> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
>> > It was a rebuttal to your slimy innuendo.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> it
> come true.
>> You, however, are a moral and intellectual coward.
>>
>> Neither do I need to knock back a few to be "brave" enough to "beak
> off".
>
> Nor do I and you well know it.
>> State your point, you drunken hag.
>
> Projection, you suffer from projection. Oh yeah and paranoia and
> delusions
> of grandeur.

Signature
Popeye
People with courage and character
always seem sinister to the rest. -Hesse
www.finalprotectivefire.com
> The second one is especially disgusting, where you drunkenly whore
> yourself out to a stranger for a ride home, and then try and tell us you
> turned the guy down.
I don't know about you (acutally I do), but, for all of my single life, I'd
take any opportunity to get laid, drunk or sober, long time friend or
someone I just met, pretty or ugly, skinny or, well, pleasingly plump.
There were a few whose name I never knew. I don't think I have much to say
about someone else, man or woman, who does the same except "hope you enjoyed
it."
Lee
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 29 Sep 2006 01:42 GMT
>> The second one is especially disgusting, where you drunkenly whore
>> yourself out to a stranger for a ride home, and then try and tell us you
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> say about someone else, man or woman, who does the same except "hope you
> enjoyed it."
I agree with you completely, except:
A) I have no idea what that has to do with the paragraph I wrote, except,
B) At least I tell the truth about it when I do it, and don't turn the PC
version into an anti-gun rant.

Signature
Popeye
People with courage and character
always seem sinister to the rest. -Hesse
www.finalprotectivefire.com
Lee Bell - 29 Sep 2006 02:14 GMT
> I agree with you completely, except:
> A) I have no idea what that has to do with the paragraph I wrote, except,
It was the part about drunkenly whoring out for a ride home.
> B) At least I tell the truth about it when I do it, and don't turn the PC
> version into an anti-gun rant.
I don't recall suggesting otherwise.
Lee
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 29 Sep 2006 02:54 GMT
>> I agree with you completely, except:
>
>> A) I have no idea what that has to do with the paragraph I wrote,
>> except,
>
> It was the part about drunkenly whoring out for a ride home.
Still not much of a parallel.
>> B) At least I tell the truth about it when I do it, and don't turn the
>> PC version into an anti-gun rant.
>
> I don't recall suggesting otherwise.
Oh, no.
-I- suggested it.

Signature
Popeye
People with courage and character
always seem sinister to the rest. -Hesse
www.finalprotectivefire.com
Lee Bell - 29 Sep 2006 03:50 GMT
>> It was the part about drunkenly whoring out for a ride home.
>
> Still not much of a parallel.
Oh well. Not every post can be masterpiece.
Chris Guynn - 29 Sep 2006 20:59 GMT
> > The second one is especially disgusting, where you drunkenly whore
> > yourself out to a stranger for a ride home, and then try and tell us you
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Lee
I associate with a bunch of sex maniacs.
> > "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?R2F362DDD -354 to 360
Have you got those saved in your Favorites, little man?
> The second one is especially disgusting, where you drunkenly whore
> yourself out to a stranger for a ride home, and then try and tell us you
> turned the guy down.
There's more of your famous and well-documented projection. Just because
you are a whoremonger, doesn't make everyone else a whore.
In any event, your interpretation of events doesn't come anywhere near the
reality . . nor even my original telling.
George was a nice guy who lives in my neighborhood. I was walking home in
the cold because there were no taxis available. He offered me a ride. I
took the chance that it was going to be a safe move and I was right. We
made pleasant, almost formal conversation on the ride and in the process
discovered that we knew people in common. That he turned out to be a
red-blooded male shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
> Then you ignorantly state how it wasn't a problem at all, as if thousands
> of women don't get raped and killed the same way.
What I said was "Suffice to say, he didn't get to see it and I'm here now,
all in one piece
and all that without a gun."
It was a calculated *risk* and as you say, turned out not to be a problem at
all.
> -- chhhheckkk --
>
> While at the same time being absolutely pathetic, it's an -excellent-
> example of your thought and logic process.
>
> And profound ignorance.
Or an example of my ability to accurately calculate risk. (wg)
> Besides, it's not repeating things over and over when you provide, and I
> highlight, a new example so frequently.
Unh hunh.
> And of course, I provide the cite and context, and I don't cherry pick
> phrases to intentionally deceive people, like I recently, clearly,
> documented you doing.
Right, one post that isn't even all that exceptional until you apply your
projection and prejudice to it.
> Of course you scurried from that, to try and hump my leg elsewhere.
If you say it's so, it must be so. snort.
> You're even still in mid-documented-innuendo here, not having clearly
> stated what you're attempting to insinuate.
Sorry, not going to play your game. I'm not in the middle of any innuendo.
You are the one that has been making the innuendo and/or blatant lies. I've
merely refuted them. Oh, gosh, look at the time . . 12:06 am.
> >> You, however, are a moral and intellectual coward.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Sure you are,you rarely show up except to leap on someone else's back.
I suspect that you are just more sensitive to posts that irritate you than
you are to those that don't particularly.
> I've documented your slimy innuendos, like insinuating I advocate
> genocide, enough times that the -blind- can see a
>
> pattern.
You've twisted and projected, slanted and slid.
> Just like your buddy Francis, your act is just stale.
So is yours.
> >> State your point, you drunken hag.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Your record of cowardly, drunken attacks is a matter of record.
My record, lol. :^) Considering how you suffer from projection and all .
. .
Magilla - 30 Sep 2006 03:06 GMT
> That he turned out to be a
> red-blooded male shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
Not all of us are lacking self control, some even have good, old
fashioned morals.
Chilly, you're still okay by me.
Y'all have a nice weekend, I'm packed and ready to go dive.
Curtis