec 2003 22:36 GMT
> ? I thought series Christmas lights went out he door years ago.  How
> ? passee....
>
> There are no series Christmas lights.
>
> There is only "New", "Tangled", and "Doesn't Work".

Any sensible person will throw the damned things in the garbage at the end
of the holiday, or better yet, just leave them installed all year. Still,
better, don't bother putting any up, don't buy anyone any presents either !!

Humbug !
David  M. Burnworth - 21 Dec 2003 23:08 GMT
> There are no series Christmas lights.
>
> There is only "New", "Tangled", and "Doesn't Work".

Good point.

David
Curtis - 22 Dec 2003 02:46 GMT
> ? I thought series Christmas lights went out he door years ago.  How
> ? passee....
>
> There are no series Christmas lights.
>
> There is only "New", "Tangled", and "Doesn't Work".

   Damn if that ain't the truth!!

Curtis
Fishbre396 - 21 Dec 2003 03:36 GMT
>I changed a lightbulb.

Wow!!
Curtis - 21 Dec 2003 04:01 GMT
> >I changed a lightbulb.
>
> Wow!!

   Something beyond your comprehension?

Curtis
Scott - 21 Dec 2003 04:19 GMT
> > >I changed a lightbulb.
> >
> > Wow!!
>
>     Something beyond your comprehension?

What is not?
Scott - 21 Dec 2003 03:40 GMT
> I changed a lightbulb.

Cool.

I did three today (one was the result of a murder; I killed it with malice
aforethought), and another one wants me.

Bulbs aint sh.t onced ya gets to know them.
rnf2 - 21 Dec 2003 04:10 GMT
> > I changed a lightbulb.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Bulbs aint sh.t onced ya gets to know them.

Aren't Once You. get the spelling right
Scott - 21 Dec 2003 04:21 GMT
> > I did three today (one was the result of a murder; I killed it with malice
> > aforethought), and another one wants me.
> >
> > Bulbs aint sh.t onced ya gets to know them.
>
> Aren't Once You. get the spelling right

In English please...
Dennis \(Icarus\) - 21 Dec 2003 05:31 GMT
> > > I changed a lightbulb.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Aren't Once You. get the spelling right

This from folks who add unnecessary "u"s to words?

Capitalize the G in "get". Don't you also need a period at the end of
"right", or do they do stuff differently in NZ? :-)

Dennis
Dan Bracuk, CTHD - 21 Dec 2003 03:49 GMT
Nitespark <nitespark@cox.net> pounded away at his keyboard resulting
in:
:I changed a lightbulb.

Into what?

Dan Bracuk
If at first you don't succeed, you run the risk of failure.
The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/
Randy Buckner - 21 Dec 2003 05:40 GMT
> I changed a lightbulb.

Can you PROVE that you changed the light bulb.  Do you have photos?
Documentation?  Witnesses? .....;-)

Buck
Nitespark - 21 Dec 2003 14:08 GMT
>>I changed a lightbulb.
>
> Can you PROVE that you changed the light bulb.  Do you have photos?
> Documentation?  Witnesses? .....;-)
>  

If you can't see the light, you must be in the dark.

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Chris Guynn - 22 Dec 2003 16:23 GMT
> I changed a lightbulb.

You mean a darksucker right?

http://www.zerobeat.net/qrp/darktheory.html
Dennis \(Icarus\) - 22 Dec 2003 18:01 GMT
> > I changed a lightbulb.
>
> You mean a darksucker right?
>
> http://www.zerobeat.net/qrp/darktheory.html

Nice page. I've pointed out to 'em that they dont mention the most powerful
darksucker of them all - the black hole.

Dennis
Nitespark - 22 Dec 2003 19:18 GMT
>>I changed a lightbulb.
>
> You mean a darksucker right?
>
> http://www.zerobeat.net/qrp/darktheory.html

Absolutely fascinating.  So there really is no such thing as a
heater....its actually a "coldsucker" and conversely, there is no such
thing as a freezer, actually a "heatsucker"????

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Chris Guynn - 22 Dec 2003 22:53 GMT
> >>I changed a lightbulb.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> heater....its actually a "coldsucker" and conversely, there is no such
> thing as a freezer, actually a "heatsucker"????

hmmm... I'd have to see the proofs, but it stands to reason... :-)
Scott - 23 Dec 2003 01:46 GMT
> >>I changed a lightbulb.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> heater....its actually a "coldsucker" and conversely, there is no such
> thing as a freezer, actually a "heatsucker"????

Temperature is a measurement of molecular movement.

At absolute zero, nothing is moving.

Pressure is a measurement of molecular inertia. Each molecule has an area
around it that it wants to keep free, kinda like the birds on a wire,
so when you compress them into a flask, such as a SCUBA cylinder, they are
all trying to find their space, and the result is inertia produced
by movement away from each other.

Heat is energy, cold is lack of energy.

