Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Dive Rite Transpac II--opinions?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Danlw - 09 Mar 2007 02:36 GMT
Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He has a
Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I would like an
opinion--from someone that has used one, or at least been diving with
someone that does.  Seems to
me it is essentially a "soft" back plate and wing with a decent harness. I
use a back inflate BC now, since in a weak moment I sold my backplate and
this looks like a good compromise that would travel well too.

Thanks, Dan
Lee Bell - 09 Mar 2007 02:56 GMT
> Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He has
> a Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> backplate and this looks like a good compromise that would travel well
> too.

I think you're impression is pretty much on target.  If I didn't dive a
metal plate and wing, I'd probably be diving a Transpac.

Lee
Danlw - 09 Mar 2007 04:39 GMT
>> Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He has
>> a Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Lee

Thanks for reply Lee.  I do like the metal plate, but mine was
6#s and did not travel well.  Dan
El Stroko Guapo - 09 Mar 2007 04:47 GMT
> Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He has a
> Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I would like an
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Thanks, Dan

The Transpac is OK. The bladder does not fit the shell, however, and if
you are hard on gear the bladder cracks at the creases. It's fairly easy
to patch, though. I'm on my second one, it seems to be holding up better
stored full of air and hung inside the house.

esg
Danlw - 09 Mar 2007 05:00 GMT
>> Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He has
>> a Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I would like an
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> esg

Do you think that would be true of any wing with bungee hold downs?  I know
they keep you more streamlined, but I can see where they would cause a
crease.

Dan
El Stroko Guapo - 09 Mar 2007 14:32 GMT
>>>Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He has
>>>a Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I would like an
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Dan

The transpac does not use bungees. The nylon cover is too small for the
plastic bladder causing creases in the bladder.

esg
TonyP - 10 Mar 2007 23:54 GMT
>> Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He
>> has a Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I would like an
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> to patch, though. I'm on my second one, it seems to be holding up better
> stored full of air and hung inside the house.

Mike, what did you use on the bladder to seal it and how?
El Stroko Guapo - 11 Mar 2007 18:51 GMT
better stored full of air and hung inside the house.

> Mike, what did you use on the bladder to seal it and how?

Rough up the area of the leak with crocus cloth/fine sandpaper, get all
the shine/oxidized plastic off. Wipe area clean with alcohol.

Cut a round-edged patch from a thin wetsuit or, better, the back of a
glove, smaller than the roughed up area but 1/2 - 3/4 " larger than the
leak.

Get the area of the leak laid flat, I use a short piece of 2X4 as an
"anvil".

Smear liberal amounts of dive glue or Loctite Stick 'n Seal (remember to
let it warm to room temperature, assuming ya keep it in the freezer)over
both the patch and the roughed up area, larger than the patch. Don't
force any glue through the puncture! Place a sheet of wax paper over the
patch and hold with a soft weight or another piece of wood with a hard
weight. Let cook over night. Remove the wax paper and run a bead of glue
around the edge of the patch so it looks like a weld. Let dry well,
inflate, and stuff the bladder back into the sack.

esg
TonyP - 11 Mar 2007 19:34 GMT
> better stored full of air and hung inside the house.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> esg

Thanks... printed out for future reference.
John Cassara - 10 Mar 2007 13:03 GMT
> Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He has
> a Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I would like an
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Thanks, Dan

I find it interesting that you ask this question having had experience with
a plate and harness and you call the Transpac " a good compromise". Sounds
like
you already have an opinion.

