Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Carl Nisrael: As If:

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 25 Apr 2007 08:18 GMT
I'll be delivering in Vancouver late next week.

 Send me your phone number- we'll dine.
Carl Nisarel - 25 Apr 2007 22:02 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Fatboy\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
sputtered:

>   I'll be delivering in Vancouver late next week.

I'm not in Vancouver, Fatboy.
Scott - 25 Apr 2007 23:09 GMT
>   I'll be delivering in Vancouver late next week.

>   Send me your phone number- we'll dine.

I'll be happy to join you.

I'll bring Dinky Dave.
Scott - 26 Apr 2007 00:19 GMT
>   I'll be delivering in Vancouver late next week.
>
>   Send me your phone number- we'll dine.

http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=221
"BELLEVUE, WA - The Second Amendment Foundation today said a new report by
criminologists Prof. Don Kates of the United States and Prof. Gary Mauser of
Canada that shows the rate of firearms ownership is irrelevant to the
homicide and violent crime rate should be required reading, especially for
reporters, editorial writers and elected representatives.

Appearing in the current issue of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
(pages 649-694), the Kates/Mauser report entitled "Would Banning Firearms
Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International Evidence" is a detailed
look at gun ownership and how it does not relate to the incidence of murder
and violence. They conclude that "nations with very stringent anti-gun laws
generally have substantially higher murder rates than those which allow
guns."

"The Kates/Mauser research strips bare the claims by gun control proponents
that America is more dangerous than other countries because of our right to
keep and bear arms," said SAF founder Alan M. Gottlieb. "What these two
seasoned researchers have revealed is that some of the most violent
countries in Europe are those with the most stringent gun laws. It seems
hardly a coincidence that here in America, the highest crime rates are in
places with strict gun control policies, such as Chicago and Washington,
D.C. However, in areas here and abroad with high rates of gun ownership
violent crime rates are lower."
Carl Nisarel - 26 Apr 2007 15:50 GMT
"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> sputtered:

> a new report by
> criminologists Prof. Don Kates of the United States and Prof.
> Gary Mauser of Canada that shows the rate of firearms
> ownership is irrelevant to the homicide and violent crime rate

Tsk, tsk. Kates and Mauser are demonstrating that Lott's research
is wrong.
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 28 Apr 2007 01:10 GMT
> >   I'll be delivering in Vancouver late next week.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> D.C. However, in areas here and abroad with high rates of gun ownership
> violent crime rates are lower."

Never read anything so stupid
The full text is here
http://www.garymauser.net/pdf/KatesMauserHJPP.pdf
If you need some examples of extreme ignorance and lack of elementary
knowledge
"Poland and neighboring Slovenia have exactly the same murder rate,
though Slovenia has over triple the gun ownership per capita".

As some guys here are not very familiar with European geography - it
is a long drive from Poland to Slovenia.

Janusz
Grumman-581 - 28 Apr 2007 03:27 GMT
> As some guys here are not very familiar with European geography - it
> is a long drive from Poland to Slovenia.

Probably as long as it takes to drive across Houston during rush
hour...
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 28 Apr 2007 07:55 GMT
On 28 Kwi, 04:27, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 27 Apr 2007 17:10:18 -0700, "janus...@hotmail.com"
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Probably as long as it takes to drive across Houston during rush
> hour...

more then 7 hours? Frankly speaking -  I doubt.
Grumman-581 - 28 Apr 2007 12:41 GMT
> more then 7 hours? Frankly speaking -  I doubt.

Never underestimate how screwed up traffic can get in Houston... When
Rita came through, it probably took longer than that...
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 06:42 GMT
"janusz_w@hotmail.com" sexually excited me with:

> As some guys here are not very familiar with European geography - it
> is a long drive from Poland to Slovenia.

But how many glory holes are there along the way?  Quit playing so hard to
get, Janus.  I want your little Polish cock deep inside of me.  It reminds
me of the little boys that I meet through MySpace.
Dennis (Icarus) - 26 Apr 2007 04:56 GMT
>   I'll be delivering in Vancouver late next week.
>
>   Send me your phone number- we'll dine.

He'll run away.....again.

Dennis
Carl Nisarel - 26 Apr 2007 15:53 GMT
"Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sputtered:

> He'll run away.....again.

