Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Belated movie review: Open Water

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
marshallkarp@gmail.com - 20 Jan 2007 15:33 GMT
It is cold here in northeast Ohio, so time to dream about summer and
diving and watch movies while getting through the winter. Last night, I
watched Open Water. I think the best way to report on this movie is
pros and cons.

Pros

Several times I was engrossed in the action and characters. There were
some intense scenes.

Underwater dive video portions were pretty good.

Acting was good, got involved with the two leads.

Location shots were good.

Cons

Strange looking. Looks like digital video transferred to film.

I was really underwhelmed by the experience. I was expecting so much
more from the hype. But, how much can you do with two people who love
each other left behind in the water for a day and night.

Once again, they lean on sharks to get a JAWS thing going to sell
tickets and stake the plot on. Sharks and JAWS in movies and TV was
overdone a long time ago.

This is not a good film to inspire people to take up recreational
diving. (Uh, huh, I'm going going to do that, I'm afraid of sharks. No
way am I getting left behind in the ocean)

Conclusion

If you don't have anything else to do to get through winter, watch this
movie. If you have the opportunity to go ocean diving, go ocean diving.

**1/2
Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick - 20 Jan 2007 15:49 GMT
I just had dinner with Wagner and his killer hound last night in
Cleveland, I'm sitting on the turnpike near Warren now.

 Enjoying the storm, Marshall?

 Someone once said this is the only movie where you wind up rooting for the
sharks.

Signature

                                   Popeye
 "A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff
    that nature replaces it with."  - Tennessee Williams
                     www.finalprotectivefire.com

> It is cold here in northeast Ohio, so time to dream about summer and
> diving and watch movies while getting through the winter. Last night, I
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> **1/2
Dennis (Icarus) - 21 Jan 2007 08:31 GMT
>   I just had dinner with Wagner and his killer hound last night in
> Cleveland, I'm sitting on the turnpike near Warren now.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>   Someone once said this is the only movie where you wind up rooting for the
> sharks.

I watched it some time back. Yeah, I wound up rootingf r the sharks.

<snip>

Dennis
ben bradlee - 20 Jan 2007 15:59 GMT
> This is not a good film to inspire people to take up recreational
> diving.

You succinctly describe the best quality of Open Water.
Greg Mossman - 20 Jan 2007 16:24 GMT
On Jan 20, 7:33 am, "marshallk...@gmail.com" <marshallk...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Once again, they lean on sharks to get a JAWS thing going to sell
> tickets and stake the plot on. Sharks and JAWS in movies and TV was
> overdone a long time ago.

You're dead wrong about that, as usual.  It's like saying aliens are
overdone or terrorists are overdone.  Sharks still get great ratings.
Look at Discovery Channel's Shark Week for example.  Sharks are
prehistoric, barely understood, and man killers.  Why not portray them
as evil?

>From the Associated Press -

"HONOLULU - The Kauai surfer was lucky: the eight-foot long shark that
took a half moon-shaped chomp out of his board didn't go for a second
bite.

"He made it back to shore, shaken but unharmed, and the spat-out
13-inch chunk of board washed up on shore later that day Jan. 5, the
only casualty of the first shark attack of 2007 on a surfboard.

"Given the shark's razor sharp teeth, a carnivorous appetite and a
reputation as a "man-eater," it's easy to understand why attacks like
that grab headlines."
El Stroko Guapo - 20 Jan 2007 18:27 GMT
> ". . . razor sharp teeth, a carnivorous appetite and a
> reputation as a "man-eater," it's easy to understand why attacks like
> that grab headlines."

Great description of my third wife, but she never got headlines. Just
the house.

esg
GWB - 20 Jan 2007 19:29 GMT
That movie sucked!
After a few minutes, I was rooting for the sharks.
George Cathcart - 21 Jan 2007 14:46 GMT
My first reaction on seeing OW was that if I had to pick someone on
that boat to get eaten by sharks it would be that couple (although you
have to admit she looked pretty good naked!). So most of the movie was
spent wondering when the sharks were going to show up and put us all
out of our misery.