Vacuum is not a force, it is a lack of force. \

And always remember; two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts does.

Scott
Nitespark - 23 Dec 2003 01:49 GMT
>>>>I changed a lightbulb.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> And always remember; two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts does.

Two wrongs don't make a right indeed.....

but two Wrights DID make an airplane!!!

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Lee Bell - 23 Dec 2003 03:39 GMT
> Two wrongs don't make a right indeed.....
> but two Wrights DID make an airplane!!!

Which modern engineers can't duplicate, at least they couldn't this year.

Lee
Nitespark - 23 Dec 2003 10:44 GMT
>>Two wrongs don't make a right indeed.....
>>but two Wrights DID make an airplane!!!
>
> Which modern engineers can't duplicate, at least they couldn't this year.

au contraire....modern engineers duplicated it....they just couldn't
duplicate the weather conditions.

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Lee Bell - 23 Dec 2003 12:47 GMT
> >>Two wrongs don't make a right indeed.....
> >>but two Wrights DID make an airplane!!!
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> au contraire....modern engineers duplicated it....they just couldn't
> duplicate the weather conditions.

The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.  The Wright Flier (is that the
right name?) flew.  The one this year didn't.

Lee
Chris Guynn - 23 Dec 2003 15:06 GMT
> > >>Two wrongs don't make a right indeed.....
> > >>but two Wrights DID make an airplane!!!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Lee

My understanding was that it did fly, just not nearly as far...
Galen Hekhuis - 23 Dec 2003 15:17 GMT
>The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.  The Wright Flier (is that the
>right name?) flew.  The one this year didn't.

Actually what they said was:  "The proof of the pudding is in the eating."
You can't imagine how many hours I've wasted going through bowls of pudding
futilely looking for proof.    :^)

 Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA                    ghekhuis@earthlink.net
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups
Lee Bell - 24 Dec 2003 00:42 GMT
> >The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.  The Wright Flier (is that the
> >right name?) flew.  The one this year didn't.
>
> Actually what they said was:  "The proof of the pudding is in the eating."
> You can't imagine how many hours I've wasted going through bowls of pudding
> futilely looking for proof.    :^)

Must be a different they, but I have to admit, your staying is better than
mine.

Time spent going through bowls of pudding is not wasted, at least not if
it's butterscotch, banana or chocolate.

Lee
Nitespark - 24 Dec 2003 00:53 GMT
>>The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.  The Wright Flier (is that the
>>right name?) flew.  The one this year didn't.
>
> Actually what they said was:  "The proof of the pudding is in the eating."
> You can't imagine how many hours I've wasted going through bowls of pudding
> futilely looking for proof.    :^)

I suspect Popeye could help you with your pudding.  How much "proof"
would you like in it???
Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Galen Hekhuis - 24 Dec 2003 01:07 GMT
>>>The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.  The Wright Flier (is that the
>>>right name?) flew.  The one this year didn't.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>I suspect Popeye could help you with your pudding.  How much "proof"
>would you like in it???

Some folks like mixes, and a little ice I can see for some things, but
*pudding*?  

 Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA                    ghekhuis@earthlink.net
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups
Nitespark - 24 Dec 2003 01:55 GMT
>>>>The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.  The Wright Flier (is that the
>>>>right name?) flew.  The one this year didn't.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Some folks like mixes, and a little ice I can see for some things, but
> *pudding*?  

Never can tell....might start a whole new market.  Maybe get Bill Cosby
to pitch it.  :)

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Matthias Voss - 24 Dec 2003 07:47 GMT
Galen Hekhuis schrieb:

> Some folks like mixes, and a little ice I can see for some things, but
> *pudding*?

Try this:
http://www.york-united-kingdom.co.uk/localinfo/yorkshirepudding/

Matthias
Nitespark - 24 Dec 2003 00:50 GMT
>>>>Two wrongs don't make a right indeed.....
>>>>but two Wrights DID make an airplane!!!
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.  The Wright Flier (is that the
> right name?) flew.  The one this year didn't.

Guess they just didn't have the Wright stuff!!
Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

David  M. Burnworth - 24 Dec 2003 02:24 GMT
To Nitespark,

Congratulations on creating one of the longest and sometimes funniest
non-scuba threads I have seen in a long time!

David
Nitespark - 24 Dec 2003 10:51 GMT
David M. Burnworth wrote:
> To Nitespark,
>
> Congratulations on creating one of the longest and sometimes funniest
> non-scuba threads I have seen in a long time!
>
> David

Thanks.....(I think)

Signature

Gun Control works!!! 3 million Holocaust victims can’t be wrong.

Lee Bell - 23 Dec 2003 03:38 GMT
> Temperature is a measurement of molecular movement.
> At absolute zero, nothing is moving.