Since I'm not in Vancouver, Fatboy's 'invitation' is bogus.
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 26 Apr 2007 10:44 GMT
> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sputtered:
>
>> He'll run away.....again.
>
> Since I'm not in Vancouver, Fatboy's 'invitation' is bogus.

 Well, where are you?
Carl Nisarel - 26 Apr 2007 22:25 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
sputtered:

>   Well, where are you?

Not in Vancouver, dimwit.

Have you figured out that you can't drive to Newfoundland on a
bridge yet?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 27 Apr 2007 03:08 GMT
> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Have you figured out that you can't drive to Newfoundland on a
> bridge yet?

 In fact, you can, but aside from your quickly changing the point, why are
you afraid to tell me where you are?

 Since you're still terrified of your own shadow, back in the hole with
you.
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 16:27 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:

>> Have you figured out that you can't drive to Newfoundland on
>> a bridge yet?
>
>   In fact, you can,

You still think there's a bridge to Newfoundland?

<snicker>
chilly - 27 Apr 2007 16:47 GMT
> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> You still think there's a bridge to Newfoundland?

I suspect that he was referring the causeway from the New World Island and
not from the mainland.
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 16:18 GMT
"chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> sputtered:

> "Carl Nisarel" <hostlbuddha@postmaster.uk.co> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I suspect that he was referring the causeway from the New
> World Island and not from the mainland.

Nope.

Newsgroups: misc.transport.trucking
From: "Douglas W \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...
@finalprotectivefire.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:05:57 -0500
Subject: Re: Any (Eastern) Canadians here besides Dave Smith?

> Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick wrote:
>>   How does one get a T/T to Newfoundland?

> you drive it to Nova Scotia
> then use an invention called a "ferry."

> the ferry company has a website if you know how to use Google.

 There is a land route, as well.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 22:28 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

> Newsgroups: misc.transport.trucking
> From: "Douglas W \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Pop...
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>   There is a land route, as well.

oh goodie, an internet stalker on top of all the other wonderful things you
encompass
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 16:29 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
sputtered:

> why are you afraid to tell me where you are?

Why are you afraid to identify the company you work for, Fatboy?
Scott - 27 Apr 2007 16:58 GMT
> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
> sputtered:
>
> > why are you afraid to tell me where you are?
>
> Why are you afraid to identify the company you work for, Fatboy?

He isnt, cocksucker.

We all know who he is and where he lives.

Why are you afraid to tell him where you live? <rhetorical>

Is it because you are a miserable little excuse for a shadow of a man? The
internet gives you the ability to be the bully you could never be in real
life.

He has you shaking like a dog sh.tting peach pits.

Back in the hole with you, you miserable piece of sh.t.
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 16:14 GMT
Rec.scuba's resident pussy "Scott Koplin"
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> whined:

> "Carl Nisarel" <hostlbuddha@postmaster.uk.co> wrote in message

>> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
>> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> He isnt,...

Really? Produce the post where he's identified his current
trucking company.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 17:13 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

> Really? Produce the post where he's identified his current
> trucking company.

i know who he works for, so do most of the people here

why do you want to know
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 16:28 GMT
Scott Koplin posted:

> Path:nntp.whidbeytel.com!news.whidbeytel.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:13:57 -0500
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to
> process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.34

Scotty just violated his AUP.

tsk, tsk.

Scotty's going to get TOSssed

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 17:25 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

go ahead with that carl

no isp admin on earth would entertain a complaint from the likes of you
except for a laugh
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 16:45 GMT
Scott Koplin whined:

> no isp admin on earth would entertain a complaint

You'll find out soon enough, Scotty.

