TonyP's Creationist Crap

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Carl Nisarel - 21 May 2007 19:48 GMT

TonyP <arpierre@hooptown.net> sputtered:

>> Even though science has ruled out the "cosmic dust"
>> hypothesis by taking more accurate measurements of its
>> accumulation rate?
>
> It has been measured at a constant rate.

"Morris chose to pick obsolete data with known problems, and call
it the "best" measurement available. With the proper values, the
expected depth of meteoritic dust on the Moon is less than one
foot."

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html#dust

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Reply to this Message

Kula - 22 May 2007 23:38 GMT

> "Morris chose to pick obsolete data with known problems, and call
> it the "best" measurement available. With the proper values, the
> expected depth of meteoritic dust on the Moon is less than one
> foot."
>
> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html#dust

Read Humes: "Monkey Girl." It's about the attempt by certain members of the
Dover, PA school board to force high school biology teachers to give
credence to "creationist science." During the trail, a long litany of
these bogus arguments meant to disprove the validity of science are offered
up by the defense and shown to be bunk by the prosecution. It's a good read
and shines a very bright light on the motives of those who portray
themselves as being very reasonable in only wanting "to teach the argument."

kula

Reply to this Message

Paul - 23 May 2007 14:58 GMT

Hang on a second. Are you saying that our president is wrong about
something?

I find that hard to believe.

>> "Morris chose to pick obsolete data with known problems, and call
>> it the "best" measurement available. With the proper values, the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> kula

Reply to this Message