Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Tragedy of a Dozen Evil Men

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RecScubaPoster - 06 Mar 2007 03:00 GMT
http://counterpunch.org/roberts03012007.html

 The Tragedy of a Dozen Evil Men
 Americans Have Lost Their Country
 By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

 The Bush-Cheney regime is America's first neoconservative regime. In
a
few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights, the
separation of powers, the Geneva Conventions, and the remains of
America's moral reputation along with the infrastructures of two
Muslim
countries and countless thousands of Islamic civilians. Plans have
been
prepared, and forces moved into place, for an attack on a third
Islamic
country, Iran, and perhaps Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon as well.

This extraordinary aggressiveness toward the US Constitution,
international law, and the Islamic world is the work, not of a vast
movement, but of a handful of ideologues--principally Vice President
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Lewis Libby, Douglas Feith, Paul
Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliott Abrams, Zalmay Khalilzad, John
Bolton,
Philip Zelikow, and Attorney General Gonzales. These are the main
operatives who have controlled policy. They have been supported by
their
media shills at the Weekly Standard, National Review, Fox News, New
York
Times, CNN, and the Wall Street Journal editorial page and by
"scholars"
in assorted think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute.

The entirety of their success in miring the United States in what
could
become permanent conflict in the Middle East is based on the power of
propaganda and the big lie.

Initially, the 9/11 attack was blamed on Osama bin Laden, but after
an
American puppet was installed in Afghanistan, the blame for 9/11 was
shifted to Iraq's Saddam Hussein, who was said to have weapons of
mass
destruction that would be used against America. The regime sent
Secretary of State Colin Powell to tell the lie to the UN that the
Bush-Cheney regime had conclusive proof of Iraqi weapons of mass
destruction.

Having conned the UN, Congress, and the American people, the regime
invaded Iraq under totally false pretenses and with totally false
expectations. The regime's occupation of Iraq has failed in a
military
sense, but the neoconservatives are turning their failure into a
strategic advantage. At the beginning of this year President Bush
began
blaming Iran for America's embarrassing defeat by a few thousand
lightly
armed insurgents in Iraq.

Bush accuses Iran of arming the Iraqi insurgents, a charge that
experts
regard as improbable. The Iraqi insurgents are Sunni. They inflict
casualties on our troops, but spend most of their energy killing
Iraqi
Shi'ites, who are closely allied with Iran, which is Shi'ite. Bush's
accusation requires us to believe that Iran is arming the enemies of
its
allies.

On the basis of this absurd accusation--a pure invention--Bush has
ordered a heavy concentration of aircraft carrier attack forces off
Iran's coast, and he has moved US attack planes to Turkish bases and
other US bases in countries contingent to Iran.

In testimony before Congress on February 1 of this year, former
National
Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski said that he expected the regime
to
orchestrate a "head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world
of
Islam at large." He said a plausible scenario was "a terrorist act
blamed on Iran, culminating in a 'defensive' US military action
against
Iran." He said that the neoconservative propaganda machine was
already
articulating a "mythical historical narrative" for widening their war
against Islam.

Why is the US spending one trillion dollars on wars, the reasons for
which are patently false. What is going on?

There are several parts to the answer. Like their forebears among the
Jacobins of the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks of the communist
revolution, and the National Socialists of Hitler's revolution,
neoconservatives believe that they have a monopoly on virtue and the
right to impose hegemony on the rest of the world. Neoconservative
conquests began in the Middle East because oil and Israel, with which
neocons are closely allied, are both in the MIddle East.

The American oil giant, UNOCAL, had plans for an oil and gas pipeline
through Afghanistan, but the Taliban were not sufficiently
cooperative.
The US invasion of Afghanistan was used to install Hamid Karzai, who
had
been on UNOCAL's payroll, as puppet prime minister. US
neoconservative
Zalmay Khalilzad, who also had been on UNOCAL's payroll, was
installed
as US ambassador to Afghanistan.

Two years later Khalilzad was appointed US ambassador to Iraq.
American
oil companies have been given control over the exploitation of Iraq's
oil resources.

The Israeli relationship is perhaps even more important. In 1996
Richard
Perle and the usual collection of neocons proposed that all of
Israel's
enemies in the Middle East be overthrown. "Israel's enemies" consist
of
the Muslim countries not in the hands of US puppets or allies. For
decades Israel has been stealing Palestine from the Palestinians such
that today there is not enough of Palestine left to comprise an
independent country. The US and Israeli governments blame Iran, Iraq,
and Syria for aiding and abetting Palestinian resistance to Israel's
theft of Palestine.