Repeated, clear violations of terms and conditions is something
that ISP admins pay attention to. Especially when that person is
making threats that cross national borders.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 17:46 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

> Repeated, clear violations of terms and conditions is something
> that ISP admins pay attention to. Especially when that person is
> making threats that cross national borders.

better check your headers again carl before you make a bogus complaint

no isp admin will take a complaint from the likes of a troll of your
caliber for anything but a joke

you are your own worst enemy bseides being a coward you can dish it out but
cant take it

i assume you have some form of proof of threats by someone
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 17:58 GMT
rec.scuba's resident pussy Scotty whined

> better check your headers again

You're not that smart, pussy. You posted several from your
whidbey.com account.

tsk, tsk, TOS

NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:13:57 -0500
Newsgroups: rec.scuba
Subject: Re: Fatboy: As If:
From: Carl Nisarel <hostlbuddha@postmaster.uk.co>
Message-ID: <Xns991F5E6B770C8hostlbuddhapostmaste@216.196.97.142>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:13:58 -0500
Lines: 10
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.184.143.11
X-Complaints-To: abuse@whidbey.com
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 18:00 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

> tsk, tsk, TOS

runa long and tattle little girl
Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 06:15 GMT
Carlita, the closet queen, wrote in
news:Xns991F7D9EDD2B6hostlbuddhapostmaste@66.150.105.47:

> Scotty just violated his AUP.
>
> tsk, tsk.
>
> Scotty's going to get TOSssed

Dream about it, faggot.  It must be difficult to live a life such as yours
where you are scared of your own shadow.  If you were'nt such a cowardly
troll, someone might have pity for you.  Even the other Canadians won't
defend someone as useless as you are.  I don't see how you can put up with
even continuing to exist.  Surely you should take a hockey stick and commit
suicide with it.  It would probably be a loose fit, but you could try
impaling yourself upon it.
Scott - 26 Apr 2007 23:09 GMT
>   Well, where are you?

In his momma's basement corralling the guppies...
Bryan Heit - 27 Apr 2007 13:54 GMT
>> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sputtered:
>>
>>> He'll run away.....again.
>> Since I'm not in Vancouver, Fatboy's 'invitation' is bogus.
>
>   Well, where are you?

I thought he was in toronto.

Bryan
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 27 Apr 2007 06:45 GMT
>>> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sputtered:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Bryan

 He's too scared to say where he is.

 He always will be.

 He's the 21st Century Poster Child for Retroactive Abortion.
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 18:06 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:

>   He's too scared to say where he is.

So when are you going to identify the company you work for,
Fatboy?

Not that it really matters, Canada Customs gives you a very
thorough check every time you enter the country.

It was really stupid of you to admit that you kept a firearm
hidden in your truck.

Just like it was really stupid of Mike Shelley to falsely claim
that he brought a restricted handgun to Toronto with him.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 27 Apr 2007 12:27 GMT
> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> So when are you going to identify the company you work for,
> Fatboy?

 Right after we have lunch.

> Not that it really matters, Canada Customs gives you a very
> thorough check every time you enter the country.

 No they don't.

 You must f.cking be on crack.

 Most times, they don't even ask for identification.

 They seem to be more concerned with how much Beechnut I have in the truck.

 I've been in and out a dozen times now (with my -extensive- criminal
record, to PEI yesterday,), past those unarmed border guards you repeatedly
said I was terrified of.

> It was really stupid of you to admit that you kept a firearm
> hidden in your truck.

 It was an example of explanation.

> Just like it was really stupid of Mike Shelley to falsely claim
> that he brought a restricted handgun to Toronto with him.

 As opposed to an unrestricted one?

 What a douchebag you are.

 Have you met that other douchebag "user"?

 He's terrified of his own shadow, too, just like you.
Grumman-581 - 28 Apr 2007 03:25 GMT
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:27:44 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:
>   As opposed to an unrestricted one?

He's just pissed that their system is so 'secure' that it only takes a
simple fee and some paperwork for someone to bring a gun into his
little fuckin' frozen sandbox... Of course, he didn't have the balls
to do a meet-n-greet... Hell, even John didn't have a problem with
*that*... <grin>
Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:48 GMT
Mike Shelley aka Grumman-581 <grumman581@gmail.com> sputtered:

> He's just pissed that their system is so 'secure' that it only
> takes a simple fee and some paperwork for someone to bring a
> gun into his little fuckin' frozen sandbox...

It takes far more than that, Mikey.

So why did you lie about bringing your handgun to Toronto?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:58 GMT
Mike Shelley Grumman-581 <grumman581@gmail.com> sputtered:

> Of course, he didn't have the balls
> to do a meet-n-greet...

Since you were hiding beneath your wife's skirts, you wouldn't
know, Mikey. You claimed to be at a hotel that had no record of
you being there.

