 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / May 2007ATTN: Lee
Where is the good diving in Florida right now? Any links to dive conditions along the coast John Hanson <jhanson@northernlinks.com> pounded away at his keyboard resulting in: :Where is the good diving in Florida right now? Any links to dive :conditions along the coast In about 6 weeks, it will be with me and mag3. Dan Bracuk If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure. >John Hanson <jhanson@northernlinks.com> pounded away at his keyboard >resulting in: [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >In about 6 weeks, it will be with me and mag3. And hopefully Curtis.... Any luck yet with the "registration details?" :-) ____________________________________________ Regards, Arnold > And hopefully Curtis.... Any luck yet with the "registration details?" > :-) Just got home from a visit with John Hanson. Talking with Lee, think we'll be fine confirming about a week in advance. I will be on a plan "B" already, on standby for the primary weekend, but intend to make some arrangements that will allow me to meet you and Dan. Curtis In rec.scuba, on Thu 10 May 2007 01:04:09a, "\"Magilla\"" <cavey_curtis@$$ yahoo.com> wrote: > Talking with Lee, think we'll be fine confirming about a week in > advance. I will be on a plan "B" already, on standby for the primary > weekend, but intend to make some arrangements that will allow me to > meet you and Dan. Can I come? I hear Florida has a lot of glory holes near the truck stops and you know how much of a -sucker- I am for truckers. In rec.scuba, on Thu 10 May 2007 01:04:09a, "\"Magilla\"" <cavey_curtis@$$ yahoo.com> wrote: > Talking with Lee, think we'll be fine confirming about a week in > advance. I will be on a plan "B" already, on standby for the > primary weekend, but intend to make some arrangements that will > allow me to meet you and Dan. Can I come? I hear Florida has a lot of glory holes near the truck stops and you know how much of a -sucker- I am for truckers. >> Talking with Lee, think we'll be fine confirming about a week in >> advance. I will be on a plan "B" already, on standby for the >> primary weekend, but intend to make some arrangements that will >> allow me to meet you and Dan. > Can I come? I hear Florida has a lot of glory holes near the > truck stops and you know how much of a -sucker- I am for truckers. Sure come on down. Let me know when you're going to be here and I'll contact those faggot a.sholes that are always arguing with you and Popeye from anonymous servers and behind fake names to find out which truck stops have the best Glory Holes. You'll have a great time. Drinks at my house . . . if you dare. > Sure come on down. Let me know when you're going to be here and I'll > contact [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Drinks at my house . . . if you dare. I am sure you realize that is "Carl", not me. >> Sure come on down. Let me know when you're going to be here and I'll >> contact [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > I am sure you realize that is "Carl", not me. Be very sure I do. > Be very sure I do. Do I own this clown or what? He cant stand that I am rejecting his affections. > > Be very sure I do. > > Do I own this clown or what? > > He cant stand that I am rejecting his affections. This is getting surreal. I can no longer tell if we're reading posts from the real Carl, Scott, or the ersatz ones. Good job guys. You've successfully combined two distinct internet personae into a single homogeneous entity. We may never again be certain who's saying what about whom. Maybe you guys have been more alike than you thunk all along? JF John Hanson wrote: > Where is the good diving in Florida right now? Any links to dive > conditions along the coast The good diving in Florida is always anywhere from Palm Beach to the Dry Tortugas, all on the Atlantic side. Conditions anywhere in Florida are always less predictable than in most of the world's dive destinations, that's why Florida is not as popular as others. The locals just go diving and take whatever they get - sometimes great, sometimes crappy. Conditions change from hour to hour, and can be fabulous a few miles away from where they are awful. During periods of heavy rain (June - Sept) runoff can leave a lot of sediment in the water, on average viz is better in the winter. Storms sometimes raise a lot of silt off the bottom, sometimes drive the Gulf Stream in and create great viz. Thermoclines are greatest in June and July, but occasionally pop up any time of year. Currents vary from mild to wild. There are all sorts of "current conditions" reports on the dive boats' sites, and wave and water temp live from buouys along the coast. Don't bother with them, as conditions will change from the time you leave yer computer and arrive at the dive site. If you absolutely positively must have warm water, great viz, and no current on every dive, Florida is not a good destination for you. If you enjoy huge biodiversity, if you get as excited by a cluster of bluebells as you do by a flight of eagles, Florida is a wonderful place to dive. If you are an experienced diver, you will want to avoid the cattle cars of the Keys (There's great diving in the Keys, but few boats will take you to it). Most of the boats elsewhere are just transportation to the dive sites - you will schlepp your own gear, set it up, and do your own dive in buddy pairs without a guide. The natives are friendly and will usually let you tag along unless you are obviously a doofus. From Miami north is all drift diving - each buddy pair or small group (or solo diver) carries a float and goes with the current along the reef. There is very little shore diving to be done. enjoy esg >> > Be very sure I do. >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > about whom. Maybe you guys have been more alike than you thunk all > along? I'm sure you can't. No one else who knows them is having a problem. But then, you have a hard time recognizing your own posts until I remind you. >>>>Be very sure I do. >>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > But then, you have a hard time recognizing your own posts until I remind > you. damn - that was good! JOF you walked right into that! > >>>"Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > damn - that was good! JOF you walked right into that!