I like my plate and never looked back when switching from a transpac like
BC, the Aqualung Patriot.
John
Danlw - 10 Mar 2007 17:29 GMT
>> Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He has
>> a Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I would like an
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> BC, the Aqualung Patriot.
> John

Well,  I started diving with a J-valve and a back plate with no integrated
wing, went to a regular jacket style BC, then to a heavy back plate with
wing.  Since that didn't travel well, I went to a back-inflate BC.  I call
the Trans-pac a compromise (for me) that would allow travel with what I
think would be a fairly stable set-up for use with a drysuit, but OK for
travel as well.  Since I usually use a 120 steel single, It looks to me like
it can handle that pretty well.  I asked because I have not dived one, and
am still forming an opinion though my first reaction  was that it would do
what I wanted. Dan
John Cassara - 10 Mar 2007 18:37 GMT
>>> Have an acquaintance that has to give up diving--medical reasons.  He
>>> has a Dive Rite Transpac II that I like the looks of.  I would like an
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> one, and am still forming an opinion though my first reaction  was that it
> would do what I wanted. Dan

I gave up on my Patriot because I felt it was not stable enough for the lp
120's I was diving. I went to diving twin 120's and it definably fell short
on stability. I would suggest a poly plate in the bc if your diving large
tanks or doubles. As a side not the twin 120 lp were more than a handful for
my skinny body and I have shifted to twin 95's and 98's on a generic plate.
John
Art Greenberg - 10 Mar 2007 21:04 GMT
>  Well,  I started diving with a J-valve and a back plate with no
>  integrated wing, went to a regular jacket style BC, then to a heavy
>  back plate with wing.  Since that didn't travel well, I went to a
>  back-inflate BC.

My wife & I use "heavy" (6 pound) SS backplates, and we have never had
any problems traveling with them. That's on top of photo and video gear,
and to places as far away as PNG and Australia.

Signature

Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse dot net

Al Wells - 10 Mar 2007 21:46 GMT
> My wife & I use "heavy" (6 pound) SS backplates, and we have never had
> any problems traveling with them. That's on top of photo and video gear,
> and to places as far away as PNG and Australia.

The weight restrictions have gotten a bit more challenging, but so far
we have not had a problem with our stainless plates and jet fins. We did
change to NiMh batteries from our old 14 AH lead acid packs. If it
becomes a problem, we'll just take our aluminum plates instead and wear
weightbelts if we must.
Brad - 12 Mar 2007 06:20 GMT
>>  Well,  I started diving with a J-valve and a back plate with no
>>  integrated wing, went to a regular jacket style BC, then to a heavy
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> any problems traveling with them. That's on top of photo and video gear,
> and to places as far away as PNG and Australia.

Cool, where did you dive here?
Madang is good but the diving around Lae is not bad if you like war wrecks,
and unexploded bombs. One just uncovered it's self last weekend about 1/4
mile from the house I was at Salamoa just off the beach, the locals are
keeping clear this time. Here they take out the explosives and use that for
fishing. Last time 5 of them fed the fishies instead of the other way around
when it went wrong.
Air Niugini carry sports equipment for free, if you tell them it is sporting
goods there is not an excess baggage fee (within reason). It's a tourist
thing. If anyone says they've seen PNG and only been to Moresby, laugh at
them, it like saying you've seen the USA and only visited Alaska. Any of the
island provinces are ideal dive spots, getting refills can be a problem in
the outer areas but if  are at a resort they take care of that. BOC here in
Lae do refills but as I go out on a boat set up for extended trips it is
filled onboard. As the one I go out on is a slow boat it tows a lure or two
all the way and has raised blue and black marlin as well as sail fish on the
way for a dive.

By comparison the safest diving in the world...
Where you are safer on the bottom inspecting a zero than walking down the
street.
13 murders last month in Lae city. Things must be improving.
Signature

Brad Leyden
6° 43.5816' S 146° 59.3097' E  WGS84
You haven't seen a stolen election yet, just wait for PNG in 2007.
Correction it won't be stolen, it will be purchased wholesale.
To mail spam is really hot but please reply to thread so all may benefit (or
laugh at my mistakes)

Art Greenberg - 14 Mar 2007 23:55 GMT
> > My wife & I use "heavy" (6 pound) SS backplates, and we have never had
> > any problems traveling with them. That's on top of photo and video gear,
> > and to places as far away as PNG and Australia.
>
>  Cool, where did you dive here?

We were on the Peter Hughes boat with Captain Alan, out of Rabaul. Spent
10 days around the NW corner of New Britain. I can say without
reservation it was the most interesting and fun diving we've had to
date. I'd go back in a heartbeat, but Tina says there are too many
great places to dive that we have not been to yet.