Now, just why did you lie about bringing your handgun to
Toronto?

As usual, you'll scurry away from and pretend not to see.

You're just another rec.scuba pussy (tm)

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Nunya - 28 Apr 2007 19:40 GMT
carl the consumate canadian coward wrote

> Since you were hiding beneath your wife's skirts, you wouldn't
> know, Mikey. You claimed to be at a hotel that had no record of
> you being there.

stalking huh? another fine quality you espouse

> Now, just why did you lie about bringing your handgun to
> Toronto?
>
> As usual, you'll scurry away from and pretend not to see.
>
> You're just another rec.scuba pussy (tm)

anytime you want to id yourself people will be happy to answer any
question you have

in fact i am sure you would have lots of new friends
Grumman-581 - 28 Apr 2007 23:53 GMT
> carl the consumate canadian coward wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> stalking huh? another fine quality you espouse

Is that little cowardly f.ck still hung up over whether I was in
Canada?  Obviously it was a scam that JOF and I cooked up just to f.ck
with his little mind...

> > Now, just why did you lie about bringing your handgun to
> > Toronto?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> in fact i am sure you would have lots of new friends

Agreed, but his problem is that he's spent way to many years in his
mother's closet sniffing her soiled underware... Probably starting to
get nylon burns on his nose by now... I would offer to show him how
easy it is to get a handgun into Canada, but he wouldn't show up
again...
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 03:48 GMT
> Agreed, but his problem is that he's spent way to many years in his
> mother's closet sniffing her soiled underware... Probably starting to
> get nylon burns on his nose by now... I would offer to show him how
> easy it is to get a handgun into Canada, but he wouldn't show up
> again...

it wanst my mommas underwear!

being a child molester is difficult, especially in an armed camp like
America
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:19 GMT
Grumman-581 <grumman581@gmail.com> sputtered:

> Is that little cowardly f.ck still hung up over whether I was in
> Canada?

I know you were in Canada, Mikey.

You're still pissed at getting smacked around by the Canada border
Agency for lying about bringing a handgun into Canada.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:20 GMT
Mike Shelley Grumman-581 <grumman581@gmail.com> sputtered:

>  I would offer to show him how
> easy it is to get a handgun into Canada,

You'll just lie about it like you did last time, Mikey.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:40 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
sputtered:

>> Just like it was really stupid of Mike Shelley to falsely claim
>> that he brought a restricted handgun to Toronto with him.
>
>   As opposed to an unrestricted one?

Mikey didn't have any gun with him but he claimed to have brought a
handgun with him that is classified as restricted.

He got spanked by the Canadian Border Agency on his way out.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:45 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Fatboy\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
sputtered:

>> Not that it really matters, Canada Customs gives you a very
>> thorough check every time you enter the country.
>
>   No they don't.

"they can X-ray the entire vehicle, as mine was at Pembina"

Douglas 'Fatboy' Frederick

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 28 Apr 2007 14:24 GMT
> "Douglas W. \"Fatboy\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Douglas 'Fatboy' Frederick

 Which has what to do with checking the individual driving the vehicle?

  "Canada Customs gives you a very thorough check every time you enter the
country."

 Carl 'cowering in the dark' Nisarel
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:14 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Fatboy\" Frederick"
<Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:

>> "they can X-ray the entire vehicle, as mine was at Pembina"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>    "Canada Customs gives you a very thorough check every time
>    you enter the country."

Hide your gun in the truck next time and find out, Fatboy.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 17:01 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:

>   I've been in and out a dozen times now (with my -extensive-
>   criminal record, to PEI yesterday,)

Have you informed the border guards that you have an extensive
criminal record, Fatboy?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 28 Apr 2007 14:18 GMT
> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Have you informed the border guards that you have an extensive
> criminal record, Fatboy?

 Yes, in fact.

 They don't give a damn.
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 03:47 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

>> "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
>> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>   They don't give a damn.

They also dont care if I am a child molester, so I get your point
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:31 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
sputtered:

>> Have you informed the border guards that you have an extensive
>> criminal record, Fatboy?
>
>   Yes, in fact.

IOW, you don't have an "extensive criminal record" and haven't been
convicted of any felonies.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 06:28 GMT
Carl the Coward wrote:

> Have you informed the border guards that you have an extensive
> criminal record, Fatboy?