- Jeez Joe. You were even faster than I figgered. You beat my post. JF >>>>>"Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > JF actually I posted it before I saw yours - but then again - you walked right into that one - you should bow to the master Popeye! :-) > >>>>>"Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > actually I posted it before I saw yours - but then again - you walked > right into that one - you should bow to the master Popeye! :-)- Check. Some of your posts reflect such oddly convoluted thought processes that they're actually entertaining. So Popeye's your master, Joe? JF >> actually I posted it before I saw yours - but then again - you walked >> right into that one - you should bow to the master Popeye! :-)- [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Some of your posts reflect such oddly convoluted thought processes > that they're actually entertaining. So Popeye's your master, Joe? That's not what he said now, was it? > That's not what he said now, was it? Of course not. That's just Francis showing what a sick cocksucker and a coward he is. At least that is what I get out of what the POS posts 99.9% of the time. But hey, he was jess be haven't fun! > > That's not what he said now, was it? > > Of course not. > > That's just Francis showing what a sick cocksucker and a coward he is. Your language is atrocious. There might be young children reading this. > At least that is what I get out of what the POS posts 99.9% of the time. > > But hey, he was jess be haven't fun! Your mockery of dialect kinda sux too. Shouldn't that be more like "He jus' be havin' fun"? Who or what are you trying to ape there? JF > Your language is atrocious. There might be young children reading > this. Not for long... They would either get bored with it or grow up rather quickly... > But hey, he was jess be haven't fun! Think he's having fun now? > > But hey, he was jess be haven't fun! > > Think he's having fun now? Oh, I am. You guys get yer panties in a bunch over the damnedest things. JF > > But hey, he was jess be haven't fun! > Think he's having fun now? I think he wants us all to think he is, which is simply more Futility® from the master. > > > But hey, he was jess be haven't fun! > > Think he's having fun now? > > I think he wants us all to think he is, which is simply more Futility® from > the master. Am I the master now? That title sure gets moved around. 8) JF On May 12, 11:48 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > >> actually I posted it before I saw yours - but then again - you walked > >> right into that one - you should bow to the master Popeye! :-)- [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > That's not what he said now, was it? His words - "bow to the master Popeye" sure don't sound like something I'd be likely to say now, do they? That's what I mean about Joe's posts - they're fun. I know what he meant but, as he says, he walked right into that one, and what was the other part - like a sheet of clean glass. JF > On May 12, 11:48 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > His words - "bow to the master Popeye" sure don't sound like <rrrippp> That's. not. what. he. said. now., was. it.? "Quit clipping the stuff that's damaging to your argument. Makes it look like it has weaknesses. Mayhap it does?" -JOF. (" But then, you have a hard time recognizing your own posts until I remind you.") -Popeye > On May 12, 11:48 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > JF I didn't walk into anything, JOF, you did - and it looks as if you are again >>> actually I posted it before I saw yours - but then again - you walked >>> right into that one - you should bow to the master Popeye! :-)- [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > That's not what he said now, was it? certainly you do not expect the jofhole to think or comprehend, do you? he is now in so many black holes for the ignorant that he thinks noone thinks he is an idiot. most people do. we just have no intention of listening to his endless idiotic brainless posting. hooray for kill files, also called in jof's case, idiot filters. "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered: > That's not what he said now, was it? You'd know, Fatboy. You're the master of changing what people say.  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>>>>>"Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > JF no he appears to be yours - still On May 11, 2:09 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > >> "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > But then, you have a hard time recognizing your own posts until I remind > you.- You continue to labour under the delusion that you truly do speak for everyone here, huh? Must be a trip for you to believe in your own omniscience. Now let's hear from the Metoo squad chiming in to add their sheepish bleats of accord. Any bets on who'll be first in line? JF > On May 11, 2:09 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > Now let's hear from the Metoo squad chiming in to add their sheepish > bleats of accord. Any bets on who'll be first in line? Well, who I speak for... And who you speak for (carl and januz)... Pretty much... Speaks for itself...! > Well, who I speak for... Any decent, intelligent, human with a spine and half a brain not addled by liberal caterwalling and stupid sh.t like thinking slacks make you something you arent in Levi's and flannel. > And who you speak for (carl and januz)... > > Pretty much... > > Speaks for itself...! Those who "practice