The Bush-Cheney regime came to power with the plans drawn to attack
the
remaining independent countries in the Middle East and with
neoconservatives in office to implement the plans. However, an excuse
was required. Neoconservatives had called for "a new Pearl Harbor,"
and
9/11 provided the propaganda event needed in order to stampede the
public and Congress into war. Neoconservative Philip Zelikow was put
in
charge of the 9/11 Commission Report to make certain no uncomfortable
facts emerged.

The neoconservatives have had enormous help from the corporate media,
from Christian evangelicals, particularly from the "Rapture
Evangelicals," from flag-waving superpatriots, and from the
military-industrial complex whose profits have prospered. But the
fact
remains that the dozen men named in the second paragraph above were
able
to overthrow the US Constitution and launch military aggression under
the guise of a preventive/preemptive "war against terrorism."

When the American people caught on that the "war on terror" was a
cloak
for wars of aggression, they put Democrats in control of Congress in
order to apply a brake to the regime's warmongering. However, the
Democrats have proven to be impotent to stop the neoconservative
drive
to wider war and, perhaps, world conflagration.

We are witnessing the triumph of a dozen evil men over American
democracy and a free press.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the
Reagan
administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal
editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is
coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

--

 http://911research.wtc7.net
 http://stj911.org
 http://www.911truth.org

 Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

 http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

 On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

 http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html

  "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
 there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
 take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
 who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
 warfare or morality."
 -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
  http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
Lee Bell - 07 Mar 2007 12:34 GMT
> few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights . . .

The single most significant attack on the Bill of Rights in the history of
our country is the constant attack on the Second Amendment and the
Republicans are not the ones reaponsible.
RecScubaPoster - 08 Mar 2007 06:31 GMT
> > few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights . . .
>
> The single most significant attack on the Bill of Rights in the history of
> our country is the constant attack on the Second Amendment and the
> Republicans are not the ones reaponsible.

When can you and your loud mouthed pussy ilk be expected in Iraq?

Defend freedom tough guy.
Danlw - 09 Mar 2007 01:46 GMT
>> > few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights . . .
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Defend freedom tough guy.

SO that means you are there (Iraq), pussy?  I did my part--what have YOU
done?
Now our fine pres candidate, McCain, apologized for saying lives have been
"wasted" in Iraq.  Also, that means he most likely won't tell the truth ever
again.
Try a politics group, asshat. Dan
RecScubaPoster - 09 Mar 2007 02:30 GMT
> > few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights . . .
>
> The single most significant attack on the Bill of Rights in the history of
> our country is the constant attack on the Second Amendment and the
> Republicans are not the ones reaponsible.

Have the Brady Bunch have switched parties?

http://www.bradycenter.org/
Scott - 29 Mar 2007 08:36 GMT
> > few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights . . .
>
> The single most significant attack on the Bill of Rights in the history of
> our country is the constant attack on the Second Amendment and the
> Republicans are not the ones reaponsible.

http://www.metroactive.com/feinstein/

http://www.metroactive.com/feinstein/feinstein-resigns.html

And the silence is deafening.
Rod - 29 Mar 2007 14:04 GMT
>> > few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights . . .
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>And the silence is deafening.

Did you notice in the last 10 or 20 years you can go swiming in most
bodies of fresh water and not find any leaches ? I submit, that is
because they have evolved, they have grown legs, become lawyers and
become elected officials.
Greg Mossman - 29 Mar 2007 16:38 GMT
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:31:21 -0800, "Scott"
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> because they have evolved, they have grown legs, become lawyers and
> become elected officials.

Perhaps the leaches [sic] all developed into the moronic sort of
people that get into the kind of trouble that only lawyers can bail
them out of.
Galen Hekhuis - 29 Mar 2007 16:49 GMT
It kind of tickles me (I'm easily amused) that the first thing these
anti-attorney people do when they get in trouble is "lawyer up." Bush,
who talks about being against courts and all had to go to the courts
and hire lawyers when he wanted to get into office.  It's kind of like
saying you hate guns and don't need them for defense and all and then
grabbing one and shooting as soon as you are threatened.
--
Galen Hekhuis                      ghekhuis@earthlink.net
               "Mistakes were made"
Dennis (Icarus) - 29 Mar 2007 18:21 GMT
> It kind of tickles me (I'm easily amused) that the first thing these
> anti-attorney people do when they get in trouble is "lawyer up." Bush,
> who talks about being against courts and all had to go to the courts

I don't recall Bush every saying he was against courts.