Does your mother know that you visit elementary schools and create glory
holes in their bathrooms?
Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 17:05 GMT
"Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>
sputtered:

>> It was really stupid of you to admit that you kept a firearm
>> hidden in your truck.
>
>   It was an example of explanation.

Nope.

"How do you think I drive around the country with one in the
truck?"

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 16:31 GMT
Bryan Heit <bjheit@NOSPAMucalgary.ca> sputtered:

> I thought he was in toronto.

Not at the moment.
Scott - 27 Apr 2007 16:56 GMT
> Bryan Heit <bjheit@NOSPAMucalgary.ca> sputtered:
>
> > I thought he was in toronto.
>
> Not at the moment.

No matter where you are you define cowardice.

194.177.96.26

Hopping through Italy now days, eh?
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 16:19 GMT
rec.scuba's resident pussy "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com>
sputtered:

> "Carl Nisarel" <hostlbuddha@postmaster.uk.co> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> No matter where you are you

bitchslap you silly.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 18:10 GMT
"Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sputtered:

> He'll run away.....again.

Hey Dennis, I'm going to be in Amsterdam in a little while.

Send me your phone number and we'll meet.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 22:04 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sputtered:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Send me your phone number and we'll meet.

i am going to be at your mommas house shaving her back
-hh - 27 Apr 2007 22:41 GMT
> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> sputtered:
>
> > He'll run away.....again.
>
> Hey Dennis, I'm going to be in Amsterdam in a little while.

So will I.

> Send me your phone number and we'll meet.

email your cell# to bb@huntzinger.com

Meet you by the cheese stand.

And I have a camera with me to take a snap to add you to the strokes
page.

-hh
Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 22:19 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

> Meet you by the cheese stand.

"The" cheese stand?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 27 Apr 2007 23:35 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

> "The" cheese stand?

yeah, the one right next to the brothel you frequent for child prostitutes

not real bright are you?
-hh - 28 Apr 2007 03:48 GMT
> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
>
> > Meet you by the cheese stand.
>
> "The" cheese stand?

Yes, inside the central room at Ansterdam airport.

If you're walking towards Gate concourse G, its on the left (front of
terminal) side.  Ain't ya never been through AMS before?

-hh
Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:49 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

>  Ain't ya never been through AMS before?

I don't fly into Amsterdam.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Nunya - 28 Apr 2007 19:41 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

> I don't fly into Amsterdam.

you dont fly anywhwere

you just jack off in your mommas basement
Dennis (Icarus) - 28 Apr 2007 00:06 GMT
> > "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> sputtered:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> So will I.

Good. Would like to meet you, Hugh, but I'm nowhere near Amsterdam
(Netherlands, I presume), being in Alabama.

> > Send me your phone number and we'll meet.
>
> email your cell# to bb@huntzinger.com

Good luck with that.

> Meet you by the cheese stand.
>
> And I have a camera with me to take a snap to add you to the strokes
> page.

Dennis
-hh - 28 Apr 2007 11:56 GMT
> > Carl Nisarel <hostlbud...@postmaster.uk.co> wrote:
> > > "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Good. Would like to meet you, Hugh, but I'm nowhere near Amsterdam
> (Netherlands, I presume), being in Alabama.

Well, at least it begins with an "A" :-)

> > > Send me your phone number and we'll meet.
> >
> > email your cell# to bb@huntzinger.com
>
> Good luck with that.

A no-show.  Not any surprise from a loud mouthe yellow belly fish.

> > Meet you by the cheese stand.

It is right outside of the passage to G; there's now two painted cows
next to the booth - hard to miss.

Couldn't get my CO boarding pass in Oslo airport (Norway) this
morning, so I had to dash all the way out to T3 desk, next to G3; I
just made the 1 hour cut-off.

Grabbed 881g of the always good 'Old Amsterdam' for 12,33 before
dashing for 2nd security check. Just enough time now before boarding
to provide a timely confirmation of Carl wussing out...afterall, since
I'm inside of airport security, I shouldn't be armed, *right*?  :-)

-hh
Dennis (Icarus) - 28 Apr 2007 15:47 GMT
<snip>

> A no-show.  Not any surprise from a loud mouthe yellow belly fish.

