>>>>A global study reveals an overwhelming wealth gap, with the world's
>>>>three richest people having more money than the poorest 48 nations
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Or would the poor countries have to share there fee for the change?
> Above all, would they?
You drunk? Three people have the money. It can't be much simpler than
that.
Matthias Voss - 19 Dec 2006 20:29 GMT
>>>>>A global study reveals an overwhelming wealth gap, with the world's
>>>>>three richest people having more money than the poorest 48 nations
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> You drunk? Three people have the money. It can't be much simpler than
> that.
If you ever were to transfer a considerate sum of money to
one LD-Country, or v.v., you would know what I mean.
But before you'd have to get hold of the money legally.
Before draining it into the corruptive sewers.
Besides, that spraying money or food supplies is no help for
the poor people. Only upsets the local economy, and leads to
more unemployment, loss of dignity, blaming everything to
the giving nations.
Matthias
Matthias
Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick - 20 Dec 2006 14:11 GMT
>>> Half the world, nearly 3 billion people, live on less than $2 a day. We
>>> know that 6 billion dollars is chicken feed for Bill Gates, Warren
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> You drunk? Three people have the money. It can't be much simpler than
> that.
They probably earned it.
Thank God for capatalism.
Tell those starving motherf..kers to get off the glass and get a job.
Popeye
You can get much further with a kind word and a gun
than you can with a kind word alone. -Capone
www.finalprotectivefire.com
Scott - 20 Dec 2006 19:13 GMT
> They probably earned it.
> Thank God for capitalism.
> Tell those starving motherf..kers to get off the glass and get a job.
<cough>
"Will work for food"
No sh.t, eh?
WTF do they think the rest of us work for?