> and hire lawyers when he wanted to get into office.  It's kind of like
> saying you hate guns and don't need them for defense and all and then
> grabbing one and shooting as soon as you are threatened.

Or calling someone who has a gun.

Dennis
Chris Guynn - 29 Mar 2007 21:32 GMT
> > It kind of tickles me (I'm easily amused) that the first thing these
> > anti-attorney people do when they get in trouble is "lawyer up." Bush,
> > who talks about being against courts and all had to go to the courts
>
> I don't recall Bush every saying he was against courts.

I think he's talking about the ICC.  It's the only thing that even remotely makes sense.
Scott - 29 Mar 2007 21:36 GMT
> > I don't recall Bush every saying he was against courts.

> I think he's talking about the ICC.  It's the only thing that even remotely makes sense.

If you squint real hard you can almost see the elephant.
Greg Mossman - 29 Mar 2007 23:37 GMT
> It kind of tickles me (I'm easily amused) that the first thing these
> anti-attorney people do when they get in trouble is "lawyer up." Bush,
> who talks about being against courts and all had to go to the courts
> and hire lawyers when he wanted to get into office.  It's kind of like
> saying you hate guns and don't need them for defense and all and then
> grabbing one and shooting as soon as you are threatened.

Yeah, well any piece in a storm.  I'd be hard-pressed to find one
around here, though.  Heck, I couldn't even muster up a decent golf
club if I tried.  Or a baseball bat.  Fortunately I have fierce attack
cats.
Danlw - 30 Mar 2007 02:41 GMT
>> It kind of tickles me (I'm easily amused) that the first thing these
>> anti-attorney people do when they get in trouble is "lawyer up." Bush,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> club if I tried.  Or a baseball bat.  Fortunately I have fierce attack
> cats.

How about a spear gun? They work great, and you can back it up with a dive
knife, strike that, dive tool. Dan
Greg Mossman - 30 Mar 2007 03:39 GMT
> >> It kind of tickles me (I'm easily amused) that the first thing these
> >> anti-attorney people do when they get in trouble is "lawyer up." Bush,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> How about a spear gun? They work great, and you can back it up with a dive
> knife, strike that, dive tool. Dan

I pet fish, I don't shoot them in their cute slimy little heads.  I
did catch and release a Spanish lobster last week in Bonaire, and felt
really bad when the bugger finally realized what was happening and
took off like a shot right into the side of the reef.  Dazed him a
bit, but I doubt he was confuzed.
Grumman-581 - 30 Mar 2007 04:21 GMT
> I did catch and release a Spanish lobster
> last week in Bonaire

Lee catches and releases lobsters also... Hell, he even relocates them
in the process...
Joe English - 30 Mar 2007 03:44 GMT
> It kind of tickles me (I'm easily amused) that the first thing these
> anti-attorney people do when they get in trouble is "lawyer up." Bush,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Galen Hekhuis                      ghekhuis@earthlink.net
>                 "Mistakes were made"

I thought it was Gore that did that
Scott - 30 Mar 2007 03:59 GMT
> I thought it was Gore that did that

Let's not forget John Edwards channeling stillborn babies...
Scott - 29 Mar 2007 16:40 GMT
> >> > few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights . . .

> >> The single most significant attack on the Bill of Rights in the history of
> >> our country is the constant attack on the Second Amendment and the
> >> Republicans are not the ones reaponsible.

> >http://www.metroactive.com/feinstein/

> >http://www.metroactive.com/feinstein/feinstein-resigns.html

> >And the silence is deafening.

> Did you notice in the last 10 or 20 years you can go swiming in most
> bodies of fresh water and not find any leaches ? I submit, that is
> because they have evolved, they have grown legs, become lawyers and
> become elected officials.

If this had been a Republican, the village idiots would be out in the street
with nooses, torches and pitchforks, screaming for a conviction, trial, and
investigation, in that order.

Since Feinstein panders to the far left Democrat moonbats, she will be, and
is, getting a pass.

Google it and see how many news agancies are covering it.

People are more interested in Anna Nicole.
Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick - 29 Mar 2007 22:17 GMT
>> >> <rubbing his nubbin in the corner of the basement> RecScubaPoster
>> >> wrote
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> People are more interested in Anna Nicole.

 Where's all those people that have been chanting about Halliburton for
years?
Scott - 29 Mar 2007 22:54 GMT
> Where's all those people that have been chanting about Halliburton for
> years?