So now he fled from you, as well as Scott, Popeye, and Grumman.

> > > Meet you by the cheese stand.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> to provide a timely confirmation of Carl wussing out...afterall, since
> I'm inside of airport security, I shouldn't be armed, *right*?  :-)

:-) Remember he's so terrified of those in the US that he fled the country.

Dennis
Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:54 GMT
"Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sputtered:

> as well as Scott, Popeye, and Grumman.

Dennis, when are you going to show up?

You scurried from my invitation.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:52 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

> Just enough time now

to demonstrate that you're a clueless fuckwit.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:55 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

> Just enough time now before boarding
> to provide a timely confirmation of Carl

I didn't say I was in Amsterdam, I wrote I was going to be there,
fuckwit.

sheesh, you scuba divers can't read for sh.t.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

-hh - 28 Apr 2007 23:14 GMT
> I didn't say I was in Amsterdam, I wrote I was going to be there,
> fuckwit.

And my response was also future tense ("So will I")

> sheesh, you scuba divers can't read for sh.t.

Amazing how cowardly trolls always claim to get tripped up over little
mouse turds.

Bottom line was that I was indeed where I said I would be...

<http://www.huntzinger.com/dive/4-28-07.jpg>

...and you never even tried to make contact to coordinate meeting
times.

In hindsight, the museum probably would have been a better landmark to
meet; I had forgotten about it.  In any event, for this trip, my
connection was too tight to really do anything in the airport other
than to jog from B to G in 25 minutes.

-hh
Grumman-581 - 28 Apr 2007 23:46 GMT
> In hindsight, the museum probably would have been a better landmark to
> meet; I had forgotten about it.

Nawh, he would have chickened out on that one just like he did when I
was at the Toronto museum and offered to meet him...
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 03:45 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

>> In hindsight, the museum probably would have been a better landmark to
>> meet; I had forgotten about it.
>
> Nawh, he would have chickened out on that one just like he did when I
> was at the Toronto museum and offered to meet him...

I couldnt meet with you, because I know you would reject my homosexual
advances

Besides, you know I like little boys
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:18 GMT
Grumman-581 <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> sputtered:

> Nawh, he would have chickened out on that one just like he did
> when I was at the Toronto museum and offered to meet him...

Since you were hiding under your wife's skirts, Mikey, there was no
indication that you were actually there.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:15 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

>> I didn't say I was in Amsterdam, I wrote I was going to be
>> there, fuckwit.
>
> And my response was also future tense ("So will I")

Did I say I was going to be there yesterday?

It's amazing how you fuckwits can't read.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

-hh - 29 Apr 2007 23:50 GMT
> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Did I say I was going to be there yesterday?

You did say "soon".

If you had bothered to email me offline as requested to coordinate
specifics, you would have found this all out *before* I got there.

But you didn't.

And now you want to try to somehow claim that its my fault.

> It's amazing how you fuckwits can't read.

Its amazing how many lame-a.s excuses you'll spin...

...just to *try* to cover-up your own pitiful shortcomings.

You blew this one, so why should I even bother to give you another
chance?

-hh
Carl Nisarel - 30 Apr 2007 00:16 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sexually excited me with the
following:

> You blew this one, so why should I even bother to give you another
> chance?

because i will lick your a.s if you let me blow you again?  oh howard, you
ruffian you!

--
Carl "Cumbucket" Niseral
Carl Nisarel - 30 Apr 2007 13:46 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

>> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> You did say "soon".

No, fuckwit, I wrote "in a little while."

...

>> It's amazing how you fuckwits can't read.
>
> Its amazing

Nah, it's not amazing. You and your buddies consistently
demonstrate your inability to read for comprehension.

It's hilarious that you lack the integrity to apply your
thinking to your buddies.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

-hh - 30 Apr 2007 23:18 GMT
> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
> >> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> No, fuckwit, I wrote "in a little while."

Like that makes a huge difference....not.

You still bailed, because you've still not bothered to make contact
for coordination.

And based on my current schedul, I can now say that I'll be in
Amsterdam "in a little while" again too.

YMMV on if I mean a few days or a few months, ala the Nistral
Mouthdancing Style.