Signature

Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse dot net

Greg Mossman - 15 Mar 2007 02:49 GMT
> > > My wife & I use "heavy" (6 pound) SS backplates, and we have never had
> > > any problems traveling with them. That's on top of photo and video gear,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> date. I'd go back in a heartbeat, but Tina says there are too many
> great places to dive that we have not been to yet.

Yep, that's one problem with the world.  Too darn big.  I just booked
my second trip to Palau and I will be doing my second Galapagos trip
in August, but PNG is definitely one of the contestants my to-do-next
list before I repeat anything else.  (Maldives and Fiji are the other
likely contenders - too damn many places)
Art Greenberg - 15 Mar 2007 14:39 GMT
>  Yep, that's one problem with the world.  Too darn big.  I just booked
>  my second trip to Palau and I will be doing my second Galapagos trip
>  in August, but PNG is definitely one of the contestants my to-do-next
>  list before I repeat anything else.  (Maldives and Fiji are the other
>  likely contenders - too damn many places)

PNG has a few different diving regions offering different "flavors" of
diving. The itinerary we did was easy, mostly shallow (not more than 90
feet) reef and "muck" diving. Elsewhere there is drift and wall diving,
and I've been told by an Aussie pal who gets there from time to time
that there is some pretty good deeper wreck diving, too.

Just for fun, and off the cuff, our contenders, in no particular order:

- Indonesia (Kodomo, Lembeh, etc.)
- Fiji
- Palau
- Chuuk
- Maldives
- Other parts of PNG
- Scapa Flow
- British Columbia/Washington State
- West coast Australia
- South coast Australia
- Galapagos
- Malpelo

There might be more, I just figured I'd stop there. I didn't consult
Tina. And I think I lied, I'd say Indonesia is probably my first choice,
especially Lembeh.

Doing Malpelo might be difficult without repeating Cocos, but I think
that's OK. 8-)

We really want to do land & diving in Galapagos. But I understand that's
getting harder, as dive operators are no longer permitted to do as much
(or any) land touring as part of their itinerary.

Also, several years ago we had made it most of the way through cave
diving training when Tina decided that stuff wasn't for her. I'd love
the opportunity to get back into that, too, but I have to figure out how
to do that without her. Not so easy after all these years diving
together.

Signature

Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse dot net

Greg Mossman - 15 Mar 2007 19:05 GMT
> PNG has a few different diving regions offering different "flavors" of
> diving. The itinerary we did was easy, mostly shallow (not more than 90
> feet) reef and "muck" diving. Elsewhere there is drift and wall diving,
> and I've been told by an Aussie pal who gets there from time to time
> that there is some pretty good deeper wreck diving, too.

PNG for me would be a liveaboard, probably Peter Hughes.  As a likely
one-shot deal, I'd try to maximize my experience by hoping they know
where the best stuff is.  Otherwise, I really haven't looked into the
details, other than noting that it's a PITA to get to.

> Just for fun, and off the cuff, our contenders, in no particular order:
>
>  - Indonesia (Kodomo, Lembeh, etc.)

Did Komodo (liveaboard via Bali).  Lembeh is definitely where I'd head
the next time, either at a dedicated muck diving resort like KBR, or
more likely off a liveaboard such as the N. Sulawesi Aggressor or
whatever boat Peter Hughes is moving up there, or the Pelagian out of
Wakatobi; Irian Jaya is also on the list, having received rave reviews
from fellow travelers I've met.

>  - Fiji

Those soft corals look amazing and it's "only" an 11-hour hop from
LAX.  My LDS does at least one or two Fiji trips a year, but land
based.  When I go, I'll liveaboard it, having heard that the land
facilities often lack a/c and enough areas have been hit by coral
bleaching that it's a crapshoot where you go unless you have really
recent reports.  Nai'a or Fiji Aggressor for me, as soon as I can
figure out the best way to use Continental miles to secure a
comfortable flight.