They cant come to the phone right now, they have Dianne's dick in their
mouth...
Greg Mossman - 29 Mar 2007 23:46 GMT
On Mar 29, 2:17 pm, "Douglas W \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:

> >> >> <rubbing his nubbin in the corner of the basement> RecScubaPoster
> >> >> wrote
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>   Where's all those people that have been chanting about Halliburton for
> years?

Isn't that the company that's relocating to Dubai, taking all its
"hard won" profits with it (except for Dick's cut, that is)?

At least Mr. & Mrs. Feinstein will keep their money in California
where we sorely need it.  I can't wait till she runs for president to
succeed Hillary.

In any case, my beloved NRA membership is running out.  They're barely
even sending me renewal notices more than every other week now.  This
time, with the Democrats firmly embedded in our near future politics,
there aren't any bets worth taking.  Therefore, I'm seeking rec.scuba
sponsors to extend my membership, maybe even pony up for a Life
Membership like Chris Dodd.

Please send donations to "Greg is the NRA", my mailing address on
request via e-mail for those of you who aren't savvy enough to look it
up.  Contributions may be tax-deductible, but you'd want to check with
a tax professional about that.  I pledge to drink one beer for every
$10 received, and I always honor my pledges.
dazed and confuzzed - 30 Mar 2007 03:55 GMT
> On Mar 29, 2:17 pm, "Douglas W \"Popeye\" Frederick"
> <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> a tax professional about that.  I pledge to drink one beer for every
> $10 received, and I always honor my pledges.

I'm in for a buck.

Signature

“TAANSTAFL”

____________________________________________________________________________

"A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3
____________________________________________________________________________

Scott - 30 Mar 2007 04:05 GMT
> I'm in for a buck.

I dont give money to beggars, panhandlers, bums or liberal lawyers.

"Will work for food."

No sh.t, eh?
dazed and confuzzed - 30 Mar 2007 04:08 GMT
>>I'm in for a buck.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> No sh.t, eh?

Don't forget, it's my fault that he's an NRA member in the first place.

in 2008, I'll try to get him into the NoR.

Signature

“TAANSTAFL”

____________________________________________________________________________

"A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3
____________________________________________________________________________

Grumman-581 - 30 Mar 2007 04:27 GMT
> Don't forget, it's my fault that he's an NRA member in the first place.
>
> in 2008, I'll try to get him into the NoR.

How about getting him in the UDC?

http://www.hqudc.org/
Chris Guynn - 30 Mar 2007 14:28 GMT
> >>I'm in for a buck.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> in 2008, I'll try to get him into the NoR.

NAMBLA might be better.  ;-)
Greg Mossman - 30 Mar 2007 17:44 GMT
> > >>I'm in for a buck.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> NAMBLA might be better.  ;-)

A little projection there, buddy?  Hanging around with half-naked
children all summer is your thing.
Rod - 31 Mar 2007 14:26 GMT
>> > >>I'm in for a buck.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>A little projection there, buddy?  Hanging around with half-naked
>children all summer is your thing.

Does anyone remember if the line item veto ever passed ? If so, why
hasn't it been used? If not, why hasn't it? It seems the only way to
empty the pork barrel.
Dennis (Icarus) - 31 Mar 2007 14:51 GMT
<snip>
> Does anyone remember if the line item veto ever passed ? If so, why
> hasn't it been used? If not, why hasn't it? It seems the only way to
> empty the pork barrel.

It was passed, but then declared unconstitutional.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-item_veto

Signature

Dennis

Joe English - 31 Mar 2007 15:45 GMT
>>>>>>I'm in for a buck.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> hasn't it been used? If not, why hasn't it? It seems the only way to
> empty the pork barrel.
to my knowledge it never passed - no one wants responsibility
Greg Mossman - 30 Mar 2007 17:43 GMT
On Mar 29, 8:08 pm, dazed and confuzzed <dedmann@comcast_remove.net>
wrote:

> >>I'm in for a buck.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> in 2008, I'll try to get him into the NoR.

NORML?
dazed and confuzzed - 30 Mar 2007 21:31 GMT
> On Mar 29, 8:08 pm, dazed and confuzzed <dedmann@comcast_remove.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> NORML?

Nation of Riflemen

Signature

“TAANSTAFL”

____________________________________________________________________________

"A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3
____________________________________________________________________________

JOF - 31 Mar 2007 14:31 GMT
> > I'm in for a buck.
>
> I dont give money to beggars, panhandlers, bums or liberal lawyers.
>
> "Will work for food."

I think he actually said he'd drink for guns.