> It's hilarious that you lack the integrity to apply your
> thinking to your buddies.

Its pitiful that you've whined about such things when the facts are
that you've  missed instances where you've been proven wrong on that
particular claim.

Yeah, you'll probably bitch that I've been selective or something, but
the same also applies to you too:  most of the time, your antics are
simply beneath my notice.

Bye-bye Carlie.  Until next time...maybe.

-hh
Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 15:18 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

>> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
>> >> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Like that makes a huge difference....not.

Douggy seems to think so.

> You still bailed,

I wasn't there when you were.

Just like Dennis wasn't there when I was.

It's hilarious to watch you demonstrate that your scuba buddies
are morons.


> And based on my current schedul, I can now say that I'll be in
> Amsterdam "in a little while" again too.

Post your schedule for the next month, I'll see if there's any
overlap.

>> It's hilarious that you lack the integrity to apply your
>> thinking to your buddies.
>
> Its pitiful that you've whined about such things when the
> facts are that you've  missed instances where you've been
> proven wrong on that particular claim.

<snicker>

You're really fuckin' deluded.

Run away, old man.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

-hh - 01 May 2007 19:08 GMT
> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
> > You still bailed,
>
> I wasn't there when you were.

Which we would have known, if only you had even tried to contact me in
advance as was requested.

> Post your schedule for the next month, I'll see if there's any
> overlap.

We all already know why you didn't volunteer your information first.

Insofar as my schedule for May, I don't know what it will be.  A few
people here know the reason why; I will not elaborate at this time.
About the only time that I'll know for sure where I'm likely to be is
when I'm too close to being homeward-bound to change that part of the
itinerary, which is exactly what happened last week.  For all other
instances, my plans are entirely subject to preemption.

-hh
Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 18:34 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

> Insofar as my schedule for May, I don't know what it will be.
> A few people here know the reason why; I will not elaborate at
> this time.

Huntzinger is in full-fledged scurry mode now.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 18:35 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

>> I wasn't there when you were.
>
> Which we would have known,

I stated it in this newsgroup.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 18:54 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

>  A few people here know the reason why;
> I will not elaborate at this time.

CC CEP

Keeping the crowds away from Cheney, eh?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

-hh - 01 May 2007 19:57 GMT
> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Keeping the crowds away from Cheney, eh?

No, this preemption has nothing to do with work.

-hh
Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 19:10 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

>> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> No, this preemption has nothing to do with work.

Ah, you're just making a buck teaching repressive governments
how to keep back the hordes.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 21:26 GMT
>> -hh <recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

> No, this preemption has nothing to do with work.

So what is the problem?

Why dont you want to work me?
Lee Bell - 01 May 2007 19:38 GMT
> For all other instances, my plans are entirely subject to preemption.

Occupational hazard for those of us with an occupation.  Happened to me
today.  Best laid plans for 3:30 went awry.
Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 18:55 GMT
"Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net> sputtered:

> Occupational hazard for those of us with an occupation.

What are you going to do once Bush is out of office, Lee?

Still planning on escaping to Bermuda?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 21:24 GMT
> "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net> sputtered:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Still planning on escaping to Bermuda?

Sorry Lee.

I have this thing for people with jobs and a sense of common decency.

What we really need is a child molester like Bill Clinton back in office.

With a little luck, I can get him to stick a cigar in my......
Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 21:21 GMT
Carl Nisarel removed a little boy's dick from his mouth long enough to
say:

> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
> Run away, old man.

It's tough being a pedophile in Canada - all the little boy dicks are
frozen.
Carl Nisarel - 01 May 2007 21:21 GMT
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

> No, fuckwit, I wrote "in a little while."
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> It's hilarious that you lack the integrity to apply your
> thinking to your buddies.

I am sorry Hugh.

It's just so difficult to be a frustrated child molester that I sometimes
take my anger out on innocent, decent people.

I have to go sniff some of mommas panties.
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:16 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

> Bottom line was that I was indeed where I said I would be...

Just like Scotty wasn't at the Peach Arch last May when I was.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Scott - 28 Apr 2007 17:46 GMT
> A no-show.  Not any surprise from a loud mouthe yellow belly fish.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> to provide a timely confirmation of Carl wussing out...afterall, since
> I'm inside of airport security, I shouldn't be armed, *right*?  :-)

Just wanted to copy this so everyone can see it again.
Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 17:08 GMT
rec.scuba's resident pussy "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com>
sputtered:

> Just wanted to copy this so everyone can see it again.