>  - Palau

This is #1 on my to-be-repeated list, since my first trip was a really
short "fam" trip and we only did 10 dives.  We're booked on the Palau
Aggressor in March 2008.

>  - Chuuk

Will be #1 on my to-be-repeated list after our Palau and Galapagos
repeats.  The Truk Odyssey was a great boat and the wrecks are
incredible.  Next time I'll be tech/trimix certified, though, to allow
even more time at depth, and try to get on a charter where helium is
available.  Therefore, that's a few years out.  I just hope the wrecks
hold up until I get back.

>  - Maldives

Yep.

>  - Other parts of PNG
>  - Scapa Flow

Brrr.  I might pass on that one.

>  - British Columbia/Washington State

BC, definitely, on the Nautilus Explorer.

I'm just waiting on Janna to transition back to cold water diving.
She was originally certified in the cold, which I believe was a big
factor in her giving up diving altogether for a few years even though
she had a few enjoyable warm-water experiences after certification.
We practically started her from scratch again a couple years ago,
taking baby steps like Eden Rock and Maui shore dives that are only
15-20' deep, and over 150 dives later she loves diving at night, she's
taken on the stiff currents of Cocos, Komodo, and the Andaman Sea, and
fortunately, she loves liveaboard diving as much or more than me.
Where before the idea of any wreck penetration scared the bejeezus out
of her, I had to chase after her through the Spiegel Grove on Dive
with Greg II until we got hopelessly lost as she was so excited
exploring (probably a bit narced too).

So now it's about time to work on getting back into the cold.  She
really wants to do the Nautilus Explorer in BC, but that's a big jump
from the warm and clear.  Our Galapagos trip in August should be a
nice intermediary, and she promised to do a few local dives with me in
her 7/5 wetsuit to get ready for the cold equatorial waters once
summer warms the Pacific around here up to 70 or so.  Hopefully she'll
enjoy it enough to want to get back into a drysuit and dive locally in
the winter.  When we've done that, BC here we come.

>  - West coast Australia
>  - South coast Australia

I've got to get out to Oz someday.  I have mixed feelings about
Australians, having endured an Australian stepfather for a period of
my wayward youth, but I've met plenty friendlies.  It's just the
accent that still gives me chills.

>  - Galapagos

Whale sharks this August, 10 days via Peter Hughes.  As Popeye says,
whoo hoo!

>  - Malpelo

I've heard mixed reviews as compared to Cocos, but a Undersea Hunter
trip that took both in would be nice.  Just a lot of traveling in
between.  I prefer those liveaboards that stop at different places
along the way.  I'm one of those who preferred my Galapagos trip to my
Cocos trip, which is why I'm doing Galapagos again.  It's colder and
murkier, to be sure, but with less boat travel, more diversity, whale
sharks, and of course the land tours, I consider it to have a lot more
bang for the buck.

> There might be more, I just figured I'd stop there. I didn't consult
> Tina. And I think I lied, I'd say Indonesia is probably my first choice,
> especially Lembeh.

If I consulted Janna, the Maldives would be our next destination.
However, I tend to take certain practicalities more to heart than she
does, i.e. difficulty and expense of getting there, so this time I was
able to pick Palau instead.  A future decision might weigh Indonesia,
PNG, Chuuk, and the Maldives and with a toss-up like that, I'd likely
give her the choice.  They're all about equally expensive and hard to
get to.

I sort of want to go back to Indonesia, but there were a few negatives
about my last trip that leave me less than excited about going back.
The funny thing is that none of the negatives really pertain to the
country (a bad airline experience, and a slight imbalance of
expectations on a liveaboard), but it's the association of those with
the place that has me wary about returning.  Plus it's a really long
way to go, and security leaving Bali and clearing customs in Honolulu
were the biggest PITAs I've yet endured since 9/11.

> We really want to do land & diving in Galapagos. But I understand that's
> getting harder, as dive operators are no longer permitted to do as much
> (or any) land touring as part of their itinerary.