Also, although the gearing up and briefing sequences were pretty
realistic and interesting, there was one major error that was
absolutely laughable (big spoiler here):
Remember how early on after they have been left behind, the girl drops
her weight belt? They even make a point of showing the weights hitting
bottom, as though that would have some significance later on in the
film. Then, at the very end, to end it all, she slips out of her BC,
raises her arms and slides beneath the waves, still wearing her wetsuit
and with no weights. Quite a trick -- only in Hollywood!

gc

> That movie sucked!
> After a few minutes, I was rooting for the sharks.
David In NH - 21 Jan 2007 14:55 GMT
>> film. Then, at the very end, to end it all, she slips out of her BC,
> raises her arms and slides beneath the waves, still wearing her wetsuit
> and with no weights. Quite a trick -- only in Hollywood!

That was only one of the mistakes that we caught. We also wondered why the
couple was so stupid as to not wave a fin in the air, etc. I can't remember
it all but there were a number of things that our group criticized.
Scott - 20 Jan 2007 19:47 GMT
> > ". . . razor sharp teeth, a carnivorous appetite and a
> > reputation as a "man-eater," it's easy to understand why attacks like
> > that grab headlines."

> Great description of my third wife, but she never got headlines. Just
> the house.

3rd?

Jeezus man.

Take it from me, you dont have to get married to get f.cked over...
marshallkarp@gmail.com - 21 Jan 2007 00:18 GMT
Sharks still get great ratings.

Greg, I agree with you on this one.

> On Jan 20, 7:33 am, "marshallk...@gmail.com" <marshallk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> reputation as a "man-eater," it's easy to understand why attacks like
> that grab headlines."
Greg Mossman - 21 Jan 2007 01:20 GMT
On Jan 20, 4:18 pm, "marshallk...@gmail.com" <marshallk...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Sharks still get great ratings.
>
> Greg, I agree with you on this one.

It's the only thing they have going for them.  If people believe they
are vicious maneaters, they'll have much more sympathy for them.  As
soon as people find out the truth, that all sharks are really warm and
friendly once you get to know them, no one will give a damn any more
about shark finning and overfishing and the sort of people who like to
torture live sharks to get revenge for Jaws.  They'll become boring
fish like cod or Chilean seabass, to be wiped off this planet and not a
soul will miss them.

For instance, take the movie the perfect storm.  The plot of the movie
involves a group of greedy uncouth fishermen, thumbing their noses at
Mother Nature by trying to wipe out the last of the Atlantic swordfish.
When the storm whips up and kills everyone, does the audience give a
hoot about the fish?  Heck, no.  It's all about the "poor" fishermen.
You think the audience would be so forgiving if the fishermen were
after humpback whales, or were shark finning?  Keep sharks deadly and
you'll keep sharks alive.
David In NH - 21 Jan 2007 13:06 GMT
Watching this movie was one of the funniest times I'd had in a long time. I
was on the Cayman Aggressor with my dive club and we watched this with a
somewhat critical eye. Aside from the whiney yuppie couple (and I have
nothing against those, taking pride in my own whine-e-ness (couldn't figure
out to spell it)), there were so many things wrong with the movie that it
served as a good learning lesson for us. (The lessons weren't in diving but
in how to make a bad film.)

Anyway, even though this movie didn't make it too big, it was made on a
shoe-string so it did make a decent profit.
news - 23 Jan 2007 01:10 GMT
> It is cold here in northeast Ohio, so time to dream about summer and
> diving and watch movies while getting through the winter. Last night, I
> watched Open Water. I think the best way to report on this movie is
> pros and cons.
>
> Pros

I just watched this too, my wife and I both thought it sucked.

Jay
http://www.divewithjay.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.