> Not many, but perhaps, psychologically, it might seem that way. Not for me
> since I'm up way before dawn anyway. Psychologically better for me to have
> the light in the morning than the afternoon.... I hate driving in the dark in the
> morning.
>> Not many, but perhaps, psychologically, it might seem that way. Not for me
>> since I'm up way before dawn anyway. Psychologically better for me to have
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>time as you are probably used to and still don't waste any daylight
>sleeping.
That would truly screw me up! I (and my body) would much rather adapt (if only
temporarily) to the local time wherever I find myself. I need a solid "dawn/dusk" etc.
to keep straight psychologically. I've been to Anchorage AK twice on/about the summer
solstice, and that was totally disorienting. I can imagine how those folks go buggy during
the winter (when there's no light except for 1-2 hrs a day) and why there are more
shrinks per capita in Anchorage than anywhere else in the USA.
____________________________________________
Regards,
Arnold
bracuk@axxent.ca - 11 Mar 2007 19:16 GMT
> That would truly screw me up! I (and my body) would much rather adapt (if only
> temporarily) to the local time wherever I find myself. I need a solid "dawn/dusk" etc.
> to keep straight psychologically. I've been to Anchorage AK twice on/about the summer
> solstice, and that was totally disorienting. I can imagine how those folks go buggy during
> the winter (when there's no light except for 1-2 hrs a day) and why there are more
> shrinks per capita in Anchorage than anywhere else in the USA.
But boat time is local time. Local to the boat, which is your home
for the week.
mag3 - 11 Mar 2007 19:33 GMT
>> That would truly screw me up! I (and my body) would much rather adapt (if only
>> temporarily) to the local time wherever I find myself. I need a solid "dawn/dusk" etc.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>But boat time is local time. Local to the boat, which is your home
>for the week.
Ah, OK. I thought so at first, but I wondered why they'd ask you to do that seems so
obvious and natural to do in the first place. I couldn't imagine that there are people that
still *don't* do that and need to be asked to do so.
____________________________________________
Regards,
Arnold
mag3 - 11 Mar 2007 19:40 GMT
>>> That would truly screw me up! I (and my body) would much rather adapt (if only
>>> temporarily) to the local time wherever I find myself. I need a solid "dawn/dusk" etc.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>But boat time is local time. Local to the boat, which is your home
>>for the week.
What confused me is when you said:
"you have your meals at the same clock time as you are probably used to"
By "probably used to," I thought you meant the "original" time not the new "local"
time.
____________________________________________
Regards,
Arnold
Lee Bell - 11 Mar 2007 22:41 GMT
>>On some liveaboards, they ask you to switch your watch to boat
>>standard time. The idea is that you have your meals at the same clock
>>time as you are probably used to and still don't waste any daylight
>>sleeping.
> That would truly screw me up! I (and my body) would much rather adapt (if
> only
> temporarily) to the local time wherever I find myself.
Boat standard time is the local time where you find yourself when you're on
a liveaboard.
Lee
mag3 - 12 Mar 2007 00:32 GMT
>>>On some liveaboards, they ask you to switch your watch to boat
>>>standard time. The idea is that you have your meals at the same clock
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Lee
I had thought so at first, but when Dan said "Have your meals at the same clock time as
you are 'probably used to'", it was the phrase "probably used to" that made me think
"original time before traveling" as opposed to "local time at the destination."
Looking at it again, what Dan said makes perfect sense now.
____________________________________________
Regards,
Arnold