the art" always are first guilty, and last to recognize. But remember, this is just entertainment. John doesn't mean anything he says here, he cant. BTW, how did you like our new trailer? > > Well, who I speak for... > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > BTW, how did you like our new trailer? Three lines of ersatz intellectualism and one line that actually makes any sense. Yer batting .250 which is about the norm for an also ran. JF On May 11, 6:21 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > > On May 11, 2:09 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Well, who I speak for... That's my question. Name some names. Evidently the list will be very very long. I'm calling your bluff, big shooter. > And who you speak for (carl and januz)... Have I said I speak for them? They seem to have their own voices as opposed to the crowd you claim to represent. Your gang, save for a notable few, are oddly silent. > Pretty much... > > Speaks for itself...! Well - for themselves. I don't pretend to speak for them. Prove me wrong. JF > On May 11, 6:21 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: <snip> > > Well, who I speak for... > > That's my question. Name some names. Evidently the list will be very > very long. I'm calling your bluff, big shooter. He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. :-) <snip> On May 11, 9:57 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> wrote: > > On May 11, 6:21 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. :-) That goes without saying. You are a pretty short list. JF > On May 11, 9:57 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > That goes without saying. You are a pretty short list. I presume you mean I'm on a pretty short list? If so, we'll see who else chimes in. :-) Dennis On May 12, 8:37 am, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> wrote: > > On May 11, 9:57 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Dennis- Hi Well, he did claim "everybody" so I expect "everybody" to come forward. Otherwise he made hisself a liar. Better get to work rallying the troops for him. JF > He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. > :-) Works for me too. Somebody will have to speak for me. I don't get any of the posts in original form. >>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. >>:-) > > Works for me too. Somebody will have to speak for me. I don't get any of > the posts in original form. As you probably would guess, Popeye can speak for me - I too will let you know when I don't agree Popeye's list might be short - but yours appear to be shorter - :-) > >>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. > >>:-) [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Popeye's list might be short - but yours appear to be shorter - :-) I think my list was never purported to be more than one - me, and I've definitely got all my list's members behind me. >> >>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is >> >>wrong. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I think my list was never purported to be more than one - me, and I've > definitely got all my list's members behind me. Oh, no. You contradict yourself all the time. >>>>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. >>>>:-) [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I think my list was never purported to be more than one - me, and I've > definitely got all my list's members behind me. thats good > >>>>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. > >>>>:-) [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > thats good- So my list is all accounted for then? JF >> >>>>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is >> >>>>wrong. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > So my list is all accounted for then? No. Try and keep up. >>>>>>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. >>>>>>:-) [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > JF appears so > >>>>>>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. > >>>>>>:-) [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > appears so- Popeye says yer wrong. Sort it out and get back to me willya? JF >>>>>>>>He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. >>>>>>>>:-) [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > JF Popeye can say whatever he wants - I have my own opinion - I think your list is complete JOF wrote: > I think my list was never purported to be more than one - me, and I've > definitely got all my list's members behind me. Everyone on that list is dealing from a position of ignorance. > Everyone on that list is dealing from a position of ignorance. Ignorance means you haven't been taught. Stupid means you are proud of your ignorance. To his credit, his greatest accomplishment here is that he manages to combine and embody stupid, puerile and senile. >> Everyone on that list is dealing from a position of ignorance. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > To his credit, his greatest accomplishment here is that he manages to > combine and embody stupid, puerile and senile. :-) >>> Everyone on that list is dealing from a position of ignorance. >> Ignorance means you haven't been taught. >> Stupid means you are proud of your ignorance. Perhaps. >> To his credit, his greatest accomplishment here is that he manages to >> combine and embody stupid, puerile and senile. > :-) and Futile, don't forget futile. >>>> Everyone on that list is dealing from a position of ignorance. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > and Futile, don't forget futile. Ouch. On May 13, 1:29 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > >>>> Everyone on that list is dealing from a position of ignorance. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Ouch. Do you spit? JF rec.scuba's resident pussy "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> sputtered: > Ignorance means you haven't been taught. > > Stupid means you are proud of your ignorance. And you demonstrate that with most every post you write, Scotty. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > JOF wrote: > >> I think my list was never purported to be more than one - me, and I've >> definitely got all my list's members behind me. > > Everyone on that list is dealing from a position of ignorance. :-) "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net> sputtered: > Everyone on that list is dealing from a position of ignorance. You're in no position to write about dealing from a position of ignorance, Lee. You demonstrated that you're quite the ignorant fool in being taken in by the '11-year old Montana girl kills illegal aliens' urban myth. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >> He can speak for me. I'll chime in if I think what he's saying is wrong. >> :-) > > Works for me too. Somebody will have to speak for me. I don't get any of > the posts in original form. since jof is in my black hole, popeye is doing pretty well. > On May 11, 6:21 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > That's my question. Name some names. Evidently the list will be very > very long. I'm calling your bluff, big shooter. I'm in. He speaks for me in this instance. Generally, I am in agreement with him. You'll know when I am not. I don't think that you are *quite* as much of a weasel as he does, but it's only a matter of degree. But hey, it's only entertainment, right? Signature“TAANSTAFL” ____________________________________________________________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 ____________________________________________________________________________ On May 11, 10:06 pm, dazed and confuzzed <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote: > > On May 11, 6:21 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > But hey, it's only entertainment, right? Hey. That's two. Keep 'em coming. 8) JF > On May 11, 10:06 pm, dazed and confuzzed <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > JF You asked. Signature“TAANSTAFL” ____________________________________________________________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 ____________________________________________________________________________ > You asked. Not only senile and stupid, but cant count or see past his f.cking nose. <chainsaw the usual senility> He made the accusation, now he want someone to fill in the blanks for his spineless, gutless a.s. > I'm in. He speaks for me in this instance. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > But hey, it's only entertainment, right? No mention of his "me too" cabal? Best part of all is we still have our freedoms and there isn't sh.t he and all the hoplophobes can do about it in this life, except come here make an a.s of himself and run off people who once respected him and called him friend. There are guns in the world, the Chinese and Sir Francis Bacon let that Genie out of the bottle centuries ago, and all the liberal cuntbubble whining isn't going to change that, ever. EVER. > There are guns in the world, the Chinese and Sir Francis Bacon let that > Genie out of the bottle centuries ago, and all the liberal cuntbubble > whining isn't going to change that, ever. Most of the world has evolved since those days. What's holding you guys back? JF > That's my question. Name some names. Too long to bother, in fact. > Evidently the list will be very > very long. In specific, to call you, on the subject of gun control debate, a world class wind bag, and as was given to me as the perfect description, the BLACK HOLE OF FIREARMS KNOWLEDGE, and on the matter of personal honor as has been discussed here, a simpering, scurrying coward, and as a matter of Rec.scuban credibility, lower than whaleshit, I'd say I speak for just about everybody. I was personally amazed to find how many killfiles you were in, but for the fact of comedy relief. Anyone who wishes to abstain (who isn't a Canadian saving face), feel free. > I'm calling your bluff, big shooter. I don't bluff. The list is readily apparent. You long ago lost the right to make even the slightest demand. >> And who you speak for (carl and januz)... > > Have I said I speak for them? Nobody asked. I've simply deemed it as Lord God and Ruler. They always chime in on your side. I'll gladly take mine, as you've previously assigned them, some just in the last day or two. And you get those you deserve as well. > They seem to have their own voices as > opposed to the crowd you claim to represent. Your gang, save for a [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Well - for themselves. I don't pretend to speak for them. Right- they speak for you. >Prove me > wrong. Eternally. > JF > Eternally. If someone gave a sh.t, one would say "Make your case. You brought it, make it." But, as Dylan sung; Too much of nothing Can turn a man into a liar, It can cause one man to sleep on nails And another man to eat fire. Ev'rybody's doin' somethin', I heard it in a dream, But when there's too much of nothing, It just makes a fella mean. On May 11, 10:20 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > > That's my question. Name some names. > > Too long to bother, in fact. Check. > > Evidently the list will be very > > very long. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > discussed here, a simpering, scurrying coward, and as a matter of Rec.scuban > credibility, lower than whaleshit, I'd say I speak for just about everybody. Of course you would, and the sad thing is that you probably believe everybody agrees. > I was personally amazed to find how many killfiles you were in, but for > the fact of comedy relief. Perhaps they were embarrassed at seeing you called out as a windbag so often. 