You want to show that Huntzinger was stupid enough to think that
I said I was in Amsterdam right then?

Do you know the difference between "now" and "in a little
while"?

You're such a fuckwit, Scotty.

It's really hilarious to watch your pathetic posts using my name
and email address.

You still can't handle your anger at being bitchslapped last May
when you scurried away from meeting me at the Peace Arch.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 20:03 GMT
Carl the Coward wrote:

> Do you know the difference between "now" and "in a little
> while"?

Trying to scurry a bit on that one, aren't you?  Such a fuckin loser.

> You're such a fuckwit, Scotty.

From a fuckin-dimwit, that is probably a complement.

> It's really hilarious to watch your pathetic posts using my name
> and email address.

It must be really bad living as you do, afraid of your own shadow.  Let's
see, how many rec.scuba members have you failed to meet so far?  You never
were at the Peace Arch, punk.  Your momma wouldn't let you out of her
closet that day.

> You still can't handle your anger at being bitchslapped last May
> when you scurried away from meeting me at the Peace Arch.

But you weren't there, so how would you know?
Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 20:39 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

> Carl the Coward wrote:

> But you weren't there, so how would you know?

yes I was

I was in full drag giving blow jobs to veterans

my little way of thanking those who sacrifice for my freedom and give me
the ability to be the cowardly little creep that I am
Carl Nisarel - 28 Apr 2007 16:43 GMT
"Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> sputtered:

> Good. Would like to meet you, Hugh, but I'm nowhere near
> Amsterdam (Netherlands, I presume), being in Alabama.

Dennis is scurrying away from my invitation.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

-hh - 28 Apr 2007 23:23 GMT
> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> sputtered:
>
> > Good. Would like to meet you, Hugh, but I'm nowhere near
> > Amsterdam (Netherlands, I presume), being in Alabama.
>
> Dennis is scurrying away from my invitation.

Hardly.   If its that important to you, simply offer to buy Dennis his
airline ticket ... or rather in your case Carl, offer to use your
Mom's credit card to buy him the ticket.  :-)

-hh
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 03:46 GMT
carl mumbled with a dick in his mouth

>> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> sputtered:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> airline ticket ... or rather in your case Carl, offer to use your
> Mom's credit card to buy him the ticket.  :-)

Well, the only reason I left America for Canada is because I got busted for
being a child molester.

The boys father threatened to stick a .45 up my a.s and pull the trigger
until it went click, so you can understand why I hate men with guns.
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 05:04 GMT
Carl the Coward wrote:

> Well, the only reason I left America for Canada is because I got
> busted for being a child molester.
>
> The boys father threatened to stick a .45 up my a.s and pull the
> trigger until it went click, so you can understand why I hate men with
> guns.

The real reason was that the father wouldn't use a batom up my a.s first.  
I hate it when you rough macho men won't use a bit of foreplay.  Greggie
wouldn't do that to me!  He would lube me up with creme cheese first and
then make me take his big jew boy man rod after sticking the baton so far
up my a.s that I screamed in pleasure.

Oh Greggie, I miss you so much.  Quit playing hard to get!
Greg Mossman - 29 Apr 2007 05:13 GMT
> Carl the Coward wrote:
> > Well, the only reason I left America for Canada is because I got
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Oh Greggie, I miss you so much.  Quit playing hard to get!

This sounds a lot like those Chuukese rejects.  Or someone just as
retarded.  The spelling is better, so it might suggest one of my more
"educated" gun nut friends.  Who knows?
Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:26 GMT
Greg Mossman <mossman@qnet.com> sputtered:

Scott Koplin wrote:
>> Oh Greggie, I miss you so much.  Quit playing hard to get!
>
> This sounds a lot like those Chuukese rejects.

It's Scotty. He's become so obsessed with me that he's posting
under my email name, as well as other sockpuppet names.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 29 Apr 2007 15:17 GMT
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> sputtered:

>> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid> sputtered:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Hardly.  

It's no different than Fatboy's invitation.

I'm nowhere near Vancouver.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.