I hope that's not the case at least for the remainder of 2007.  I've
heard that this is something they're trying to push for the future,
but AFAIK the new laws taking effect on 1/1/2008 are only limiting
trips to 7-day itineraries, banning night diving, and banning dive
boats from the southern islands itinerary (the latter affects only the
Lammer Law, according to the Rodale's article IIRC).  The mixed land
and sea touring is the best reason to go, IMO.

> Also, several years ago we had made it most of the way through cave
> diving training when Tina decided that stuff wasn't for her. I'd love
> the opportunity to get back into that, too, but I have to figure out how
> to do that without her. Not so easy after all these years diving
> together.

I know what you mean.  I'd really like to get out local diving even,
but that's hard enough (I need her, or somebuddy, to get me
motivated).  Arranging a week trip somewhere warm without taking her
along wouldn't be very safe for me.

I'll see how Janna likes Chandelier Cave in Palau.  That's an easy
one.  I did a cenote dive at Hidden Worlds years ago, where she
snorkeled above, and she hasn't expressed much of a desire to go
caving.  But now she seems to have lost any claustrophobic feelings
she used to get, as her recent wreck penetration dives have shown.  Of
course those were all "cavern"-like penetrations, with easy access
back to daylight.  I've talked to her about doing a cavern class at
some point, for the experience if nothing else, but I doubt she'd be
interested in real cave diving.  I'd be interested in the training,
but after a few cenote dives in the Yucatan, I don't see what the big
thrill is.  I'm more of a fish and coral guy for the most part.
Art Greenberg - 17 Mar 2007 15:41 GMT
>  PNG for me would be a liveaboard, probably Peter Hughes.  As a likely
>  one-shot deal, I'd try to maximize my experience by hoping they know
>  where the best stuff is.  Otherwise, I really haven't looked into the
>  details, other than noting that it's a PITA to get to.

If you like relatively shallow, low-stress diving, then the itinerary we
did there would suit you. High biodiversity, things you probably won't
see anywhere else. I especially enjoyed the "muck" dives, where some of
the critters I found were too small to photograph with my 60mm macro.

I bought a port for a 105mm macro after that trip. I still don't have
the lens, though. And now, it may be time for me to switch to digital.
None of the boats do E6 processing any more. 8-(

We went to PNG through Cairns, staying overnight there, then on to Port
Moresby and Rabaul. We spent a night in Rabaul before boarding the boat.
It was a long trip, but it didn't take long after the diving started
that I forgot all about that!

>  Did Komodo (liveaboard via Bali).  Lembeh is definitely where I'd
>  head the next time, either at a dedicated muck diving resort like
>  KBR, or more likely off a liveaboard such as the N. Sulawesi
>  Aggressor or whatever boat Peter Hughes is moving up there, or the
>  Pelagian out of Wakatobi; Irian Jaya is also on the list, having
>  received rave reviews from fellow travelers I've met.

There is a not-so-positive review of KBR in the latest issue of
Undercurrent. The author was disappointed in the service and
accommodations, given the cost. Apparently, now that the area has been
"discovered", there's plenty of competition that does better.

I don't like that the N. Sulawesi Aggressor is just a 5.5 dive day
itinerary. That's OK in the Carribean where it takes just a day to get
there. It seems a waste to take 2 or 3 days to get somewhere and just
dive for 5.5 days. And its too expensive to do 2 weeks back-to-back.

Peter Hughes has just started advertising their new boat for that area
(I think I saw in in Rodale's), but there's nothing on their website
about it yet. I'm going to ask them about it next weekend at BTS.

I am concerned about civil unrest and terrorism in that part of the
world, too. I don't know what to make of it.

> >  - Fiji
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>  figure out the best way to use Continental miles to secure a
>  comfortable flight.

I've wanted to do the Nai'a ever since I saw Stan Waterman's piece about
it.

> >  - Chuuk
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>  helium is available.  Therefore, that's a few years out.  I just hope
>  the wrecks hold up until I get back.

I am under the impression that there is plenty of diving there that
doesn't call for mix. And I'm pretty sure I wouldn't consider carrying
stages and spending a bunch of time on hangs fun any more.