8) > Anyone who wishes to abstain (who isn't a Canadian saving face), feel > free. > > > I'm calling your bluff, big shooter. > > I don't bluff. It's just hot air then. > The list is readily apparent. To whom? > You long ago lost the right to make even the slightest demand. Doesn't seem to be working out for you then, does it? > >> And who you speak for (carl and januz)... > > > Have I said I speak for them? > > Nobody asked. You said, three lines up in case you've forgotten already. > I've simply deemed it as Lord God and Ruler. Wow! I genuflect to your Monumentalness. > They always chime in on your side. Really? The bells are pretty silent right now but we should get the metoos chiming in here any time. > >Prove me > > wrong. > > Eternally. In yer dreams. I've been very busy at work, and that means dealing with adults all the time. I've missed this stuff. It's great for stress relief. Thanks for playing. JF > On May 11, 10:20 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" > <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > Of course you would, and the sad thing is that you probably believe > everybody agrees. So far... Howz it lookin to you? <snip Futile nonsense> >> That's my question. Name some names. > Too long to bother, in fact. I'll not object to being a "we" on this list. Since JOF has been in my KF for quite some time, Doug is my representative, how's that? Means may not totally agree with every single point, but he has my vote & overall support. Got it? Curtis >>> That's my question. Name some names. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Curtis Apropos of nothing whatsoever, does anyone have an ASCII thingy for a snowball rolling downhill...? How many minutes has it been? > >> That's my question. Name some names. > > Too long to bother, in fact. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Curtis Got it. Went without saying though. JF > >> That's my question. Name some names. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Curtis JOF or Popeye... Hmmm... what shall I do? <snip the lame attempt at cheap shot from the senile coward> > I'm sure you can't. > > No one else who knows them is having a problem. > > But then, you have a hard time recognizing your own posts until I remind > you. Like walking into a sheet of clean glass. > <snip the lame attempt at cheap shot from the senile coward> > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Like walking into a sheet of clean glass. Right on cue. JF >><snip the lame attempt at cheap shot from the senile coward> >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > JF but see, JOF - you walked right into it > >><snip the lame attempt at cheap shot from the senile coward> > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > but see, JOF - you walked right into it- You're great, Joe. Thanks. 8) JF >>>><snip the lame attempt at cheap shot from the senile coward> >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > JF no problemo (i am bilingual) > but see, JOF - you walked right into it He has become so desperate that he is trying to make it look like he is controlling everyone. Senility sure can be ugly. Popeye wrote >> This is getting surreal. I can no longer tell if we're reading posts >> from the real Carl, Scott, or the ersatz ones. Good job guys. You've >> successfully combined two distinct internet personae into a single >> homogeneous entity. We may never again be certain who's saying what >> about whom. Maybe you guys have been more alike than you thunk all >> along? > I'm sure you can't. > No one else who knows them is having a problem. > But then, you have a hard time recognizing your own posts until I remind > you. Futile, ain't it? Actually, no one else who knows Scott is having a problem. I'm not sure anyone knows Carl. He's not brave enough to let that happen. Lee > Popeye wrote > > I'm sure you can't. > > No one else who knows them is having a problem. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Actually, no one else who knows Scott is having a problem. I'm not sure > anyone knows Carl. He's not brave enough to let that happen. Actually, I know more than I ever wanted to about "Carl". Same with Francis. >> And hopefully Curtis.... Any luck yet with the "registration details?" >> :-) [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Curtis No sweat. If it can't be that Sunday (06/24) I'll be in KL from 06/25 - 06/29. Perhaps if Dan wants to dive with my group on one of those days, so can you/Lee etc. ____________________________________________ Regards, Arnold I haven't been near the water for a few days, but it should be pretty good. There's a tropical something up around Jacksonville that's moving out. It's been giving us offshore winds at 10 to 15 knots or more, but offshore winds don't usually pose a diving problem, seas or visibility. Perhaps OMG, Bullshark or one other locals have a more recent idea of visibility at the moment. I looked at the marine forcast, http://www.wunderground.com/MAR/AM/651.html , and it looks like the weather will be stable, even improving a bit. Lee >I haven't been near the water for a few days, but it should be pretty good. >There's a tropical something up around Jacksonville that's moving out. It's [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >I looked at the marine forcast, http://www.wunderground.com/MAR/AM/651.html >, and it looks like the weather will be stable, even improving a bit. Thanks. Looks like I'll dive WPB tomorrow and head home Saturday. > Thanks. Looks like I'll dive WPB tomorrow and head home Saturday. Great, I'm sitting here typing messages to you while you're diving in my back yard . . . well, 60 miles up the road from my back yard. Hope you had fun. Lee >> Thanks. Looks like I'll dive WPB tomorrow and head home Saturday. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Lee It was awesome. The DM was saying 50 feet of vis but that would be from the surface looking down. Horizontally, it was about 30 to 40 max. Still good diving...and a good surface interval. We saw two sea turtles getting it on, on the surface as well as flying fish at that time. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.