You have no statistices, only cowardice, lies and bullshit.

http://patdollard.com/2007/01/11/this-civil-war-is-on-in-america-not-iraq/#more-33

Democratic Senator Dick Durbin's official response to President Bush's
speech was literally nothing but drivel. And self-contradictory
drivel, no less. Which is no mean f.cking feat. Quite an achievement
to make just enough sense to contradict yourself. Which means it made
just enough sense to reveal the complete bankruptcy of ideas and
policies that has left the now literally treasonous Democratic Party
unable to serve America, and only able to serve itself.

The Democrats' months-old overall position on Iraq makes no sense, and
therefor relies on, at best, tortured, twisted and tragi-comically
shifting logic and arguments. And the biggest problem with their
position ( I'd say policies, but they have none other than the
domestic political play of retreat, based on an Orwellian Big Brother
declaration of defeat, solely in order to have the advantage in the
2008 elections ) is that it is based not on the facts on the ground in
Iraq, but instead on a propaganda soundbite, created and promoted as
reality by their Propaganda Ministry ( the MSM ): Iraq is in a civil
war. This very concept, created by those desperate for it to be so for
the sake of political gain, lays the entire foundation for the
Democrats' position. What if it were not true? Well then, the entire
Democratic agenda, quite simply a demand for a retreat, would be
wrong. And guess f.cking what? You got it.

I was in Ramadi when Al Qaeda blew up the Shia's golden-domed shrine.
They blew it up with the express goals of fomenting a civil war that
the Iraqis clearly were not interested in, and to create the resultant
American political divisiveness you see today. The entire Jihad
movement very closely monitors American politics and media. They are
obsessed with it. They understand that the media war is every bit as
critical as the ground war. Americans, very naive and with few
alternative sources, most often simply believe what they see and hear
in the media, not understanding the media's motives and manipulations,
nor how the media itself has been manipulated. When the Dome was blown
up, nearly all Iraqis knew it was Zarqwai and weren't taking the bait.
Meanwhile, I watched as the MSM reported on protests in Ramadi that
were not happening. They reported on many phantom events in Ramadi,
including the overrunning of the Ramadi Government Center, while I
stood in the middle of it, with nary a shot fired all day. Were they
lying about the protests? One way or another, by intent or negligence,
they were. And let's not forget, every crime has a motive. The media's
motive is to promote defeat in order to get their client, the
Democratic Party, elected. ( The time for mincing words is long gone,
there is too much at stake. Treason is as treason does. )

By the time the Dome blew, years had transpired without any broad
civil war sentiment or activity, in an Iraq in which 90% of the
households have automatic weapons. Nor did that change after the Dome
blew. As armed as all Iraqis are, if the civil war game was on, we
would see it as clearly as we see the hands at the ends of our arms.
Instead all that we see are the violent acts of limited, special-
interest sectarian gangs, comprised primarily of, well, gangsters and
not the average Iraqi. Shiite and Sunni thugs ( Al Sadr of course
amongst them ) used the event to whip up as many potential gang-
recruits as they could, and then to go for broke with the violence and
seemingly sectarian neighborhood cleansing. And it was sectarian, but
sectarian only as it related to gang warfare.

And that is what we are seeing in Iraq - widespread but limited,
organized gang turf wars, not the broad, populist, armed movement that
is the true definition of a civil war. As it has always been from the
beginning, we are not fighting the people of Iraq, we are not fighting
a populist insurgency, we are fighting criminal gangs. The people of
Iraq, in fact, would like to see democracy, capitalism and modern
education flower in their homeland. This is why they vote in greater
percentages than we Americans.

The second biggest flaw in the Democrats' position is the illogical
and self-contradictory essence of both their arguments and operating
principles. They say the solution in Iraq is political, not just
military, so we should retreat. This makes absolutely no sense, or can
only make sense to a facile, child-like mind. The problem with their
position is astoundingly simple: no political solution is possible
without the military strength to implement and protect it. Their
positions are at cross-purposes. You simply cannot implement a stable
political infrastructure by first eliminating the effective military
force that is any such infrastructure's lifeblood. It's like removing
the amniotic fluid from a womb: the baby is not going to grow. It is
going to die.

Their position is nothing short of lunacy. The Democrats have left
themselves nothing but such lunactic positions, because their goals
for Iraq have nothing to do with what is best for the peace and
security of the United States and the world. Their goals for Iraq only
have to do with what is best for the Democratic Party: make the
Republican Party look bad. And the best way to do that is to make Iraq
an American defeat. I have never seen such widespread naked treason,
such absolute evil, in all my 42 years. They and the MSM have
tunnelvision: they only care about selling their Big Brother, false
script of defeat to the American people; for years they have been in a
frenzy to sell this war as Vietnam - for personal gain - and now that
frenzy is at a fever pitch. In their minds, they cannot, and will not,
be stopped. But good people have stopped worse. We can still prevail
over the American insurgents that we are now forced to fight. Their
positions are so illogical and tortured because it is very hard to
make what is bad for America, and indeed what will ultimately be fatal
to many Americans, look good for America. This is why you keep shaking
your head when you hear the Dems and the MSM speak about this war.
Because just as it made no sense for Big Brother to declare "War is
Peace" it makes no sense for them to declare that what is bad for
America is actually good for America.

And perhaps the final problem with the Democrats' position I will just
touch on here, but will elaborate on later. Their entire posititon is
completely devoid of the concept of consequences. Nowhere do they
analyze for us, let alone even address, the consequences of a U.S.
retreat from Iraq. It is because those consequences are almost
certainly a fresh wave of civilian casualties on American soil, at the
hands of Jihadis who will then have substantial portions of Iraq's
resources to use for those attacks, as well as the freedom from
focusing on Iraq and the resultant freedom to focus on our homeland.
They do not want you to know this, because if you do, you will not
support a U.S. retreat from Iraq. Yes, they are evil. It sounds crazy,
but no other word bears as legitimate a description of their behavior.
They rely on us shying from such extreme language, even though it is
the truest language, out of our own fear of undercutting our
credibility. Credibility is not lost by operating in the extremes, it
is lost by operating outside of the truth. The contemporary Democratic
Party has become the most malignant internal cancer to eat at the body
of America, in the history of America.

Yes, clearly the Civil War is on in America. And to quote one of the
left's own icons, Michael Stipe of REM, "The time to rise has been
engaged".

backwards!

moonbats, especially barking moonbats,
are far left liberal.