JF
Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick - 31 Mar 2007 19:59 GMT
>> > I'm in for a buck.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I think he actually said he'd drink for guns.

 Who is it that always starts the gunthreads?
Scott - 31 Mar 2007 20:28 GMT
>   Who is it that always starts the gunthreads?

Tries to, anyway.

He cant defend his liberal socialist masters, or lucidly address a single
issue, so he has to try and derail it into another of his little senile
games.
Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick - 30 Mar 2007 04:00 GMT
> At least Mr. & Mrs. Feinstein will keep their money in California
> where we sorely need it.

 Yeah, yeah, double standards.

 -Almost- Canadian-like.

> In any case, my beloved NRA membership is running out.

 Send it to me, I'll pay it.

 163 Proffitt Rd,
 Gatlinburg, Tn
 37728
Scott - 30 Mar 2007 04:11 GMT
>   Yeah, yeah, double standards.

>   -Almost- Canadian-like.

It's the disgusting disease that knows no border.

It is a defect of the mind and soul commonly known as "liberal socialism".

See Great Britain and Iran, for just one instance of the epidemic.

The Limeys need to bomb those dirty cocksuckers and their "Navy" so hard and
so fast they would be begging the UN for the chance to return the 15.

>   Send it to me, I'll pay it.

>   163 Proffitt Rd,
>   Gatlinburg, Tn
>   37728

You I would send money to, but not for Greg.
Rod - 30 Mar 2007 04:09 GMT
>> >> > few short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights . . .
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>People are more interested in Anna Nicole.

well at least she is off the commitee, 1 1/2 billion dollars late
Scott - 30 Mar 2007 04:16 GMT
> well at least she is off the commitee, 1 1/2 billion dollars late

And we have to thank her for providing another shining illumination of the
blind hypocrisy of the far left moonbats.

I wonder how much cash she has in her freezer?
SeanMartinFarrell@gmail.com - 30 Mar 2007 17:29 GMT
> > well at least she is off the commitee, 1 1/2 billion dollars late
>
> And we have to thank her for providing another shining illumination of the
> blind hypocrisy of the far left moonbats.

I would take it as more of a confirmation that all governments are
comprised of hypocritic sh.t monkeys. It's sad that all sides are so
brain washed that they'll just spout off their teams talking points
instead of uniting to give her the boot. There's so much noise to
signal now that they know that can get away with pretty much anything
because any story that breaks immediately turns into two sides yelling
stupid slogans that have nothing to do with the issue.

> I wonder how much cash she has in her freezer?
Scott - 30 Mar 2007 18:11 GMT
> > > well at least she is off the commitee, 1 1/2 billion dollars late

> > And we have to thank her for providing another shining illumination of the
> > blind hypocrisy of the far left moonbats.

> I would take it as more of a confirmation that all governments are
> comprised of hypocritic sh.t monkeys. It's sad that all sides are so
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> because any story that breaks immediately turns into two sides yelling
> stupid slogans that have nothing to do with the issue.

Typical whitewash. Boringly typical. This is a far left Democrat (a position
she chose and ran on) caught with her hand in the cookie jar.

Something those of us who consider ourselves Americans first have been
saying for literally years, while enduring the onslaught of attacks, lies
and simple outright fabrication from the far left socialists.

When Cunningham and any of the others *not* on the left get busted, we are
all for stiff penalties *if* convicted. No fanfare, just slam him into a
jail cell, and Cunningham was a hero of mine. The left wants all Republicans
and those not on the left punished regardless of fact or truth. Even though
they have no impeachable crimes to accuse or convict Bush of (that was the
Clintons), they scream for him to be impeached.

We are also for stiff penalties for those on the left who get busted, but it
is simply a fact that the lefties are willing to wink and nod at any goings
on with their chosen leaders, see the Clintons for just one example. 100% of
the people I know who are not way out in the left field don't care what
brand the government crook is, they want them busted. The opposite is simply
not true.

Not one word in the mainstream leftist media about Feinstein, not a peep.

Where is the outrage from Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reed,
Schumer, Kennedy, Kerry, Michael Moore, Arianna Huffington, Cindy Sheehan,
Barbara Streisand, Sean Penn, ABC, CNN, George Soros, etc? Where is the
independent counsel and investigative committee?

pppfffttttpppp.
Carl Nisarel - 31 Mar 2007 02:32 GMT
"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> muttered:

>  Even though
> they have no impeachable crimes to accuse or convict Bush of

As usual, you're in deep denial.

The Bush Administration has committed a long list of crimes.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.