I'm going to stick my neck out a bit, but I don't think this is correct.
Absolute zero is the temperature at which, if it followed the graph, all
molecules in a gas would cease all movement.  It presumes, however, that it
would still be a gas at that point, which it wouldn't.  As I recall, and I'm
really getting iffy here, temperatures below absolute zero have been
achieved.

Lee
Grumman-581 - 23 Dec 2003 03:38 GMT
> As I recall, and I'm really getting iffy here, temperatures below
> absolute zero have been achieved.

Yeah, but only in a certain carpetbagger senator from NY... <snicker>
Dazed and Confuzed - 23 Dec 2003 04:53 GMT
> > As I recall, and I'm really getting iffy here, temperatures below
> > absolute zero have been achieved.
>
> Yeah, but only in a certain carpetbagger senator from NY... <snicker>

That was right after Monica came out of the woodwork.....Didja ever
notice that shortly after that , the dog "buddy" disappeared and they got
a cat?

I heard that the dog got betwen them and froze to death.....

--

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Scott - 23 Dec 2003 03:51 GMT
> > Temperature is a measurement of molecular movement.
> > At absolute zero, nothing is moving.
>
> I'm going to stick my neck out a bit, but I don't think this is correct.
> Absolute zero is the temperature at which, if it followed the graph, all
> molecules in a gas would cease all movement.

Which is exactly what I said. Nothing we can measure or detect is moving.
So, in reality, we could define the limits
of this to the limit of the human ability.

> It presumes, however, that it would still be a gas at that point, which it
wouldn't.
> As I recall, and I'm really getting iffy here, temperatures below absolute
zero have been achieved.

Easy.

Space.

No molecules, no movement, no temperature. In fact, lack of molecular
movement (due to no molecules) is a fact.

Scott
Lee Bell - 23 Dec 2003 12:49 GMT
> > > Temperature is a measurement of molecular movement.
> > > At absolute zero, nothing is moving.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> So, in reality, we could define the limits
> of this to the limit of the human ability.

No, it's not what you said.  You did not mention gas.

> > It presumes, however, that it would still be a gas at that point, which it
> > wouldn't. As I recall, and I'm really getting iffy here, temperatures
below absolute
> zero have been achieved.

> Easy.
> Space.
> No molecules, no movement, no temperature. In fact, lack of molecular
> movement (due to no molecules) is a fact.

Space, at least what we call space when talking about astronauts, is not a
perfect vacuum.  The molecules may be scattered far and wide, but they're
still there.

Lee
Alan Street - 23 Dec 2003 22:12 GMT
> > Easy.
> > Space.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> perfect vacuum.  The molecules may be scattered far and wide, but they're
> still there.

True. There's actually quite a lot of them in interplanetary space.
Another interesting tidbit is the concept of temperature at very low
pressures. As Scott pointed out, temperature is actually a measure of
the average particle energy in a given area. Although there aren't many
particles in space, those that are there tend be very energetic and tend
to keep that energy because there isn't much for them to bump into.
Although the concept of "temperature" becomes somewhat distorted in the
upper atmosphere, the "temperature" of the plasma in the ionosphere is
on the order of 1000 degrees C. Here's an interesting page that shows
the pressure and temperature of the upper atmoshpere:

http://www.linmpi.mpg.de/english/forschung1/

(nasa.gov also has some good references, but I couldn't quickly find any
that easily showed what I was trying to say)

Alan
Dennis \(Icarus\) - 23 Dec 2003 03:59 GMT
> > Temperature is a measurement of molecular movement.
> > At absolute zero, nothing is moving.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> really getting iffy here, temperatures below absolute zero have been
> achieved.

Apparently, the movement doesn't stop, but they're as slow as they possibly
can be.
http://www.pa.msu.edu/~sciencet/ask_st/012992.html

I think the gas would have passed through to liquid (and solid)? states
before reaching absolute zero.

This describes negative temperature on the kelvin scale
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/neg_temperature.html

Dennis

> Lee
Chris Guynn - 23 Dec 2003 15:06 GMT
> > Temperature is a measurement of molecular movement.
> > At absolute zero, nothing is moving.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Lee

They hadn't when I was in college... of course, that's been a year or two
:-)
Lee Bell - 24 Dec 2003 00:40 GMT
"Chris Guynn"

> As I recall, and I'm really getting iffy here, temperatures below absolute
zero have been achieved.

> They hadn't when I was in college... of course, that's been a year or two
> :-)

You're probably right.  I did a bit of a search after I posted that suggests
that there has not been a recorded temperature even at, let alone below
absolute zero.  Temperatures on Pluto, which I thought were a sure thing,
weren't that cold.

Lee
Alan Street - 23 Dec 2003 21:24 GMT
> > Temperature is a measurement of molecular movement.
> > At absolute zero, nothing is moving.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> really getting iffy here, temperatures below absolute zero have been
> achieved.

Not to my knowledge.

Also, at absolute zero, all materials are solids.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.