> >  - Scapa Flow
>
>  Brrr.  I might pass on that one.

Not any worse than diving here in NJ.

> >  - British Columbia/Washington State
>
>  BC, definitely, on the Nautilus Explorer.

But not Scapa Flow? Similar temperature, no?

> >  - West coast Australia
> >  - South coast Australia
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>  my wayward youth, but I've met plenty friendlies.  It's just the
>  accent that still gives me chills.

LOL!

We enjoyed the Coral Sea and GBR. But if we go back, it won't be on a
Mike Ball boat.

> > Also, several years ago we had made it most of the way through cave
> > diving training when Tina decided that stuff wasn't for her. I'd love
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>  but after a few cenote dives in the Yucatan, I don't see what the big
>  thrill is.  I'm more of a fish and coral guy for the most part.

I'm not sure what attracts me to that, as I'm mostly a wrecks guy who
also likes fish and reefs. We started out expecting to be "vacation"
divers, and thought local diving would be a good way to stay in shape
for that. But we fell in love with the wrecks here.

I really enjoyed the cave diving we did in Florida. We started out
mostly for the training, since we wanted to do some wreck penetration.
But again, it turned out to be more fun than I initially thought it
would be.

I'd really like to see the Yucatan caves some day.

Signature

Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse dot net

Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick - 16 Mar 2007 00:14 GMT
>>  Yep, that's one problem with the world.  Too darn big.  I just booked
>>  my second trip to Palau and I will be doing my second Galapagos trip
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Just for fun, and off the cuff, our contenders, in no particular order:

 The Bikini Atoll.

 http://www.bikiniatoll.com/divetour.html

Signature

                                Popeye
        "Best thing for him, really, his therapy was
           going nowhere."  -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

                   www.finalprotectivefire.com

Art Greenberg - 17 Mar 2007 15:14 GMT
>    The Bikini Atoll.
>
>    http://www.bikiniatoll.com/divetour.html

No.

I really like diving wrecks. I'd like to dive those wrecks. But I've
done enough dives past 150 on air to know that I will never do that
again - even under benign conditions (those dives I did were in warm
water with little current and excellent viz). And it looks to me like
there aren't enough shallower dives to make the cost and hassle getting
there worth it.

I might reconsider if I could book with a group that was bringing some
He along.

But really, I like to have fun when I dive. I haven't done enough
serious dives lately to consider that kind of diving fun any more, and I
don't have much (if any) incentive to get back into it (the exception
being caving, and that's probably not gonna happen, either).

Signature

Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse dot net

ben bradlee - 18 Mar 2007 14:05 GMT
> But I've
> done enough dives past 150 on air to know that I will never do that
> again - even under benign conditions (those dives I did were in warm
> water with little current and excellent viz).

Maybe you explained before, but why is that?  There is a certain risk to
diving say to 160 feet.  Do you think that helium significantly reduces that
risk or do you just not like the feeling when on air?
Art Greenberg - 18 Mar 2007 22:51 GMT
>  Maybe you explained before, but why is that?  There is a certain risk
>  to diving say to 160 feet.  Do you think that helium significantly
>  reduces that risk or do you just not like the feeling when on air?

I'm narced enough at 130 on air (or nitrox). I barely remember some of
those deeper dives. I feel that I'm lucky that nothing went wrong.

Yes, IMO the extra trouble and expense of using the proper gas is well
worth the safety margin it provides.

Signature

Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse dot net

Rod - 21 Mar 2007 04:08 GMT
>>  Maybe you explained before, but why is that?  There is a certain risk
>>  to diving say to 160 feet.  Do you think that helium significantly
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Yes, IMO the extra trouble and expense of using the proper gas is well
>worth the safety margin it provides.

Which nitrox were you on at 130 fsw ?
Art Greenberg - 21 Mar 2007 11:43 GMT
>  Which nitrox were you on at 130 fsw ?

EAN28. Why would that matter?

Signature

Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse dot net

Lee Bell - 21 Mar 2007 13:54 GMT
> Which nitrox were you on at 130 fsw ?

28%
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.